Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Welcome to KRILA Mr. Barry Kym McHugh & His Delegation Local Government in Korea Young-Hoon Ahn In-Sung Kang October 28th, 2008 Korea Research Institute For Local Administration (KRILA) Contents 1 Overview of Korea 2 Decentralisation in Brief 3 Organisational Framework and Examples 4 Local Public Employment 5 Local Finance Map of Korea (Rep. of) • Nation-wide Area: 99,720 km2 (Year 2007) Capital Seoul and Gyeonggi Province Busan, 2nd Met. City Population Concentration In 1966 In 2005 History of Local Autonomy • 1949: Adoption of the Local Autonomy Act • 1961: Local Council suspended by the military government • 1987: Democracy movements in Korea • 1991: Election for local council members revived • 1995: Full-fledged elections for local government Decentralisation in Brief • Decentralisation began since 1991 and deepened in 1995 – Korea had been considered a centralised State before 1991 local election for local councils – The local autonomy was reinvigorated since the election of provincial governors and mayors in 1995 Decentralisation in Brief (Cont.) • Local Government Structure – A two-tier system consisting of the central, provincial, and municipal levels – The upper or regional level consists of provinces(Do) and metropolitan cities(metropolitan Si). – The lower or basic local level is composed of municipalities, – such as municipal cities(Si), rural districts(Gun, rural county) and autonomous urban districts(Gu, located inside metropolitan cities) Structural Tier Central Government Seoul Metropolitan City Autonomous District (25) Metropolitan City (6) Autonomous District (44) County (5) Province (8) City (76) Jeju Special Autonomous Province (1) County (81) Administra -tive City(2) Gu (26) District Dong (522) Dong (692) Eup /Myeon (10/36) Eup/ Myeon/ Dong(81/ 453/921) Eup /Myeon (114/ 712) Eup/ Myeon/ Dong (7/5/31) Decentralisation in Brief (Cont.) • Structural Characteristics – All municipalities have administrative sub-levels, Eup and Myeon in rural areas and Dong in urban areas – The metropolitan cities, including Seoul, have districts with a municipal status, like the other municipalities governed by elected mayors and council members – When a Eup’s population exceeds 50 000, it can change its status to a city by the decree of the Minister concerned and, with over one million inhabitants, become a metropolitan city Decentralisation in Brief (Cont.) • Local elected councillors, mayors and governors – Over 3,600 elected council members: – 738 of upper-levels and 2 888 of lower-levels – 230 mayors and 16 Metropolitan and provincial executive presidents – Serving on 246 regional and local selfgovernments, of which one municipality has in average more than 200 000 inhabitants Decentralisation in Brief (Cont.) •Local civil servants – Local government employs over 340 000 staff – and spends more than 100 trillion Won (roughly equivalent to 100 billion US dollars) a year (currency value before credit crisis of Oct. 2008) Some Characteristics • Korea legislative framework is similar to the Franco-Germanic style rather than the UK – Korean local government benefits from the Germanic principle of “self-administration” (Selfbstvewaltung) – The right to local autonomy as a general principle of state organisation laid down in the Title VIII of the Korean constitution – It guarantees the institution of local councils (Article 118), stipulating the democratic and representative nature of their governmental bodies Some Characteristics (Cont.) • Uniformity of institutional form as divided into the Executive branch and the Council • Division of responsibilities between Central and Local – According to the official statistics of 2002 and updated in 2007, which was resulted from the 2-years research twice conducted by the Krila – Central government takes the final decision powers on about 70% of the whole governmental functions, – Whereas local governments take charge of more than 30% of functions, together with 3 to 5 % of delegated functions assigned by central government LG’s Organisational Framework • Local Council – 4 years term of office by democratic ballot – The regular session of each local council is held twice each year – Additional session will be prescribed by each Municipal Ordinance and by the chairman’s call as the extraordinary session within fifteen days LG’s Organisational Framework • The Executive – Mayors and Governors as for chief executive of local government elected also for 4-years term (limited to three terms at maximum) – Vice-mayors and vice-governors originated from civil servants and local officials are nominated by the consent of central government and his/her chief executive Example of Administrative Structure • The exemplary administrative structure of Seoul Special City – Seoul Metropolitan City’s organ is divided into the executive branch, and the Seoul Metropolitan Council as the legislative body – Seoul is represented by 1 mayor and 3 vice mayors (two for administrative affairs and one for political affairs) and 106 council members Seoul Metropolitan Government Another Example of Administrative Structure • Seocho-Gu, one of 25 autonomous districts within the Seoul metropolitan city – The Seocho-Gu office as autonomous Gu (District) is headed also by directly elected Chief executive – This district as basic municipality is engaged in the following functions: – civil affairs such as residence certification, seal impression, disposal of refuse, and regional parking problem like notification of resident first parking system, etc. Seocho-Gu Autonomous District Local Public Employment • Dual System: Central and Local (9 grades system) – National public officials are recruited and paid by central government, dealing with national administrative affairs – Local public officials responsible for local administrative affairs are recruite and paid by local governments (on the basis of upper-level) – The total number of local public officials in each local government is regulated by the bylaw based on criteria prescribed by a Presidential Decree – The Local Civil Service Act regulates the appointment, examination, qualification, wages, services, guarantee of status, disciplinary sanction, and educational training – National public officials can be employed in local governments according t the provisions of the law – Those who are in fifth grade and higher are appointed by the President, while those not exceeding sixth grade are appointed by the Minister of Pubic Administration and Security (MOPAS) Local Public Employment (Cont.) • Classification of Local Public Officials – According to the Local Government Civil Service Act, local public officials are classified into career service and special-career service officials – Career service officials are employed based on their performance and qualification, and their status is guaranteed by the Act – Local public officials in general service field deal with administrative affairs related to technology, research, and general pubic administration – Specified service officials are, i.e., educational public officials, local firefighting officials, and other officials in charge of special duties – Local public officials in technical field are involved in specific technical and classified tasks by their skill • Local Politicians classified as special-career officials – Locally elected officials are political special-career officials both elected by the people and appointed with the consent of mayors and governors and central government – They are vice mayors and vice governors, secretaries general, chiefs of subordinate administrative organizations Local Finance – The size of the local public sector represented 15.8% of the GDP ($787.5 billion in 2005) – Local expenditures growing much faster than the central government and doubled since 1985 – Of which, i.e., in 2007, local taxes account for about one-third of the local governments revenue (38.07 trillion Won) Local Finance (Cont.) • Local revenues: – Local taxes, general grant, specific grant (subsidies), fees and charges, and local borrowings • The ratio of Local v. National tax to GDP Figure 1. The Ratio of Local & National Tax to GDP 25% 20% 3.6% 15% 2.0% 3.4% • 4.4% 3.8% Local Tax National Tax 10% 14.1% 14.4% 14.2% 1985 1990 1995 16.1% 15.7% 2000 2005 5% 0% Source: Korea National Statistical Office DB (2007) Breakdown of Local Revenue – General grants for providing general running costs, including the salary of local public officials, – Earmarked grants for local developments Total Revenue ₩ 124,966 (billion Won) 100% Local Taxes ₩ 43,549 35% Fees and Charges ₩ 30,100 24% General Grant ₩ 24,129 19% Specific Grant ₩ 23,689 19% Borrowings and etc. ₩ 3,497 3% FY 2008 Budget (unit:billion Won) Specific Grant (19%) Borrowings and etc. (3%) Local Taxes (35%) General Grant (19%) Fees and Charges (24%)