Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
FondsKongress Presentation The Outlook for Global Emerging Market Equities 1st February 2006 Schroder Investment Management Limited 31 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7QA Telephone: 020 7658 6000 Fax: 020 7658 6965 Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority 27026 Emerging Markets Efficient Frontiers vs Europe 10 year (Annualised)* 5 year (Annualised)* 3 year (Annualised)* Annualised return (%p.a.) 7.5% Annualised return (%p.a.) Annualised return (%p.a.) 18% 36.0% MSCI Europe 100% 7.0% 6.5% 6.0% 5.5% EM 20% EM 40% MSCI EM 100% 16% EM 80% 14% 12% EM 60% 10% 8% EM 80% 5.0% 6% 26.0% EM 40% 0% 4.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% 19.0% 20.0% 21.0% 15.5% Annualised Risk (%SD pa) Cumulative Return MSCI EM +54.1% MSCI Europe +100.2% EM 80% EM 60% 28.0% EM 40% 24.0% 22.0% EM 20% 2% MSCI EM 100% 32.0% 30.0% EM 60% 4% 4.5% MSCI EM 100% 34.0% 20.0% EM 20% MSCI Europe 100% MSCI Europe 100% 18.0% 16.5% 17.5% 18.5% 19.5% Annualised Risk (%SD pa) 12.5% 13.5% 14.5% 15.5% 16.5% Annualised Risk (%SD pa) Cumulative Return MSCI EM +111.7% MSCI Europe +6.5% Cumulative Return MSCI EM +141.9% MSCI Europe +69.2% Emerging markets are excellent diversifiers Source: Factset, MSCI. *All figures are US$ MSCI Price returns to 30 December 2005 27026 Economics Cyclical recovery Relative Performance of MSCI EM/World and OECD G7 Lead Indicator yoy % change yoy % change 8 60 6 40 4 20 2 0 0 -20 -2 -4 -40 -6 -60 Dec-90 Jun-93 Dec-95 OECD G7 Lead Indicator Jun-98 Dec-00 Jun-03 Dec-05 MSCI EM / MSCI World Free (rhs) Cyclical upturn supportive for gems Source: Thomson DataStream, data shown to December 2005 27026 Global Economic Outlook for 2006 Country 2005 Scenario 1 Base Case (60% probability) Global Growth CPI Interest Rates EM Performance 3.2% 2.9% 2.8% +35% 2.9% 2.1% 3.2%* +10% to +15% Scenario 2 Growth Resurgence (30% probability) 3.7% 2.8% 4.0% +20% Scenario 3 Ice Age (10% probability) 2.1% 1.5% 2.3% 0% to -10% *Fed fund rates to peak at 4.75% Q1 2006 Source: Schroders 27026 Economics Outlook remains positive World GDP Growth 2004 Consensus % 2005 Consensus % 2006 Consensus % World +3.8 +3.2 +3.2 US Japan European Union +4.2 +2.3 +2.3 +3.6 +2.4 +1.6 +3.4 +2.0 +2.1 Latin America North East Asia South East Asia Eastern Europe +5.8 +7.9 +6.3 +7.2 +4.2 +7.2 +5.0 +5.3 +3.9 +6.9 +5.0 +5.3 Source: Consensus Economics December 2005 27026 Economics Emerging Market economies decoupling Difference in real GDP Growth (Emerging vs Developed) and Relative Performance Differential (MSCI EM vs MSCI World) 6.0 Mar 1989 = 100 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 300 270 240 210 180 150 120 90 60 30 Global GDP represented by Emerging Markets (%) 2005 2004 2003 2000 26.0* 25.9 24.9 24.2 *CLSA estimate Source: CLSA Mar-89 Mar-92 Mar-95 Mar-98 Mar-01 Mar-04 Real GDP growth differential (LHS) Relative performance MSCI EM vs MSCI World (rhs) Source: CSFB, data shown to December 2005 27026 Economics Emerging Market* Exports Share in Emerging Market* Exports % 24 20 16 12 8 4 1996 2000 1998 U.S.** 2004 2002 China ** 2006 China now accounts for almost same share of emerging economies’ exports as the US Source: BCA Research December 2005 * Includes Brazil, Chile, Turkey, Taiwan, Korea, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, The Philippines and India ** Smoothed except for final data points 27026 Economics Decoupling… continues Economic Forecast 2011 – 2015 (Average) G7 NorthEast Asia SouthEast Asia Eastern Europe Latin America GDP Growth Industrial Production Current Account (% of GDP) CPI +2.4 +6.5 +5.2 +5.0 +3.8 +2.5 +10.8 +6.9 +5.8 +4.3 -0.9 +1.2 +5.1 -0.5 -0.8 +2.0 +2.9 +3.4 +4.0 +4.4 Source: Consensus Economics October 2005 27026 Economics GEM Industrial Production Outperforming G7 Industrial Production Industrial Production 145 135 125 115 105 95 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 G7 Industrial Production GEM Industrial Production* Source: Thomson Datastream, EIU, Factsheet, ML GEM Equity Research, August 2005 * Weighted by MSCI, includes: Brazil, Mexico, Korea, Taiwan, China, India, Turkey and South Africa. Data rebased to 1/2000 27026 Economics Structural improvement Change in leading emerging market parameters end 1994 - 2005 Area Debt/GDP EMBI+ Sovereign rating Inflation Fiscal balance Current account balance Gross external financing requirement as % of GDP GDP growth Exports to GDP Average 3 month volatility 1994 43.0% BB56% -3.1% -2.1% 4.2% 6.7% 19.0% 8% 2005 2005 minus 1994 43.1% BB+ 4% -1.0% 1.8% 5.7% 4.7% 34.2% 10.4% 0.1% 2 points -52% 2.1% 3.9% 1.5% -2.0% 15.2% 2.4% Source: Deutsche Bank January 2006 27026 Emerging Markets Some structural shifts Emerging markets*: Foreign reserves 28 % of GDP 26 Foreign debt Trade balance % of GDP % of GDP 36 Record high 34 24 22 3.5 A sharp decline 2.5 32 1.5 20 30 18 A dramatic turnaround 0.5 28 16 14 -0.5 26 12 10 -1.5 24 94 96 98 00 02 Foreign reserves 04 06 94 96 98 00 02 Foreign debt 04 06 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 Trade Balance *Includes 20 Emerging Market economies Source: BCA Research December 2005 27026 Economics Structural Improvement Inflation well and truly beaten ...Exchange rates undervalued, not overvalued 600 110 % … Current accounts now in surplus 4 % GDP Jan 90 =100 105 500 3 100 400 2 95 300 1 90 200 0 85 100 0 Jan92 Oct94 Jul97 Apr- Feb- Nov00 03 05 GDP weighted-average Emerging Market inflation rates Source: JP Morgan, data shown to November 2005 80 -1 75 -2 90 93 96 99 02 05 Real effective exchange rate (median) Source: JP Morgan, data shown to December 2005 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05e Emerging Markets current account % GDP Source: JP Morgan, data shown to December 2005 27026 GEM and Developed Markets Key macroeconomic data Country EM US Japan Europe Developed Markets EM minus Developed Markets CPI (%) CA Bal (% of GDP) Fiscal Bal (% of GDP) Total Govt Debt (% GDP) 06 (%) 05 (%) 06 (%) 05 (%) 06 (%) 05 (%) 4.2 3.0 0.5 1.9 2.3 1.9 2.1 -6.4 3.3 0.0 -3.2 5.3 1.3 -6.8 3.3 0.3 -3.3 4.6 -1.7 -2.7 -5.7 -2.8 -3.1 1.4 -1.9 -3.3 -5.0 -2.8 -3.3 1.4 44.4 65.7 174.3 70.0 79.9 35.5 Source: Deutsche Bank, MSCI, Bloomberg. Data shown at 16 November 2005 27026 Economics Structural improvements have led to improved credit rating Market Cap Weighted GEM Credit Rating 2 BBB+ BBB BBB0 Dec-97 Dec-99 Dec-01 Dec-03 Dec-05 Source: UBS December 2005 27026 Risk As economies have improved, volatility has declined MSCI EM Historical volatility 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Dec-93 May-96 Oct-98 Mar-01 Aug-03 Dec-05 MSCI EM 10 week volatility Source: Bloomberg, data shown to December 2005 27026 Risk: … Resulting in excellent Sharpe ratios 5 year market performance GEMS S&P 500 Russell 2000 Nasdaq ACWI EAFE DAX Nikkei 5 Years: Volatility (%) 18.4% 16.5% 19.8% 25.8% 15.1% 15.6% 24.8% 22.7% $(%) Return 22.6% -1.1% 6.8% -2.2% 0.6% 2.4% 1.1% 2.6% Sharpe Ratio 1.22 -0.07 0.35 -0.09 0.04 0.15 0.05 0.11 Source: Deutsche Bank GEMs Strategy, Bloomberg, MSCI, data shown for 30 December 2005 27026 Relative price still well below 1994 highs MSCI EM Relative to MSCI World US$ 400 360 320 280 240 200 160 120 80 40 Dec 1988 = 100 Dec-88 31 December 1998 to 30 December 2005 MSCI World MSCI EM 24.3% 180.6% Source: Factset, MSCI. MSCI Gross indices quoted May-92 Oct-95 Feb-99 Jul-02 Dec-05 MSCI EM relative to MSCI World Source: Thomson DataStream, data shown to December 2005 27026 Valuations P/E ratio also at low historic levels MSCI EM Price Earnings Ratio* 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 Dec-91 Apr-94 Aug-96 Dec-98 Apr-01 Aug-03 Dec-05 MSCI EM P/E * P/E ratio shown is MSCI EM from 30 September 1995. Prior to 30 September 1995 IFCI P/E ratio is shown Source: Factset, Thomson DataStream, data shown to December 2005 27026 Valuations … Forward P/E also at low historic levels Forward Price Earnings US$ 25 20 P/E EPS PE/G 15 10 Emerging Markets USA World 10.8 14.3 0.8 15.3 13.9 1.1 14.8 12.2 1.2 Source: Factset, MSCI As at December 2005, IBES – 12 month forward 5 0 Jun-94 Oct-96 Feb-99 May-01 Sep-03 Dec-05 MSCI EM Forward P/E Source: Factset, MSCI, data shown to December 2005 27026 Valuations Cheap relative to developed markets Price Earnings Discount % 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% -40% -50% -60% -70% Emerging Markets at a Premium Emerging Markets at a Discount Jan-92 May-94 Sep-96 Jan-99 May-01 Aug-03 Dec-05 MSCI EM relative to MSCI World Forward P/E Source: Thomson Datastream, data shown to December 2005 27026 Valuations Cheap relative to developed markets Price Earnings / Growth Ratio* % 0% -10% -20% -30% -40% -50% -60% -70% -80% 93 96 98 MSCI EM vs MSCI US 01 03 05 MSCI EM vs MSCI World * 12m rolling average of I/B/E/S 12m Forward P/E to Long Term average EPS growth (3–5 years) Source: Factset data shown to December 2005 27026 Valuations Cheap relative to other asset classes Yields from different asset classes Yield % 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 EM Equities US Japanese US AAA US EM EMU UK US High Yield Equities** Equities** Sovereign Equities** Equities* Bonds** Treasurys Bonds Bonds** * Forward Earnings Yield for Equities ** Corporate Bond Source: BCA Research December 2005 27026 Valuations Underpinned by improving ROE MSCI EM ROE relative to MSCI World ROE 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Jan-92 May-94 Aug-96 Dec-98 Apr-01 Aug-03 Dec-05 MSCI EM ROE / MSCI World ROE Source: CSFB, data shown to December 2005 27026 Valuations Reasonably priced relative to size of economies GEM Aggregate Index / GDP % 300 250 200 +1Std Avg 150 100 -1Std 50 0 Jan-88 Aug-91 Mar-95 Oct-98 May-02 Dec-05 GEM Aggregate Index/GDP Source: UBS, data shown to December 2005 27026 Liquidity Fund flow was supportive during second half of 2005 Monthly change in flows for Emerging Market dedicated funds US$m 3000 2000 1000 0 -1000 -2000 -3000 Jan-95 Jan-97 Jan-99 Jan-01 Jan-03 Jan-05 Volatile flows have not affected performance Source: EmergingPortfolio.com, data based on 352 dedicated GEM funds and is shown to November 2005 27026 Foreign Fund Flows into Emerging Markets Global US$m Emerging Markets Equity New Inflows 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 YTD 30/11/05 2,228.5 3,563.6 -164.4 -350.8 -868.6 5,896.2 -2,268.3 2,265.3 Source: EmergingPortfolio.com, data based on 352 dedicated GEM funds and is shown to November 2005 27026 Concerns – $ weakness – Rising interest rates 27026 Concerns A weak Dollar has been positive for Emerging Markets Monthly change in flows for Emerging Market dedicated funds Inverted Scale US$m 80 35 85 30 90 25 95 20 100 15 105 10 110 5 115 0 Dec-90 Jun-93 Dec-95 Jun-98 Dec-00 Jun-03 Dec-05 Trade-weighted US$ MSCI Emerging Markets relative to MSCI World in local currency (rhs) Source: Thomson Datastream, data shown to December 2005 27026 Concerns Interest rate cycles have been associated with financial crises % % 16 Mexican Peso Crisis 1987 Crash 14 S&L Crisis Tech Bubble Burst Asian Crisis 12 Do we need another crisis for Fed Tightening to stop? 10 8 LCD Crisis 6 Continental III 4 First Penn 2 76 81 86 91 96 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Bubbles? – High yield – EM Debt – Real Estate 01 10-Year treasury yield (LS) Fed funds target rate (RS) Source: BCA Research December 2005 27026 Concerns Emerging Markets tend to falter when US rates peak 110 105 100 95 90 85 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 Mean, EM rel. to the US 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Median Perf, EM rel to US Emerging Markets Perf. Rel to US peaks 2 to 3 months before US Rate Hike Cycle Peaks Source: Citigroup Investment Research, Datastream, MSCI, Worldscope and IBES 27026 5 year correlation of key factors to GEM 0.9 0.6 0.38 0.48 0.5 0.53 OECD Leading Indicator Copper 0.3 0.02 -0 -0.3 -0.6 -0.9 -0.73 -0.67 EMBI+ VIX Global M2 Local US 10Yr Currency Yield GEMs are positively correlated with rising US 10 year yields Source: Deutsche Bank, MSCI, Bloomberg. Data shown for October 2005 27026 Summary Economics – Global slowdown, but modest – Emerging Market economies have been decoupling – Emerging Market economies have gone through structural improvement Valuations – Remain attractive Concerns – $ weakness supportive, provided not excessive – Over zealous monetary tightening 27026 Global Emerging Markets Strategy Source: Schroders, 6th January 2006 27026 The Case for BRIC 27026 World Population 2003 Population (2003, millions) Rest of World 57% BRICS 43% Brazil Russia India China 176.6 143.4 1,064.4 1,288.4 OECD World 914.6 6,272.5 BRICs nearly 3 times the population size of the OECD Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators Database April 2005 27026 Emerging Markets stages of development Maturity Hong Kong/Singapore Taiwan Israel S. Korea G7 Czech/Hungary/Poland Mexico Malaysia Sub-Saharan Africa Brazil China Russia India Frontier markets Emerging markets deregulation Premium growth (5%-7%) Established growth (3%-5%) Mature economies (2%-3%) Time BRICs at early stage of development …… therefore should grow faster Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators Database April 2005 GNI/capita 2003 data Schroders 27026 GDP 2003* 2040** BRICS 8% GNI per capita* 2003 (US$) Rest of World 92% Rest of World 60% BRICS 40% Brazil Russia India China USA 2,720 2,610 540 1,100 37,870 OECD World 29,360 5,510 BRICs small but growing percentage of World GDP Source: * World Bank, World Development Indicators Database April 2005 ** Goldman Sachs 27026 Global Growth Split 2005E 2040 BRICS 31% Rest of World 33% Rest of World 69% BRICS 67% BRICs to be 67% of global growth by 2040 GS BRICs Model Projections Source: Goldman Sachs, ‘How solid are the BRICs ’ Global Economics Paper No:134 (Dec 2005) 27026 GDP The largest economies in 2050 China-India (Chindia) . . . the second-largest economy in 2004 on PPP basis GDP (2005 US$bn) Proportional world GDP (PPP) 50000 45000 40000 UK 3.1 France 3.1 35000 30000 Germany 4.4 25000 Japan 20000 15000 7.3 Chindia 10000 5000 20.6 US 21.3 0 Ch US In Jpn Br Mex Russ Ger UK Fr 0 5 10 15 20 25 % Source: GS BRICs Model Projections – – – Source: World Bank Per OECD China is already bigger than 2 of G7 – Canada and Italy By 2010 China will be 4th largest economy after US, Japan and Germany “If China were cut off from foreign trade and investment its growth would be just 1-2% p.a. less.” Source: Professor Lucas, University of Chicago – Sunday Times 25th September 2005 27026 BRICs growth of middle class Number of people above $3,000 in the BRICs vs G6 population Number, millions 2200.0 2000.0 1800.0 1600.0 1400.0 1200.0 1000.0 800.0 600.0 400.0 200.0 0.0 1882.7 1195.4 733.4 684.8 164.3 51.9 86.5 Brazil China 2005 390.2 6.0 India 349.7 295.7 132.8 214.1 69.7 Russia BRICs G6 USA 2025 BRICs discretionary consumption will be key driver of global growth GS BRICs Model Projections Source: Goldman Sachs, Dreaming with BRICs: the Path to 2050 (Oct 2003) 27026 BRICs growth of middle class Consumer durable growth* Nuber, millions 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 200% 230% 140% 720% 770% 170% 510% 550% 600 400 200 0 Passenger cars TV sets BRICs 2005 est BRICs 2025 forecast 70% penetration PCs Mobile phones BRICs 2025 forecast 50% penetration …driving strong consumer growth *Schroders estimation using 50% and 70% of current developed market penetration rates. Assuming world population growth from 6.3bn to 7.6bn between 2003 and 2005 Source: Population forecasts - Goldman Sachs, Dreaming with BRICs: the Path to 2050 (Oct 2003), Penetration rates- HSBC Earthtrends, Schroders 27026 Currency Purchasing power parity* (against US$) China India Russia Brazil -50.0 -45.0 -40.0 -35.0 -30.0 -25.0 -20.0 -15.0 -10.0 -5.0 0.0 % Undervalued BRICs currencies are undervalued on a PPP basis… PPP based on inflation differentials (not trade weighted) •Source: Bloomberg, Schroders. All data to Dec 2005 (based from Jan 2002) 27026 BRICs Efficient Frontiers BRICs vs MSCI China 5 year (Annualised)* BRICs vs MSCI India 5 year (Annualised)* Annualised return (%pa) Annualised return (%pa) 22% 20.5% BRICS 100% 17% 20.0% BRICS 80% 19.5% BRICS 60% 12% 19.0% BRICS 40% BRICS 20% BRICS 100% BRICS 80% BRICS 60% BRICS 40% BRICS 20% 18.5% 7% 18.0% 2% 23% MSCI China 100% 24% 25% 26% 27% 28% Annualised return (%SD pa) 17.5% 23% MSCI India 100% 24% 25% 26% 27% Annualised return (%SD pa) BRICs give higher returns and lower risk than single country portfolios Source: Factset, Bloomberg, Schroders * all returns to 31 Dec 2005 27026 Precedent of Korea KOSPI Price Index 1200 1000 800 1975 to 1986 1987 to 1994 600 GNI/capita US$ KOSPI growth % $602 to $2,643 $2,643 to $9,459 150% 438% 400 GNI/capita 2003 US$ 200 0 75 80 85 90 95 00 Korea SE Composite (KOSPI) - Price Index (~KW) Source: Korean National Statistical Office 05 Brazil Russia India China $2,720 $2,610 $540 $1,100 Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators Database April 2005 27026 Precedent of Taiwan TAIEX Index 12,000 10,000 8,000 1979 to 1983 1984 to 1992 6,000 GNI/capita US$ TAIEX growth % $758 to $2,573 $2,573 to $9,591 40% 343% 4,000 GNI/capita 2003 US$ 2,000 0 79 83 87 91 TAIEX Index Source: Directorate – General of Budget Accounting & Statistics Taiwan, Bloomberg 95 99 03 Brazil Russia India China $2,720 $2,610 $540 $1,100 Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators Database April 2005 27026 Country Allocation BRICs *Index levels calculated internally intra-month Source: Schroders, 6th January 2006 27026 Disclosure Statement The returns presented represent past performance and are not necessarily representative of future returns which may vary. The value of investments can fall as well as rise as a result of market or currency movements Potential investors should be aware that investment in Emerging Markets involves an above average degree of risk and should be seen as long-term in nature. Less developed markets are generally less well regulated than mature markets, they may be less liquid and may have less reliable custody arrangements Opinions Schroders has expressed its own views and opinions in this presentation and these may change Data Protection For the purposes of the United Kingdom’s Data Protection Act 1998, the data controller in respect of any personal data you supply is Schroder Investment Management Limited. Personal information you supply may be processed for the purposes of investment administration by the Schroders Group which may include the transfer of data outside of the European Economic Area. Schroder Investment Management Limited may also use such information for marketing activities unless you notify it otherwise in writing Taped Telephone Lines For your security communications with our London office may be taped or monitored Identification Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7QA Telephone: 020 7658 6000, Fax: 020 7658 6965 Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority 27026