Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Clean/Green: Show me the Money! Economic Backdrop: Is the World Recovering? IMF’s “World Economic Outlook” forecasts 4.2% global growth vs -.6% in 2009 China to grow at 10% India to grow at 8.8% U.S. growth at 3.1% implies continued unemployment rate of 10% or more Europe and Japan are lagging Economists still worry about double dip recession PIGS credit crisis still threatens global economy Sovereign risk could prolong the credit crisis State and local government contraction will fuel further run up in U.S. unemployment Is U.S. Economy Strengthening? Real GDP Growth (% change, Quarter-on-Quarter) Unemployment Rate 8.0 12.0 6.0 10.0 4.0 8.0 2.0 6.0 0.0 -2.0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 4.0 -4.0 2.0 -6.0 0.0 2004 -8.0 2005 2006 2007 Inflation (% change, Month-on-Month) 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% -0.50% -1.00% -1.50% -2.00% -2.50% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 What’s Happening with State Finances? Are States as Bad Off as it Seems? State Budget Deficits vs. Total Budgets $14 70% $12.8 $12.3 59.8% $12 60% $10.0 $10 50% $8.2 $8 40% 34.3% 34.0% 26.7% $6 $4.7 26.4% $4.7 $4.4 23.2% $4.1 $4.0 26.7% 24.6% $4.0 $4 $3.4 21.0% 24.1% $3.2 $2.7 18.1% $2.6 13.3% 14.5% $2.1 15.4% 14.8% $2 30% 12.5% 11.8% $2.0 9.7% $2.0 $1.8 $1.8 NV CO 20% 10% 8.8% $0 0% IL CA NJ NY CT FL NC PA MN Shortfall GA WI OH % of FY10 Budget MA AZ WA MD MI Translation for Financing Economic paradox Government spending is quickest, strongest stimulus we have Sustainability of government balance sheets is the central crisis in the world Interest rates should remain fairly low in coming 12-18 months though concerns on inflation and deflation remain Investors will continue on worldwide flight to quality Volatility will remain with us Risks are being studied with fine tooth comb Treasury Bond Yield 7 6 5 Yield 4 3 2 1 0 Public Bonds are on Sale Credit Spreads Narrowing Government Funding Programs for Clean/Green Energy Federal Programs State and Local Programs Roadmap to ARRA Clean-Green Economy DOE Renewable Energy Loan Guarantees: Key Program Provisions EPAct Title XVII § 1705 authorizes guarantees for projects that commence construction by September 30, 2011 to include any of the following: DOE program concept is that the state can commit DOE loan guarantee to a project in its state Renewable energy systems, including incremental hydropower, that generate electricity or thermal energy, and facilities that manufacture related components; Electric power transmission systems; or Leading edge biofuel projects (pilot or demonstration scale) Proposals from states submitted early this year but nothing yet approved No real progress being seen yet Primary areas of DOE interest is: Ability of state agency to provide credit review and loan processing and management Requirement that the state have stake in the program, as through direct loan, guarantee, equity, etc. 11 DOE Loan Guarantee Considerations Financial Attributes Third party supply or off-take agreements EPC contracts with liquidated damages Detailed construction contracts and bids Permitting and environmental review Intellectual property rights must be secure Equity commitments need to be secured before applications Project site control essential Working financial models showing assumptions, reserves and sensitivity analysis Favorable market and competition review Technical Attributes Engineering reports Technological advantages Mitigation of technology risk IFA Loan Guarantee Program Guidelines SB 1906 and SB 390 together authorize up to $3 billion in moral obligation support for renewable, clean and efficient energy projects General terms Process: Generally 1-2 months from application Preference for 7 year term Commercially available technology Verifiable, quantifiable savings 1.05x coverage Up to 100% financing may be available Application and review IFA Energy and Credit Committee review Inducement resolution Final resolution Sample projects: Efficient lighting, appliances, HVAC Insulation Efficient boilers and refrigeration Occupancy sensors Qualified Energy Conservation Bonds $3.2 billion of QECBs authorized in Stimulus Bill QECB Program Mechanics Tax Credit Treatment Eligible QECB uses include: Energy efficiency capital expenditures in public buildings Renewable energy production Various research and development applications Certain mass commuting facilities Several types of energy related demo projects Public energy efficiency education campaigns Renewable energy 14 Tax credit is treated as income Unused credits may be carried over, but not refunded 70% of tax credit rate set daily by U.S. Treasury Credits can be stripped (same rules as stripping of interest from T-E bonds, expanding flexibility of program and investor base) Direct Interest Subsidy for Bonds Issued After December 31, 2009 Lesser of interest rate on bonds or 70% of interest on bonds at tax credit rate New Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Additional $2.2 billion (in addition to $1.2 billion that has already been allocated) of new CREBs awarded to 805 projects in October 2009 Eligible Purposes: To finance qualified renewable energy facilities that produce electricity – solar, wind, closed-loop biomass, open-loop biomass, geothermal, small irrigation, hydropower, landfill gas, marine renewable and trash combustion facilities Allocation 1/3 to state/local/tribal governments 1/3 to public power projects 1/3 for electric cooperatives New CREB Program Mechanics Tax Credit Treatment Tax credit is treated as income Unused credits may be carried over, but not refunded 70% of tax credit rate set daily by U.S. Treasury Credits can be stripped (same rules as stripping of interest from T-E bonds, expanding flexibility of program and investor base) Direct Interest Subsidy for Bonds Issued After December 31, 2009 15 Lesser of interest rate on bonds or 70% of interest on bonds at tax credit rate Energy Performance Contracting Still Growing • 20% annual growth from 1990 to 2000 • 3% annual growth from 2000 to 2004 • 22% annual growth from 2004 to 2008 • Factors attributing to diminished growth from 2000 to 2004 include: • Collapse of Enron • Suspension of the federal ESPC program • Uncertainty about the deregulation of the electric utility industry Source: Introduction to Energy Performance Contracting. Prepared by ICF International and National Association of Energy Services Companies, October 2007 16 EPC Market Characteristics MUSH (municipals, universities, schools and hospitals) market and the federal market account for about 80% of the total EPC projects. Commercial building projects comprise about 9%, industrial projects about 6%, and residential and public housing projects the remainder 22% MUSH Market 9% 6% 2% 3% Federal Market Commercial Building Projects Industrial Projects Public Housing Projects 58% Residential Projects Source: Introduction to Energy Performance Contracting. Prepared by ICF International and National Association of Energy Services Companies, October 2007 17 Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Berkeley led the way and now 16 states have some PACE efforts approved and 10 more evaluating it Voluntarily impose special assessment on property tax bill that is used to finance selected clean energy and efficiency projects Property tax remains with property, not owner and are therefore generally a prior claim to mortgage payments Nonprofit banking organization emerging to fund the improvements against future incremental tax receipts Large scale roll out will depend on ability of sponsoring government to enhance and homogenize the credit for investors (e.g. Boulder County moral ob backing their $10 million debt – 600 residential properties ) Banks remain skeptical that the improvements translate to higher home values Efforts underway for PACE legislation and programs around the country How rest of nation responds remains to be seen How secure is the revenue stream supporting the debt? Will banks let this debt come ahead of their mortgage rights?