* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download www.robinson.cam.ac.uk
Economics of fascism wikipedia , lookup
Economic democracy wikipedia , lookup
Economic growth wikipedia , lookup
Okishio's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup
Production for use wikipedia , lookup
Post–World War II economic expansion wikipedia , lookup
Investing in Civilization Alan Freeman radicaldemon.org What is economic recovery? 1929, 1893 1989 1979 1969 1959 1949 1939 1929 1919 1909 1899 1889 1879 1869 Crash after 20 years slow growth Long (10 years) period of high unemployment Political, social upheaval and suffering (war, etc) Long (20 year+) period of growth Working definition of ‘recovery’ Recovery starts with war Government spending + private investment Government spending (% of GDP) Gross private investment (% of GDP) Unemployment (% of workforce) 60% War 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 1950 1947 1944 1941 1938 1935 1932 1929 0% Sources: GDP components, Bureau of Economic Analysis Unemployment rate: Bureau of Labour Statistics and John T. Dunlop and Walter Galenson, eds., Labor in the Twentieth Century (New York, Academic Press, 1978), p. 30. • Unemployment high • Investment low • Government replaces investor • ‘Fordism’ • Welfare state • New growth • New use values • New era What made the profit rate rise? War 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 2004 1999 1994 1989 1984 1979 1974 1969 1964 1959 1954 1949 1944 1939 1934 1929 Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis www.bea.gov. NIPA tables C=Fixed Assets table 1.01 (Current-cost net capital stock of private enterprises) L=Output, table 1.9.5, line 2 (output of private enterprises) Accumulation Ratio = L/C Value State restored the profit rate It ‘used up’ accumulated private capital It substituted for the ‘normal’ function of slump The ‘numerator’ in the profit rate was slashed When the economy was ‘handed back’ to private capital, they obtained a high return It secured the productivity of the economy USA entered postwar with unit costs 1/3 nearest rival Without increasing capital stock Profit rate was highest ever – because capital stock was lowest ever (relative to output) The Dark Side War needed for recovery War leaders were social reformers ‘Universal’ rights confined to victors Small advance, enormous suffering Is there an alternative? ‘Universalist-civilisational’ ‘Reactionary-Parasitic’ Coexist in same historical processes The Heart of Darkness “[England] needs new lands from which we can easily obtain raw materials and at the same time exploit the cheap slave labour that is available from the natives of the colonies in order to save the 40 million inhabitants of the United Kingdom from a bloody civil war” - Cecil Rhodes, founder of Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) and de Beers 1870 Radical Programme (Liberal Unionists) Universal education Social Housing ‘three acres and a cow’ -to be financed by colonial revenue Sources: Bigelow, B.and B. Peterson, Rethinking globalization. P44 The Radical Programme – Joseph Chamberlain The Bright Side New consumptionism (car, gadgets) Which, hitherto, only the rich consumed Also new ‘social consumption’ Health, education, jobs, minimum wage, pension What the state actually invested in 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% UK US Japan Germany 0% Jobs in major economic sectors as proportion of total Advanced Countries 90% 80% 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 10% 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 employee jobs in services as percent of total employee jobs Services: a silent transition Share of services in employment China 90% Agriculture Services Manufacturing 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% The Cost Illusion “Human Rights” are productive State invested in the labour force Raised productivity (skills, health, reduced costs, etc) of the workforce Reduced the value of labour power – the cost of the wage bill Neoclassical economics resents as a ‘cost’ – actually, it was an asset Typical Canadian auto wage $1500 lower than US: employer does not pay health insurance This is ‘investing in civilization’ The Physicalist Illusion Assumes productivity only by machinery Decisive advances in history raised human capacity Hindu-Arabic numbers The Book Mass Education, numeracy, literacy Germany recovered twice within 5 years after enormous physical destruction Implications of the service economy Enough material resources to feed the world $6,000 average 2008 = Western average 1950 Most production not material 86 per cent work in services Access to advanced services confined to few Art Care (children, education, elderly care, disability) ‘Green’ investment is a middle-class indulgence We have to make these things universal This requires a new declaration of rights Investing in Civilization What is needed? Investing in primal productive force of society – humans New universal rights: ‘right to care, create, and sustain’ Reduced material basis, expanded spiritual basis Achieve on a world basis Who? How? All previous solutions: ‘the nation’ • Universalism for the rich nations • at the cost of destitution for most of the world poor Marx: world working class + oppressed and poor “Socialism versus barbarism” Economic Ideology Today Equilibrium:market is perfect Physicalism: market allocates things Overestimates machines Underestimates humans In crisis ‘the invisible hand shakes’ humans re-appear as agents GDP per capita as share of GDP per capita in Advanced Countries Inequality: an unsustainable truth 12% Inequality between Global North and South 10% 8% 6% 4% 1960 1966 1972 1978 1984 1990 1996 2002 2008 Source: International Comparison Project (ICP), World Economic Outlook, German statistical office Shares of World GDP 1950-2006 70% 60% 50% US Europe Advanced East Asia Rest without China Rest with China 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Break in series - China data available from 1970 19 50 19 53 19 56 19 59 19 62 19 65 19 68 19 71 19 74 19 77 19 80 19 83 19 86 19 89 19 92 19 95 19 98 20 01 20 04 GDP as share of total, MEPP dollars (Current dollars at Market Exchange Rates) Leading – or crushing? Sources: World Bank WDI indicators, IMF World Economic Outlook, United Nations TED database