* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Accelerator theory
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
THE ACCELERATOR THEORY ACCELERATOR THEORY Whereas the multiplier attempted to explain the consequences of a change in investment, the accelerator theory focuses on the causes of a change in investment spending THEORIES ON INVESTMENT SPENDING Up to now, we have assumed that business decisions about investment spending are based solely on interest rates. The Accelerator theory provides a different explanation…. THE ACCELERATOR THEORY The Accelerator theory argues that firms make investment decisions based on changes in output (real GDP). This attempts to explain the unpredictable nature of the “animal spirits” ANIMAL SPIRITS Keynes argued that changes in investment were the most important cause of fluctuations in the business cycle. The accelerator theory tries to explain why investment spending is constantly changing A REFRESHER ON INVESTMENT SPENDING Hopefully, this formula looks like a long lost friend…. Gross investment = Depreciation + Net Investment INVESTMENT SPENDING Total investment spending consists of the sum of spending on capital goods that have depreciated and spending on new capital goods ASSUMPTIONS OF THE THEORY The Accelerator theory assumes that firms try to have a fixed proportion of capital goods to output. So when output increases, firms will need more capital goods… AN EXAMPLE… Let’s assume a firm produces 1,000 units of a product with 10 machines that produce 100 units each. Every year 1 machine needs to be replaced….Let’s look at some data… HERE’S THE DATA Year Output Change in output 1 1000 2 1000 0 3 1100 4 Machines needed Depreciation Net Investment Gross Investment 10 1 0 1 100 11 1 1 2 1200 100 12 1 1 2 5 1200 0 12 1 0 1 6 1100 -100 11 0 0 0 10 OBSERVATIONS Based on our example, we see that with a 10% increase in production in year 3, investment spending doubled from 1 machine to 2 MORE OBSERVATIONS In year 4, output continued to rise, but investment spending leveled off, as investment spending remained constant at 2 machines ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS In year 5, as production leveled off at 1200 units, investment spending fell from 2 to 1 machine….and by Year 6, as output fell to 1100 units, investment spending dropped to 0 CONCLUSIONS Changes in investment depend on changes in output (GDP) Small changes to output (GDP) can lead to large changes in investment When output (GDP) begins to rise, investment booms If output (GDP) remains constant, investment falls If output (GDP) falls, investment spending drops to 0 THE ACCELERATOR IN THE REAL WORLD Critics argue that the wild swings portended by the Accelerator theory may not hold, depending on unemployment, and level of utilization of capital goods. If there is spare capacity in the economy and underutilized capital goods, investment may not occur even if GDP increases THE ACCELERATOR AND THE MULTIPLIER These two may be linked to create great increases or decreases in GDP. Increases in investment (I) contribute to the multiplier effect, which can lead to more investment and more GDP growth…….and the converse as well… CROWDING OUT CROWDING OUT The crowding-out effect involves a reduction in investment spending due to higher interest rates which have risen due to expansionary fiscal policy decisions made by the federal government STEP 1—GOVERNMENT ENACTS EXPANSIONARY FISCAL POLICY STEP 2—DEMAND FOR MONEY INCREASES STEP 3—INVESTMENT SPENDING FALLS AS INTEREST RATES RISE BEST LAID PLANS Higher interest rates lead to decreased AD from the private sector, somewhat (or perhaps completely) nullifying the expansionary policy that the government pursued in the beginning of this process…. THE CROWDING OUT CONTROVERSY As usual, economists disagree about when it occurs and to what extent. Keynesians believe the effect will be small, especially during recession, while neoclassicists warn that crowding out is always a grave danger! CAN’T THESE TWO EVER AGREE? I GUESS NOT…..