Download Crystallographic studies of two bacterial antibiotic

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Metastable inner-shell molecular state wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

Chemical bond wikipedia , lookup

X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
X-ray crystallographic studies of
two bacterial antibiotic resistance
enzymes: Aminoglycoside
Phosphotransferase (2’’)-Ic and
GES-1 β-lactamase
Laura Byrnes
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
August 15th, 2007
Background



Antibiotic resistance has been around
for eons
Widespread use, poor patient
compliance have pushed along
resistance
Structures of antibiotic resistance
enzymes contain valuable information
for getting around resistance
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
2
Why bother?

Reaction mechanisms much clearer




Hydrogen bonds
Hydrogen atoms (at ultra-high resolution)
Illustrate and characterize proteinsubstrate interactions
Structure-based drug discovery
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
3
Goals

Characterize interactions between
GES-1 and inhibitor complex,
imipenem

Solve the structure of APH(2’’)-Ic
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
4
Enzymatic Action

GES-1

a β-lactamase
Penicillin

APH(2’’)-Ic

May 23, 2017
an aminoglycoside
phosphotransferase
Laura Byrnes SULI
Gentamicin
5
What do we need?
X-rays!
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
6
Why crystals and X-rays?




Molecules arranged in a regular, repeating
pattern in crystals
Electrons in the molecules bend an incident
X-ray beam into thousands of diffracted
beams
Multiple copies of the same molecule in the
same orientation amplify the diffraction
peaks
The diffraction pattern contains all of the
information necessary to determine the
structure!
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
7
Different crystallization
methods

Vapor Diffusion



Hanging drop
Sitting drop
Dialysis
We used the hanging drop method to grow
the APH(2’’)-Ic crystals used to collect data
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
8
The Protein Crystal Cookbook


You wish!
What can we do… ?
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
9
What’s Next?

Vary conditions







May 23, 2017
Salt/metal ions (trace)
Precipitant (e.g. PEG -- polyethylene glycol,
alcohols, high salt concentration)
pH
Buffer types
Temperature
Protein concentration
Organic compounds (trace)
Laura Byrnes SULI
10
Obstacles


May 23, 2017
Protein showers
Salty!
Some proteins just won’t crystallize
Unique problems; APH(2’’)-Ic crystals
grow as flat sheets
Laura Byrnes SULI
11
Tools of the Trade
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
12
So you think you have
crystals?



Crystals mounted
on a nylon fiber
loop (~200μm)
Keep it cold!
Cryoprotectant

May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
Our crystals were
grown in 20% PEG
13
Leave it to the robot…
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
14
X-ray Diffraction, in a Nutshell
Bragg’s Law:
May 23, 2017
n  2 * d sin 
Laura Byrnes SULI
15
The Reciprocal Lattice
1
1
a* 

d (100) a
1
1
b* 

d (010) b
1
1
c* 

d (001) c
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
16
Ewald Sphere
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
17
What does it all add up to?
Water lines
Diffraction
pattern
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
18
Molecular Replacement

Use a related protein as a structural model

We used APH(2’’)-Ib

Doesn’t always work out

Other options:
Multiple isomorphous replacement




Soak crystals in heavy metal solutions
Modify substrates or cofactors with heavy atoms
Collect X-ray Absorption edge, collect diffraction data at that
wavelength
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
19
Fitting the Data

Specially designed
programs (e.g.
COOT) and
hardware are used
to refine the
structure in 3D!
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
20
The Beautiful Result


Blue: 2Fobs-Fcalc
Green: (+) Fobs-Fcalc


Red: (-) Fobs-Fcalc


May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
Something missing
Atoms in wrong place
Model outlined
inside density map
21
Conclusions: GES-1


GES-1 crystals bound imipenem
showed ~65% occupancy for the
inhibitor in the active site
Some interactions observed:



May 23, 2017
Covalent bonding between inhibitor and
key active site residue
Multiple hydrogen bonding partners
Salt bridge
Laura Byrnes SULI
22
GES-1 bound Imipenem
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
23
Conclusions: APH(2’’)-1c


The APH(2’’)-Ib structure, with ~25%
sequence identity to APH(2’’)-Ic, not an
ideal model
Future studies



May 23, 2017
Try soaking with 8-bromo-ATP
Crystallize other mutants and WT
Co-crystallize with substrates
Laura Byrnes SULI
24
Acknowledgments

Clyde Smith,


Apurva Mehta,



Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
SULI Program coordinators at SLAC
Office of Science, Department of
Energy
May 23, 2017
Laura Byrnes SULI
25