Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Trading zones, interactional expertise and convergent technologies Michael E. Gorman University of Virginia Presented to NABIS Chicago August, 2006 Michael E. Gorman All rights reserved QuickTi me™ and a TIFF ( Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see thi s pi ctur e. Portions of this talk derived from the workshop I organized on Trading zones, Interactional Expertise and Interdisciplinary Collaboration, supported by the National Science Foundation (SES-0526096), the Boston Consulting Group, and the Center for Nanotechnology & Society ASU, May 22-24, 2006 Michael E. Gorman Goal of Convergent Technologies (nano, bio, info, cogno) Enhancing Human Performance: To what end? Super soldier? Will the enhancements be available to all? Michael E. Gorman Convergent technologies (nano, bio, info, cogno) require • Disciplinary depth combined with • Ability to form interdisciplinary teams • Integration of societal and ethical considerations – Nanotechnology as a model • Avoiding the problem of compartmentalization – “There are no ethical issues in design…” Michael E. Gorman Scientists who can serve as • Entrepreneurs--translating ideas into action (trading zones) • Philosophers--communicating across paradigms (interactional expertise) • Stewards--linking scientific discovery, technological innovation and social progress (moral imagination) Michael E. Gorman Problem of Incommensurability (Kuhn) • Experts in a new paradigm may not be able to communicated with those in the old – J. Polanyi’s first paper on the laser rejected • Participants in different cultures may not be able to communicate with each other • Making it impossible to see a superordinate goal, and work towards it together Michael E. Gorman Trading Zone as solution to incommensurablity • Galison-- radar, particle accelerators--scientists and engineers develop a creole to communicate • Nanocajun • Lambert--JPL engineers refer to their negotiations as trades • Baird--MRI--incomplete creole between physics and surgery led to an artifact being treated as a lesion – Solved by someone whose multidisciplinary background crossed the zone – Interactional expert Michael E. Gorman Three levels of shared expertise in multidisciplinary trading zones (adapted from Collins and Evans) • None--participants speak different languages • Interactional--ability to converse intelligently with experts from another culture • Contributing--each discipline contributes to a new breakthrough, developing new terms (Luis & Walter Alvarez) Michael E. Gorman Three Kinds of Trading Zones State 1: One group (or elite: oligarchy) • has the overall problem representation • black boxes others into specific roles whose purpose those persons do not need to understand. • Communication downward (orders) & upward (evidence of obedience)--no trade – Rigid hierarchy • Examples: Seeing Like a State (Scott) Michael E. Gorman Three Kinds of Trading Zones State 2: Relatively equal trading zones • Actors often trade with boundary objects (cowrie shell) or across systems (Radar, Everglades) • Boundaries of zone can shift--who is allowed to trade? Who is left out? • Zones can be nested within or networked with other zones Michael E. Gorman Service Science involves both 2a & 2b • Represents a new kind of interactional expertise that combines technical and business knowledge with cognitive and social psychology • Service scientists facilitate human-technological coevolution that enhances human capabilities, world-wide • Involves trading zones that may become collaborations Jim Spohrer, IBM Almaden Quick Time™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) dec ompressor are needed to s ee this pic ture. Michael E. Gorman Three Kinds of Trading Zones State 3: Shared mental model • All participants share a common representation of the system and its goals. • Dynamic representations, so sharing needs to be continuous. – – • Flowing to the work Must avoid groupthink Joint contribution to development of a new expertise – ARPANET Michael E. Gorman Differing mental models of same trading zone lead to problems • Toshiba engineers who work with Lexar also provide information to competitors working on the same technology • Lexar: thinks they are in a strategic partnership, therefore work on trust--close to a Stage 3 • Toshiba: any sharing that is not expressly forbidden is allowed--Stage 2 • Story of trust & betrayal & blaming the victim • Or story about ‘realities’ of business Michael E. Gorman Differing mental models can cause organizational problems • Boeing engineers who wanted to be in a State 2 or 3 with management, felt they were in a State 1 – Airplanes as boundary objects: engineers as designers or assemblers? • Ed Wells Institute as boundary organization Michael E. Gorman Michael E. Gorman A Small Nanobiotechnology Trading Zone Goal: to explore how scientists, engineers, ethicists and social scientists could collaborate on nanotechnology research • Graudate student had two advisors: a materials scientist (Groves) and a social scientist (Gorman). Together, we explored how depositing nanodots of one metal oxide on another can be directed toward ‘world ills’ – Decided on medical or environmental sensors--added a biomedical engineer • All three of us keep diaries of our cognitive processes and send them to a cognitive scientist (Shrager) • Supported by NSF (SES-0210452) Michael E. Gorman Metaphor: Mountains and Bridges Michael E. Gorman Trajectory of Gorman’s expertise in nanotechnology • None--where G started before project • Interactional--after learning about selfdirected assembly and metal oxides, G had the judgment to help shape the research strategy but not the skill to do experiments • Contributing--G’s name is on a patent application Michael E. Gorman Michael E. Gorman Michael E. Gorman 3 States, Emerging Technologies and the Environment State 1: Control of the environment; ignore most stakeholders • Engineers and scientists develop nanotechnologies, leaving others to deal with ‘end-of-pipe’ environmental consequences • NGOs mandating a moratorium on new technologies without consulting researchers Michael E. Gorman State 1 Extractive Industry: Quincy Mine Shaft, UP QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Michael E. Gorman State 2: Balancing interests • The potential environmental impacts of new technologies need to be monitored and negotiated with agencies like EPA, with environmental scientists and with multiple stakeholders • Current environmental regulations are not adequate for nanotechnology (Wardak & Rejeski) – Regulatory assumption that nanoparticles can be classified and treated like their macro-scale counterparts • New trading zones necessary to develop new regulations and complement existing ones Michael E. Gorman The impacts of breakthrough technologies on complex systems are not entirely predictable, therefore Michael E. Gorman State 3: Adaptive management of a reflexive historical system The Earth Systems Engineer has “to be in continued dialog with the creation that we are responsible for, and part of”—creating “new and more self-aware cognitive systems”. Brad Allenby Michael E. Gorman Requirements for such a dialogue • Continuous and fine-grained monitoring • Reversible technologies – Should be designed to permit alteration of technological systems as we get more data on their effects – And hear from stakeholders • Adaptive management of resilient systems – What aspects of system most need to be resilient? • True interdisciplinary collaboration – Stage 3 trading zone at the level of systems goals – Axiological (values) component must be considered Michael E. Gorman But values are often based on incommensurable ideological differences Prohibiting any kind of State 3 agreement, unless participants exercise Michael E. Gorman Moral Imagination • We learn practical ethics from stories, which become mental models for virtuous behavior (Johnson: Werhane) • These mental models can become unquestioned assumptions--’realities’ • Moral imagination consists of seeing that these ‘realities’ are mental models, and that alternative models, e.g., those of other stakeholders, are worth understanding • NOT relativism--the hope is to evolve improved models for how to progress, as a civilization Michael E. Gorman A Failure of Moral Imagination & Trading Zones: IP example GMOs: Monsanto’s story: • Will lead to next green revolution • Reduce environmental damage due to pesticides, fertilizer But how to protect R&D investment? • Prevent re-use of seeds Michael E. Gorman Seed re-use as farmer’s right, especially in developing world • Farmer contracts that result in field inspections • A technology developed by USDA and Delta & Pine that ‘turns off’ trait--labeled ‘terminator’ by RAFI (now ETC) Michael E. Gorman Share knowledge with scientists from the developing world Michael E. Gorman McDonough’s Principles as statement of values that can be translated into action • Waste = Food – biological/organic nutrient cycle – technological nutrient cycle – Cradle to cradle design Michael E. Gorman Successful example of moral imagination • Design of an environmental furniture fabric • An architect, a fashion designer, an environmental chemist and a textile manufacturer adopt a shared mental model (story) --waste equals food--and collaborated on product development Michael E. Gorman Arizona State University’s decision theater permits development of a visual creole that allows multiple stakeholders to engage in moral imagination by seeing the impact of their assumptions on the growth of Phoenix QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Michael E. Gorman Convergent Technologies promise to extend human capabilities to realms reserved for Gods in traditional stories • Control of evolution, including invention of new organisms • Management of the global ecosystem • Change ‘human nature’ by – Cyborg: expanding cognition, distributing it among technologies – Supersoldier Michael E. Gorman Each individual scientist may not be able to be • Entrepreneur • Philosopher • Steward But in order to create technologies that represent social progress, scientists will have to work with others who can help them navigate these responsibilities Michael E. Gorman Innovation exceeds the pace of regulation • Current regulation depends on known risks • Leading to the precautionary principle, which would prevent discoveries that might be beneficial • Degrees of freedom are greatest at the point of breakthrough • Therefore, scientists need to exercise moral imagination, in company with others Michael E. Gorman Enrepreneur and steward roles could be in conflict • Entrepreneur wants ownership of IP, shuns transparency • Steward prefers transparency, looks for ways of sharing new ideas that have potential benefit • The two roles do not have to be in conflict: entrepreneurs can create markets that represent social benefit Michael E. Gorman Technological development as freedom “Economic unfreedom, in the form of extreme poverty, can make a person a helpless prey in the violation of other kinds of freedom” (Amartya Sen) • Technologies for Tier 4 markets--increased affluence, education (especially for women) could both limit population growth and environmental damage • Technological progress should involve enhancing human capabilities in ways that give us the maximum opportunity to gain intelligence about ourselves, our relations with each other and with the universe we are transforming Michael E. Gorman Michael E. Gorman Michael E. Gorman