Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Santa Barbara Coastal LTER & California’s Marine Protected Areas Dave Siegel University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara Coastal LTER Santa Barbara Coastal Long Term Ecological Research • ~ 10,000 km2 • Steep coastal mountains • Small estuaries • Shallow rocky reefs • Deep ocean basin • Offshore islands • Mediterranean climate • Strong ENSO signal • Major biogeographic boundary Giant Kelp Forests • Worldwide distribution on shallow temperate reefs • High productivity • High species diversity • Complex trophic interactions • Biological habitat formation • High economic importance U.S. West Coast Rockfish Source: Pacific Fisheries Management Council, 2001 How a MPA might work • MPA’s allow adults grow to full maturity • Elimination of harvest enables more “natural” communities & food webs to exist • Obvious tool for near-sedentary adults • Fishery benefits if progeny disperse broadly or adults “spill out” of the MPA Fished Organism Life Cycle is Important How a MPA might work Spillover MPA Fish(x) Distance -> Key: Spatial Management of a Fishery MPA’s Work Within Their Borders From Halpern [2002] A Benefit of Getting Old & Fat MPA’s in Channel Islands • State-federal process to implement Marine Protected Areas around the Channel Island National Marine Sanctuary • Stakeholder driven goals: – protect biodiversity – maintain fishery yields & incomes Conservation vs. Fisheries Value Conservation Goal Fishery Goal Fractional Set Aside We were victims of public service... • Six SBC-LTER PI’s served on the Science Panel for the Channel Islands Marine Reserve process • Helped the stakeholder panel arrive on a “preferred alternative” MPA plan • This plan has been implemented by the State Approved Oct. 24, 2002 for state waters Federal approval in the works What did/can SBC-LTER contribute?? • Local data & expertise – SBC-LTER & partner program data • Theoretical & synthetic analyses – How big, how many, how connected? – How hard will it be to assess MPA efficiency?? • Next steps – Flow, Fish & Fishing (F3) Biocomplexity Project – MLPA, California-wide MPA designation legislation Dispersal Scales for Marine Organisms Kinlan & Gaines [2003; Ecology 84: 2007-2020]. Larval Transport Modeling • Provide a metric for source-to-destination exchanges among nearshore populations • Incorporate important oceanographic & organism life history characteristics • Constrain using easily obtained observations • Useful for modeling spatial population dynamics Siegel et al. [2003; Marine Ecology Progress Series 260: 83-96] Larval Transport Modeling U = 5 ustd = 15 To = 42 Tf = 56 100 total settlers= 1024 total part = 5000 90 N = 5000 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 alongcoast (km) (a,b,c = 84.815 200.39 216.62) Planktonic larval duration: 6 to 8 weeks Flow Statistics: U = 5 cm/s, su = 15 cm/s 1000 Regional Scale Self Seeding What fraction of larvae settle within a region of size L? Will a MPA seed itself or its surroundings? Scales as Dd/L Dd large L small Dd small L large Will a MPA Retain or Export?? 50% retention Dd/L~0.5 Design for Export Design for Conservation A MPA will retain or export progeny based on the organism’s dispersion scale & the size of the MPA Is a MPA a Source or Sink? If MPA has L= 10 km, exports if Dd 5 km Retains Exports • A single MPA will be both a larval source & sink • Points to networks of reserves for conservation Reserve Networks • Enable conservation & fisheries goals to be achieved simultaneously • Reserves must not be spaced too far apart Size --> adult movement Spacing --> larval dispersal Approved Oct. 24, 2002 State waters implemented Federal in the works Larval Transport, Time & Fish Stock Uncertainty • Larval dispersal calculated represents ensemble mean conditions • The implied time to construct this mean estimate is ~20 years!! – Assumes larval releases are daily & a decorrelation time scale of 3 days Time, continued... • Annual recruitment may be a small sampling of the kernel (N = 10?, or less!!) – (300 releases / year) * (10% survival) / (3 day tL) • Example - intermediate disperser (N = 100) • Critical for assessing “MPA success” as a fishery tool 1.8 total settlers= 13 total part = 100 • Implies that connections among sites are stochastic & intermittent U = 5 Ustd = 15 To = 14 Tf = 21 2 N=5000 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 alongcoast (km) 200 250 300 350 Invertebrate Settlement – SBC-LTER/PISCO Ellwood Invert Setttlment Time Series 70 60 Mytilus Clams (excl razor & HIAARC) any marine snail (excl. veligers, limp) Limpet species Snail veliger any seastar Hiatella arctica # settlers/deployment 50 40 30 20 10 0 160 180 200 220 240 JD 2001 260 280 300 320 Time series sampling – Dt = 2 d Interpreting Settlement Time Series • Stochastic, quasi-random time series • No correlation of settling among species • Few settlement events for each species • Events are short Ellwood Invert Setttlment Time Series 70 60 (2 days) Mytilus Clams (excl razor & HIAARC) any marine snail (excl. veligers, limp) Limpet species Snail veliger any seastar Hiatella arctica # settlers/deployment 50 40 30 20 10 0 160 180 200 220 240 JD 2001 260 280 300 320 Implications for MPA Assessment • MPA increases in fishery yields will be difficult to discern from inherent system variability • A variable fishery response is expected • Proper MPA assessment needs to be done over some long time (not really known yet) • Need real predictive tools (including fishing dynamics) Flow, Fish & Fishing - www.icess.ucsb.edu/~davey/F_cubed MPA’s in California • Marine Life Protection Act (AB993) – Implement a MPA network for California – Take a regional approach to siting marine reserves – SBC-LTER participants are part of this process – On hold due to state budget … but it is the law!! SBC-LTER & the MPA Process • Theoretical & synthetic analyses for MPA – How big, how many, how connected? – Assessment of MPA efficiency?? • Other relevant SBC results for MLPA process – Long-term observations of the kelp ecosystem – Terrestrial inputs of nutrients, sediments, etc. • Our forays into the world of “broader impacts” will continue throughout SBC’s lifespan Thank You!!