Download GIS STANDARDS

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
GIS STANDARDS





Introduction
Reasons for standards
Organizations
Types of standards
Implementing standards
INTRODUCTION

standards are needed as GIS users attempt to
integrate operations with other hardware, GISs
and data sources

challenge is to get industry, government and
users to implement and promote use of
standards

many standards are set simply through common
use, major attempts to develop national and
international standards
REASONS FOR STANDARDS

portability of applications

data networks

common environments

cost of program development
STANDARDS ORGANIZATIONS

American National Standards Institute

Digital Cartographic Data Standards Task Force

Federal Coordinating Committee on Digital
Cartography – Standards Working Group

Institute of Electrical Electronics Engineers

International Standards Organization

Open Software Foundation

X-Open
TYPES OF STANDARDS

networking standards – critical to allow
communications between remote computers

database query standards – SQL is emerging as the
standard

data exchange standards – governments/private
companies recognize need to exchange data
between different agencies/groups

several common data exchange formats currently in
use:
DATA EXCHANGE FORMATS

DEM – Digital Elevation Models

allows a single attribute per cell
DATA EXCHANGE FORMATS

DLG – Digital Line Graph

most widely used format for
exchange of digital
cartographic data in vector
format

used primarily for coordinate
information, though it does
support alphanumeric
attributes
DLG Roads
DATA EXCHANGE FORMATS

GBF/DIME – Geographic Base File/Dual
Independent Map Encoding

allows both coordinate and attribute data
DATA EXCHANGE FORMATS

TIGER – Topologically Integrated Geographic
Encoding and Referencing
support
pre-census
geographic and
cartographic
functions in
preparation for the
1990 Census
to
assist in the
analysis of the data
as well as to
produce new
cartographic
DATA EXCHANGE FORMATS

SIF – Standard Interchange Format (Intergraph)


popular data exchange format for many GIS packages
DXF – Digital eXchange Format

popular exchange format for many GIS packages to
transfer with CAD

specially formatted text file that can be viewed and
modified with any text editor

organized into different sections – header, table, block,
etc.
IMPLEMENTING STANDARDS


Start-up Costs

implementation of standard can incur substantial costs
(money and time)

major short-term costs related to user training and
reprogramming software
Management Support

needs to recognize the positive impacts of standards
on productivity and system costs (plus commitment of
short-term costs)
IMPLEMENTING STANDARDS

Technical Tradeoffs

tradeoffs between functionality and performance

standards provide for broad functionality

adopting standard operating system provides access to large
library of existing applications

standards do not allow fine tuning to specific hardware

some de facto standards are neither efficient nor the
best available
IMPLEMENTING STANDARDS

Potential for Security Risks

wide availability of common operating systems allow
for misuse and exploitation


spread of computer viruses depends on common operating
systems
Innovation

broadly accepted standards make it very difficult to
introduce innovations
STANDARDS

majority of standards effort in GIS to date has
concerned data formats


missing – standard of data models that would provide
standard ways of representing geographic phenomena

should there be standard resolutions for DEM?

should there be standards of vertical accuracy?
missing – standards of data accuracy for GIS

map accuracy standards deal only with cartographic features
STANDARDS

data may be written into standard format for transfer,
but it may still be virtually meaningless without
extensive documentation

standards would provide GIS user with expectations
about the reliability of the database as a window on
the world

rather than on source documents, on transferred databases