Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CMS Database Issues Derek Barge DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database Issues-Derek Barge Slide 1 Sensors: factories Frames: Brussels Pitch adapter: Hybrid: Brussels CF carrier Hybrids: Strasbourg CERN Sensor QAC Pisa Module FNAL UCSB assembly Bonding FNAL UCSB & testing Perugia Wien Bari TIB-TID INTEGRATION Lyon Wien Pisa Louvain Brussels PETALS INTEGRATIONAachen TECassembly Aachen TK ASSEMBLY CERN Louvain Strasbourg Zurich StrasbourgKarlsruheAachen Brussels Lyon Pisa TOB assembly TIB-IDassembly CERN Karlsruhe Wien Padova Pisa Torino Bari Firenze Integration ROD INTEGRATION into FNAL UCSB mechanics Sub-assemblies Perugia Strasbourg Karlsruhe TECassembly Karlsruhe . --> Lyon Production Hybrids Sensors Overview • Quick Overview of Production Process: Hybrids (~2755 TOB – 5 types, 500-2613 TEC – 3 types) 1. Receiving / Visual Inspection / Hybrid Assembly 2. Testing – Bonding – Thermal Testing – Module Assembly Sensors (5510 TOB – 2 types, 1000-5226 TEC – 4 types) 1. Receiving / Probing (Special) 2. Module Assembly Modules (~2755 TOB – 6 types, 500-2613 TEC – 3 types) 1. Assembly (using hybrids & sensors) 2. Wire-bonding 3. Testing Rods ( ~460 - ~24 types) 1. Assembly / Testing / ? / Shipping DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database -Derek Barge Issues-Derek Barge Slide 3 KeepingHybrids Sensors Track of Things • What Do we need to keep track of? For Hybrids, Sensors, Modules & Rods, we need to know: - Where is it? (What Test Center? UCSB, CERN, etc.) - What Type is it? (Module or Hybrid? TEC or TOB? Single or Stereo?) - How is it related to other objects? - Does it contain any other parts? What are their serial numbers? - Is it a part in another container? What is the container’s serial number? - Has it been Wire-bonded? (hybrids & modules only) - What channels were NOT bonded successfully? - Has it been tested? - What channels were faulty and why? Did it Pass or Fail? - Is it ready for the next production stage? - History & Shipping (When was it: Made? Bonded? Tested? Shipped?) DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database -Derek Barge Issues-Derek Barge Slide 4 Data Hybrids Sensors Management • Need tools to track parts & record information at different stages of production and centers System must handle: ~ 13,480+ Total Objects of ~ 46+ types Requirements - Must be Reliable - Must be Adaptable, needs to quickly accommodate changes - Should be centralized - Should be Internet based for accessibility - Must be secure - Should be easy to use - Should be as fast as possible What is the CMS collaboration’s solution? DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database -Derek Barge Issues-Derek Barge Slide 5 TrackerDB Hybrids Sensors • Oracle (SQL) database for tracking CMS production Relational Database format, data stored in tables: - Center - Bonding Data - Object Assembly - Sensor Data (ST, QTC) - Gantry Assembly Measurements - History & Shipping Data is uploaded and stored for later reference - Uploading of Module Assembly & Wire-bonding data almost fully automated, Hybrid data will be automated this month Queries can be written to get data for - A Specific Part (Example: time history for a particular hybrid) - All parts meeting certain criteria (Example: all modules at UCSB that have been assembled and not wire-bonded) DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database -Derek Barge Issues-Derek Barge Slide 6 DBHybrids Sensors Problems • Although the TrackerDB itself is reliable, and has the potential to meet our needs, All the interface tools we need either don’t exist or work - BigBrowser is slow & can’t track parts through their containers - Other interfaces track modules only or sensors only - Interface servers go down (PISA server summer ’03) Data Problems (being resolved) - Sensors with incorrect or missing data - Hybrids received with missing bonding data Testing Tables not developed - Hybrid Testing Tables not ready until DEC 2003 - Module testing data structures not sufficient for UCSB DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database -Derek Barge Issues-Derek Barge Slide 7 Sensors Solution Hybrids Sensors2 • Combine TrackerDB & local UCSB DB Maximize mileage from Tracker DB, rely on it for: - Sensor Data (unavoidable) - Bonding Data (also kept locally) - Gantry Data (also kept locally) - Relating Object serial numbers (also kept locally) - Object Histories & Shipping (unavoidable) Local UCSB DB System handles TrackerDB shortfalls: - Hybrid Testing Data (migrating to DB JAN 2004) - Module Testing Data UCSB web interface designed to: - Query TrackerDB & display results - Interface to local testing data DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database -Derek Barge Issues-Derek Barge Slide 8 UCSB UCSB DB Interface Interface Hybrids Sensors Problems Working Works • Currently Relying on UCSB Interface for: Inventory for Hybrids, Sensors & Modules, can sort by: - #, Center, Type, Bonding Status, Production Stage (container?) Sensor Data: - Position of Faulty Strips (CAC, IDIEL, ISTRIP, RPOLY) - Depletion Voltage (used to pair sensors for module production) - Current(Voltage) curve (compared to module I(V) in module testing) All Hybrid & Module Electrical Testing Data Tracking incoming & outgoing shipments Frame inventory (otherwise untracked) DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database -Derek Barge Issues-Derek Barge Slide 9 UCSB Interface - Main DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database Issues-Derek Barge Slide 10 UCSB Sensor Inventory DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database Issues-Derek Barge Slide 11 Sensor 30210314308203 DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database Issues-Derek Barge Slide 12 Processed Hybrid Hybrids Sensors Results Hybrids • What have we done so far? Hybrids (199 processed so far) - 160 at UCSB (All wire-bonded) - 126 TOB_P_4U (52 in modules) - 7 TOB_P_4D (3 in modules) - 7 TOB_P_6U (6 in modules) - 6 TOB_S_4U (0 in modules) - 8 TOB_S_4D (3 in modules) - 6 TEC (4 in modules) - 11 sent to Fermilab for module production - 16 in module at FERMILAB - 10 in modules at CERN - 1 in module at STRASBOURG - 1 in module in TORINO DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database -Derek Barge Issues-Derek Barge Slide 13 Automation Hybrids Sensors • Tasks previously done by technicians now done automatically: Example: Module Checklist - Paper Checklist (9 min + / module) - find what hybrid, near sensor, and far sensor are in the module - lookup channel faults and I(V) curves for both sensors (PIZA interface) - manually add sensor I(V) curves - Automated Checklist ( ~ 2 min ) - Enter Module serial number and wait • Efficiency improvement of at least 7 min / module, 1.75 hours / day @ 15 modules / day Accuracy improved, no data entry errors DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database -Derek Barge Issues-Derek Barge Slide 14 Works What’s Hybrids Sensors in Progress Left? • Still need systems to manage: Module Thermal Testing Data Rod Assembly & Testing Data • Also Distributed to Fermilab Already using UCSB tools for Module checklist & Sensor Data Still need inventory tools DOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database -Derek Barge Issues-Derek Barge Slide 15