Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Processing of exoplanet full field images Farid Karioty CoRoT Week 12/06/2005 Plan I. Already done: II. To be done: Masks assignment Background windows Offset windows Spectrum calculations for each star after mask assignment III. Remaining problem Images corrections Stars identification MGPDV (CoRoT Sight Geometric Model) update PSF extraction from full field images Photometric precision of extracted PSF IV. Conclusion I. EXOWIND Inputs: 3 full field images (equivalent exposition time is 30 min/ image) EXODAT extractions EXOBASKET Theoretic PSF set Outputs: 2 positions files of these stars for MGPDV update XML assignment file of the masks EXOWIND (IHM) Cosmic impacts correction Method: 3 full field images, 30 minutes exposition each For each pixel of the 3 images Calculate the median for each pixel triplet If a pixel value exceeds mean value by more than 3σ, then it is replaced by the median value of the 3 pixels The 3 images are summed EMC correction (crosstalk) Crosstalk: Depends of seismology channel windowing Scrambling on the exoplanet channel Correction: Parasites positions are predictable Values of the different scrambling sequences are read in prescan pixels of the full field images An image containing the parasites is generated & subtracted Crosstalk correction (IHM) Offset correction Method: Calculate in prescan and overscan pixels the offset values for each half CCD Subtraction of the measured offset (possibility to choose between the value measured in the prescan or the overscan pixels) Offset correction (IHM) Gain correction Method: Reading in the BDE (calibration data base) of the gain values for each channel Application of the multiplicative factor for each half CCD Smearing correction Method : Calculate the smearing value for each column of the image Smearing subtraction Background correction Methods: Division of the image into sub-images in which the minimum value is taken, then interpolation back to a 2048x2048 pixels image Same method but the median value is used Convolution method: convolution of the image by an enlarged Gaussian & fit by a 2nd degree polynomial Ravines : search of valleys in the image Background correction (IHM) Identification of saturated stars Method : Histogram of the image => selection of the saturation threshold Research in the image of saturation domains (adjacent pixels with values greater to the chosen saturation threshold) Identification of these stars (automatic identification & manual module for the stars where a doubt persists e.g. 2 close saturated stars) Identification of saturated stars (IHM) Stars identification Identification of about 20 bright slightly contaminated stars of the same spectral type Update of CCD position in the MGPDV (translation & rotation) Identification of 100 to 500 stars (still of the same spectral type) Distortion update of the MGPDV Stars identification (2) Method: Projection of the catalogue on the CCD (selection of the stars with these 3 parameters: mgr, contamination, spectral type) For each star: calculation of the subpixel shift between the star position on the CCD and it’s position given by the catalogue & the MGPDV (correlation method) If the shift is less than a user-defined limit (depending on the knowledge of CCD position & distortion coefficients in the MGPDV) & if the correlation is greater to a userdefined threshold, then the star is identified Stars identification (IHM) PSF extraction Method: Selection in the catalogue of the stars corresponding to the PSF spectral type to extract the maximum magnitude of these “PSF stars” (MGR min = MGR sat) the maximum contamination level of these stars Choice of the number of sub-domains in the image (1 extracted PSF by sub-domain and spectral type) Summation of the stack of PSF stars after subpixel recentering Filtering by an ellipsoidal Gaussian to decrease the background noise (residuals of the corrections, other fainter stars…) PSF extraction (IHM) Extracted PSF II. Masks assignment Method: For each EXOBASKET star: PSF fitting Fitted PSF = signal, remaining = noise Stack of images for the attribution procedure XML file of the masks assignments But: it is crucial to know precisely the PSF III. Unsolved problem Photometric precision of the extracted PSF : Important remainders, maximum errors ≈ 20% Too much important imprecision for a PSF fit assignment quality is decreased A deconvolution method is being implemented IV. Conclusion Images corrections: OK Identification of the saturated stars and of the saturation magnitude: OK Identification of the stars: OK PSF extraction: not totally solved but the deconvolution method seems to give better results