Download IHM - RSSD

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Computational electromagnetics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Processing of exoplanet
full field images
Farid Karioty
CoRoT Week 12/06/2005
Plan

I. Already done:





II. To be done:





Masks assignment
Background windows
Offset windows
Spectrum calculations for each star after mask assignment
III. Remaining problem


Images corrections
Stars identification
MGPDV (CoRoT Sight Geometric Model) update
PSF extraction from full field images
Photometric precision of extracted PSF
IV. Conclusion
I. EXOWIND

Inputs:
3 full field images (equivalent exposition time is 30 min/
image)
 EXODAT extractions
 EXOBASKET
 Theoretic PSF set


Outputs:
2 positions files of these stars for MGPDV update
 XML assignment file of the masks

EXOWIND (IHM)
Cosmic impacts correction

Method:
3 full field images, 30 minutes exposition each
 For each pixel of the 3 images

Calculate the median for each pixel triplet
 If a pixel value exceeds mean value by more than 3σ, then
it is replaced by the median value of the 3 pixels


The 3 images are summed
EMC correction (crosstalk)

Crosstalk:
Depends of seismology channel windowing
 Scrambling on the exoplanet channel


Correction:
Parasites positions are predictable
 Values of the different scrambling sequences are read in
prescan pixels of the full field images
 An image containing the parasites is generated &
subtracted

Crosstalk correction
(IHM)
Offset correction

Method:

Calculate in prescan and overscan pixels the offset
values for each half CCD

Subtraction of the measured offset (possibility to
choose between the value measured in the prescan
or the overscan pixels)
Offset correction
(IHM)
Gain correction

Method:

Reading in the BDE (calibration data base) of the
gain values for each channel

Application of the multiplicative factor for each half
CCD
Smearing correction

Method :

Calculate the smearing value for each column of the
image

Smearing subtraction
Background correction

Methods:

Division of the image into sub-images in which the
minimum value is taken, then interpolation back to a
2048x2048 pixels image

Same method but the median value is used

Convolution method: convolution of the image by an
enlarged Gaussian & fit by a 2nd degree polynomial

Ravines : search of valleys in the image
Background correction
(IHM)
Identification of saturated stars

Method :

Histogram of the image => selection of the
saturation threshold

Research in the image of saturation domains
(adjacent pixels with values greater to the chosen
saturation threshold)

Identification of these stars (automatic identification
& manual module for the stars where a doubt
persists e.g. 2 close saturated stars)
Identification of saturated stars
(IHM)
Stars identification

Identification of about 20 bright slightly
contaminated stars of the same spectral type

Update of CCD position in the MGPDV
(translation & rotation)

Identification of 100 to 500 stars (still of the
same spectral type)

Distortion update of the MGPDV
Stars identification (2)

Method:

Projection of the catalogue on the CCD (selection of the
stars with these 3 parameters: mgr, contamination,
spectral type)

For each star: calculation of the subpixel shift between
the star position on the CCD and it’s position given by the
catalogue & the MGPDV (correlation method)

If the shift is less than a user-defined limit (depending on
the knowledge of CCD position & distortion coefficients
in the MGPDV) & if the correlation is greater to a userdefined threshold, then the star is identified
Stars identification
(IHM)
PSF extraction

Method:

Selection in the catalogue of the stars corresponding to



the PSF spectral type to extract
the maximum magnitude of these “PSF stars” (MGR min = MGR sat)
the maximum contamination level of these stars

Choice of the number of sub-domains in the image (1 extracted
PSF by sub-domain and spectral type)

Summation of the stack of PSF stars after subpixel recentering

Filtering by an ellipsoidal Gaussian to decrease the background
noise (residuals of the corrections, other fainter stars…)
PSF extraction (IHM)
Extracted PSF
II. Masks assignment

Method:

For each EXOBASKET star:
PSF fitting
 Fitted PSF = signal, remaining = noise
 Stack of images for the attribution procedure
 XML file of the masks assignments


But: it is crucial to know precisely the PSF
III. Unsolved problem

Photometric precision of the extracted PSF :

Important remainders, maximum errors ≈ 20%

Too much important imprecision for a PSF fit

assignment quality is decreased

A deconvolution method is being implemented
IV. Conclusion

Images corrections: OK

Identification of the saturated stars and of the
saturation magnitude: OK

Identification of the stars: OK

PSF extraction: not totally solved but the
deconvolution method seems to give better results