Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Fair Work Commission’s Role in the Enterprise Bargaining Process Associate Professor Anthony Forsyth RMIT University School of Law Associate Professor John Howe Melbourne Law School Overview Background and methodology Overall data on applications under Part 2-4 of FW Act Data & Interviews on MSDs and Scope Orders Data & Interviews on Bargaining Orders, 240 and Low Paid Bargaining Orders Updated FWC data Key Findings and & Conclusions The University of Melbourne 2 Research Methodology Study of operation of Part 2-4 of FW Act over first 3 years of operation (1 July 2009-30 June 2012) – Forsyth, Gahan, Howe and Landau We drew from four principal sources of data: Quarterly reports on agreement-making made publicly available by DEEWR Unit record file data drawn from FWC’s own case management system; Relevant decisions and orders relating to applications made under Part 2-4 of the FW Act; Qualitative evidence drawn from interviews with parties The University of Melbourne 3 Jun-12 May-12 Apr-12 Mar-12 Feb-12 Jan-12 Dec-11 Nov-11 Oct-11 Sep-11 Aug-11 Jul-11 Jun-11 May-11 Apr-11 Mar-11 Feb-11 Jan-11 Dec-10 Nov-10 Oct-10 Sep-10 Aug-10 Jul-10 Jun-10 May-10 Apr-10 Mar-10 Feb-10 Jan-10 Dec-09 Nov-09 Oct-09 Sep-09 Aug-09 Jul-09 Number of applications made Applications lodged under Part 2-4, monthly 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 4 Applications lodged under Part 2-4, by type 1200 Number of applications made 1000 800 600 400 200 0 s.229 bargaining order s.236 majority support determination s.238 scope order s.240 bargaining dispute s.242 low-paid authorisation 5 Applications lodged under Part 2-4, by applicant type 1400 Number of applications made 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Employer Organisation Employer Individual Union Applicant type 6 Applications lodged under Part 2-4, monthly, by state/territory 1000 900 800 Number of applciations made 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 NT TAS ACT WA SA Qld NSW VIC 7 Other services Arts and recreation services Health care and social assistance Education & training Public administration & safety Administrative and support services Professional, scientific and technical services Rental, hiring & real estate services Finanical & insurance services Information media & telecommunications Transport, postal and warehousing Wholesale & retail trade Construction Electricity, gas & water Manufacturing Mining Agriculture, forestry & fishing Number of applications made Applications lodged under Part 2-4, by industry 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 8 Getting Parties to the Table: Are MSDs Working? The provisions governing MSDs - ss.236 and 237 of the FW Act An employee bargaining representative may apply to FWC for an MSD where an employer refuses to bargain, and it can be demonstrated that a majority of the relevant employees wishes to bargain collectively If employer refuses to bargain after MSD, bargaining rep may apply for bargaining order A key departure from previous regime The University of Melbourne 9 Jun-12 May-12 Apr-12 Mar-12 Feb-12 Jan-12 Dec-11 Nov-11 Oct-11 Sep-11 Aug-11 Jul-11 Jun-11 May-11 Apr-11 Mar-11 Feb-11 Jan-11 Dec-10 Nov-10 Oct-10 Sep-10 Aug-10 Jul-10 Jun-10 May-10 Apr-10 Mar-10 Feb-10 Jan-10 Dec-09 Nov-09 Oct-09 Sep-09 Aug-09 Jul-09 Number of applciations Applications for majority support determinations, monthly total 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 10 Other services Arts and recreation services Health care and social assistance Education & training Public administration & safety Administrative and support services Professional, scientific and technical services Rental, hiring & real estate services Finanical & insurance services Information media & telecommunications Transport, postal and warehousing Wholesale & retail trade Construction Electricity, gas & water Manufacturing Mining Agriculture, forestry & fishing Number of applications made Applications for majority support determinations, by industry 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 11 Procedural matter Order/determination not made Order/determination made Matter resolved in whole or in part Application adjourned indefinitely Application withdrawn Lodged only Don't know Applications for majority support determinations, by outcome 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 12 Majority Support Determinations – Key Issues FWC has taken a relatively flexible and nonlegalistic approach to the task of determining whether majority support for collective bargaining exists Members of the tribunal have shown initiative in ascertaining the views of employees, where the evidence of majority support presented by an applicant for an MSD is equivocal. In certain circumstances, FWC has suggested the parties agree to a secret ballot The University of Melbourne 13 Assessing the Impact of the MSD Provisions Interview data supports the conclusion that the MSD provisions have been fairly effective in compelling employers to bargain, where a majority of workers wish to Unions have adjusted their approach to MSDs to minimise challenges ‘Shadow effect’ of provisions ‘... just the existence of the MSD [provisions] means that an employer is far more likely to agree to bargaining ...’ The University of Melbourne 14 Assessing the Impact of MSD Provisions (2) Impact confirmed by employer interviewees It was often now only employers very hostile to bargaining who sought to defend applications for MSDs, where there was evidence of majority support: I think it’s conducive to reaching agreement, because it creates an environment where the onus is on the party not wanting to collectively bargain, they have to demonstrate why. And it’s a high hurdle, so it encourages engagement.’ … [M]y experience is that it has to be a really entrenched position of the employer to contest these. They have to be really motivated to want to keep the union out … there was still some concern voiced – from both employers and unions – that the process could be unfairly manipulated The University of Melbourne 15 Who is to be covered by the agreement? Scope Orders Ss 238-239 of FW Act introduced to provide an alternative to industrial action as the principal means of resolving these disputes Main issue in decided cases has been whether the making of an order will promote fair and efficient decision-making A relatively small number of applications: suggests that most parties determine scope without using provisions The University of Melbourne 16 Applications for scope orders, by outcome 60 Number of applciations made 50 40 30 20 10 0 Don't know Lodged only Application withdrawn Application adjourned indefinitely Order made Order not made 17