Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, (2005) 4 : 115-118 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Blood Glucose Monitoring Performance of “Roche Accu-Check Go” Glucometer Device at Moderately High Altitude Habib Bilen* Alpaslan Kılıçaslan** Güngör Akçay* İlyas Çapoğlu* * University of Atatürk,School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Erzurum, Turkey ** University of Hacettepe, School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara, Turkey To evaluate the performance of Roche Accu-check glucometer device compared to reference laboratory measurement in moderately high altitude. Research Design and Methods: Fasting blood glucose measurements were made simultaneously by Accucheck go glucometer device and standard laboratory methods in a group of 204 male and female patients residing in Erzurum, a province in Eastern Turkey with an altitude of 2000 meters. Majority of patients had type 2 diabetes. Results: Average fasting blood glucose levels measured with Accu-check go (101.5; 71-456) were lower compared to reference values (102.5; 69-456), with no statistically significant difference. Also, there were no significant differences between the two methods with regard to measured values below and above the threshold level of 126. The type of diabetes and gender had no effect on measurements. Conclusions: Slightly lower glucose levels observed with Accu-check go at a moderately high altitude of 2000 meters can be explained on the basis of oxidoreductase method used. However, absence of any significant difference suggests that the ability of Accu-check go to detect hypoglycemia at this altitude at an early stage is not compromised. Keywords: Accu-check go, altitude, blood glucose monitoring system Introduction Hypoglycemia is a major complication in the treatment of diabetes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is an important tool both for the improved glucose control and in the prevention of hypoglycemia (1). SMGB allows self-monitoring of blood glucose when used appropriately. However the performance of these devices are affected by a number of factors including altitude, temperature, oxygen saturation of blood, low atmospheric pressure, humidity, and a change in hematocrit value, as well as user-related factors (2-7). In this study, our objective was to evaluate the performance of Roche Accu-check glucometer device compared to reference laboratory measurements in moderately high altitude. The study was Correspondence address: Habib Bilen University of Atatürk,School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Erzurum, Turkey Tel : +90 442 236 12 12 E-mail : [email protected] conducted at the Endocrinology Unit, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey. Erzurum with an altitude of greater than 2000 meters is a popular winter sports center with a long winter season. Research Design and Methods A total of 204 patients between 19 and 71 years of age mostly residing in Erzurum were included in this study. Majority of the patients had type 2 diabetes. Blood sampling for fasting blood glucose measurements was done in the morning hours at the laboratory of Endocrinology Unit by nurses. The room temperature was approximately 20°C. Capillary blood glucose was measured by “Roche Accu-check go (serial no: GJ0492680, Roche, Mannheim, Germany)” glucometer device, which utilizes a photometric measurement technique based on oxidoreductase method. Approximately 1.5 μl of full blood (fresh capillary or venous, Li- or NH4-heparin or EDTA) is required for measurements by Accu-check go, and the reading is available in 5 seconds. A venous blood sample was drawn quickly thereafter for laboratory measurement of plasma glucose with an Olympus AU 2700 115 ORIGINAL ARTICLE analyzer (serial no: 1110268). Barometric pressure and humidity were constant. Performance of the glucometer device was determined by comparison with the standard laboratory methods. Patients with diabetes complication were excluded from the study. Patients who were treated with medications that can affect blood glucose levels (e.g. steroids), patients who had anemia (serum hematocrit <40%) and patients who are receiving medications that influence glucose measurement by glucometer (e.g. aspirin, vitamin C) were also excluded. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee-Institutional Board, and was carried out in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2000. Statistical analysis Wilcoxon pairwise two-sample test was used due to the abnormal distribution of data. Instead of mean, median values (minimum and maximum) were used. Kappa constant was used to assess the concordance between the two measurement methods with regard to the values observed below and above the threshold level of 126. Statistical analysis were performed with SPSS 11.5 and medcalc 6.16. cordance between the two measurements was assessed with kappa constant and the concordance rate was 47%, which is depicted by Bland & Altman plots (Figure 1). As can be seen from the figure, the concordance rate for values below 126 is higher compared to those above it, although chisquare test revealed no statistical difference between the two measurement methods for values below and above 126 (p > 0.05). In Table 2, the relationship between gender and the two measurement methods is shown. There were 124 female and 80 male patients in the study. There were no differences between the two methods in terms of gender (p > 0.05). Majority of the patients had type 2 diabetes (Table 1), and the effect of the type of diabetes on measurements was investigated. Accu-check go and reference measurements did not differ significantly with respect to the type of diabetes (p > 0.05) (Table 3). Results Table 1. Demographic characteristics of patients. AGE Male, y (range) 49.5 (21-71) Female, y (range) 45.0 (19-66) SEX Male, n (%) 80 (39.2) Female, n (%) 124 (60.8) TYPE of DM The mean age was 46 years (19-71 y). Demographic characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The average blood glucose levels measured with Accu-check go and reference laboratory were 101.5 (71-456) and 102.5 (69-456) mg/dl, respectively. The blood glucose values of the overall patient group were divided into two: those below and above 126 mg/dl. The con- Type 1, n (%) 33 (16.2) Type 2, n (%) 171 (83.8) Female Type 1, n (%) 20 (16.1) Type 2, n (%) 104 (83.9) Male Type 1, n (%) 13 (16.3) Type 2, n (%) 67 (83.8) Table 2. Comparison of two methods for different sexes. Gender Male (n=80) Female (n=124) Total (n=204) Measurement method Median (Min-Max) P value 0,801 (ns) Reference 100,0 (75,0-444,0) Accu-check 104,5 (74,0-456,0) Reference 102,5 (71,0-456,0) Accu-check 101,0 (69,0-432,0) Reference 102,5 (69,0-456,0) Accu-check 101,5 (71,0-456,0) ns: not significant, P<0,05 is considered significant 116 0,893 (ns) ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table 3. Comparison of two methods for different diabetes types. DM Type Measurement method Median (Min-Max) P value 0,815 (ns) DM Type 1 (n=33) DM Type 2 (n=171) Total (n=204) Reference 111,0 (83,0-450,0) Accu-check 119,0 (81,0-397,0) Reference 100,0 (71,0-456,0) Accu-check 101,0 (69,0-456,0) Reference 102,5 (69,0-456,0) Accu-check 101,5 (71,0-456,0) 0,889 (ns) ns: not significant, P<0,05 is considered significant the oxidase method at different altitudes and found lower values with increasing altitude (11). 400 300 Refferance - Accu_check +1.96 SD 238,0 200 100 Mean 0 -5,5 -100 -200 -1.96 SD -249,0 -300 -400 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 AVERAGE of Refferance and Accu_check Figure 1. Bland & Altman plot diagram of blood glucose values for two measurement methods (within +/- 1.96 standard deviation) Conclusion In this study, we evaluated the performance of Roche Accu-check go glucometer device at a moderately high altitude and found no significant difference between measurements made with Accu-check go and reference laboratory (p > 0.05). In contrast with a previous study, Accu-check go values were lower compared to laboratory values (8). However in that study, the effect of altitude was not assessed. Capillary blood glucose measurement devices (BGMs) have been shown to produce lower values under laboratory conditions with constant humidity and temperature simulating altitudes greater than 2000 meters (4), in very high altitudes (9) and in hypobaric chamber where different partial oxygen and atmospheric pressures are created (10). Also, in intensive care patients, glucometers based on oxidase method have been reported to produce lower glucose values (3). Moore et al. evaluated In this study, although slightly lower glucose values were observed with Accu-check go, the difference was not significant. Since Accu-check go is based on an oxidoreductase method, lower values can be explained on the basis of decreased partial oxygen pressure at moderately high altitudes, though the difference was negligible. We also evaluated whether Accu-check go measurements differ for values below and above a threshold level of 126 mg/dl. In contrast to the previous study in which blood glucose levels were measured in different groups (8), we found no significant difference. Factors that can influence the performance of glucometer devices include inadequate exposure to capillary blood drop, timing errors, and user errors (12). In order to minimize the effect of such factors, glucometer measurements were performed by trained personnel. On the other hand, possible effect of other variables such as hematocrit changes, altitude, ambient temperature, humidity, hypotension, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoxia and low atmospheric pressure cannot be ruled out completely. In order to eliminate such confounding factors patients with a hematocrit value below 40, patients with hypotension, and patients who are being treated with medications that can have an impact on glucose measurements were excluded from the study. In the study examining the performance of glucometer device at different temperatures different results were obtained (13,14). In our study the temperature, partial atmospheric pressure and the humidity were constant. However, triglycerides were not measured which might have affected our results, though this is quite unlikely. 117 ORIGINAL ARTICLE In our sub-group analyses performed for some variables such as the type of diabetes and gender, we found no significant effect. Particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes, regular exercise improves insulin sensitivity and helps to restore normal blood glucose levels (15). However, exercise may result in hypoglycemia especially in patients with marginally elevated blood glucose. Self monitoring of blood glucose is also important with this regard. Since Accu-check go tends to result in insignificantly lower values compared to the reference laboratory, we believe that this glucometer device can be reliably used for early detection of hypoglycemia at this altitude. In conclusion, average fasting blood glucose levels measured with Accu-check go were lower compared to reference values, though the difference was not significant. Accu-check go seems to be a reliable option in the early detection and prevention of the adverse consequences of hypoglycemia at moderately high altitudes. The reliability of Accu-check go at moderately high and very high altitudes should be confirmed with further studies. References 1. Molitch ME, Barr J, Callahan PL, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 17: 81-86, 1994. 2. Fink KS, Christensen DB, Ellsworth A. Effect of high altitude on blood glucose meter performance. Diabetes Technol Ther 4: 627-35, 2002. seven blood glucose testing systems at high altitude. Diabetes Educ 15: 444-448, 1989. 5. Walker R. Capillary blood glucose monitoring and its role in diabetes management. Br J Community Nurs 9: 438-40 (abstract), 2004. 6. Devreese K, Leroux-Roels G. Laboratory assessment of five glucose meters designed for self-monitoring of blood glucose concentration. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 31: 829-37, 1993. 7. Bimenya GS, Nzarubara GR, Kiconco J, Sabuni S, Byarugaba W. The accuracy of self monitoring blood glucose meter systems in Kampala Uganda. Afr Health Sci 3:23-32, 2003. 8. Hawkins RC. Evaluation of Roche Accu-Chek Go and Medisense Optium blood glucose meters. Clin Chim Acta 353: 127-131, 2005. 9. Pavan P, Sarto P, Merlo L, Casara D, Ponchia A, Biasin R, Noventa D, Avogaro A. Metabolic and cardiovascular parameters in type 1 diabetes at extreme altitude. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36: 1283-1289, 2004. 10. Piepmeier EH, Hammett-Stabler C, Price ME, Kemper GB, Davis MG. Atmospheric pressure effect on glucose monitoring devices. Diabetes Care 18: 423-24, 1995. 11. Moore K, Vizzard N, Coleman C, McMahon J, Hayes R, Thompson CJ. Extreme altitude mountaineering and Type 1 diabetes; the Diabetes Federation of Ireland Kilimanjaro Expedition. Diabet Med 18: 749-755, 2001. 12. Bergman M, Felig P. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels in diabetes. Principles and practice. Arch Intern Med 144: 2029-34, 1984. 13. Nawawi H, Sazali BS, Kamaruzaman BH, Yazid TN, Jemain AA, Ismail F, Khalid BA. Effect of ambient temperature on analytical and clinical performance of a blood glucose monitoring system: Omnitest Sensor glucose meter Ann Clin Biochem 38: 676-683, 2001. 3. Tang Z, Louie RF, Lee JH, Lee DM, Miller EE, Kost GJ. Oxygen effects on glucose meter measurements with glucose dehydrogenase- and oxidase-based test strips for point-of-care testing. Crit Care Med 29: 1062-70, 2001. 14. King JM, Eigenmann CA, Colagiuri S. Effect of ambient temperature and humidity on performance of blood glucose meters. Diabet Med 12: 337-40, 1995. 4. Giordano N, Trash W, Hollenbaugh L, Dube WP, Hodges C, Swain A, Banion CR, Klingensmith GJ. Performance of 15. Horton ES. Role and management of exercise in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 11: 201-211, 1988. 118