Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
10/12/2014 Urinary Tract Infections: From Simple to Complex Adriane N Irwin, MS, PharmD, BCACP Clinical Assistant Professor – Ambulatory Care October 25, 2014 Learning Objectives • Develop empiric antimicrobial treatment regimens for acute uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) • Develop antimicrobial treatment regimens for UTIs in response to specific culture and susceptibility testing • Assess treatment options for complex patient cases 1 Urinary Tract Infections Introduction • Presence of microorganisms in the urinary tract that cannot be accounted for by contamination • Two types of urinary tract infection • Cystitis: Involves the lower urinary tract (bladder) • Pyelonephritis: Involves the upper urinary tract (kidney) 2 1 10/12/2014 Uncomplicated Complicated - Cystitis - Pyelonephritis - Patient characteristics - Patient characteristics - Women of child bearing age - Men - No structural and/or functional abnormalities - Structural and/or function abnormalities (catheters, obstructions, neurologic deficits, transplant) - Pathogens - Pathogens Primary: Escherichia coli (80%) Other: Enterobacteriaceae (Klebsiella & Proteus species) Primary: Escherichia coli (50%) Other: Enterococcus species, miscellaneous gram negatives (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) 3 Diagnosis Introduction • Symptoms suggestive of cystitis: • Dysuria • Possibly with any of the following: frequency, urgency, suprapubic pain or heaviness, hematuria • Symptoms suggestive of pyelonephritis: • Any indication of upper tract or systemic disease: nausea/vomiting, fever, flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness, fatigue • Dysuria or other classic symptoms of cystitis may not be present 4 Diagnosis Introduction • Patient populations that can present with asymptomatic bacteriuria: • • • • Elderly Children Pregnant women Patients with indwelling catheters 5 2 10/12/2014 Goals of Treatment Introduction 1. Eradicate the invading organism 2. Prevent (and treat) systemic consequences of infection 3. Prevent recurrence 6 Antibiotic Selection Treatment • Choice of agent should be individualized based on: • • • • • • • Allergies Patient compliance history Most likely organism(s) Local susceptibility Cost Availability Provider threshold for failure 7 Terminology Treatment • Empiric therapy: • Treatment prior to a firm diagnosis • Antibiotic treatment given before specific microorganism and susceptibilities are known • Culture driven therapy: • Antibiotic treatment tailored to the microorganism 8 3 10/12/2014 Uncomplicated Cystitis Treatment • Woman with… • Absence of symptoms suggestive of pyelonephritis • Able to take oral medication Empiric Treatment Recommendations nitrofurantoin 100 mg BID x 5 days trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) 160/800 mg BID x 3 days fosfomycin 3 g as a single dose 9 Gu tp a K e t a l . Cl i n In fe ct Di s. 2 0 11 ;5 2:e 1 0 3-2 0 . Empiric Agents: nitrofurantoin TMP/SMX fosfomycin Nitrofurantoin: - Avoid if pyelonephritis is suspected - CrCl < 60 mL/min TMP/SMX: - Avoid if E. coli resistance ≥ 20% or unknown - Use in previous 3 months Fosfomycin: - Avoid if pyelonephritis is suspected - Lower efficacy - Availability (?) 10 Gu tp a K e t a l . Cl i n In fe ct Di s. 2 0 11 ;5 2:e 1 0 3-2 0 . Empiric Agents: nitrofurantoin TMP/SMX fosfomycin Fluoroquinolone: - Resistance prevalence high is some areas Alternate Agents: fluoroquinolone β-lactam 11 β-lactam: - Lower efficacy than other agents so close follow-up recommended - Avoid ampicillin or amoxicillin alone Gu tp a K e t a l . Cl i n In fe ct Di s. 2 0 11 ;5 2:e 1 0 3-2 0 . 4 10/12/2014 Uncomplicated Cystitis Treatment Culture Driven Recommendations TMP/SMX 160/800 mg BID x 3 days nitrofurantoin 100 mg BID x 5 days fosfomycin 3 g single dose ciprofloxacin 250 mg BID x 3 days levofloxacin 250 mg daily x 3 days amoxicillin/clavulanat e 500/125mg BID x 5 – 7 days cefuroxime 500 mg BID x 3-7 days trimethoprim 100 mg BID x 3 – 5 days 12 Complicated Cystitis Treatment • E coli resistance to TMP/SMX < 20% • Preferred: TMP/SMX x 3 days • Alternatives: • nitrofurantoin x 5 days • fluoroquinolone x 3 days (reserved for patients with multiple intolerances) • E coli resistance to TMP/SMX ≥ 20% • nitrofurantoin x 7 days • fluoroquinolone x 5 – 7 days 13 Pyelonephritis Treatment • Both complicated and uncomplicated infections • Important to obtain urine culture with sensitivities Empiric Treatment Recommendations Preferred: fluoroquinolone x 7 days* Alternatives: TMP/SMX or broad spectrum cephalosporin x 14 days Not suitable: nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin * Consider initial dose of parental antibiotic if local E coli resistance to fluoroquinolone is > 10%, patients who require treatment response to avoid hospital admission, or patients with fluoroquinolone use in past 3 months 14 Gu tp a K e t a l . Cl i n In fe ct Di s. 2 0 11 ;5 2:e 1 0 3-2 0 . 5 10/12/2014 Patient Case 1: PT is a 23 year old female with a past medical history of allergic rhinitis. Her only medication is an estrogen containing oral contraceptive and only known drug allergy is a history of rash when she takes “sulfa drugs.” She calls her primary care provider (PCP) today describing recent onset of dysuria and urinary urgency. She denies any fever, chills, or flank pain. Which of the following is the best therapeutic choice for PT ? 1. Nitrofurantoin monohydrate 100 mg BID x 5 days 2. Ciprofloxacin 500 mg BID x 3 days 3. Fosfomycin 3 g packet as a single dose 4. TMP/SMX 1 DS tablet BID x 3 days 15 Patient Case 1: PT’s PCP collects a urine sample for UA and culture and starts her on nitrofurantoin as empiric therapy. Two days later, the culture results are finalized (next slide). Does PT need to be changed to culture driven therapy? 1. Yes 2. No 16 ESCHERICHIA COLI Antibiotic Sensitivity SuscT ype Status Ampicillin Resistant >= 32 Final Cefazolin Resistant >= 64 Final Ceftriaxone Resistant >= 64 Final Ciprofloxacin Resistant >= 4 Final Ertapenem Susceptible <=0.5 Final Gentamicin Resistant >= 16 Final Imipenem Susceptible <=1 Final Nitrofurantoin Susceptible 32 Final Tobramycin Intermediate 8 Final T rimethoprim + Sulfamethoxazole Resistant >=320 Final 17 6 10/12/2014 Patient Case 2: PT is a 78 year old female with a past medical history of allergic hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Her only medications are lisinopril 10 mg and pravastatin 20 mg. She has NKDA. Her annual labs were completed about 1 month ago. At the time, her SCr was 1.2 mg/dL (CrCl 48 mL/min). She calls her PCP today describing recent onset of dysuria and urinary urgency. She denies any fever, chills, or flank pain. Which of the following is the best therapeutic choice for PT ? 1. Nitrofurantoin monohydrate 100 mg BID x 5 days 2. Ciprofloxacin 500 mg BID x 3 days 3. Fosfomycin 3 g packet as a single dose 4. TMP/SMX 1 DS tablet BID x 3 days 18 Patient Case 2: PT’s PCP collects a urine sample for UA and culture and starts her on TMP/SMX as empiric therapy. Two days later, the culture results are finalized (next slide). Does PT need to be changed to culture driven therapy? 1. Yes 2. No 19 ESCHERICHIA COLI Antibiotic Sensitivity SuscT ype Status Ampicillin Resistant >= 32 Final Cefazolin Resistant >= 64 Final Ceftriaxone Resistant >= 64 Final Ciprofloxacin Resistant >= 4 Final Ertapenem Susceptible <=0.5 Final Gentamicin Resistant >= 16 Final Imipenem Susceptible <=1 Final Nitrofurantoin Susceptible 32 Final Tobramycin Intermediate 8 Final T rimethoprim + Sulfamethoxazole Resistant >=320 Final 20 7 10/12/2014 Nitrofurantoin & Reduced Renal Function 21 Introduction Nitrofurantoin & Reduced Renal Function • Current package labeling states that the use of nitrofurantoin is contraindicated in patients with a CrCl < 60 mL/min • Historical perspective: • 1988: Macrodantin product information had a CrCl < 40 mL/min • 2003: Macrobid product information had a CrCl < 60 mL/min • Why? • Concentrations may be insufficient to treat infection • Increased risk of side effects 22 Urinary Excretion Data Nitrofurantoin & Reduced Renal Function CrCl (mL/min) Patients & Dose Outcomes N = ~ 18 100 mg x 1 Max concentration (mg/dL) 10-hr urine collection Schlegel (1967) N = ~ 11 100 mg repeated Lippman (1958) Felts (1971) N=8 50 mg repeated N=6 100 mg x 1 Sachs (1968) < 20 20 – 40 41 – 60 > 60 <5 <5 – < 10 < 5 – 15 < 5 - 15 Amount (mg), 24-hr urine collection < 50 75 – 150 25 – 150 100 250 Mean (range) maxurine concentration (mg/dL) Mean (range) maxurine concentration (mg/dL) “Normal” renal function: 11 (4 – 23) “Azotemia:” 2 (0- 5) “Normal” renal function: 7.4 (0.6 – 10.6) Renal insufficiency: CrCl < 20 mL/min: 0.6 CrCl 20 – 59 mL/min: 1.6 Ta b l e a d a p te d fro m Op l i ng e r M e t al . An n Ph a rm ac o th e r. 20 1 3 ;47 :1 06 -1 1 . 23 Sa c h s J e t a l . Ne w En gl J M e d. 1 9 68 ;2 7 8;1 0 32 -5 . Sc h l e g a l J U e t a .l Ge n i tou ri n Surg . 1 96 7 ;5 9:3 2 -6. L i p p m a n RW e t a l . J Uro l . 1 9 5 8;8 0 :77 -8 1 . Fe l ts J H e t a l . Am J M ed . 1 97 1 ;51 :3 3 1-9 . 8 10/12/2014 Study Limitations Nitrofurantoin & Reduced Renal Function • The number of patients included within each CrCl group is unclear • Information on key parts of the methodology is scarce • Endpoints not consist between studies and may not be consistent with treatment dosing and/or clinical practice • No evaluation of clinical endpoints 24 Clinical Data Nitrofurantoin & Reduced Renal Function • Retrospective chart review of 356 patients treated with nitrofurantoin for suspected UTI between 2004 – 2008 in long-term and acute care hospitals • Impaired renal function was defined as CrCl < 50 mL/min • Primary endpoint: • Clinical cure: Absence of clinical symptoms and no additional antimicrobials within 14 days of nitrofurantoin treatment completion • Microbiologic cure: Repeat negative cultures 25 Ba i n s A e t a l . Ca n Ph a rm J . 2 0 0 9;1 4 2:2 4 8 -2. Clinical Data Nitrofurantoin & Reduced Renal Function • Primary endpoint: • Cure rates were comparable in both groups - - 71% (95% CI 63 – 79) in the renally impaired groups vs 78% (95% CI 73 – 84). • Limitations: • Retrospective nature • Suspected UTI (not microbiologically confirmed) • Relatively moderate renal impairment (average CrCl 40 mL/min, range 15 – 50 mL/min) • Under powered • Selection bias as patients needed to be hospitalized at 14 days 26 Ba i n s A e t a l . Ca n Ph a rm J . 2 0 0 9;1 4 2:2 4 8 -2. 9 10/12/2014 Conclusions Nitrofurantoin & Reduced Renal Function • There is a need for additional research that incorporates clinical outcomes to better assess the use of nitrofurantoin in patients with reduced renal function • Conflict exists between package labeling and the realities of clinic practice including implementation of the IDSA guidelines • Use of nitrofurantoin in patients with in patients with reduced renal function should be evaluated on a case by case basis 27 Patient Case 2: PT’s PCP had started her on TMP/SMX. However, after seeing the results of her urine culture decides to changes her antibiotic therapy. Which of the following is now the best option for PT ? 1. Start nitrofurantoin monohydrate 100 mg BID x 5 days 2. Start ertapenem 1 g IM qday 3. Call the laboratory to see if they have susceptibilities to fosfomycin. 4. All of the above 28 ESCHERICHIA COLI Antibiotic Sensitivity SuscT ype Status Ampicillin Resistant >= 32 Final Cefazolin Resistant >= 64 Final Ceftriaxone Resistant >= 64 Final Ciprofloxacin Resistant >= 4 Final Ertapenem Susceptible <=0.5 Final Gentamicin Resistant Imipenem Nitrofurantoin Tobramycin T rimethoprim + Sulfamethoxazole Finalthe best Which>=of16 the following is now for PT ? Susceptible option <=1 Final 1. Start nitrofurantoin monohydrate 100 Susceptible 32 Final mg BID x 5 days Intermediate 2. 8 Final Start ertapenem 1 g IM qday 3. Call the laboratory toFinal see if they have Resistant >=320 susceptibilities to fosfomycin. 4. All of the above 29 10 10/12/2014 UTIs & ESBL Producing Organisms 30 “…alarmed by the prospect that effective antibiotics may not be available to treat seriously ill patients in the near future.” — Joseph R Dalovisio, MD, IDSA President 31 Introduction ESBL Producing Organisms What is an ESBL? • Extended spectrum β-lactamase(ESBL) • Beta lactamase capable of hydrolyzing… • Pencillins • Cephalosporins • Monobactams (e.g., aztreonam) • Plasmid mediated form of resistance - - > Multiple resistance genes transferred between bacteria 32 11 10/12/2014 Antibiotic Resistance Pattern ESBL Producing Organisms Auer et al (2010) Ena et al (2006) Melzer et al (2007) Source Antibiotic Urine Urine Blood Ampicillin - 0% 0% Ceftazidime - 0% 0% Carbapenem 100% 100% 100% 68.4% Aminoglycoside 78% 79% Ciprofloxacin 22% 43% 8.7% TMP/SMX 27% 48% 15.2% Nitrofurantoin 94% 92% - Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) 33 Clinical Data ESBL Producing Organisms Study Design Subjects Primary Endpoint & Conclusion Burgess (2003) Retrospective cohort study ESBL infections (n = 18) 1˚ endpoint: Clinical cure – Carbapenem: 100% – Pip/tazo + FQ or AG: 56% Endimiani (2004) Retrospective cohort study ESBL 1˚ endpoint: Clinical failure K pneumoniae – Imipenem: 20% (2 of 10) bacteremia – Ciprofloxacin: 71.4% (5 of 7) (n = 17) Paterson (2004) Prospective cohort study ESBL 1˚ endpoint: Mortality K pneumoniae – Carbapenem: 4.8% bacteremia – Non-carbapenem: 27.6% (n = 71) 34 Conclusions ESBL Producing Organisms • Most clinical literature on the treatment of ESBL bacteria involves parental agents in the hospital setting. • Current literature provides little guidance on managing UTIs in the outpatient setting. Selecting therapy requires assessment of infection severity, patient characteristics, and patient convenience. • Fluoroquinolones, nitrofurantoin, TMP/SMX, and possibly fosfomycin are usually the only oral antibiotics to consider when reviewing an ESBL susceptibility report. 35 Pullukcu H et al. In J AntimicrobAgents. 2007;29:62-5. 12 10/12/2014 Common Questions 36 UTI Recurrences Common Questions • Recurrences generally do not require prolonged therapy and can be treated with standard empiric therapy. • Time to recurrence: • Less than 6 months - - > Choose a different agent • Greater than 6 months - - > May choose same agent 37 UTI Recurrences Common Questions • Recurrences generally do not require prolonged therapy and can be treated with standard empiric therapy. • Time to recurrence: • Less than 6 months - - > Choose a different agent • Greater than 6 months - - > May choose same agent 38 13 10/12/2014 Prophylaxis Common Questions 1. Self initiated therapy at the onset of symptoms 2. Postcoital therapy 3. Continuous low dose prophylaxis ‾ ‾ ‾ ‾ Individuals with > 3 episodes per year Nitrofurantoin 50 mg qday x 6 months TMP/SMX ½ SS tablet qday x 6 months Other agents may be acceptable based on patient characteristics 39 UTIs & Pregnancy Common Questions • Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy translates to an increased risk - - > (1) pyelonephritis and (2) preterm delivery and low birth weight • Optimal agent and duration is unclear. Culture with sensitivities often recommended prior to selection of agent Good β-lactams* Okay T MP/SMX and nitrofurantion (except in women near term) Avoid tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones *Due to resistance, may need to consider broad-spectrum oral cephalosporins such as cefuroxime or cefpodoxime 40 Cefuroxime Susceptibility Common Questions • Most E. coli are susceptible to cefuroxime • Reasonable empiric choice for symptomatic patients and/or pregnant women with bacteriuria • Culture results: • cefazolin (susceptible) - - > cefuroxime (susceptible) • ceftriaxone (susceptible) - - > cefuroxime (likely susceptible) • ceftriaxone (resistant) - - > cefuroxime (resistant) 41 14 10/12/2014 Enterococcus Species Common Questions • Preferred - - > amoxicillin or nitrofurantoin • Alternatives - - -> • linezolid: not renally eliminated • vancomycin: often the only option due to resistance, intolerances, and renal impairment • Not acceptable - - > cephalosporins 42 Urinary Tract Infections: From Simple to Complex Adriane N Irwin, MS, PharmD, BCACP Clinical Assistant Professor – Ambulatory Care October 25, 2014 15