Download Genetic Therapy - Cedarville University

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Genetic Therapy
Definitions
ƒ Somatic cell gene therapy: alteration of
genes of a diseased individual, often only in
a target organ or tissue.
ƒ Germ-line gene therapy: alteration of germline cells of an individual, so that
subsequent generations also are affected by
the change.
Techniques
ƒ First somatic cell gene therapy procedures:
– Inserted a normal gene into the DNA of cells in order to
compensate for the nonfunctioning defective gene.
– Involves obtaining blood cells from a person afflicted with a genetic
disease and then introducing a normal gene into the defective cell.
– The normal gene is delivered using a domesticated retrovirus that
infects the cell, introducing the properly functioning gene.
– Retroviruses can infect many types of cells, so it is important to
develop gene transfer techniques that allow only retroviruses to
deliver genes to a cell and then remain there.
– Furthermore, the new gene must not get to the wrong place in the
genome of the cell.
– For cystic fibrosis: adenovirus used as vector
– Other studies: new DNA introduced directly into skin cells or tumor
cells
Germ-line gene therapy:
ƒ Technically more difficult and raises more
ethical challenges
ƒ Two main methods:
– Treat a pre-embryo with a serious genetic
defect before implantation in the mother
(involves IVF)
– Treat germ cells of affected adults
Candidate Diseases for Gene
Therapy
ƒ
ƒ
Single gene defects more likely to respond
1993: gene therapy approved for:
–
–
–
–
Severe combined immune deficiency (SCID)
Familial hypercholesterolemia
Cystic fibrosis
Gaucher's disease
ƒ More recently:
– Most protocols aimed toward the treatment of cancer
– A few also targeted toward AIDS
ƒ Future:
–
–
–
–
Parkinson's
Alzheimer's disease
Arthritis
Heart disease
Criteria for selection
– The disease is an incurable, life-threatening disease
– Organ, tissue and cell types affected by the disease have been
identified
– The normal counterpart of the defective gene has been isolated
and cloned
– The normal gene can be introduced into a substantial subfraction of
the cells from the affected tissue
– (or) introduction of the gene into the available target tissue, such as
bone marrow, will somehow alter the disease process in the tissue
affected by the disease
– The gene can be expressed adequately (it will direct the production
of enough normal protein to make a difference)
– Techniques are available to verify the safety of the procedure
Historical Notes on Gene Therapy
ƒ First Attempt
– Performed under questionable circumstances by University of
California at Los Angeles (UCLA)
ƒ Researcher: Dr. Martin Cline
– Without the approval of his UCLA IRB, performed recombinant
DNA transfer into cells of the bone marrow of two patients with
hereditary blood disorders in Italy and Israel
– At the time, Italy did not have IRBs, and Dr. Cline did not disclose
fully details to the Israeli IRB
ƒ Dr. Cline suffered grave consequences
ƒ Forced to resign his department chairmanship at UCLA
and lost some grants
Response to Ethical Crisis:
ƒ Called for ethical review:
–
–
–
National Council of Churches
Synagogue Council of America
United States Catholic Conference
ƒ President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems
in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research
vigorously defended the continuation of rDNA research
ƒ Suggested that the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee
(RAC) to the NIH broaden the scope of its review to include
the ethical and social implications of gene therapy
Results of further research:
ƒ September 14, 1990: researchers at the U.S.
National Institutes of Health
– Performed the first (approved) gene therapy procedure
on four-year old Ashanti DeSilva
– Born with a rare genetic disease: severe combined
immune deficiency (SCID)
– Children with this usually develop overwhelming
infections and rarely survive to adulthood
ƒ Common childhood illnesses like chickenpox life-threatening
ƒ Ashanti led a cloistered existence
Gene therapy procedure:
– Doctors removed white blood cells from the
child's body
– Let the cells grow in the lab and inserted the
missing gene into the cells
– Infused the genetically modified blood cells
back into the patient's bloodstream
– Strengthened Ashanti's immune system:
Results
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Ashanti no longer has recurrent colds
allowed to attend school
immunized against whooping cough
not a cure: the white blood cells treated
genetically only work for a few months, and
the process must be repeated every few
months
Other Protocols
ƒ 1990 – two other protocols
– gene therapy on children like Ashanti DeSilva who
suffer from SCID
– tumor — infiltrating blood cells genetically altered to
deliver tumor necrosis factor to tumor cells
ƒ 1992 – Director of NIH, approved a
compassionate use exemption:
– allowed a critically ill patient to receive gene therapy
– circumvention of the regular approval process proved
very controversial
Gene Therapy Tragedies
ƒ 1999 – death of Jesse Gelsinger, the first
fatality in a gene therapy experiment
ƒ Subsequent investigations revealed that the
deaths of six gene therapy patients
ƒ United States Senate held hearings on this
topic on February 2, 2000
Ethical Arguments - Pro
ƒ Arguments in Favor of Gene Therapy
– Central argument: can be used to treat desperately ill
patients, or to prevent the onset of horrible illnesses.
– Conventional treatment has failed for the candidate
diseases for gene therapy, and for these patients, gene
therapy is the only hope for a future.
– Germ-line gene therapy offers a true cure, and not
simply palliative or symptomatic treatment
– Germ-line gene therapy may be the only effective way
of addressing some genetic diseases
Ethical Arguments - Pro (cont)
– By preventing the transmission of disease
genes, the expense and risk of somatic cell
therapy for multiple generations is avoided
– Medicine should respond to the reproductive
health needs of prospective parents
– The scientific community has a right to free
inquiry, within the bounds of acceptable human
research.
Ethical Arguments - Pro (cont.)
ƒ Solves later moral dilemmas about human
embryos:
ƒ Germ-line gene therapy techniques will undoubtedly
place some embryos at risk
ƒ But once the successful techniques are developed,
"defective" embryos could be repaired.
ƒ Eliminates need for their destruction
Ethical Arguments – Con
ƒ Arguments Against Gene Therapy
– "Slippery slope" argument:
ƒ Is it possible to distinguish between "good" and "bad" uses of
gene modification techniques?
ƒ Should the potential for harmful abuse of the technology keep
us from developing more techniques?
– The difficulty of follow-up
ƒ Patients need to be under surveillance for decades to monitor
long-term effects of the therapy on future generations
– Many gene therapy candidates are children too young to
understand the ramifications of gene therapy treatment.
Ethical Arguments – Con (cont.)
ƒ Conflict of interest problems:
– Individual's reproductive liberties and privacy interests v.
the interests of insurance companies
– Justice and resource allocation:
ƒ In a time of strain on our health care system, can we afford such
expensive therapy?
ƒ Who should receive gene therapy?
ƒ If it is made available only to those who can afford it, "the
distribution of desirable biological traits among different
socioeconomic and ethnic groups would become badly skewed"
Ethical Arguments – Con (cont.)
ƒ Against germ-line gene therapy techniques:
– Involve too much scientific uncertainty and clinical risks, and longterm effects of such therapy are unknown
– Would open the door to attempts at altering human traits not
associated with disease: could exacerbate problems of social
discrimination
– Involves research on early embryos and affects their offspring:
essentially creates generations of unconsenting research subjects
– Very expensive, and will never be cost effective enough to merit
high social priority
– Germ-line gene therapy would violate the rights of subsequent
generations to inherit a genetic endowment that has not been
intentionally modified.