Download Serpiginous Choroiditis: An Update

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Eradication of infectious diseases wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Retinal implant wikipedia , lookup

Management of multiple sclerosis wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
REVIEW
Serpiginous Choroiditis:
An Update
Agrawal Alok (M.S.,Ph.D.)1, Biswas Jyotirmay (MS)2,
Waduthantri Samanthila3
1.Department of Uveitis,Medical Research
Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya,
41 Old College Road,Nungambakkam
Chennai -600006, India
Tel: 91-44-28271616 Ext: 1429, 1302
Fax: 91-44-28254180
Email Id: [email protected]
2.Ocular pathology and Uveitis department
Medical Research Foundation and
Vision Research Foundation,
Sankara Nethralaya,
41 Old College Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai 600006, India
Tel: 91-44-28271616 Ext: 1429, 1302
Fax: 91-44-28254180
3.Singapore National Eye Centre
Clinical research Fellow,
Singapore Eye Research Institute 11,
Third Hospital Avenue Singapore 168751.
Tel : 62277255 Fax: 63224599
G
eographic Helicoid Peripapillary
Choroidopathy (GHPC) is a rare,
usually bilateral, chronic, progressive
and recurrent disease of unknown
aetiology affecting the retinal pigment
epithelium, choriocapillaris and choroid. It
characteristically starts at the juxtapapillary
or peripapillary region and progresses
centrifugally from the disc to involve the
macula area.1,2,3 It is also known as serpiginous
choroiditis because of its peculiar extension
in a serpiginous fashion. The disease has
a relentless destructive course. As the
lesions resolve, retinal pigment epithelial
and choroidal degeneration begin, leading
to fibrous scarring and pigment hyper
or hypoplasia. 1-6 Subretinal neovascular
membrane (SRNVM) formation may occur
after a chronic course.7,8,9,10 On rare occasions,
serpiginous choroiditis may present initially
as lesions involving the macula exclusively.11,12
The word “serpiginous” is an adjective
which means “with a wavy or indented
margin”. The serpiginous choroiditis shows
the similar wavy or amoeboid like lesions
in choroid as a result of inflammation of
unknown aetiology. Jonathan Hutchinson
first described this entity in 1900 in Archives
of Surgery. This clinical entity was first
reported by Junius in 1932 who termed it as
“peripapillary retinochoroiditis”. Thereafter,
this clinical entity has passed through various
nomenclatures by various authors (Table 1).
The term “serpiginous choroidopathy” was
coined by Gass in 1987.
Table 1: Different nomenclatures of Serpiginous choroiditis
by various authors
• Peripapillary choroidalsclerosis by Sorsby, 1939
• Helicoid peripapillary chorioretinal degeneration by Franceschetti, 1962
• Geographic helicoids peripapillary choroidopathy by Schatz,1974
• Geographic choroiditis by Baarsma,1976
• Serpiginous choroidopathy by Gass, 1987
Serpiginous choroiditis is a rare cause of
posterior uveitis, usually less than 5% in most
of the studies from the world13. However, it
has been reported in various studies that the
incidence of serpiginous choroiditis is higher
in India (Table 2).14,15,16,17 The disease affects
healthy, young to middle aged adult with
higher male predominance. Though there is
no familial predisposition, in one study the
clinical entity was found to be associated
with HLA B7. 18
35
REVIEW
Table 2: Reported incidence
rate of serpiginous choroiditis
in various Indian studies 14-17
• Biswas et al (1997)-19%
• Gupta et al (2001)-25.1%
• Rathinam et al (2001)-10.9%
• Das et al (2005)-15.21%
Aetiopathogenesis
The etiology of serpiginous choroiditis
is unknown. Association of various
infective agents has been implicated in
aetiopathogenesis of this clinical entity.
A role of possible viral aetiology has been
suggested by Gass et al19who reported a
case of serpiginous choroiditis following
Herpes zoster. Priya et al 20 reported that
two-thirds of aqueous humor samples from
patients with serpiginous choroiditis in their
study were positive for varicella zoster virus
(VZV) or herpes simplex virus (HSV) using
the polymerase chain reaction. Gupta et al 21
reported seven cases of ocular tuberculosis
who presented with serpiginous choroiditis
and showed considerable improvement
in terms of visual acuity and clinically,
when treated with antitubercular drugs.
Laatifkainen and Erkkila 22 reported nine
patients with serpiginous choroiditis and
all of them had positive tuberculin skin
tests. With advent of newer diagnostic
tests like interferon (IFN- γ) release assaysQuantiFERON TB gold tests, the diagnosis
of tubercular infection has become easier
and more accurate. With the help of this
test, Friederike et al 23 reported that 11 of 21
serpiginous choroiditis patients (52%) were
tested positive in their study, indicating a
tuberculous etiology in this uveitis entity.
There are also reports of an immunemediated mechanism attributable to HLA-B7
and retinal S antigen associations. 18, 24
An elevation of factor VIII-von Willebrand
antigen has been found in a small series of
patients.25
choriocapillaries, retinal pigment epithelium
and photoreceptors. Among them most
affected structures are choriocapillaries,
which appear acellular. The larger choroidal
vessels are generally spared. Lymphocytic
infiltrates are seen near the margins of
the lesions.
Clinical Pictures
Serpiginous choroiditis is a bilateral
condition with asymmetric involvement of
the eyes. The patient typically presents with
unilateral decrease in vision, photopsias,
metamorphopsia, and visual field loss. On
examination, the anterior segment is usually
normal. If present, the vitritis is mild and
most often in the form of pigmented cells
in anterior vitreous. Serpiginous choroiditis
involves the peripapillary region and macula.
Recurrences are common and can occur weeks
to years after the initial event. Depending on
the extent of lesions, serpiginous choroiditis
can be divided in to the following types:
Classic or Peripapillary
Geographic Serpiginous
choroiditis
Classic or Peripapillary Geographic variety
accounts for 80% cases of serpiginous
choroiditis. The lesion begins with ill-defined
patches of grayish or creamy yellow subretinal
infiltrates which starts at the peripapillary
area and progresses towards the periphery
like a serpentine in a centrifugal manner
(Figure 1,2). The overlying retina is secondarily
involved and becomes oedematous. Though
rare, sometimes serous exudative detachment
can occur 27. The active lesions generally
resolve within 6-8 weeks with or without
treatment, ultimately leaving behind areas
of choriocapillaries and retinal pigment
epithelium atrophy. Many a time, the disease
remains asymptomatic until the fovea is
affected. It has been seen that about two
third of patients with serpiginous choroiditis
may present with scars or healed lesions at
the time of initial presentation 28.
Macular Serpiginous
choroiditis
Macular variety, accounts for 5.9% cases
of total serpiginous choroiditis cases. 19
The lesion begins in the macular area and
is characterized by worse visual prognosis
due to foveal involvement and higher risk of
secondary CNVM. This variety of serpiginous
choroiditis often remains under-diagnosed
or misdiagnosed.
Ampiginous Choroiditis
This is a rare variety of serpiginous choroiditis
where the lesions generally occur in
periphery in a multifocal pattern. Ampiginous
Histopathogical
Features 19, 26, 42
The characteristic finding of the lesions in
serpiginous choroiditis are atrophy of the
36
Fig.1: Active peripapillary (classic) serpiginous choriditis
REVIEW
Fig.2a: Ampiginous Choroiditis
Fig.2b: Fundus fluorescien angiography photographs showing better
delineation of lesions
Table 3: Active and Healed Lesions of Serpiginous choroiditis
• Active lesions are slightly ill-defined, gray-white, jigsaw puzzle shaped lesions
at the level of the choriocapillaries and retinal pigment epithelium Active lesions
are commonly located adjacent to atrophic scars.
• Healed lesions are more clearly defined than the active lesions, they subtly elevate
the retina and appear to have substances.
choroiditis was first reported by Lyness and
Bird in 1984, who described a recurrent form
of acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment
epitheliopathy (APMPPE) that resembles
serpiginous choroiditis in its bilateral nature,
fluorescein angiographic features, resultant
pigmentary disturbances and the recurrent
clinical course. 18 The term “Ampiginous
Choroiditis” was coined by Nussenblatt et al.
Compared to the classic variety of
serpiginous choroiditis, there is no significant
difference in anterior segment inflammation,
vitritis in Ampiginous Choroiditis. However
the central foveal involvement is less in
Ampiginous Choroiditis.
Indocyanine Green angiography: ICG is
often more sensitive than FFA in determining
extent and appearance of new subclinical
lesions. Some authors reported that the
lesions which were not apparent on FFA can
be detected with the help of ICG 31,32. Also
ICG shows larger area of hypofluorescence
in active lesions than seen clinically or on
FFA. ICG in serpiginous choroiditis shows
hypofluorescent areas beginning from early
to late phase indicating non perfusion of
the choriocapillaries and often areas of
delayed filling, indicating late perfusion of
the choriocapillaries.
Visual fields & Electrophysiological
Studies: Visual field shows absolute or
relative scotomas corresponding to the
lesions. Electrophysiologic studies are usually
normal.
Differential Diagnosis: Though serpiginous choroiditis is easy to diagnose
from its characteristic lesions and pattern
of involvement, few conditions which affect
choriocapillaries like variety of macular
lesions, that can mimic this variant form of
serpiginous choroiditis. These include agerelated macular degeneration, idiopathic
subretinal neovascularization, idiopathic
central serous retinopathy with exudation,
retinal pigment epithelitis, posterior scleritis,
toxoplasmic retinitis, presumed ocular
histoplasmosis syndrome, tuberculosis,
Ancilliary Tests
Fundus fluorescein angiography: FFA shows
early hyperfluorescence of the active lesions.
The late phase of the study demonstrates
hyperfluorescence of the border of the active
lesion that may extend centrally (Figure 7).
Inactive lesions show early hyperflourescence
and progressive hyperfluorescence with late
staining of the sclera and scar tissue.
37
REVIEW
sarcoidosis, acute multifocal posterior
placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE)
and viral diseases. It is differentiated from
serpiginous choroiditis for similar clinical and
angiographic pictures as their management
differs significantly.
Treatment
Depending on the various proposed theory of
aetiopathogenesis, several treatments have
been tried for serpiginous choroiditis.
Systemic corticosteroids are found to be
effective in controlling the active lesions and
shortening the duration of active diseases 33
but their role in prevention of recurrence
is doubtful. Serpiginous choroiditis has
been reported to recur while tapering and
discontinuation of systemic corticosteroids 34
thereby emphasizing the role of long term
corticosteroids therapy. However in cases
of fovea-threatening lesions, aggressive
rapid control of the inflammation is needed
as it has been reported that the response
of serpiginous choroiditis to oral steroids
occurs after two weeks of treatment 35.
So, high-dose intravenous steroid therapy
(1g intravenous methylprednisolone daily
for three days) is recommended by many
authors for macula-threatening cases of
serpiginous choroiditis35.There are also
reports of intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetate
(IVTA) therapy in serpiginous choroidopathy38.
IVTA was also used in cases where systemic
corticosteroids were contraindicated 36 and
in a case of secondary choroidal neovascular
membrane 37 .It has been observed that
though IVTA injection brings in the required
concentration of the drug without systemic
side effects to the desired tissue level and
likely to be effective in the treatment of acute
lesions, but it is not helpful in preventing
recurrence of the disease 38.
The spectrum of alternative therapies
to systemic corticosteroid treatment
ranges from immunosuppression with
cyclosporine alone or as part of a regimen
with immunosuppressives and most of the
study using these agents showed mixed
result. Christmas et al 34 reported 4 out of 6
patients with serpiginous choroiditis treated
with 2–40 months of immunosuppressive
drugs, such as cyclosporine A, azathioprine,
or mycophenolate mofetil, successfully
38
Fig.3: Fundus photograph with early and late fundus fluorescien angiography photographs of Acute
Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy (APMPPE) which is an important differential diagnosis
of Serpiginous Choroiditis
Fig.4: Healed Serpiginious Choroiditis with gross
retinal pigment epithelium and choriocapillary
atrophy
Fig.5: Macular Serpiginious Choroiditis showing
active margins
Treatment of Serpiginous choroiditis: Key Topics
• Long term oral corticosteroids comprise the mainstay of treatment of active disease.
• In fovea threatening cases of Serpiginous choroiditis, high-dose intravenous steroid
therapy is recommended.
• A combination of immunosuppressives with oral prednisolone can salvage vision in
serpiginous choroiditis.
• Successful resolution did not prevent recurrence of the disease.
• There is need for periodic follow-up and self-examination of central vision by Amsler
chart in this disease.
discontinued their therapy without
recurrences. On the other hand, Akpek et
al 39 reported that 2 out of 4 patients with
serpiginous choroiditis in their study, who
were treated with cyclosporine alone or
combined with azathioprine experienced a
recurrence while on therapy.
A triple-agent immunosuppressive
regimen using cyclosporine (5mg/kg/day
initially) in combination with azathioprine
(1.5mg/kg/day) and prednisone (1mg/kg/day)
was first reported by Hooper and Kaplan in
1991 40. Treatment was tapered 8 weeks after
initiation and discontinued after 6 months,
when no recurrence was encountered.
However, as the medications were weaned,
recurrence of the inflammation developed in
two patients. Munteau et al 29 also reported
satisfying results with this triple-agent
therapy. Although prompt control of the
inflammation on initiation of treatment
was achieved, recurrence of inflammation
after discontinuation of treatment has been
reported in some studies. Also, Biswas et
al 41 reported that there was no significant
change in the rate of regression of lesions in
their study when this regimen was compared
to the treatment with azathioprine or
corticosteroids alone.
There are also reports of use of
Interferon Alpha used in management
of Serpiginous choroiditis. Sobaci et al 42
reported of successfully treating 8 eyes of 5
patients with IFN alpha-2a, but they could
REVIEW
not explain the mechanisms by which IFN
affects the course of Serpiginous choroiditis.
Continued progression of choroiditis
lesions occured in 14% of patients after
initiating antituberculosis treatment in
tubercular serpiginous-like choroiditis.
Increased immunosuppression with
continuation of antituberculosis treatment
resulted in good outcome. 43 Serpiginous
choroidopathy was seen in young patients
and had three distinct presentations that
seemed to affect the choriocapillaris
primarily. Patients appeared to have a
variation of serpiginous choroidopathy,
typical of the Asian-Indian population, that
had some important differences from that
reported in Caucasians.44
Prompt diagnosis and rapid initiation
of treatment of active lesions with
immunosuppression and maintenance of
appropriate immunosuppression for at least
6 months is essential for initial management
and prevention of recurrences in Serpiginous
choroiditis.
References
1. Schatz H, Maumence AE, Patz A. Geographical helicoid peripapillary choroidopathy: Clinical presentation and fluorescein angiographic
findings. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1974;78:747-61. 2. Hamilton AM, Bird AC. Geographical choroidopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 1974;58:784-97. 3. Laatikainen L, Erkkila H. Serpiginous choroidits. Br J Ophthalmol 1974;58:777-83. 4. Chisholm IH, Gass JDM, Hutton WL. The late stage of serpiginous (geographic) chroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol 1976;82:343-51. 5. Weiss, Annesley WH JR, Shields JA, Tomer T, Christopherson K. The clinical course of serpiginous choroidopathy. Am J Ophthalmol
1979;87:133-42. 6. Laatikainen L, Erkkila H. A follow up study on serpiginous choroiditis. Acta Ophthalmol 1981;59:707-12. 7. Jampol LM, Orth D, Daily MJ, Rabb MF. Subretinal neovascularisation with geographic (serpiginous) choroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol
1979;88:683-89. 8. Bluemankranzh MS, Gass JDM, Clarkson JG. Atypical serpiginous choroiditis. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:1773-75. 9. Laatikainen L, Erkkila H. Subretinal and disc neovascularisation in serpiginous choroiditis. Br J Ophthalmol 1982;66:326-31. 10. Wu JS, Lewis H, Fine SL, Grover DA, Green DR. Clinicopathologic findings in a patient with serpiginous choroiditis and treated choroidal
neovasularisation. Retina 1989; 9:292-301. 11. Hardy RA, Schatz H. Macular geographic helicoid choroidopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1237-42. 12. Mansour AM, Jampol LM, Packo KH, Hrismalos NF. Macular serpiginous choroidits. Retina 1988; 8:125-31. 13. Chang JH, Wakefield D: Uveitis: a global perspective. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 10:263–79, 2002
14. Biswas J, Narain S, Das D, et al: Pattern of uveitis in a referral uveitis clinic in India. Int Ophthalmol 20: 223–8, 1996-97
15. Rathinam SR, Namperumalsamy P: Global variation and pattern changes in epidemiology of uveitis Indian Journal of Ophthalmology,
Volume 55, Issue 3,2007
16. Singh R, Gupta V, Gupta A: Pattern of Uveitis in a Referral Eye Clinic in North India. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 52, Issue 2,
2004
17. Das D, Bhattacharjee H, Bhattacharyya P: Pattern of uveitis in North East India: A tertiary eye care center study, Indian Journal of
Ophthalmology, Volume 57, Issue 2, 2009
18. Erkkila H, Laatikainen L, Jokinen E: Immunological studies on serpiginous choroiditis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 219:131–4, 1982
19. Gass JDM: Stereoscopic atlas of macular diseases: diagnosis and treatment, vol 1, St Louis, Mosby, ed 3, pp 136–144, 1987
20. Priya K, Madhavan HN, Reiser BJ et al: Association of herpes viruses in the aqueous humor of patients with serpiginous choroiditis: a
polymerase chain reaction-based study. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 10:253–61, 2002
21. Gupta V, Gupta A, Arora S, etal: Presumed tubercular serpiginous like choroiditis: clinical presentations and management. Ophthalmology
110:1744–9, 2003
22. Laatikainen L, Erkkila ¨ H: Serpiginous choroiditis. Br J Ophthalmol 58:777–83, 1974
23. Friederike M, Matthias D. B, Ute W, Regina M, Alexander D, and Stefan Z: QuantiFERON TB-Gold—A New Test Strengthening Long-Suspected
Tuberculous Involvement in Serpiginous-like Choroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol; 146:761–766. 2008
24. Broekhuyse RM, van Herck M, Pinckers AJ, et al: Immune responsiveness to retinal S-antigen and opsin in serpiginous choroiditis and other
retinal diseases. Doc Ophthalmol 69:83–93, 1988
25. King DG, Grizzard WS, Sever RJ, et al: Serpiginous choroidopathy associated with elevated factor VIII-von Willebrand factor antigen. Retina
10:97–101, 1990
26. Wu JS, Lewis H, Fine SL, et al: Clinicopathologic findings in a patient with serpiginous choroiditis and treated choroidal neovascularization.
Retina 9:292–301, 1989
27. Hoyng C, Tilanus M, Deutman A: Atypical central lesions in serpiginous choroiditis treated with oral prednisone. Graefes Arch Clin Exp
Ophthalmol 236:154–6, 1998
39
REVIEW
28. Laatikainen L, Erkkila ¨ H: A follow-up study on serpiginous choroiditis. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 59:707–18, 1981
29. Munteanu G,Munteanu M, Zolog I: Serpiginous choroiditis clinical study. Oftalmologia 52:72–80, 2001
30. Lyness AL, Bird AC: Recurrences of acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 98:203–7, 1984
31. Squirrell D M ,Bhola R M ,Talbot J F . Indocyanine green angiographic findings in serpiginous choroidopathy: evidence of a widespread
choriocapillaris defect of the peripapillary area and posterior pole. Eye 15:336–8, 2001
32. Van Liefferinge T, Sallet G, De Laey JJ: Indocyanine green angiography in cases of inflammatory chorioretinopathy. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol
257:73–81, 1995
33. Weiss H, Annesley WH, Shields JA, et al: The clinical course of serpiginous choroidopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 87:133– 42, 1979
34. Christmas NJ, Oh KT, Oh DM, et al: Long-term follow-up of patients with serpinginous choroiditis. Retina 22:550–6, 2002
35. Nikos N., Ioannis H., Simina P,Nikos G, Nikos E, Tasos K. Intravenous Pulse Methylprednisolone Therapy for Acute Treatment of Serpiginous
Choroiditis Ocular Immunology & Inflammation,14:1,29 — 33,2005
36. Pathengay A. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in serpiginous choroidopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol.;53:77–79, 2005
37. Navajas EV, Costa RA, Farah ME, Cardillo JA, Bonomo PP. Indocyanine green-mediated photothrombosis combined with intravitreal
triamcinolone for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization in serpiginous choroiditis. Eye,17(5):563–566. 2003
38. Adgüzel, Ufuk, Sar, Ayça, Özmen, Cengiz and Öz, Özay Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Treatment for Serpiginous Choroiditis .Ocular
Immunology & Inflammation,14:6,375 — 378, 2006
39. Akpek EK, Baltatzis S, Yang J, et al: Long-term immunosuppressive treatment of serpiginous choroiditis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 9:
153–67, 2001
40. Hooper PL, Kaplan HJ. Triple agent immunosuppression in serpiginous choroiditis. Ophthalmology, 98:944–951, discussion 951–952, 1991
41. Abrez, H., Biswas, Jyotirmay and Sudharshan, S. Clinical Profile, Treatment, and Visual Outcome of Serpiginous Choroiditis. Ocular
Immunology & Inflammation,15:4,325 — 335,2007
42. Sobac, Güngör, Bayraktar, Zeki and Bayer. Interferon Alpha-2A Treatment for Serpiginous Choroiditis. Ocular Immunology &
Inflammation,13:1,59 — 66. 2005
43. Continuous Progression of Tubercular Serpiginous-like Choroiditis After Initiating Antituberculosis Treatment. AJO, Volume 152, Issue 5 ,
Pages 857-863, Nov 2011
44. Clinical characteristics of serpiginous choroidopathy in North India. AJO, Volume 134, Issue 1 , Pages 47-56, July 2002
About the Authors
Dr Alok Agrawal graduated from India in 2003.After his undergraduate degree he went and did a long-term observership in different
eye hospitals in USA. He received his Postgraduate degree from India in 2008 and PhD in Ophthalmology in 2011.
He did his long term fellowship training in Uveitis in 2008 at Sankara Nethralaya, India and has acquired a wealth of experience in
managing patients with a variety of complex ocular inflammatory diseases after doing another International Clinical Fellowship in
Ocular Immunology & Inflammation Services from Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore in 2010.
His research interests are mainly in Vogt-Koyanagi Harada Disease, Cytomegalovirus infection in the immunocompetent. Dr Alok’s
other passion is in uveitic cataract surgery.
Dr Alok is member of various eye societies and has numerous publications in peer review journals. He is actively involved in research
and has given talks in various conferences globally.
Dr Jyotirmay Biswas is an ophthalmologist who has specialized in uveitis and ophthalmic pathology. He has done MBBS from Medical
College, Calcutta and post graduation in ophthalmology from PGIMER, Chandigarh, fellowship in vitreoretinal surgery from Sankara
Nethralaya. His current area of research is ocular tuberculosis, AIDS and Eales’ disease.
Dr Waduthantri Samanthila has done MBBS from China and did fellowship in uveitis from SNEC,Singapore. She is currently a Clinical
research Fellow in Singapore Eye Research Institute,Singapore.
40