Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
TEACHING WRITINGUSING GRAMMAR TRANSLATION METHOD A STUDY AT FIRST GRADE STUDENT OF SMPN 4 GUNUNGHALU BANDUNG BARAT Prandika David W 08220435 E-mail :[email protected] English Education Study Program Language and Arts Departement STKIP Siliwangi Bandung ABSTRACT The objective of this research entitled ‘’ Teaching Writing Using Grammar Translation method at the first Grade of SMPN 4 Gununghalu ‘’was to find out whether or not Teaching Writing Using Grammar Translation method was effective to improve students’ writing comprehension ability. This research applied posttest only control group design and quantitative method. The population this research 40 of seventh grade student at SMPN 4 GununghaluBandung Barat and the sample was entire population which was devided into two group (control and experiment group). Eachgroup consisted of 20 student. The instrument used in this research was a test. The data of this research were collective by giving posttest to both group. The collected data was analysed using t-test formula. The result of data analysed showed that:mean score of posttest in control group was 5.85 mean score of posttest in experimental group was 6.41. The t-observed was 0.7380 and the table with df 38 andlevel of significance at 0,05 (5%) was0.56. Based on the data analysis above, the was accepted because the t-observed was bigger than the table (0.7380 >0.56). It also mean than Teaching Writing Using Grammar Translation methodwas effective to improve the students’ Writingcomprehension ability. Keyword: teaching, writing, grammar, translation A. Background English still knew as a hard lesson in the seven grade of SMPN 4 GUNGHALU. Until this year students in this class only study using minimum books. Teacher’s creative ability is needed to teach this class. Some simple media can use for every days writing. Because if only use some lessons book the students will not get English lesson goodly. This condition was not good for English education. Story book with a 2 language is friendly and the nearest thing with the students. This media is a simple media that knows every day by students. Almost all students have it in their house. So this media is good media for this class. Story book can helps teacher and students to have teaching and learning process. However, teacher will not need repeating in read English words in front of class. Not only that, the students also not only hear the English words from their teacher but also from other speaker who record his or her voice in the cassette recorder. The words that written by students will add their vocabulary B. THEORITICAL FOUNDATION It be explain about the effectiveness of language teaching, definition of teaching, definition writing, definition teaching Writing, C. REASEARCH METHODOLOGY In this part there will be discussed about research design, research method, research population and sample, research instrument. research data collection, research data analyzing, and research procedure 1. Research Method The main purpose of the research was to find out whether with using Grammar Translation method was effective in teaching writing comprehension This research used quantitative method. Quantitative study is an experiment design has hypothesis trough the use objective instrument and statistical analysis Research Instrument This instrument that were used for gathering the data was posttest \. Experimental and control group was given Teaching Writing Using Grammar Translation method 2. Research Population According to Burns (1995:65),“ population is an entire group of people or object or NO 1 2 Population Research Table 3.1 Population Research CLASS TOTAL NAME STUDENT 7-C 20 7-D 20 40 3. Research Data Collecting In collecting the data, the writer obtained the data from the pre-test and the post-test. The postest gave to experiment group and control group 4. Research Data Analysis For analyzing the data, the research used the formula as follow : The mean To calculate the average score of the pretest and posttest result given the experimental and the control group using the following formula : ∑ = X = refers to the mean of sample ∑X = refers of the total amount of all individual observation of x N = refers to the total number of observation 5. Standar Deviation To calculate the standard deviation of scores of the two group using the formula : ∑( ) SD = SD = Standar Deviation X = the sum of score Xa = the mean of sample N = the number of observation Standard Error To calculate the Standard Error using the formula : S ( Xe – Xc) = + S ( Xe – Xc) = refers to the standard error of deferences between the mean Xe = refers to the mean of the experimental Xc= refers to the mean of the control group Se = refers to the standard deviation the experimental Sc = refers to the standard deviation the control group Ne = refers to the number of the experimental sample Nc = refers to the number of the control group 3 AHMAD IRFAN 8 AHMAD S MUJI 6 AI LINDA 8 AI LISNAWATI 9 ANGGI GIANA 6 ARI FAUZI 7 DEDE YULIANI DIKDIK SAPUTRA 7 GUNAWAN 9 IPIT PATIMAH 7 IRNA SUMARNI JENAL MUTAQIN 10 JOKO SUSILO 5 LILIS KARLINA 8 M.DEDE M M,IDAN IRAWAN MISBAHUL HARON 9 Table 4.1 Posttest Scores of the Experimental Group M.RIFALDI 5 NAME Post-test Table 4.2 Posttest Score of the Control Group ABDUL AZIS AGUNG RAHMAT 7 4 T – Observed To calculate t-observed using the formula : Tabs = ( Hatch and Hossein, ( ) 1982 : 115 ) Tabs = T-observe Xe = refers to the mean of experimental group Xc = refers to the mean of control group S ( Xe-Xc ) = refers to the standard error of different between the mean 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 D. RESEARCH OF PROCCEDURE The research was conductive one week period with three meeting: The treatment student of the experiment group and the control class on June 11 th-13 th,2012 The posttest students of the experimental group on June 14th-16th,2012 The posttest student of the control group on June 18th,2012 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 No 1 2 7 7 6 7 10 148 No NAME Post-test 1 AGUNG AHMAD N 5 2 3 A posttest was carried out the order to gain AI FITRI 5 AI FITRIYANI 7 AIDAH AISYAH NURHASANAH ANGGI AHMAD Z ANGGI DATIATUR R ASEP GUNAWAN 7 7 ̇ = ∑ − ASTRI TRIYANI 7 = CUHAYATI 6 DANDI 5 DEDE YUSUP 5 DIKI PERMANA 6 HANIFAH 4 HASIM ARIPIN IIS RAHMAWATI 2 the data of the student entire behavior, 4 5 6 7 8 9 especially writing ability on the two group. 8 1. Control Group 8 a. To Calculate the mean 8 10 = 11 5.85 12 b. To Calculated Standard deviation 13 14 ∑( SD = 15 16 – . = 8 17 18 19 IQBAL FAUJI 4 KARTIKA SARI DEWI 4 LAILA PURWATI 5 = . = √5.85 20 LITFI √ = 2.41 6 117 c. To calculate Degree of Freedom A. Data Analysis of The Posttest DF = ( N1 = N2 ) – 2 = ( 20 + 20 ) – 2 = 40 – 2 = 38 2. The Experimental Group d. To Calculate Standard Error a. To Calculated the Mean = ∑ S=( = = 6.41 = – . √ = ∑( = )= + = √2.72 + 2.41 20 20 b. To Calculate Standard deviation = − √7.3984 + 5.8081 20 20 = √0.36992 + 0.2901 = √0.813 = 0.075 e. To Calculate T – Observed . = = √7.45 = 2.72 = 0.7380 = ( − − √6.41 −5.85 0.813 c. To calculate Degree of Freedom Base DF = ( N1 = N2 ) – 2 = ( 44 + 44 ) – 2 = 40 – 2 = 38 on the Posttest data analysis of experimental group and control group, the result was as follow: Table 4.3 The Posttest Data Analysis of Experimental and Control Group N X S d ( − )f Experim 2 6. 2. 0.73 3 1.67 0.7 ental 0 41 72 80 8 1 38 0 Control 2 5. 2. 0.73 3 1.67 0.7 0 85 41 80 8 1 38 0 Table 4.4 The Improvement of the Mean Score E C Improv Grou Group ement p Mean 6.41 5.85 0.56 Posttest The Conclusions The T-observed was higher than the T-critical value ( 2.14> 1.67 ) at the significance level at 0.05 with df of 38. The difference was 0.56 the result of the research showed that T-observed was 2.14, the T-critical value at the significance level at 0.05 with the df was 1.671. based on the data above, teaching grammar translation was more effective, it also mean that the alternative hypothesis was accepted and the null hypothesis was rejected. The Suggestions It is good for a teaching to motivate students to read what they want without being worried about producing errors. The teachers are expected to be the facilitators and motivators not to be the decision makers. It is advisable for a teacher to use grammar translation in teaching writing. BIBLIOGRAPHY Hatch and Hossein, (1982 : 115 )To calculate t observed using the formula Smith. (1963) Reading is defined as“ active attempt to understand a writer massage”