* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download the effects of line tripping modes on fatigue life losses of turbine
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Electric machine wikipedia , lookup
Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
Wind turbine wikipedia , lookup
IEEE ICSS2005 International Conference On Systems & Signals THE EFFECTS OF LINE TRIPPING MODES ON FATIGUE LIFE LOSSES OF TURBINE GENERATORS C. H. Lin Abstract-- In this paper, the effects of two types of line tripping mode, i.e. sequential mode and resistor-plug-in mode, on torsional vibrations of turbine generators are studied. And the fatigue life losses are estimated, based on the results of an EPRI and a GE testing reports, by using a verified program developed by the Aberdeen University. It is shown in the results that the losses induced by a three-phase-to-ground fault will be significantly reduced under the sequential tripping mode, yet those by a singlephase-to-ground fault will be increased. As to the resistor-plug-in mode, worse fatigue conditions will be made under all types of fault. generators because electric power will not vary strictly but step by step. In circumstance of clearance of a three-phase-toground fault, the fault type will change from the three-phaseto-ground fault (3P-G) to the double-phase-to-ground fault (2P-G), then to the single-phase-to-ground fault (1P-G), and to the open circuit eventually. 2. Resistor-plug-in mode: This mode is primarily applied to limit the surge voltage induced by circuit breaker switching operations on an EHV line. The resistor is inserted prior to the operation of a circuit breaker, with the resistane of about 200~800 ohms and the period of about 2 cycles. Index Terms-- Power System, Steam Turbine, Trip, Torsional Vibration, Fatigue II. SYSTEM STUDIED I. INTRODUCTION Power system faults may give rise to torsional vibrations on turbine generators [1], leading to excessively stressing on shafts and blades. Since the progress in materials is limited, this problem becomes more and more serious following the development of the large-scale turbine generators. According to the statistics in [2], there were 41 events that might attribute to power system faults among the 144 events recorded by a torsional vibration monitoring. So it receives a lot of attentions for fatigue damages causing by power system faults [3, 4]. Since the line tripping and reclosing would follow faults, it can be inferred that what a significant role they will play on torsional vibrations of turbine generators. In practice, it has been proved that the different line reclosing modes, e.g. high speed reclosing, delayed reclosing and selective reclosing, would induce the different degrees of torsional vibrations on turbine shafts [5-7]. However, hardly any similar studies have been proposed with respect to line tripping modes. In actual, the line tripping modes are more and more flexible following the progress in electric technologies. So their effect on torsional vibrations of turbine generators will become more and more significant. Thus, it is studied in this paper the effects of following two types of line tripping modes, so as to make up the deficiency of previous works. 1. Sequential tripping mode: Under such a type of tripping, the faulty lines are tripped phase by phase with one cycle of interval. It is good from the viewpoint of impacts to turbine C. H. Lin is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Kao Yuan Institute of Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C. (e-mail: [email protected]) 2.1 Electric System The system studied has been simplified to a singlemachine-to-infinite-bus system. A 4-poles/60Hz/951MW generator, driven by a steam turbine unit, supplies power to the infinite bus via a step-up transformer (with rating of 1057MVA/345kV) and two parallelled transmission lines. An IEEE TYPE-1 AVR regulates the generator terminal voltage. The entire system is modeled using the Matlab/Simulink and Power System Block-set, with parameters listing in Table 1. Rs Ll Lmd Lmq Rf RT Table 1 System Parameters Generator (pu) AVR 0.00359 Llfd 0.168 Tr 0.001 Kf 0.046 0.19 Rkd 0.0257 Ka 50 Tf 0.578 1.574 Lkd 0.11 Ta 0.02 Efmax 1.0 1.49 Rkq 0.0257 Ke -0.029 Efmin -0.95 0.0007 Lkq 0.49 Te 0.1169 Kp 0 Transformer (pu) Transmission line (pu) 0.00192 XT 0.14304 RL 0.0073 XL 0.1088 2.2 Mechanical system The steam turbine unit, including a high-pressure stage (HP) and two low-pressure stages (LP1, LP2) steam turbines, is a close-coupled and cross-compound reheat unit that operates at a rotational speed of 1800 rpm. Each of the LP-turbines had F and R spindles, using a shrunk-on rotor with eleven stages in each spindle, including rotary and stationary blade stages. There are eleven rows of blades, twisted in structure and with a serrated type of root, in the LP-turbine. The first nine rows of blades sheathed the disc with shrouds. The last two rows of blades were freestanding structure in which the rotational diameter of the longest blades was 4531 mm. It is very difficult to characterize such a complex turbine generator structure, yet it was generally acceptable for using ~1~ IEEE ICSS2005 International Conference On Systems & Signals the lumped mass-damping-spring model on the studies of torsional vibrations. By modeling with such a type of model, the parameters are listed in Table 2. Torque distribution HP 31 LP1F 14.45 LP1R 14.45 LP2F 14.45 LP2R 14.45 GEN - REC - EXC - B1F 2.8 B1R 2.8 B2F 2.8 B2R 2.8 Table 2 Parameters of the Mechanical Model Inertia constant Damping coefficient Stiffness coefficient (MW-s/MVA) (MW-s/MVA-rad) (MW/MVA-rad) HHP 0.1787 DH 0.00180 KH1 144.15 HLP1F 0.6462 D1F 0.00023 K1FR 1595.0 HLP1R 0.6410 D1R 0.00021 K12 206.0 HLP2F 0.6499 D2F 0.00021 K2FR 1584.9 HLP2R 0.6602 D2R 0.00021 K2G 325.28 HGEN 1.1616 DG 0.00012 KGR 117.16 HREC 0.00344 DR 0.00000 KRE 1.61 HEXC 0.00236 DE 0.00000 - - HB1F 0.0344 DB1F 0.00004 KB1F 36.2 HB1R 0.0344 DB1R 0.00004 KB1R 36.2 HB2F 0.0344 DB2F 0.00004 KB2F 36.2 HB2R 0.0344 DB2R 0.00004 KB2R 36.2 III. FUNDAMENTAL STUDIES 5.00 0.50 3.00 0.30 B2F Torque (pu) LP2R/GEN Torque (pu) 3.1 Frequency domain analysis The frequency characteristics of turbine shafts and blades were evaluated by using the frequency scanning. The excitation signal is applied to the generator rotor terminal, of which the frequency is increased from 0.01Hz to 140Hz with an interval of 0.01Hz. The results show that there are eight peaking responses, of which the frequencies are 19.5Hz, 37.2Hz, 46.2Hz, 49.8Hz, 52.0Hz, 53.2Hz, 112.3Hz and 115.7Hz, respectively. These are the natural modes of the mechanical system. 3.2 Time domain analysis Transient simulations are made to obtain the time behaviors of shafts and blades subjecting to power system faults. Suppose a fault is applied at 0.1 second to one of the transmission lines. The faulty line is tripped by circuit breakers 2.5 cycles later, and is re-closed onto the same fault after 20 cycles. The fault is cleared again without subsequent reclosing. From the simulation results for a three-phase-to-ground fault, it can be seen from the shaft torques that the LP2R/GEN shaft vibrates strictest, and from the blade torques that the B2F blade vibrates strictest. Fig. 1 demonstrates torques of these two sections. 1.00 -1.00 -3.00 -5.00 with the results tabulating in Table 3. IV. COMPARISON OF TORSIONAL VIBRATIONS 4.1 The effects of sequential tripping mode For comparison, transient simulations are made again under the same condition except the faults are cleared with the sequential tripping mode rather than the simultaneous tripping mode. The results about peak-to-peak torques of shafts and blades are listed in Table 4. By comparing Table 4 with Table 3, it can be seen that the peak-to-peak torque of B2F blade is reduced from 0.6143pu to 0.547pu (about 11% of reductions) under the three-phase-to-ground fault, and from 0.4797pu to 0.4564pu (about 4.9% of reductions) under the double-phaseto-ground fault. However, it is increased from 0.3711pu to 0.3818pu (about 2.9% of increase) under the single-phase-toground fault. This phenominen still holds for other blades as well as for shafts. Thus, the effect of the sequential tripping mode is dependent on the fault types. Under the three-phaseto-ground fault, the sequential tripping mode gives rise to soft power variation, leading to less impact to turbine generators. However, there is no longer the effect of soft power variation under the single-phase-to-ground fault, thus leading to adverse results. Table 3 The Peak-to-peak Torques (pu) of Shafts and Blades under Various Faults B1R B2F B2R Fault HP/LP1F LP1R/LP2F LP2R/GEN B1F 3P-G 0.9877 2P-G 0.7447 1P-G 0.5210 0.5 1 Time (sec) 1.5 2 5.7620 4.2175 0.2441 0.2539 0.4797 0.4192 1.6231 2.7575 0.1934 0.2047 0.3711 0.3215 Table 4 The Peak-to-peak Torques (pu) of Shafts and Blades under the Sequential Tripping Mode B1R B2F B2R Fault HP/LP1F LP1R/LP2F LP2R/GEN B1F 3P-G 0.2808 0.2839 0.5470 0.4391 2P-G 0.9820 0.6893 3.7161 2.4035 5.3290 3.9089 0.2189 0.2264 0.4564 0.3710 1P-G 0.5428 1.6431 2.9295 0.2051 0.2132 0.3818 0.3356 Table 5 The Peak-to-peak Torques (pu) of the LP2R/GEN Shaft under the Resistor-plug-in Mode 200Ω 400Ω 600Ω 800Ω Fault 3P-G 9.2 8.8 8.6 2P-G 1P-G 6.9 4.9 6.5 4.2 6.2 4.0 8.5 6.0 3.9 Table 6 The Peak-to-peak Torques (pu) of the B2F Blade under the Resistorplug-in Mode 200Ω 400Ω 600Ω 800Ω Fault 0.10 -0.10 3P-G 0.80 0.79 0.78 -0.30 2P-G 1P-G 0.63 0.45 0.60 0.44 0.59 0.43 -0.50 0 0.3079 0.3158 0.6143 0.5479 3.9275 2.6304 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.77 0.58 0.43 Time (sec) Fig.1 Torques due to the three-phase-to-ground fault For comparison purpose, define the peak-to-peak torque as the difference between the maximal and the minimal torques. The peak-to-peak torques of shafts and blades under various faults then can be evaluated according to transient simulations, 4.2 The effects of resistor-plug-in mode By replacing the sequential tripping mode with the resistorplug-in one, the transient simulations are made again, and the results are compared to those in fundamental studies. In Tables 5 and 6, it depicts the peak-to-peak torques of LP2R/GEN shaft and B2F blade respectively. Since there is an additional ~2~ IEEE ICSS2005 International Conference On Systems & Signals V. ESTIMATION OF FATIGUE LIFE LOSS A verified program developed by the Aberdeen University [8] was used to evaluate the fatigue life loss of steam turbine shafts and blades stressing by torsional vibrations, which is based on the linear damage acumulation by the PalmgrenMiner rule. According to the results of a series of ultrasonic frequency corrosion fatigue tests made by the EPRI for some widely used turbine blade materials under 18 different environments [9], the fatigue behavior of the B2F blade, made by the AISI-403 alloy, is characterized by the stress-life cycle curve shown in Fig. 2(a). Likewise, according to a three-years project conducted by the General Electric Co. which aimed at predicting the fatigue damage of some turbine rotor materials [10], the fatigue behavior of the LP2R/GEN shaft, made by the ASTM A470 alloy, is characterized by the stress-life cycle curve shown in Fig. 2(b). and comparing the fatigue life loss of shafts and blades under different line tripping modes. The safety factor, suming up all of the factors influencing the stress distribution on the shafts and blades, relates the torque to the stress beared by shafts and blades by following formula. [Stress beared]={[torque beared]/[steady-state working torque]}*[stress in relevance to softening point]/[safety factor] In general, the softening point of turbine rotor alloys is at the 105 cycles-to-failure of a stress-life cycle curve [11]. In circumstance of 0.9pu of power generated by the generator, the steady-state working torques of HP/LP1F, LP1R/LP2F and LP2R/GEN shafts will be 0.28pu 、 0.59pu and 0.90pu respectively according to the torque distributions tabulated in Table 2. Likewise, the steady-state bending torque of B2F blade will be 0.0253pu, which results to the shear stress on blade. In addition to that, the inertia would give rise to centrifugal stress on blade, which is 0.0344pu according to model parameters. Thus the steady-state working torque of B2F blade will be 0.0427pu by using the vector operation. Accordingly, the stress-life cycle curves can be transformed to the torque-life cycle curves. Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) demonstrate such curves for the LP2R/GEN shaft and B2F blade respectively under different safety factors. LP2R/GEN Torque (pu) disturbance at the moment of resistor inserting, the vibrations induced on both the two sections are seen to become strict no matter under what types of fault. Furthermore, the vibrations tend to be stricter following the decrease in resistance inserted in. In circumstance of inserting a 200-ohms of resistor, the peak-to-peak torque of LP2R/GEN shaft increases from 3.8pu to 4.9pu (about 30% of increase) under the single-phase-toground fault. As to the one of B2F blade, it increases from 0.54pu to 0.63pu (about 12.5% of increase) under the doublephase-to-ground fault. With such a large amount of increases in peak-to-peak torques, it shows clearly the significance of line tripping with the resistor-plug-in mode. 500 4 sf=1 sf=2 3 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 logarithm of cycles-to-failure 10 A470 (a) 300 200 B2F Torque (pu) stress-MPa 400 100 0 0 2 4 6 8 logarithm of cycles-to-failure 10 (a) 800 stress-MPa sf=1.5 sf=2.5 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 sf=3 sf=4 sf=5 0 600 AISI-403 2 4 6 8 logarithm of cycles-to-failure 10 (b) 400 Fig. 3 The torque-life cycle curves for LP2R/GEN shaft and B2F blade 200 5.1 Fatigue life loss under the sequential tripping mode Since there is a great effect on blade vibrations under the three-phase-to-ground fault, a comparison in fatigue life loss is made under such a condition. The results are listed in Table 7. It can be seen that the reductions in fatigue life loss are tremendous. For example of the B2F blade, the fatigue life loss under simultaneous tripping is about 8 times the one under sequential tripping for safety factor varing from 4.5 to 5.5. As the safety factor decreased to 4.0, fatigue damage will take place under the simultaneous tripping, while only 28% of 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 logarithm of cycles-to-failure (b) Fig.2 The stress-life cycle curves for ASTM A470 and AISI-403 alloys Since the fatigue life characteristics are extremely nonlinear, a concept of safety factor (sf) is used when evaluating ~3~ IEEE ICSS2005 International Conference On Systems & Signals fatigue life losses will be accumulated under the sequential tripping. Thus, the sequential tripping mode is good for preventing turbine damages subjecting to a three-phase-toground fault. Table 7 The Fatigue Life Losses (%) of Blades under the 3P-G Fault B1F B1R sf Normal Sequential Sequential Normal 2 2.5 3.0 3.5 sf 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 Failure 5.415932 0.118155 0.005421 55.533535 0.508502 0.011899 0.000802 Failure 11.690680 0.252637 0.011059 Sequential 28.520653 2.378355 0.260075 0.035105 Normal 25.347399 2.118950 0.231502 0.031524 B2F Normal Failure 18.298645 1.973222 0.269037 74.952873 0.688496 0.015749 0.000802 B2R Sequential 0.143413 0.012626 0.001538 0.000256 REFERENCES [1] Table 8 The Fatigue Life Losses (%) of Shafts under the 1P-G Fault HP/LP1F LP2R/GEN LP1R/LP2F sf Normal 1.15 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.0 2.25 2.5 2.75 3.0 0.062581 0.013483 0.000480 0.000030 0.000002 0.000000 - Resistorplug-in Failure Failure Failure 25.670 1.989 0.208 - Normal 0.001508 0.000094 0.000007 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Resistorplug-in Failure Failure Failure Failure Failure 28.291 5.419 Normal 0.026932 0.002304 0.000273 0.000041 0.000006 0.000001 torsional vibrations and fatigue life losses of turbine shafts and blades are studied. It is anticipated that the results could be useful to safety operations of a steam turbine generator system. Followings are some conclusions summarized. 1. The sequential tripping mode will significantly reduce the fatigue life losses of turbine shafts and blades due to the threephase-to-ground and double-phase-to-ground faults. On the contrary, it will lead to adverse results under the single-phaseto-ground fault. So the fault type is a critical factor. 2. The resistor-plug-in mode will worsen the fatigue condition of turbine shafts and blades. The smaller the resistance is, the more life losses will be. So it seems significant to consider this phenomenon when utilizing such a type of mode for alleviating the surge voltage induced by breaker switchings. Resistorplug-in Failure Failure Failure Failure Failure 19.189 5.2 Fatigue life loss under the resistor-plug-in mode For the line tripping with resistor-plug-in mode, there is a greater effect on the shaft sections under the single-phase-toground fault, thus a comparison in fatigue life loss is made under such a condition. Table 8 listed the results for inserting a 200-ohms of resistor. It can be seen that the effect is so great that the LP2R/GEN shaft with sf=2.75 would be damaged under the tripping with resistor-plug-in mode, yet it just consumed 0.000006% of life time under the normal tripping mode. Therefore, it would be necessary to assess the adverse effect on turbine fatigue when utilizing the resistor-plug-in tripping mode to alleviate the surge voltage induced by circuit breaker switchings. However, it ought to be pointed out that the results in Table 8 are just for comparison purpose. In practice, a turbine generator would be designed to withstand the strictest three-phase-to-ground fault. It goes without saying that it can withstand the single-phase-to-ground fault. VI. CONCLUSIONS In this paper, the effects of liner tripping modes on C. J. Cudworth and J. R. Smith, Steam turbine generator shaft torque transients: A comparison of simulated and test results, IEE Proc., Pt. C, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 327-334, 1990. [2] T. J. Hammons and J. J. Bremmer, Stressing of turbine-generator-exciter shafts by variable-frequency currents superimposed on DC currents in asynchronous HVDC links and following disturbances at converter stations, IEEE Trans., vol. EC-9, no.3, pp. 503-513, 1994. [3] R. D. Dunlop, S. H. Horowitz, A. C. Parikh, M. C. Jackson and S. D. Umans, Turbine-generator shaft torques and fatigue -Part II: Impact of system disturbances and high speed reclosure, IEEE Trans., vol. PAS-98, no. 6, pp. 2308-2328, 1979. [4] Ta-Peng Tsao and Chi-Hshiung Lin, Long term effect of power system unbalance on the corrosion fatigue life expenditure of low pressure turbine blades, IEE Proceeding- Science, Measurement and Technology, Vol. 147, No. 5, pp. 229-236, September 2000. [5] A. Abolins, D. Lambrecht, J. S. Joyce, and L. T. Rosenberg, Effect of clearing short circuits and automatic reclosing on torsional stress and life expenditure of turbine-generator shafts, IEEE Trans., vol. PAS-95, no. 1, pp. 14-25, January/February 1976. [6] J. S. Joyce, T. Kulig, and D. Lambrecht, The Impact of High-Speed Reclosure of Single and Multi-Phase System Faults on TurbineGenerator Shaft Torsional Fatigue, IEEE Trans., vol. PAS-99, no. 1, pp. 279-291, January/February 1980. [7] A. M. El-Serafi, and S. O. Faried, Effect of sequential reclosure of multi-phase system faults on turbine-generator shaft torsional torques, IEEE Trans., vol. PWRS-6, no. 4, pp. 1380-1388, November 1991. [8] C. Chyn, R. C. Wu, T. P. Tsao, Torsional fatigue of turbine-generator shafts owing to network faults, IEE Proceedings- Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol, 143, no. 5, pp. 479-486, 1996.. [9] O. Jonas, Characterization of steam turbine environment and selection of test environments (EPRI, Workshop on Corrosion Fatigue of Steam Turbine Blade Materials, Palo Alto, CA, September 1981). [10] R. A. Williams, S. L. Adams, R. J. Placek, O. Klufas, D. C. Gonyea and D.K. Sharma, A methodology for predicting torsional fatigue crack initiation in large turbine-generator shafts, IEEE Trans., vol. EC-1, no. 3, pp. 80-86, 1986. [11] M. C. Jackson, S. D. Umans, R. D. Dunlop, S. H. Horowitz, and A. C. Parikh, Turbine-generator shaft torques and fatigue -Part I: Simulation methods and fatigue analysis, IEEE Trans., vol. PAS-98, no. 6, pp. 2299-2307, 1979. ~4~