* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Local Bubble
Survey
Document related concepts
Microplasma wikipedia , lookup
Planetary nebula wikipedia , lookup
Metastable inner-shell molecular state wikipedia , lookup
Stellar evolution wikipedia , lookup
Outer space wikipedia , lookup
History of X-ray astronomy wikipedia , lookup
X-ray astronomy detector wikipedia , lookup
X-ray astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Advanced Composition Explorer wikipedia , lookup
Standard solar model wikipedia , lookup
Heliosphere wikipedia , lookup
Astrophysical X-ray source wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
The Local Bubble Michael M. Schulreich Zentrum für Astronomie und Astrophysik Technische Universität Berlin Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells 10/11/2014 Title image: Volume rendering of the simulated density distribution connected to the Local and Loop I superbubble (background ISM was assumed to be homogeneous) The Local Bubble and its Origin The discovery of the Local Bubble 1968) • Color excess measurements (Fitzgerald Cavity of thin hot gas in - the local interstellar Hole in interstellar dust around themedium Sun Extension in Galactic plane: ~ 50 Extensions: × 100pc 200 pc in the Sounding rocket flights in the 1980s (e.g. Univ. of Galactic Plane Wisconsin Survey; Mc Cammon & Sanders 6001990); pc perpendicular mapped diffuse soft X-ray (SXR) emission from a large Produced by 14 - 20 fraction of the sky supernova explosions starting ⇠14 Myr ago bands - No strong intensity variations of ultra-SXR (Fuchs et al. 2006) (E ≤ 0.3keV) on large angular scales (Bloch et al. 1986) Subgroups Upper Lupus ➔ SXR emitting plasma must contained in Centaurus cavity (UCL) and Lower Centaurus Crux Lyman α absorption measurements in the spectra of nearby hot stars (LCC) of the Scorpius Centaurus Association - HI deficient in the local ISM - • • Jenny Feige, DPG 2014 Detecting SN Dust on the Earth’s Sea Floor with AMS 7 / 12 Anti-correlation ➔ „displacement model“ (Sanders et al. 1977; Snowden et al. 1991) • • Solar system resides in a cavity filled with hot plasma that locally displaces HI gas as far as 100pc Actual SXR emitting volume has even greater extent toward the Galactic poles since observed photon flux increased from plane to pole by a factor of 2 to 3 Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 The discovery of the Local Bubble Further constraints for the Local Bubble‘s (LB) dimensions ... (l=90) (y) (pc) 200 NGP (z) (pc) NGP (z) 200 200 (pc) 100 100 100 GC (l=0) (x) GC (l=0) (x) (l=90) (y) -200 (pc) -100 0 0 0 0 100 -200 200 -100 0 100 -200 200 -100 0 100 200(pc) (pc) -100 -100 -100 -200 -200 -200 (c) (b) (a) Sfeir et al. (1999) ... from observing equivalent width of NaI lines toward hundreds of stars with known Hipparcos parallaxes (Sfeir et al. 1999, Lallement et al. 2003): • Bubble is asymmetrically shaped and tilted about • • 20° to the direction of the Galactic poles Radius varies between ~60 and 250 pc within the Galactic plane Generally elongated in vertical direction; possibly open-ended toward Galactic north pole (chimney?; Welsh et al. 1999) ... from shadowing experiments based on ROSAT data: • Dense absorber (molecular cloud) at known distance • • allows to separate foreground from background emission Determination of emission measure and thus electron density in the foreground Derivation of bubble extension in different directions (assuming homogeneous density and temperature in bubble interior; Snowden et al. 1998) Cavity and LB are not the same in all directions ➔ LB might contain some warm rather than hot gas, and/or is inhomogeneous Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 The discovery of the Local Bubble L. Puspitarini et al.: Local ISM 3D distribution and soft X-ray background recycling under the action of higher stellar winds and supernova (SN) More extended and resolved maps of the local ISM explosions that inflate hot MK bubbles within dense clouds. (Lallement etmodels al. 2014) Hydrodynamical of the multi-phase ISM evolution under the action of stellar winds and supernova remnants (SNRs, inverting ~23,000 redding measurements toward e.g., Created de Avillez from & Breitschwerdt 2009) demonstrate how high density and temperature nearby stars contrasts are maintained as shells are cooling and condense over the following thousand to million years, giving birth to new of stars. Clouds engulfed by expanding length (structures smaller Limited number target stars ➔ smoothing hot gas evaporate. However, depending on their sizes and densithanmay 15survive pc are mapped atcavities. their actual sizes) ties they up not to Myrs in the hot This is the case for the LB: as a matter of fact, beside hot gas, cooler clouds Black line:areROSAT unabsorbed 0.25keV surface brightness (∼5−10 pc wide) also present inside the bubble, including a group of very tenuous within 10−20 parsecs from the (Snowden et al.clouds 1998) Sun, the Local Fluff. 6 Hot gas line: (T ∼ 10averaged K) emits soft X-rays and heliospheric produces a back- contribution to the signal Blue estimated ground that has been well observed during the ROSAT survey (Puspitarini al. 2014) (Snowden et al. 1995,et1997). The 106 K gas is primarily traced in the 0.25 keV band, while hotter areas appear as distinct enhancements in the 0.75 keV maps, whose sources are supernova remnants, young stellar bubbles or super-bubbles (Snowden et al. 1998). In the softer bands a fraction of the X-ray emission is generated in the Galactic halo, and there is also an extragalactic Fig. 1. Differential color excess in the Galactic plane, derived by inverLong standing debate: contribution. sion of LOS data (map taken from Lallement et al. 2014). The Sun With the assumption that the Local Bubble and other nearby is at (0,0) and the Galactic center direction is to the right. Cavities (in Is the SXR background duearetofilled thewith LBhotatgas. all,A or due to ISM are filled with hot gas, then in principle cavities in the red) are potential SXRB sources if they po-rather lar plot of the unabsorbed (foreground) 0.25between keV diffuse background charge exchange reactions solar windknowledge ions andof the 3D geometry of the ISM may be used to synderived from shadowing (Snowden 1998a) is shown superimposed in thesize SXRB intensity distributions (maps), as well as spectral interstellar intoscaling the heliosphere? black (thick line),neutrals centered on streaming the Sun. The linear of the X-ray information to compare with observations. This can be done by surface brightness, i.e., the ratio between surface brightnesses and par- computing the X-ray emission from all empty (low density) reetconsistent al. (2014) analyzed theof helium secs,Galeazzi is chosen to be with the physical extent the LB. Alsofocossing gions, and cone absorption by any matter between the emitting reshown is the shape of the estimated average heliospheric contribution gion and the Sun. Provided maps and data are precise enough, (abundant of neutral gas ➔ ideal place for probing solar wind‘s to the signal (dashed blue line). This contribution has been arbitrarily it should be possible to derive the pressure of the hot gas as a X-ray efficiency) scaled to makeproduction it more visible and the heliospheric signal should not be function of direction and partly of distance. This is what we illusdirectly compared here with the measured background. trate here, in a simplified manner, using only the X-ray surface Found that both sources are required to produce 0.25This keV brightness. work will be updated and improved as higherflux in Galactic (40% solar wind; 60%resolution hot LB3D gas) maps become available. examples of the potential studies plane based on the combination of 3D Figure 1 shows the large-scale structure of the local ISM as maps and diffuse X-ray emission. ➔ Bold ofquestions the thepreviously LB‘s existence! Image: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center We addressconfirmation in particular the two men- it comes from the inversion of stellar light reddening measurements. About 23 000 color excess measurements based on the tioned: (i) we compare the shapes and sizes of the nearby cavities with the soft X-ray data, in a search for properties of the Strömgren, Geneva and Geneva-Copenhagen photometric syshave been assembled for target stars located at distances Michaelhot Schulreich Localtems Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 nearby gas; (ii) we search a potential source region The for the • • • • • • The origin of the Local Bubble • Product of local SN explosions (e.g. Cox & Smith 2001) • „Smoking gun“ is difficult to find as present LB territory lacks an OB association that might have harbored SN precursors • Berghöfer & Breitschwerdt (2002) searched for a moving group that had passed through solar neighborhood in the past ➔ Pleiades subgroup B1 (its present day stars are members of the Sco Cen association) • Fuchs et al. (2006) scrutinized complete volume (Ø 400 pc) centered at the solar system in the Hipparcos and ARIVEL catalogue • Selected only those 79 B stars that are concentrated in both real and velocity space Fuchs et al. (2006) • Extrapolated trajectories (center of mass) back in space & time • Using initial mass function (IMF) ➔ number of SNe in the past; explosion sites (from trajectories); explosion times (from MS life times; assuming that stars in cluster are born coevally) • Cluster age: put de-reddened cluster stars into CMD; turn-off point from isochrones (Schaller 1992) • Association had entered present LB volume rather off-center 10 to 15 Myr ago • Since then, 14 to 20 SN explosions should have occured (last explosion only ~0.5 Myr ago) • Corresponding energy input into surrounding ISM is consistent with current LB size Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Local Bubble simulations First, provide ,realistic‘ (SN-driven) background ISM for LB evolution calculations • EVAF: 3D parallelized adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) hydrocode [details in de Avillez & Breitschwerdt (2004, 2005)] • Solves full HD/MHD equations on large domain: 1 kpc × 1 kpc × ±10 kpc • Boundary conditions: periodic (four vertical boundary faces); outflow (top & bottom boundary) • Type Ia,b,c/II SNe random + clustered in disk • Background heating due to diffuse UV photon field • Gravitational field by stars + self-gravity • SFR local density/temp.: n > 10 cm-3 / T ≤ 100K ➔ Formation and motion of OB associations (random velocity of stars) • Evolution of computational volume for τ ~ 400 Myr ➔ Sufficiently long to erase memory of initial conditions Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 HD-Evolution of ISM II Avillez & Breitschwerdt, 2010 Results Local Bubble simulations x Collective effect of SNe induces Self-consistently evolved ISM break-out features ...of ISM disk gas ➔ “galactic fountain” (cf. intermediate velGalactic fountain flow due toocity SN-induced break-out of ISM clouds) ➔ reduce disk pressure y ✤ disk gas Density and temperature distribution shows structures on all scales structures on all scales in density and temperature distribution (cf. observation of filaments) ✤ shear flow due to expanding SNRsflow (generate level of SNRs shear due tohigh expanding turbulence ➔ coupling of scales) generate high level of turbulence ➔ coupling of scales cloud formation by shock compressed layers ➔ clouds are ✤ Cloud formation by shock comprestransient features ➔ generation of new stars sed layers ➔ clouds are transient features ➔ generation large amount of gas in thermally unstable phases of new stars ✤ large amount of gas in thermally volume filling factor of HIM ~20% unstable phases HIM ~ 20% no pressure equilibrium! ✤ volume filling de factor Avillez &of Breitschwerdt (2010) ✤ no pressure equilibrium! ✤ • • • • • • • Dieter Breitschwerdt - Workshop on “Magnetic Fields on scales from kpc to km” - Cracow, 18.5.2010 ROSAT PSPC observations (Egger & Aschenbach 1995) Wednesday, June 9, 2010 • SXRs absorbed by nearby neutral shell • Possibly the result of an interaction between the LB shell Loop I superbubble ring and its neighboring SB Loop I (Breitschwerdt et al. 2000) 0 17 LIC • Loop I excited by the Sco Cen association, or one of its distinct subgroups pc Sco-Cen association wall Sun galactic plane HI clouds Local Bubble ➔ Study joint evolution of LB & Loop I Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble shell ring Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Local Bubble simulations D. Breitschwerdt et al. our-coded p in the range for a slice cube e Galactic D LB simulation present time (i.e. he first explosion) tred at (175, p I shifted ht. Bottom: the “future” of p I at ote that part of ged with the ISM, gulfed by Loop I Breitschwerdt 006) Breitschwerdt et al. (2009) • SBs are generated almost coevally cooler (OVI absorbing) and hotter (X-ray emitting) gas co-exist. This is a direct result of the turbulent and inhomogeneous density and temperature structure in realistically evolved structure superbubbles. Turbulent mixing generates gas in the whole thermally unstable regime be• In the beginning: smooth and spherical tween 10 –10 K. While the amount of OVI in the LB has been measured fairly accurately MyrSect. of evolution due to inhomogeneous medium 3), the source of the soft X-ray emission isambient more elusive. First of all, it is more dif• Develop internal structures after ~8(see ficult to localize, as there are most likely no dense clouds inside the LB, which can be used instability for shadowing experiments, thus allowing us to separate back- and foreground emission. • Interacting shells develop Rayleigh-Taylor Secondly, an as yet uncertain amount of soft X-rays will be produced locally by solar wind • Instability becomes non-linear ➔ Formation of Local Cloud and its companion HI clouds (cf. Breitschwerdt et al. 2000) • Two bubbles will merge in ~3 Myr from now, when interaction shell starts to fragment 5 Michael Schulreich 6 The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 The OVI test: Comparison with FUSE and Copernicus data Turbulence inside SBs: cooler (OVI absorbing) and hotter (X-ray emitting) gas can coexist Averaged OVI column density vs. LOS path length for simulated LB/ Loop I (14.3 ≤ t ≤ 14.7 Myr) • Steep decrease after Comparison of FUSE data with simulated minimum, maximum, and averaged OVI column densities (91 LOS between ±45°) last SN in LB (no further heating) • For >100pc: ⟨N(OVI)⟩ > 2 × 1013cm-2 LOS Histograms of the percentage of LOS vs. log N(OVI) in simulated LB at t=14.5 and 14.6Myr • Max[⟨N(OVI)⟩] =1.78 × 1013 cm-2 • Copernicus absorption line data: 1.6 × 1013cm-2 (Shelton & Cox 1994) ➔ Pin down LB age: ~14.5 Myr Michael Schulreich Breitschwerdt et al. (2009) The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Relics of the ,Blast from the Past‘ of a massive star close to the solar system A Crust from the Pacific Ocean Validate LB evolution models ➔ Search for traces of involved SNe on Earth Promising tracer: Radionuclide 60Fe Crust description Produced inside massive stars via successive neutron capture on other Fe Fe-Mn Crust isotopes, both before and during the SN Depth: 4380 m explosion Growthon rate: No in-situ production Earth 2.37 life mm/Myr Comparatively long time (t1/2 = 2.6 Myr) he in nity • will t in o Courtesy of TU Munich Jenny Feige, DPG 2014 A Crust from the Pacific Ocean • A Crust• from the Pacific Ocean Detecting SN Dust on the Earth’s Sea Floor with AMS 3 / 12 Ferromanganes crusts Target Isotope: 60 Fe ~20% Mn and ~15% Fe Crust description t1/2 = 2.6and Myr-plateaus, Crustondescription Found sea-mountains Fe-Mn Crust deep-sea volcanoes and the mid-ocean No in-situ production Crust 4380 m ridges Fe-Mn Depth: on Earth 4380 mrate: from ambient Obtain Depth: elemental composition Growth water Procedure: Growth2.37 rate:mm/Myr Low growth (< 10 mm/Myr) 2.37rate mm/Myr Cutting pieces 60 of Target Isotope: Fe Specific crust 237KD 2 mm 60 Target Isotope: Fe ever One of the biggest Fe-Mn crusts tTime 2.6 Myr 1/2 = information: recovered t1/2 = 2.6 Myr 400000 yrproduction in 1 mm No in-situ Stems from North Equatorial Pacific No 2in-situ production Measurement on Earth Sliced into mm thick pieces with on Earth Accelerator Mass Time information: 400,000 yr in 1 mm Procedure: Spectrometry Measurement with Accelerator Mass Procedure: Spectrometry Cutting pieces of Jenny • • • • • • • • • Cutting pieces of Detecting SN Dust on the Earth’s Sea Floor with AMS 4 / 12 2 mm The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Time information: 2 mm Jenny Feige, DPG 2014 Michael Schulreich 10 New Be Dating ofvs. theMeasurements Crust Analytical Calculation Relics of the ,Blast from the Past‘ The peak shifts from 2.8 - 2.2 Myr An enhanced concentration of 60Fe was measured in 237KD by Knie et al. (2004) and confirmed by Fitoussi et al. (2008) -15 • • = ⇢ = ⌦r , n = 9/2 ⌦ • 44 ‡Ú ‡ ‡ Ú 66 88 tê@MyrD tê@MyrD ‡Ú‡ 10 10 12 12 14 14 Ù The LB and the 60 Fe Anomaly in the Ù Ocean’s Crust 60 Fe Anomaly in the Ù Ocean’s Cru The LBFeige and the(2010) Mü D The density distribution of the interstellar medium shaped by a supernova explosion. 2 2 rsn+5 60 ➔ 60Fe amount deposited on Earth by arriving SN blast waves ➔ Good agreement with crust measurements Michael Schulreich 22 Ú‡ Ê Woosley, Weaver 1995 J. Feige, D. Breitschwerdt, C. Dettbarn Ï B. Fuchs, Rauscher et al. 2002 Ú Limongi, Chieffi 2006 2.0 J. Feige, D. Breitschwerdt, Fuchs, C.Heger Dettbarn 2007 Ù B.Woosley, - Fit Woosley, Heger 2007 - Fit Limongi, Chieffi 2006 1.5 MeanFit (n + 5)(2n + 7) ESN t = 6⇡ ⌦ 60Fe yields taken as a function of the massive stars‘ initial Feige, D. Breitschwerdt, B. Fuchs, C. Dettbarn The LB and the Fe Anomaly in the Ocean’s Crust masses from stellar evolution models 6⇡ 00 ‡ Ù -4 r radius of the expanding SNR evolves as •(n +The 5)(2n + 7) E t SN -16 2.5 9 2 Radius of the expanding ant is calculated with +5 ‡ Ú ¥ 10-16 5. ¥5.10 The Local Bubble Fe Yieldê@10 n= ¥ 10 1. ¥1.10 1.0 60 ⇢ = ⌦r n , Feige (2010) ‡ -15 -15 00 LCC Knie 2004 The computed data (UCL: blue, LCC: red) plotted over the 60 Fe measurements (black points) with an ISM dens The 60 Fe/Fe ratio versus the age of the crust based on the new 10 Be dating. 3 n = 1 atom/cm . Green dots: Confirmation of the peak by Fitoussi et al. 2008. n r expands not in a ogenous ambient medium, nto a medium that has dy been shaped by a ous SN ‡ -15 1.510 ¥ 10-15 1.5 ¥ Analytical studyinto by Feige (2010) Region Supernova Exploding a Low Density Basis: SN model by Kahn (1998) SNR does not expand into homogeneous medium, but into a el developed by Kahn in medium that has already been shaped by previous SN events Ú Ú ¥ 10 2. ¥2.10 FeêFe Link between 60Fe anomaly and formation of the LB? Knie et al. 2004 ‡ et al. UCL Fitoussi 2008 Ë -15 -15 60 peak at 2-3 Myr FeêFe 60Fe • • 2.5 ¥ 2.510 ¥ 10-15 Each layer corresponds to certain age 60 • • • -15 3. ¥3.10 ¥ 10-15 Ù Ê Ù Ú Ù Ê Ú 0.0 10 Ï Ù Ù Ï 0.5 Ú Ê Ú 12 14 Ê Ú Ï Ù Ù Ù Ê Ù Ú 16 Ú 18 Mê@Mü D Ê Ù Ï Ú Ê 20 Ê Ú Ê Ï 22 24 Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 10 New Be Dating ofvs. theMeasurements Crust Analytical Calculation Relics of the ,Blast from the Past‘ The peak shifts from 2.8 - 2.2 Myr An enhanced concentration of 60Fe was measured in 237KD by Knie et al. (2004) and confirmed by Fitoussi et al. (2008) -15 ‡ -15 1.510 ¥ 10-15 1.5 ¥ Feige (2010) ¥ 10 1. ¥1.10 ‡ Ú -16 ¥ 10-16 5. ¥5.10 Model restrictions: • Same explosion center for all SN events • Ambient medium is either homogeneous or with power-law LCC Knie 2004 ‡ -15 -15 00 Ú Ú ¥ 10 2. ¥2.10 FeêFe Link between 60Fe anomaly and formation of the LB? Knie et al. 2004 ‡ et al. UCL Fitoussi 2008 Ë -15 -15 60 peak at 2-3 Myr FeêFe 60Fe • • 2.5 ¥ 2.510 ¥ 10-15 Each layer corresponds to certain age 60 • • • -15 3. ¥3.10 ¥ 10-15 00 22 ‡ Ú‡ 44 ‡Ú ‡ ‡ Ú 66 88 tê@MyrD tê@MyrD ‡Ú‡ 10 10 12 12 14 14 The computed data (UCL: blue, LCC: red) plotted over the 60 Fe measurements (black points) with an ISM dens The 60 Fe/Fe ratio versus the age of the crust based on the new 10 Be dating. 3 n = 1 atom/cm . Green dots: Confirmation of the peak by Fitoussi et al. 2008. • External medium taken to be constant for all but the very Fe Yieldê@10 1.0 60 • Turbulent mixing and mass loading not incorporated Ù Ê Ù Ú Ù 60 Fe Anomaly in the Ù Ocean’s Cru The LBFeige and the(2010) Ù Ï Overcome these shortcomings ➔ Perform 3D high-resolution numerical simulations The Local Bubble Ê Ú 0.0 10 Ú Ê Ú 12 14 Ê Ú Ï Ù Ï Ù Ù 0.5 Michael Schulreich The LB and the 60 Fe Anomaly in the Ù Ocean’s Crust -4 first explosion Ê Woosley, Weaver 1995 J. Feige, D. Breitschwerdt, C. Dettbarn Ï B. Fuchs, Rauscher et al. 2002 Ú Limongi, Chieffi 2006 2.0 J. Feige, D. Breitschwerdt, Fuchs, C.Heger Dettbarn 2007 Ù B.Woosley, - Fit Woosley, Heger 2007 - Fit Limongi, Chieffi 2006 1.5 MeanFit 2.5 Mü D density distribution; pressure must be small compared to pressure in bubble interior Ù Ù Ù Ê Ù Ú 16 Ú 18 Mê@Mü D Ê Ù Ï Ú Ê 20 Ê Ú Ê Ï 22 24 Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 RAMSES: a parallel graded octree AMR hydrodynamics code • Code developed by Teyssier (2002) • Freely available for download online • Tree-based AMR (octree structure): • • Cartesian mesh is recursively refined on cell-by-cell basis Fully threaded: each oct has direct access to neighboring parent cells and children octs ➔ Optimized mesh adaption to complex geometries MPI-based parallel implementation ➔ Space filling curves • Hydro module: Unsplit second-order • • • • Godunov method ➔ Riemann solver with piecewise linear reconstruction (MUSCL-Hancock scheme) MHD module: Constrained transport scheme RHD module: GPU-accelerated (CUDA libraries); grey flux-limited diffusion approximation N body module: Particle-mesh method on AMR grids; efficient Poisson solvers Additional physical modules mainly tailored for cosmological applications Modified and extended RAMSES to recreate previously described ISM setup: Star formation (IMF; collisionless particles represent massive stars) Feedback from stellar winds and SNe Solar wind bubble Self-gravity of the gas & external gravitational field (bulge, disk, halo contribution) Heating & CIE cooling for gas with solar metallicity Stellar trajectories (provided by Ch. Dettbarn, ARI): UCL/LCC (Sco Cen subgroups) - Take errors in Hipparcos data into account - Drop assumption of center of mass motion for all SN precursors - Use Gaussian error distribution for stellar paths • • • • • • Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Evolution of the local interstellar medium over 246 Myr Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Calculating the amount of SN-released 60Fe that arrives on Earth • Spatiotemporal evolution of the concentration of 60Fe (chemical mixing) is treated as advectiondiffusion process of a passive scalar • Includes radioactive decay of 60Fe based on the latest half-life data • Force maximum grid refinement at the center of the computational box (locus of the solar system ➔ allow for accurate 60Fe flux measurements • • As fluxes are given at cell centers: average over eight innermost grid cells Compute time-integrated flux (so-called „fluence“): F = • ⇢|u|Z Amp t From this, calculate surface density of atoms deposited on Earth at time t before present (assuming isotropic fall-out); uptake factor only poorly known; we use U = 0.6% (Knie et al. 2004) ⌃(t) = U F exp( t/⌧1/2 ) 4 • Obtain number density of 60Fe for each crust layer by summing Σ(t) within the corresponding time intervals and dividing it through the thickness of the layer • Finally, relate this density to the one of stable iron (i.e. 60Fe/Fe) using Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Chemical mixing simulations with homogeneous background medium (n = 0.1 cm-3, T = 104K) Movies of SB evolution (Δx = 0.7 pc; cuts through z = 0 and y = 0) Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Chemical mixing simulations with homogeneous background medium Maps of the 60Fe density distribution with SN explosion centers (cuts through y = 0 and z = 0) • No structures that can restrict (or promote) superbubble growth in certain directions • • - LB extent in the Galactic disk exceeds observationally derived values no sufficient elongation in z-direction Overall size and shape of the LB not very important for modelling 60Fe amount that arrives on Earth Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble But, gas-dynamical properties of region between SN explosion centers and locus of the Earth is crucial • determines arrival time of the LB‘s outer shell sets the date for the earliest possible 60Fe signal in terrestrial archives Increased density by order of magnitude (n = 1 cm-3) ➔ Solar system is not reached in the time required Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Chemical mixing simulations with homogeneous background medium Entropy maps, 60Fe fluence, and modeled 60Fe/Fe content in deep sea crust Schulreich & Breitschwerdt (in prep.) Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Chemical mixing simulations with homogeneous background medium Entropy maps, 60Fe fluence, and modelled 60Fe/Fe content in deep sea crust Schulreich & Breitschwerdt (in prep.) Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014 Conclusions • The Local Bubble, a low-density X-ray emitting cavity deficient of HI, is our Galactic habitat • Without it, we would perceive significantly fewer stars on the night sky and hence our knowledge of the cosmos would certainly be less developed. • Decipher its origin and present properties by remodelling its past • Identify the SN precursors / most probable stellar trajectories • Follow the superbubble‘s evolution by means of high-resolution numerical simulations that take into account the turbulent multiphase nature of its environment ➔ reproduce observational features such as size, age, dynamical instabilities in the interaction shell, etc. • We can reproduce the 60Fe anomaly in deep ocean crusts by means of idealized analytical calculations and more realistic chemical mixing simulations using passive scalars • We are committed to a „bottom up“ approach: Add additional physical processes on a step by step basis in order to gain knowledge of their influence and importance (e.g. non-equilibrium ionization ➔ Talk by Dieter Breitschwerdt) Michael Schulreich The Local Bubble Superbubbles, HI holes and Supershells - 10/11/2014