Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Lake Laach region as monitoring test site Ingo Möller October 17-19, 2011 Maria Laach, Germany 2nd CGS Europe Knowledge Sharing Workshop Natural Analogues Acknowledgements Many thanks to Kai Spickenbom Christian Seeger Dave Jones BGR: Eckhard Faber, Martin Krüger, Dietmar Laszinski, Franz May, Jürgen Poggenburg, Nicole Rann, Stefan Schlömer, Christian Wöhrl BGS: Tom Barlow, Patricia Coombs, Kay Green, Bob Lister, Jonathan Pearce, Richard Shaw, Michael Strutt, Julian Trick, Ian Webster, Julie West LUWG (Mainz): Olaf Prawitt NIAH: Volker Böder, Harro Lütjens, Arne Sauer Inst. Geosciences (Univ. Mainz): Frank Sirocko & staff URS: Giorgio Caramanna, Salvatore Lombardi others: Michael Uhlenbruch, Ansgar Hehenkamp, Benedictine Abbey of Maria Laach, SGD Nord (Koblenz) Rationale Deployment of geological CO2 storage implies the capability to detect possible leakage from reservoirs and eventual effects on the environment, especially the biosphere including human health Monitoring as essential system component within the planning, selection, installation and operation of geological CO2 storage sites Monitoring performance must ensure different methodological components: Detection Verification & characterization of spots suspicious to leakage Long-term-Monitoring in case of confirmed releases Only a selected combination of different methods and technologies can fulfill these necessities Regional setting Lake Laach is one of the volcanic centres of the East Eifel volcanic field Located in the uplifting Paleozoic Rhenish Massif which represents the Devonian basement Its eruption at about 12900 yr bp is the only known large explosive eruption in Central Europe during late Quaternary Neighbouring quarternary volcanic centres are at Rieden and Wehr Like at Lake Laach, their eruptions (Rieden: ~430380 ka, Wehr: ~300-150 ka) have formed calderas Other dominant features: cinder cones and related lava flows, ignimbrites & volcanic ash and tuff Precondition: Presence of CO2 Dissolved carbon species and free CO2 reach the surface at many places in the East Eifel volcanic field (and other regions of the Rhenish Massif) Isotope analyses (noble gases and carbon) show a geogenic origin of the CO2 It is linked to the magma source of the volcanic fields which is located in the upper earth mantle, in an area of reduced seismic velocities, known as “Eifel Plume” There, magnesium rich magmas, which are formed by partial melting of peridotite, take up CO2 and release it during ascent in the lower earth crust (due to pressure release and cooling of the magma) In the fractured upper earth crust, CO2 migrates along the margins of basement blocks and faults, where it comes in contact with groundwaters. Water-rock interactions consume some of the CO2 (transformation into dissolved bicarbonates and solid carbonates) Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes Dry mofettes Carbonic and other mineral springs Environmental leakage indicators CO2-influenced life communities Deep CO2 „reservoirs“ & industrial analogues Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes 10m Surface survey Large-area sidescan sonar survey Underwater ROV survey Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes Long-term gas flux monitoring experiment Lake Laach 2011 April 5, 2011 water depth: 7.8 m September 19, 2011 Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes r = 0.3 r = -0.63 r = 0.65 Long-term gas flux monitoring experiment Lake Laach 2011 Gas flow rate (running hourly mean) vs. water temperature, air pressure (not corr.) & wind speed Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes Dry mofettes „Vent 1“ δ13C values CO2 (Vol%) Lake Laach, western side Large-scale perspective Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes Dry mofettes Langer (1988) Small-scale perspective Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes Dry mofettes Carbonic and other mineral springs e.g. cold water geysirs Sketch of the Analogue Inventory „Pferdebrunnen“ CO2 gas : 94.7 – 97.8 Vol-% δ13CCO2 : -4.7 to -3.8 ‰ HCO3: 1010 mg/l pH : 5.78 Conductivity: 1265 µS/cm Oxygen saturation: 0.4 - 2.6 mg/l Redox potential: 35 - 40 mV „Römerbrunnen“ CO2 gas : 89 – 96 Vol-% δ13CCO2 : -4.6 to -5.1 ‰ HCO3: 1820 mg/l pH : 6.39 Conductivity: 2480 µS/cm Oxygen saturation: 5.6 mg/l Redox potential: 35 mV e.g. captured springs Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes Dry mofettes Carbonic and other mineral springs Environmental leakage indicators Wehr Small-scale perspective Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes Dry mofettes Carbonic and other mineral springs Environmental leakage indicators Fe(III)-oxides Stands of Carex sp. in dry, terrestrial habitats Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes Dry mofettes Carbonic and other mineral springs Environmental leakage indicators CO2-influenced life communities Large-scale perspective Sketch of the Analogue Inventory Mofettes Dry mofettes Carbonic and other mineral springs Environmental leakage indicators CO2-influenced life communities Deep CO2 „reservoirs“ & industrial analogues Results of the CCS-related R&D work „onshore“ „offshore“ Example: Stable carbon isotopes from CO2 gas Clear isotopic distinction between deep, inorganic CO2 and shallow, biological CO2 (though atmospheric influence, mixture & fractionation) Normally, CO2 generated from burning fossil fuels have isotopic signature well differentiated from “environmental” C isotope values. However, some CO2 species might have an isotopic signature which is similar to that of shallow biogenic CO2 Results, continued A good number of established and reliable methods and tools exist for the near surface monitoring at CO2 storage sites regarding gas monitoring bio monitoring (micro and makro cosmos) eco monitoring (populations and systems) They represent a huge toolbox for confidence building; confidence in technology with regard to markets and the public (confidence Æ acceptance) Results, continued Development & evaluation of suites of techniques enabling small-scale surveys to detect eventual leakage pathways on a regional level (and to contribute to baselines) a rapid surveying of relatively large areas and the derivation of essential results in short time (and even real time) detailed large-scale verification and characterization procedures for selected study sites the use of local knowledge to target possible sites of gas migration and/or release continuous monitoring and discrete measurements Definition of a flexible multi-level approach for the (near surface) monitoring at CO2 storage sites of different types: Detection Verification Characterization Long-term monitoring Lessons-learnt Reliable techniques exist that can distinguish deep, geogenic CO2 from shallow, biogenic CO2 Leakage, if it occurs, can be quantified by detailed flux measurements Permanent gas monitoring stations are able to observe short-term variations and to differentiate anomalies from the background The detection of CO2 gas is able to resolve even low levels Once detected, the quantification accuracy is still orders of magnitude higher; less than 0.001 – 0.003 t per year, i.e. less than 5 – 10 g per day Lessons-learnt, continued What we need is: Baseline monitoring (besides monitoring during operation) that reveals natural (e.g. seasonal) variations for relevant objects explains the determining factors of these variations seems to be specific for individual storage sites starts well before the first CO2 injection just to have sufficient time for the interpretation of recorded data Systematical link between (the results of) near surface and subsurface monitoring efforts