Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Deteksi Keamanan Pangan Transgenik Dahrul Syah Agenda Pengantar Substantial Equivalen Beyond Substantial Equivalen Pro – Kontra Pengaturan di Indonesia Teknologi Pangan - IPB 1 Biotech Products in Food Supply 1. Fermentation products – Yeasts and molds used to make cheese, bread, wine, beer, soy sauce 2. Enzymes – Lactase tablets to breakdown lactose in milk - for allergies – Chymosin (rennet) for cheese manufacture – Amylase in beer 3. Hormones Bovine growth hormone (rbst) Vitamin D added milk Insulin 2 4. Whole foods/crops – FLAVR SAVR, Endless Summer tomatoes – Virus – resistant squash – Insect resistant potatoes, corn – Herbicide resistant soybeans, canola 3 Acceptance of Technologies • Public accepts new technologies with personal benefits rInsulin vs rBST Benefits of many bioengineered products unknown or not perceived as personal Platform of “omics” AGRONOMICS PHENOTYPICS GENOMICS PROTEOMICS METABOLOMICS STATISTICS Structure Gene Protein Metabolite Function expression expression expression Data integration Unintended effects? DIFFERENCES COMPONENTS PROTEINS DNA/mRNAs TISSUE PLANT 4 Potential Food Safety Effects • • • • • Toxicants New Substances Nutrients Allergenicity Other Effects - Unintended -- IFT Expert Report on Biotechnology and Foods, 2000 Considerations in Safety Evaluations • Substantial Equivalence – based on comparison of recombinant product with traditional product – Not an absolute guarantee of safety – Process to establish that no NEW hazards have been introduced into the plant or product • Toxins? • Nutrient Effects? Proteins, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins, minerals • Allergens? 5 Equivalency testing Selection of Traditional Counterpart History of “safe use” Genetic characterisation Agronomic characterisation Comparison with Traditional Counterpart Chemical characterisation •nutrients •toxicants •allergens Dietary patterns Kesetaraan Substansial Asam Lemak Allergens ☺ Nutrients: • • • • • Carbohydrates Proteins Lipids Vitamins Minerals Asam Amino Tempe yang dibuat dari kedele import dan kedele lokal 6 Three Levels of Equivalence 1.Equivalent Oil No further testing Oil 2.Equivalence except for predictable, well-defined traits Focused evaluation on limited differences 3.Lack of equivalence, multiple complex differences or no traditional counterpart Rigorous case-by-case safety assessment Kesetaraan; Proksimat 60 Mean Mean 50 50 40 40 % BB % BB 60 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 Air Abu Protein Lemak 0 Air Tempe Kedele Import Abu Protein Lemak Tempe Kedele Lokal Perbedaan signifikan : kadar air Sumber: Syah (2005) 7 Chemical Characterisation Fatty Acid Analysis of Seeds 9 field sites in 1992 50 30 % % 40 20 10 0 C16:0 (palmitic) C18:0 (stearic) C18:1 cis (oleic) C18:2 (linoleic) C18:3 (linolenic) *No significant differences from the control line were observed Sumber: Hugget (2001) % AL/Total AL Komposisi Asam Lemak (% AL/Total AL) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Palm itat Stearat Arakhidat Dodekanoat Tempe Kedele Import Oleat Linoleat Linolenat Tempe Kedele Lokal 8 Chemical Characterisation Amino Acid Analysis of Seeds 9 field sites in 1992 % Dry Weight 3 2 1 tryptophan methionine cysteine arginine lysine histidine tyrosine leucine 0 phenylalanine H Control seeds Literature low RRS seeds Literature high *No significant differences from the control line were observed Sumber: Hugget (2001) Kesetaraan : Komposisi Asam Amino 6 % BB 5 4 3 2 1 0 Asp Glu Ser His Gly Thr Arg Tempe Kedele Import Ala Tyr Met Val Phe Leu Lys Tempe Kedele Lokal 9 Polar Chart Asam Amino (%AA/AA Total) Lys Leu Phe 25 20 15 10 5 0 Glu Ser Spektrum Asam Amino yang identik His Val Gly Met Thr Tyr Ala Tempe Kedele Import Arg Tempe Kedele Lokal Toxicant Analysis of Seeds from Roundup Ready Soybeans 100 9 field sites in 1992 % Dry weight 80 60 40 20 0 Trypsin inhibitor TIU / mg DW Lectin H.U./mg protein extracted Control seeds Literature low RRS seeds Literature high *No significant differences from the control line were observed Sumber: Hugget (2001) 10 Kesetaraan : Tripsin Inhibitor 60000 40000 20000 0 Kedele Tempe Import Lokal Kesetaraan : Asam Fitat 0,28 mg / g TIU / g 80000 0,27 0,26 0,25 Kedele Tempe Import Lokal 11 Kesetaraan : Hemaglutinin Tempe Kedele Import (1681 HU/g) Tempe Kedele Lokal (1648 HU/g) No Changes in Endogenous Allergens Soyabean Sensitive Serum Total Protein Non-sensitive Serum RR1: GTS line 61-67-1 RR2: Parental line A5403 RR3: GTS line 40-3-2 C1: Cargill control 1 C2: Cargill control 2 C3: ADM control 106 kD 80 kD 49.5 kD 32.5 kD 27.5 kD 18.5 kD Control 4 Control 3 Control 2 RR-3 RR-1 RR-2 Control 4 Control 3 Control 2 RR-3 RR-2 RR-1 Control 3 Control 4 RR-3 Control 2 RR-1 RR-2 12 Chemical Characterisation - Summary Component Proximate analysis Amino acids Fatty acids Trypsin inhibitors Lectins Phytoestrogens Urease Stachyose, raffinose Phytate Known allergens Beans Meal Flour Isolate Conc. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Oil = = = = • Based on assessment of over 400 components in 2000 independent analyses J. Nutr. (1996) 126:702-716 • Confirmed with soybeans treated with Roundup herbicide - J. Agri. Food Chem. 1999, 47:4469-4473 • No changes in endogenous soya allergens - J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1996, 96:1008-1010 GM Soybeans vs Traditional Varieties Component Changed Unchanged Nutritional/Toxicant composition Animal feed performance Processing Dietary use Tolerance to glyphosate X One additional protein / gene X Sumber: Hugget (2001) 13 Agenda Pengantar Substantial Equivalen Beyond Substantial Equivalen Pro – Kontra Pengaturan di Indonesia Teknologi Pangan - IPB Keamanan seluruh Komponen; gen sisipan, pembawa dan inang Tomato DNA Fish DNA Tomato cell Fish cell Desired gene Replicated DNA Fish Tomato Denucleated fish egg Tomato-fish Credit: Owen Koo 14 Safety of Genetic Material Inserted Characterization of • Source • Size • Number • Location of insertion • Identification of sequences in the plant Safety of DNA itself is not in question Safety of CTP-EPSPS • No toxicity associated with CTP-EPSPS gene • No toxicity associated with CTP-EPSPS protein - EPSPS family of proteins have a long history of safe consumption - No amino acid sequence homology to known toxins or allergens - No toxicity observed in animal studies - Shows none of the properties of allergens J. Nutrition, 1996, 126:728-740 15 CP4 EPSPS - Toxicity Assessment Mean body weight (g) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Males, pre-test Males, day 7, Females, pre-test Vehicle control 49 mg/kg CP4 EPSPS 363 mg/kg BSA control 154 mg/kg CP4 EPSPS Females, day 7 572 mg/kg CP4 EPSPS Digestion of CP4 EPSPS in vitro Gastric fluid C 0 15 30 60 120 Seconds Intestinal fluid C 0 10 32 100 270 1181 Minutes • CP4 EPSPS does not have the stability characteristics of known food allergens 16 Comparison of CP4 EPSPS to known allergenic proteins Allergen Molecular weight (10-70 kD) High concentration in food Heat stable pH stable Protease stable Glycosylated Sequence homology + + + + + + + CP4 EPSPS + - “no significant concern” Unintended Effects: “… the unintended expression of some unknown or unexpected toxic or antinutrient factor, or the otherwise unintended enhanced production of known toxic constituents.” - (Royal Society, 1998) Evidence of such effects has not been found as result of bioengineering. Effects are less likely in bioengineered than in conventional products. 17 Food Allergens: • All food allergens are proteins: only a small fraction of food proteins cause allergic response. • Common foods with allergenic proteins: peanuts, milk, seafoods • Potential allergenicity of genetic material (proteins) introduced into a plant is an important part of safety assessment. Allergenicity Assessment • Follows a decision-tree process • Includes: – Source of the gene – Sequence homology of newly introduced protein – Reactivity of newly introduced proteins with Immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies from people with known allergies to source material – Other properties, such as digestibility of the protein 18 Metode : Pengujian Alergenitas • Test Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis. - Sensitisasi mencit dengan pemberian ransum tempe selama 2 bulan. - Mencit dianestasi, darahnya diambil, diperoleh serum mencit anti-alergen - Antiserum diinjeksikan secara intradermal dipunggung mencit - Mencit diinjeksi lagi dengan sampel dan evans blue melalui ekor - Sampel menyebabkan alergi jika terlihat area biru pada punggung Allergenitas ; PCA Negatif untuk kedua tempe 19 Allergenitas ; Ig E Hasil (IU/ml) No Perlakuan 1 Standar 2 Ovalbumin (1%) 3 Protein tempe kedelai import (1%) 0 4 Protein tempe kedelai import (3%) 0.2 5 Protein tempe kedelai lokal (1%) 0 6 Protein tempe kedelai lokal (3%) 0 0 0.4 Pro – Kontra (1) Assumption based risk assessment Substantial Equivalence SCIENCE/Evidence based risk assessment Tox Testing 20 Pro – Kontra (2) (Unproved) model testing risk assessment Tox Testing with Protein (from E.coli) Test as consumed risk assessment EVENT-Specific Whole Food Tox testing GM Labelling 21 Pengaturan di Indonesia UU 7 Tahun 1996 dan PP turunannya Pasal dan Ayat Khusus Labelling Pengaturan Komisi Keamanan Hayati dan Keamanan Pangan Komisi Teknis Keamanan Hayati dan Keamanan Pangan Teknologi Pangan - IPB 22