Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
District Energy: America’s Best–Kept Secret for Clean, Affordable, Homegrown Energy Presented by: House of Representatives Briefing 10:00 am to 11:30 am Rayburn House Office Building – 2358B 6 September , 2010 Agenda • District Energy Industry Overview – – Rob Thornton, IDEA • Urban Renewable District Energy Case Example District Energy St. Paul – – Ken Smith, DESP • Thermal Renewable and Energy Efficiency Act (TREEA) – Mark Spurr, IDEA • Why Thermal Energy is an Important Policy Priority – Dr. Neal Elliott, ACEEE • Q&A • • • • • Formed in 1909 – 101 years in 2010 501(c ) 6 industry association 1200+ members in 25 nations 56 % end-user systems; majority in North America; 40 States Most major public & private colleges and universities; urban utilities. District Energy – Community Scale Heating and Cooling • Underground network of • • • pipes “combines” heating and cooling requirements of multiple buildings Creates a “market” for valuable thermal energy Aggregated thermal loads creates scale to apply fuels, technologies not feasible on singlebuilding basis Fuel flexibility improves energy security, local economy Infrastructure for Local Clean Energy Economy • Connects thermal energy sources with users • Urban infrastructure re-investment • Energy dollars re-circulate in local economy • High quality jobs in construction & operation Building Interconnection Air Handling Unit District Cooling Plant Multiple Chillers Ice/CHW Storage 38° F - 44° F 56° F - 60° F Air to Floors Energy Transfer Station 54° F 34° F Condenser Water Piping Cooling Tower Eliminated AVOIDED •Boilers/Chillers •CFC’s •Fuel Combustion •Stacks/Chimney •Fuel Delivery & Storage •Emissions REDUCED •Electrical Vault •Water Use •Chemicals • Mechanical space Impact on End User/Customer •Customer capital costs reduced or amortized over long term service agreement •Reduces size mechanical room; electrical vaults; condenser shafts and roof loads •Colder CHW supply improves HVAC performance •Lower owning, operating and maintenance costs •More leasable space Higher Value Buildings Without District Energy With District Energy District Energy Industry Growth (Million sq ft customer bldg space connected/committed) Aggregate SF reported since 1990 - 495,127,348 SF (Annual average 24.7 Million SF/Yr – North America) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 US District Energy Industry Capacity Systems Reporting Gross SF Customer Building Space Served Heating Capacity (MMBtu/Hr) Cooling Capacity (Tons) Electricity Generation (CHP Mwe) 85 1,898,037,560 49,239,000 1,082,355 950 330 2,489,216,071 82,107,191 1,855,546 2,197 # Downtown Utilities Campus Energy Systems * Based on systems reporting 2005 data to EIA Survey District Energy: Creating Scale for Efficient and Cleaner Energy Solutions • Promotes Energy Efficiency and Conservation • Eases Transition to Alternative Energy Sources – Local fuel supplies (biomass, surplus wood, waste, etc) – Renewable thermal (lake/ocean/river cooling; geothermal) • Enables Use of Surplus Thermal Energy – Heat from power generation stations – Excess industrial heat sources • • • • Increases Energy Security Through Fuel Flexibility Decreases Emissions of Carbon Energy Dollars Re-circulate in Local Economy Improves Air Quality Wasted Energy Is a Huge Challenge and Opportunity Energy Flows in the Global Electricity System Source: IEA, CHP: Evaluating the Benefits of Greater Global Investment (2008). 2/3 of the fuel we use to produce power is wasted -CHP can more than double this efficiency Opportunity: District Energy “District heating and cooling is an integrative technology that can make significant contributions to reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and air pollution and to increasing energy security.” International Energy Agency DHC/CHP Executive Committee District Heating and Cooling: Environmental Technology for the 21st Century IPCC Recommendations “Measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from buildings fall into one of three categories: reducing energy consumption and embodied energy in buildings, switching to low-carbon fuels including a higher share of renewable energy or controlling the emissions of nonCO2 GHG gases.” “Community-scale energy systems also offer significant new opportunities for the use of renewable energy.” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Chapter 6 - Residential and Commercial Buildings International Momentum Summit Declaration (7 June 2007) Power Generation… (See page 25 of 38) 70.1 - adopt instruments and measures to significantly increase the share of combined heat and power (CHP) in the generation of electricity. CHP as a Share of Total National Power Generation Source: IEA, CHP: Evaluating the Benefits of Greater Global Investment (2008). The global average is just 9% European District Energy Policy The Denmark Story: II Source, IEA, CHP/DHC Scorecard: Denmark (2008). Denmark’s cities said “Yes, in my backyard!” District Energy Networks Make Efficient Use of Local Renewable Energy Sources and Surplus Heat Industrial surplus heat Solar, geothermal Biofuels Surplus heat from waste Surplus heat from biorefineries Fossil fuels and heat pumps Combined heat and power The Greater Copenhagen DH system 18 municipalities 4 integrated DH systems 500,000 end – users 34,500 TJ (9,600 GWh, 32,700 GBtu) Approx 20 % heat demand in Denmark Heating Transmission Systems CHP share of DH and Power 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 1980 '85 District Heating Source: Danish Energy Authority '90 '95 Electricity '00 '05 '07 District Heating and RE - Composition of Fuels for District Heating Production 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 1980 Oil '85 Natural Gas Source: Danish Energy Authority '90 Coal '95 '00 Renewable Energy etc. '06 National Energy Account Billion DKK 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 1980 '85 Total '90 Oil Source: Danish Energy Authority Natural Gas '95 '00 Coal Electricity '05 '07 Denmark in Numbers - GDP, CO and Energy Consumption 2 Index 1980 = 100 180 160 140 120 100 80 '80 '82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 GDP in Constant Prices CO2 Emissions, Adjusted (1990-04) Source: Danish Energy Authority '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 Gross Energy Consumption, Adjusted Recent US Policy Initiative • • • • Section 471 in EISA 2007 authorized $3.75 B for district energy ARRA - $1.6 program appropriation in both Senate/House bills Negotiated out at 3:30 am in conference in Feb 09 DOE set $156 M program for CHP; Waste Heat Recovery and District Energy Shovel-Ready Projects • • • • • Attracted 379 private/public projects - $9.2 B total value Public/private committed $5.6B to leverage federal $3.6 B 79 “approved” projects worth $1.6 billion 9 projects funded - $156 Oversubscribed 25:1 DOE Objective - Clean Energy Application Centers CHP at 20% of US Generating Capacity in 2030 CHP Total Electricity Generating Capacity Annual Energy Savings Annual CO2 Reduction Number of Car Equivalents Taken Off Road 2006 85 GW (9% of current capacity) 20 % Target with Robust DOE Program and Policy Changes 2030 Target 240.9 GW (20% of projected capacity 1.9 Quads 5.3 Quads 248 MMT 848 MMT 45 million 154 million CHP in a Global Context – 20% Capacity Goal is Reachable BAU Case (McKinsey & Co). Source: ORNL 2030 Goal: Aggressive Growth in All Markets Large CHP >20 MW Mid CHP 1 MW to 20 MW Small CHP <1 MW Existing Industrial Market • Improved performance • Utilize new fuels and waste streams • Overcome external barriers Fast-Growth Market • Technology for new applications • Packaged systems • Demonstrations to make the business case Emerging Market • New systems and technologies • Smart Grid and ‘green’ consumers • Build distribution network Over 1,600 new systems Over 10,000 new systems Over 50,000 new systems 160 140 82 GW 120 100 80 77.6 GW 60 40 20 0 2008 2030 180 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 60 GW 54 GW Capacity (GW) 160 GW Capacity (GW) Capacity (GW) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 6.2 GW 0 2008 2030 20 GW .4 GW 2008 19 GW 2030 Market sectors include CHP, District Energy, and Waste Energy Recovery applications 35 Seattle Steam – Urban Biomass Seattle Steam – Urban Biomass • Utilizes waste wood, • • • • avoiding landfill Serves approx 200 buildings downtown Reduces CO2 output by 55,000 tons/year Cuts carbon footprint by 50-60% Supports LEED for customers District Energy/CHP in Healthcare Thermal Energy Corp - Houston Thermal Energy Corp – Houston TX • Serves Texas Medical Center • • • (MD Anderson Cancer) – 16M SF, largest healthcare campus in world – since 1973 Just installed 48 MW CHP – 80% efficiency On Aug 23, 2010 Texas grid (ERCOT) set new demand record – 65,000MW; avoided peak price of $2200/MWhr DOE ARRA grant - $10 M of $370 M project Cogeneration & District Cooling – Princeton University > 150 Buildings Academic Research Administrative Residential Athletic Princeton Micro - Grid Management PJM Electric Price Generate/Buy/Mix NYMEX Gas, Biodiesel, Fuel Price Preferred Chiller & Boiler Selections Biodiesel REC’s, CO2 Credits, Current Campus Loads Princeton University Micro Grid Preferred Fuel Selections ICAP & Transmission Warnings Weather Prediction Production Equipment Efficiency & Availability “Business Rules” Operating Display & Historical Trends Live feedback to Micro Grid Management Operator Action Wholesale Market Price vs. Capacity ($ per MWh) Regional Electric Grid ISO Campus Electric Generation Dispatch To Minimize Cost 20 Generation 18 Campus Demand 16 Power Purchase 14 Megawatts . 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 08 Jul 05 08 Jul 05 09 Jul 05 09 Jul 05 10 Jul 05 10 Jul 05 11 Jul 05 Optimal TES Dispatch in Real Time Electric Market CHP/District Cooling Reduces Peak Demand on Local “Smart” Grid Grid demand Princeton Demand Princeton Campus Energy System – Benefit to Local Grid • 2005 campus peak demand on grid 27 MW • 2006 campus peak demand on grid 2 MW • Campus energy system “freed up” 25 MW to local grid • CHP/District cooling reduces peak load on local wires, enhances reliability, avoids brownouts • Benefit to local economy Climate Neutrality at Cornell University Utilities Annual Budget ~ $60 million Enterprise Units •Electric •35 MW peak •240 GWh/yr •Steam •380 klb/h peak •1,200,000 klb/yr •Chilled Water •20,000 tons peak •40,000,000 ton-hrs/yr •Water and Sewer •2.5 trillion BTU’s/yr since 1990 •~275 thousand tons CO2/yr The Future: Climate Action Plan Cornell Lake Source Cooling 16,000 Tons Capacity - $58,000,000 Lake source water: 39-41º F Lake return water : 48-56º F Campus loop supply/return : 45º - 60º F Lake source intake pipe: 10,400 ft long, 250 ft deep Campus S/R loop pipe: 12,000 ft Benefits: • Efficiency - production at 0.1 kW/ton; fully automated (no operators) • CO2 emissions cut 56 million #’s/yr • Reduced cooling electricity by 87% cutting 25 million kwh/yr • Sulfur oxides cut 654,000 lbs/yr • Nox reduced 55,000 lbs/yr • 40,000 lbs CFC eliminated • Traded op expense for amortization Cornell Combined Heat & Power • Commissioned • • • • • • • • • December 2009 30 MW and 300 klb/h Produce 180 GWh/yr and 750,000 klbs/yr Offset indirect emissions Reduce coal usage by 50% Reduce campus CO2 20% (50,000 tons/yr) Provide efficient steaming capacity Electric reliability Fuel flexibility (HP gas line) Dual fuel capability – Future liquid biofuel option Cornell’s Carbon Footprint Thank you for your attention www.districtenergy.org Rob Thornton [email protected] +1-508-366-9339