Download PA1DSP - Why NOT to use the NE602

yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Power dividers and directional couplers wikipedia , lookup

Telecommunication wikipedia , lookup

HD-MAC wikipedia , lookup

Analog television wikipedia , lookup

Oscilloscope wikipedia , lookup

Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup

Crystal radio wikipedia , lookup

Amplifier wikipedia , lookup

Radio direction finder wikipedia , lookup

Cellular repeater wikipedia , lookup

Oscilloscope history wikipedia , lookup

Battle of the Beams wikipedia , lookup

Transistor–transistor logic wikipedia , lookup

Flip-flop (electronics) wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

FTA receiver wikipedia , lookup

Active electronically scanned array wikipedia , lookup

Radio receiver wikipedia , lookup

Distortion (music) wikipedia , lookup

Analog-to-digital converter wikipedia , lookup

Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup

Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup

Operational amplifier wikipedia , lookup

Direction finding wikipedia , lookup

Wien bridge oscillator wikipedia , lookup

Phase-locked loop wikipedia , lookup

Index of electronics articles wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Superheterodyne receiver wikipedia , lookup

Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup

Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup

Radio transmitter design wikipedia , lookup

Heterodyne wikipedia , lookup

PA1DSP - Why NOT to use the NE602
Many simple receivers I see around the web are based on the NE602 (a.k.a the SA602, NE612 and
SA612) chip. This chip packs a mixer and oscillator into a tiny 8-pin DIP package. It is cheap and easy
to obtain. The (fully differential) mixer offers some 18 dB gain. The local oscillator drive-level is low,
which saves batteries in portable equipment. No wonder people use it a lot!
Unfortunately, the NE602 suffers from one major (and disastrous) drawback: It has an extremely bad
large-signal characteristic. The datasheet tells us that its third-order intercept point (IP3) is around -13
It also shows the following compression graph:
The desired output of the mixer (a.k.a. the fundamental mixing product) starts to compress at around
-25 dBm. This can be seen in the graph as the ‘knee’ in de the fundamental product line. The knee
shows that increasing the input level by an amount no longer produces an increase at the output of the
same amount. The mixer is no longer linear and starts to produce harmonic distortion. Increasing the
input level further will result in spurious signals in the audio and desensitization of the receiver.
Let’s see how much signal would be needed at the antenna of a receiver to reach -25 dBm at the input
of the mixer. We start the analysis by converting dBm’s into milliwatts:
The input impedance of the RF port of the mixer in the NE602 is around 1.5 kOhms. Therefore, the
peak input voltage at which distortion starts will be:
So when the AC swing at the input of the mixer exceeds 0.1 V peak, distortion will occur.
A well-known 40 meter receiver based on the NE602 uses this input network:
The input network has the following frequency characteristic (strange how it peaks at 6.4 MHz, which
is not the 40m band!):
The mixer input reaches 100 mV at 6.4 MHz when the antenna voltage is 0.04 Vpeak. In this case, the
power delivered by the antenna is 13.2 microwatts.
It doesn’t take much to generate such a signal at the antenna; a nearby AM broadcasting station will
easily cause distortion or blocking of the NE602’s mixer. In fact, almost anything nearby will achieve
Given the above, it is clear that strong signals must be kept away from the NE602. A very good
preselector together with good shielding will help in reducing the chances of distortion and
desensitization. However, unless you live in a secluded area far away from everything, I recommend
against using the NE602 as a front-end mixer.
On the positive side, the NE602 can be put to good use in a transmitter, as the builder is in complete
control of the signal levels. It is also acceptable as a second mixer (after a good crystal filter), which is
its intended use.
Concluding remarks
In my opinion, any (simple) receiver that uses an NE602 as its front-end mixer must be considered a
toy. Incidentally, the K1 from Elecraft uses an NE602 chip as its first mixer. The designers reduced the
chances of overloading the mixer by putting a 9th-order filter at its input. Even with this amount of
filtering, a selectable 14 dB attenuator was included to cope with high-level in-band input signals.
We can still build very simple receivers with the NE602. We can use ready-made diode mixers, such as
the SBL-1 or the TUF-1 from Mini-Circuits. They cost quite a bit more, but I think they’re worth it. Or
maybe you should buy them “because you’re worth it!”. The downside of these mixers is that they
require a high oscillator drive level (at least +7 dBm) to work and they don’t include an oscillator
transistor like the NE602 does. They must also be terminated properly at every port, which complicates
things a little.
Another alternative to the NE602 is the 74HC4066 analog multiplexer. This IC can be used as a mixer
on the lower amateur bands and it doesn’t require a high oscillator drive level to work. It has been
successfully used in a 40m rig by Oliver DL7JGR. Additionally, Sprat number 99 features a 74HC4066
based mixer by Leon VK2DOB.
Whatever your next receiver project will be: Please, avoid the NE602 in receivers (unless you include
lots of RF filtering). For transmitters, the NE602 is great!
73, Niels.