Download Magnetometry by means of Hall micro

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Giant magnetoresistance wikipedia , lookup

Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup

Test probe wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Magnetometry by means of Hall micro-probes in the Quantum
Design PPMS∗
(Dated: February 27, 2008)
Abstract
This application note will describe how to perform Hall micro-probe magnetometry experiments
with the Quantum Design Physical Properties Measurement System (PPMS). This technique allows
detection of magnetic signals from very tiny crystals, typically 10 − 100 µm in size, and extends
the temperature range for magnetization measurements down to ∼0.3K when Hall probes are used
in combination with the Model P825 Helium-3 insert. This application note covers general issues
about Hall magnetometry, as well as detailed instructions on how to employ the Hall probes with
different inserts for the PPMS. Examples of possible measurements will also be described.
∗
This study was performed by Dr. Andrea Candini and Prof. Marco Affronte at the S3 National Center on
Nanostructures and Biosystems on surface of INFM-CNR and Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio
Emilia, Via Campi 213/A, 41100 Modena, Italy and it was partially supported by the European Network
of Excellence MAGMANet contract N.515767.
1
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
I.
GENERAL
A.
Principle of Operations
Discovered by Edwin H. Hall in 1879, the Hall effect is the appearance of a transverse
voltage (known as the Hall voltage VH ) when a charge current is placed in a perpendicular
magnetic field. This effect is depicted in Figure 1.
FIG. 1: Schematic view of Hall’s experiment
It turns out that
VH =
RH IBz
d
(1)
where I is the driving current, Bz the magnetic field component along the z axis and d
is the film thickness. In the free charge -Drude- model the Hall coefficient RH (material
dependent) can be simply expressed as:
RH =
1
ne
(2)
n being the charge carrier density and e the electron charge (equal to 1.6×10−19 C). The Hall
voltage VH is thus proportional to the magnetic field and to the current and it is inversely
proportional to the carrier density n of the conductor.
When the density of charge carriers n and the geometrical factors are known, a Hall probe
can be used to measure the magnetic field. If a magnetic sample is placed near the Hall
sensor, as shown in Figure 2, then the Hall voltage will be proportional to the sum of the
magnetic flux originated by external magnetic field B and by the stray field coming from
the sample that enters in the active area. Since the stray field is related to the magnetization
of the sample, the device works as a magnetometer, based on the Hall effect.
2
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
Interested readers can find an extended literature on Hall probe magnetometry and its
possible applications in References [1–10]. In addition, References [11–14] give further details
on how to relate the Hall signals with the magnetic field that enters in the active area.
FIG. 2: Principle of Hall probe magnetometry. A magnetic sample is placed close to the active area
of the Hall sensor and magnetized by an external field. The output signal will be proportional to
the stray field generated by the sample’s magnetization that enters in the probe’s sensitive region.
B.
1.
Setup Description
Devices
Various types of Hall sensors are currently available in the market [15]. Even if in principle any material will show the Hall effect, depending on the specific measurement, some
materials show better characteristics than others. For instance, when working at low temperatures, GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures, with a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) below
the surface, are usually considered as one of the best choices. This is because of the special
combination of small density n and high mobility µ of the charge carriers that results in a
high signal to noise ratio. On the other hand, for room temperature applications, InSb is the
material generally employed, since it has the highest mobility among the semiconductors in
this temperature range.
Another important issue is the geometrical size of the active area of the probe, since it is
directly involved in the coupling between the sensor and the field coming from the sample.
Hence, this will roughly determine the size of the measurable sample. When working with
magnetic samples with sizes down to the micrometer scale, Hall devices with active areas in
3
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
the range 10 × 10 µm2 to 100 × 100 µm2 are usually the preferable choice since they offer
the best sensitivity.
2.
Sample Mounting
¦ Glue the semiconductor chip containing the Hall sensors on the Resistance sample
holder, possibly with silver paint to assure good thermal contact.
¦ Connect the electrical pads of the probe with those of the sample holder, following the
scheme depicted in Figure 3, i.e. following the labels printed on the holder and remembering
that the current and voltage leads must be perpendicular.
¦ Place the magnetic specimen over the probe surface with cryogenic grease (Apiezon N).
In order to avoid damages of the sensor, a soft tip can be used to pick up the sample and
position it. This must be placed nearby to the sensor active area, to optimize the flux
coupling. The final result should look like the example shown in Figure 4.
FIG. 3: Wiring the Hall probe
C.
Performing Measurements
With the Hall probe wired as described in the previous paragraph, measurements can be
simply performed with the dc-Resistivity option P-400 [18]. The system will measure the
-Hall- resistance given by
Res =
VHall
RH
=
B
I
d
4
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
(3)
FIG. 4: Typical sample mounting on a Hall probe with a magnetic crystal on it. a): View of the
sample holder (sample board for the horizontal rotator - part number 3084-371). Probes are wired
following the scheme depicted in Figure 3. b): zoom of the sample region. One edge of the crystal
is aligned with the active area of the probe. The probe is prepared for measurements in the parallel
geometry (see Section II B). Contours of the Hall devices have been highlighted for clarity.
where RH /d is the Hall coefficient of the probe, while B is the sum of the external field and
the stray field due to the sample’s magnetization.
In principle, exciting the probe with high values of current I will improve the measurements sensitivity. However, above certain material dependent limit high currents lead to
heating effects that degrade the probe’s performance. For low-temperature AlGaAs probes
(with lateral size of the order of ≈ 10 µm), optimal values for the excitation currents are usually found within 1−10 µA. It is preferable to use the probes in the constant current mode, to
avoid non-linearity effects during the measurements: through the Bridge Setup command
in the Sequence Commands set the voltage and power limits at the maximum for each channel, and specify only the current value; select AC-driving mode and Standard-calibration
mode. Under these conditions, at low temperature the sensitivity of the resistance bridge is
usually ≈ 10−2 Ω.
In order to separate the sample’s signal from the background due to the external field,
the user may exploit several procedures:
i) align the plane of the sensor with the external field: this will strongly reduce the
5
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
background contribution since this is proportional to component of the external field
perpendicular to the Hall probe plane; moreover this essentially allows to avoid Quantum
Hall plateaus at low temperatures;
ii) wire and measure also an empty probe, that will work as a reference (the PPMS User
Bridge board allows to measure up to three channels separately): best results will be
obtained if all the probes are coming from the same substrate and consequently have very
similar features. This method can actually be performed following two different routes: one
is to employ the resistivity user bridge and make the subtraction between the signals after
the measurements (any data analysis softwares can be used); the other is to make use of
external instrumentation, as exemplified in Figure 5. A common configuration is to employ
pre-amplifiers to measure the Hall signal of two active areas of the same device and a
locked-phase instrument triggered with the current source to perform the final subtraction.
In this case, the substraction is performed analogically during data acquisition.
This
configuration also enhances the magnetic signal from the sample up to two times, when the
sample fits exactly the distance between the two crosses;
iii) in case of magnetization measurements as a function of the external field, the background is a straight line (VH ≈ RH Bext ) that can be easily evaluated and then subtracted.
FIG. 5: Scheme of the experimental configuration when using external instrumentation. The
Lock-In is triggered with the current source. Electrical noise is usually below 1 µV.
6
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
It is generally accepted that, working with micrometric crystals, the absolute value of the
magnetization can be hardly quantified: this is due to the difficulty in estimating the actual
size and shape of the micro-crystal and - true for any magnetic flux detection techniquein the estimation of the geometrical factors that relate the stray field with the actual flux
entering in the sensor. When possible, data taken with the Hall probe can be scaled by
the user with the absolute values obtained using dc magnetometry such as the PPMS VSM
option on bulk sample of the same material.
CAUTION: the user should be careful in manipulating the Hall probes, since they are very
easy to damage, especially the 2DEG devices. Any type of shock, including thermal and
electrical, must be avoided. Hence, the Hall probes should be cooled and warmed quite slowly
(few Kelvin/min) and a wait time should be inserted at each new temperature before starting
the measurements to allow the Hall probe to get in thermal and electrical equilibrium. To
reduce the risk of electrical shock to the Hall sensors, have the Resistivity cable plugged
into the PPMS and the bridge channels all turned OFF when inserting the probe into the
PPMS sample chamber.
7
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
1.
Examples of Measurements
Since by measuring the resistance of the Hall probe it is quite straightforward to obtain
the magnetization of the sample (even if in arbitrary units), many type of measurements
can be performed. The most common will be reviewed here below.
Magnetization Measurements:
¦ fix the temperature and wait for the probe to stabilize (usual time ranges from 10 to 60
minutes, depending on the temperature and the cooling process).
¦ Select Scan Field from the Sequence Commands menu and measure the Resistivity of the
channels wired to the Hall probe. An example is given in Figure 6.
1.0
Mn12
M/M
s
0.5
0.0
-0.5
2K
3K
-1.0
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
H (T)
0
FIG. 6: Hall probe magnetometry on a Mn12 -ac [16] micro-crystal. The long side of the sample
(≈ 100 µm long), corresponding to the easy axis of magnetization of the molecule, was oriented
parallel to the external field. Evidently, the signal is clean and the steps due to quantum tunnelling
of magnetization are observable. Data have been acquired with an home-built pre-amplifier and
an external Lock-In, using the experimental scheme depicted in Figure 5.
8
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
dc-Susceptibility Measurements:
¦ fix the external field and wait for the probe to stabilize (a few minutes are usually sufficient).
¦ Select Scan Temperature from the Sequence Commands menu and measure the Resistivity of the channels wired to the Hall probe. The user should let the system cool very
smoothly to allow the Hall probe to be always at equilibrium. However, this type of measurement usually requires samples with strong magnetic signals, since the Hall coefficient of a
probe may slightly vary with the temperature. Figure 7 shows an example of a temperature
dependent dc-susceptibility taken with a Hall probe magnetometer.
300
360
Fe
(emu / mol)
(emu / mol)
FC
200
-cubic
17
270
180
90
ZFC
H
0.0
= 100 G
0.5
1.0
T
1.5
(K)
100
Fe
-cubic
Fe
-trigonal
17
17
0
1
2
3
4
Temperature (K)
FIG. 7: Magnetic susceptibility of two derivatives of the Fe17 -magnetic molecule with the external
field fixed at H = 0.01 T, taken with the Hall probe magnetometer. Inset: Zero-field cooled
(ZFC) and field cooled (FC) magnetization data for Fe17 -cubic, elucidating the superparamagnetic
blocking nature of the peak at TB ' 0.5 K. To present data in absolute units, they have been
properly scaled with those measured with the standard ACMS option on powder material down
to 2 K. Data acquisition was made with the internal Resistance user-bridge. This Figure is taken
from Reference [17].
9
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
Relaxation Measurements:
¦ Select Scan Time from the Sequence Commands menu and measure the Resistivity of the
channel wired to the Hall probe.
¦ Temperature and field must remain fixed during the measurements. Due to relaxation of
pinned magnetic flux in the superconducting magnet, the field at the sample location can
drift significantly in persistent mode. Thus, keeping the magnet in driven mode is suggested
when making sample relaxation measurements as this effectively eliminates any such field
relaxation effects seen at the sample. (CAUTION: make sure to set the magnet persistent
at the end of the experiment for magnet protection and helium conservation). For more
information on such magnetic field artifacts, please refer to the Quantum Design application
note titled “Magnetic Field Management Using Superconducting Solenoid Field Sources”.
Also the Hall probes have their own intrinsic relaxation time (usually in the microseconds range); however, Hall probe relaxation effects can be eliminated if an empty probe
is measured as a reference. An example of this type of measurements is given in Figure 8.
10
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
1.0
T = 0.38 K
T = 0.40 K
M / M
0
0.8
0.6
T = 0.43 K
0.4
T = 0.46 K
0.2
T = 0.49 K
0.0
0
30
60
90
time (minutes)
FIG. 8: Time decay of M for Fe17 -cubic, measured at zero-applied-field after saturation for the
indicated temperatures. Fitting the decay with an exponential law, τ can be calculated for every
temperature. This is found to follow an Arrhenius behavior from which the activation energy of
the system can be calculated. Data acquisition was made with the internal Resistance user-bridge
(subtraction of the empty reference probe has been performed in post-processing data analysis).
This Figure is taken from Reference [17].
11
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
II.
SHORT NOTES ON THE USE WITH DIFFERENT INSERTS
While all the procedures described in the previous sections are generally valid for all the
inserts available for the PPMS, there are some precautions that will be addressed specifically.
A.
Standard Resistivity Puck
Using this puck (part number 4084-109) the probe will be perpendicular to the external
field and the background signal from the magnet field will be very large. When working at
low temperature and in fields higher than ≈ 1 T, quantum Hall features may also affect the
measurements.
B.
Horizontal Rotator
This insert allows the user to make measurements as a function of the sample’s orientation
with respect to the external field. However, since also the background signal is changing, it
may be difficult to compare measurements taken at different angles.
The user should employ the Resistivity Sample Board (part number 3084-371) as a sample
holder. When the probe is aligned with the external field (position at 90◦ ), the coupling
between the magnetic flux and the sensor is maximized if the current channel is aligned with
the field, and the magnetic specimen is placed as close as possible to the probe’s active area,
as shown in Figure 4.
C.
He3 Insert
For the He3-insert the Resistivity Sample Mount is the part number 4092-610, that will
fix the probe in the parallel geometry, as described in the previous paragraph. Usually the
Hall sensors do not show any problem when cooled at very low temperature and current
as high as 10 µA can be used. Actually, due to the low dissipation on the Hall probes
(< 0.1 µW), this technique can be used also with Model P850 Dilution Refrigerator (min.
temperature ∼ 50 mK).
Note: since newer He3 insert have the horizontal sample mount, it is recommended to buy
the vertical sample mount geometry from the Quantum Design (part number 4092-301). To
12
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0
exchange these parts on the He3 probe, please contact your local Quantum Design service
representative.
III.
CONCLUSIONS
This application note is intended to provide to the PPMS user an introductory guide on
how to perform Hall probe magnetometry, employing the internal Resistivity bridge. This
technique is sensitive, inexpensive, flexible and reliable and it expands the dc magnetometry
facilities of the PPMS to a wider range of temperatures and applications.
[1] A.D. Kent et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 76 (1994) 6656
[2] A.K. Geim et al. APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 71 (1997) 2379
[3] Y. Li et al. APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 80 (2002) 4644
[4] A.K. Geim et al. NATURE 390 (1997) 259
[5] R.B.G. Kramer et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 95 (2005) 267209
[6] P.-A, Besse et al. APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 80 (2002) 4199
[7] K. Togawa et al. IEEE TRANSACTION ON MAGNETICS 41 (2005) 3661
[8] L. Bokacheva et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 85 (2000) 4803
[9] L. Sorace et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 68 (2003) 220407(R)
[10] E. del Barco et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 93 (2004) 157202
[11] X. Q. Li, et al. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS: CONDENSED MATTER 9 (1997) 8065
[12] S.J. Bending, et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 81 (1997) 3721
[13] S. Liu, et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 83 (1998) 6161
[14] F.M. Peeters, et al. APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 72 (1998) 572
[15] see for example http://www.ahsltd.com/index.htm
[16] R. Sessoli et al. NATURE (London) 365 (1993) 141
[17] M. Evangelisti et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 96 (2006) 167202
[18] Equivalently other options for electrical measurements can be used as well an external set up
for Hall effect measurements.
13
Quantum Design
Application Note, 1084-701, Rev. A0