Download Equatorial Dry Air Intrusion and Related Synoptic Variability in MJO

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
1326
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
VOLUME 142
Equatorial Dry Air Intrusion and Related Synoptic Variability in MJO Initiation
during DYNAMO
BRANDON W. KERNS AND SHUYI S. CHEN
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
(Manuscript received 10 May 2013, in final form 29 October 2013)
ABSTRACT
Dynamics of the Madden–Julian oscillation (DYNAMO) was conducted over the equatorial Indian Ocean
(IO) from October 2011 to March 2012. During mid- to late November, a strong Madden–Julian oscillation
(MJO) event, denoted MJO-2, initiated in the western IO and passed through the DYNAMO observation
array. Dry air intrusions associated with synoptic variability in the equatorial region played a key role in the
evolution of MJO-2. First, a sharp dry air intrusion surging from the subtropics into the equatorial region
suppresses convection in the ITCZ south of the equator. This diminishes subsidence on the equator associated
with the ITCZ convection, which leads to an equatorward shift of convection. It is viewed as a contributing
factor for the onset of equatorial convection in MJO-2. Once the MJO convection is established, a second
type of dry air intrusion is related to synoptic gyres within the MJO convective envelope. The westwardpropagating gyres draw drier air from the subtropics into the equatorial region on the west side of the MJO-2.
This dry air intrusion contributes to a 1–2-day break in the rainfall during the active phase of MJO-2. Furthermore, the dry air intrusion suppresses convection in the westerlies of the MJO in the IO. This favors the
abrupt shutdown of MJO convection during transition to the suppressed phase in DYNAMO. The two types
of dry air intrusions can redistribute convection from the ITCZ to the equator and favor the eastward
propagation of the MJO convection. Further study of multiple MJO events is necessary to determine the
generality of these findings.
1. Introduction
The Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) is the dominant intraseasonal (20–90 day) mode of variability in
the tropics (Madden and Julian 1971, 1972, 1994; Zhang
2005). It is most active during boreal winter. Convectively active phases of the MJO are characterized by
rainy periods that can last several weeks at a given location. In the Indian Ocean, the MJO can be described
as a packet or envelope of convection centered near the
equator moving eastward at ;5–10 m s21. The envelope
of convection spans ;2000–4000 km and is often organized into coherent ‘‘super cloud clusters,’’ which can be
objectively tracked for several days (Nakazawa 1988;
Mapes and Houze 1993; Chen et al. 1996). In addition to
convection, the low- (upper-) level winds oscillate between anomalous easterlies (westerlies) and westerlies
Corresponding author address: Brandon Kerns, Rosenstiel School
of Marine and Atmospheric Science, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway,
Miami, FL 33149.
E-mail: [email protected]
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00159.1
Ó 2014 American Meteorological Society
(easterlies) with the passage of the MJO. Because of its
global influence on general circulation patterns, the
MJO affects floods (Bond and Vecchi 2003), droughts
(Hoell et al. 2012), heat waves, and tropical cyclones
(Molinari and Vollaro 2000; Maloney and Hartmann
2001).
The influence of the MJO varies regionally. Rainfall
and low-level winds are most affected in regions where
deep convection is climatologically favored: the Indian
Ocean (IO), Maritime Continent, and western Pacific
Ocean. The convection tends to persist longest in the IO
and western Pacific (WPAC). The eastward progression
of the MJO resembles a ‘‘seesaw’’ between the IO and
WPAC (Zhu and Wang 1993; Chen and Houze 1997).
The term ‘‘MJO event’’ in this study refers to the initial
development of the large-scale convection near the
equator in the western/central IO and eastward propagation to the Maritime Continent. This is described as
the convective phase in Stephens et al. (2004). The end of
the MJO event in the IO is marked by post-MJO suppressed convection throughout the equatorial IO. This is
referred to as the restoring phase. The restoring phase
MARCH 2014
KERNS AND CHEN
sets up the destabilization phase in advance of the next
MJO event. Recent work suggests that the triggering of
an MJO event may be influenced by the extratropics (Ray
and Zhang 2010; Zhao et al. 2013; Ray and Li 2013).
In the tropical IO, the characteristics of convection
and wind associated with the MJO differ from the
western Pacific. In the western Pacific, Tropical Ocean
and Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere
Response Experiment (TOGA COARE) provided the
most detailed observations of the MJO. The heaviest
rain occurred behind the leading edge of the westerlies,
in the so-called strong westerly region (Chen et al. 1996;
Houze et al. 2000). The overall structure of the MJO was
described as a hybrid Kelvin–Rossby wave (Houze et al.
2000). Furthermore, mesoscale descent associated with
large (.300 km) cloud clusters reinforced the low-level
westerlies. Similarly, Kubota et al. (2006) found that in
a WPAC MJO event, the strongest convection was coincident with the strongest westerly winds, which were
enhanced by a developing tropical cyclone to the north.
In contrast to TOGA COARE, rainfall during an MJO
event in the IO during the Mirai Indian Ocean Cruise for
the Study of the MJO Onset (MISMO) in October 2006
was concentrated at the leading edge of the westerlies
(Yamada et al. 2010). Rainfall was concentrated in
eastward-moving bands of rainfall, while bands of cold
cloud tops (e.g., cloud shields) tended to move westward. The eastward-propagating precipitation systems
were similar to convectively coupled Kelvin waves with
rainfall concentrated at the zonal wind confluence.
These convectively coupled Kelvin waves move eastward at 12–15 m s21, much slower than the MJO propagation of 5–10 m s21 (Kiladis et al. 2009; Yang et al.
2007a,b). In contrast, the westward-propagating systems
were mainly mid- and upper-level anvil clouds without
much precipitation. A notable feature of the schematic
of Yamada et al. (2010) is a 2–3 day ‘‘break’’ in rainfall
between the consecutive eastward-propagating systems
within the convectively active phase of MJO.
Equatorial waves play a significant role in modulating
tropical convection, including convection within the
active MJO envelope (Wheeler and Kiladis 1999; Wheeler
and Weickmann 2001; Wheeler et al. 2000; Cho et al.
2004; Kiladis et al. 2009). Equatorial waves have characteristic time scales of 2–15 days and have the highest
amplitude near the equator. Kelvin waves are the predominant eastward-propagating mode. Kelvin waves
coupled with convection move at 12–15 m s21, which is
much faster than the MJO propagation of 5–10 m s21.
The MJO convection at times resembles a wave packet
of convectively coupled Kelvin waves with group velocity
slower than the Kelvin wave phase speed (Masanuga
2007; Roundy 2008). However, in some MJO events with
1327
the convection concentrated off the equator, the Kelvin
mode is not a prominent feature (Chen et al. 1996; Chen
and Houze 1997). Westward-propagating equatorial
wave modes include the equatorial Rossby (ER) waves,
mixed Rossby–gravity (MRG) waves, and westwardmoving inertio-gravity waves (Wheeler and Kiladis
1999). ER waves are characterized by symmetric twin
gyres on either side of the equator with convection
concentrated near the gyre centers. MRG waves are
characterized by gyres centered near or on the equator
with convection concentrated on the poleward sides of
the cross-equatorial flow, which is separate from the
circulation center. In nature, ER waves and MRG waves
exist as a continuum along with easterly waves and tropical
depression type (‘‘TD type’’) disturbances which are
centered farther off the equator (e.g., 108–208) and do
not conform to any particular equatorial wave mode
(Dunkerton 1993; Takayabu and Nitta 1993; Dunkerton
and Baldwin 1995; Kiladis et al. 2009). ER waves and
MRG waves can transition to off-equator low pressure
systems (e.g., TD-type disturbances), occasionally spawning tropical cyclones (Lau and Lau 1990; Dickinson and
Molinari 2002; Frank and Roundy 2006). Because it can
be difficult to distinguish between ER waves, MRG
waves, and the TD-type disturbances, in this study they
are referred to generically as Rossby-like waves. The
low-level wind flow associated with Rossby-like waves is
generally in the form of synoptic-scale cyclonic gyres,
denoted Rossby gyres.
Dynamics of the Madden–Julian oscillation (DYNAMO)
was conducted from August 2011 to March 2012, with
the intensive observation period (IOP) in October 2011–
January 2012 (Yoneyama et al. 2013). In addition to
DYNAMO, two concurrent experiments were carried
out in the equatorial IO: the Cooperative Indian Ocean
Experiment on Intraseasonal Variability (CINDY) and
the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) MJO
Investigation Experiment (AMIE). For brevity, these
cooperative field experiments are hereafter referred to
simply as ‘‘DYNAMO.’’ One of the major objectives of
DYNAMO was to use multiplatform, in situ, and remotely sensed observations to help understand MJO
initiation. The three well-defined MJO events that occurred during these field experiments are the most wellobserved MJO events over the IO (Gottschalck et al.
2013; Yoneyama et al. 2013). Yoneyama et al. (2013)
discussed three hypotheses that motivated the field experiments. In particular, the first one stated that sufficient moistening is necessary over a region of the scale of
the MJO, prior to MJO initiation. In this study, it is argued that for the second MJO event in DYNAMO, the
intrusion of dry air into this moist equatorial region
was a contributing factor in the initiation of equatorial
1328
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
convection, day-to-day variability within the MJO, and
eastward propagation.
This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes
the data used. Section 3 gives an overview of dry air
intrusion during MJO-2. The time–longitude view of
MJO-2 is presented in section 4. Vertical structure of dry
air intrusion is in section 5. Section 6 discusses the role of
the Rossby gyres for dry air intrusion. The topic of
section 7 is the possible relationship between an extratropical wave train and the dry air intrusion. Finally, the
summary and conclusions are given in section 8.
2. Data
a. DYNAMO field campaign
The DYNAMO field data include an array of six
surface stations, four of them on islands and two ships:
the R/V Revelle and R/V Mirai (sounding array is drawn
in Fig. 1). The stations each had 3-hourly radiosondes
during the MJO event considered in this study. This
study uses the Southern Hemisphere quadrilateral, also
known as the southern array. The sounding data at Gan
(0.68S, 73.18E), Diego Garcia (7.38S, 72.48E), and the
RV Revelle (stationed at 08, 808E during the period of
this study) are level-3 quality controlled data processed
by the National Center for Atmospheric Research
(NCAR) Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL). See Wang
et al. (2012) for details regarding the quality control
process used. The RV Mirai (stationed at 8.08S, 808E until
28 November) data are level-2 preliminary data from the
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
(JAMSTEC).
In addition, during November–December the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) P3
flew 12 science missions and the Centre National
d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) Falcon flew 10 missions. The
NOAA P3 was based out of Diego Garcia and the CNES
Falcon out of Gan. A total of 468 dropwindsondes were
deployed along the P3 flight paths (Chen et al. 2012),
which are level-3 quality controlled data from the
NCAR EOL (Young et al. 2012). For further details
regarding the field experiment objectives, design, and
instrumentation see Yoneyama et al. (2013).
This study focuses on the period from 12 November to
5 December, including an MJO event denoted MJO-2
(i.e., the second event of DYNAMO). It includes the preMJO-2 convectively suppressed phase (12–23 November),
transition to equatorial convection (23–24 November),
MJO-2 active convection (24–28 November over the
DYNAMO arrays), and the beginning of the post-MJO-2
suppressed phase (29 November into early December).
As discussed by Yoneyama et al. (2013) and Gottschalck
VOLUME 142
et al. (2013), two strong, relatively fast, circumnavigating
MJO events spaced less than 45 days apart occurred
during 17 September–8 December. This second event was
MJO-2. The 30-day time scale of these events was relatively short compared with typical MJOs (30–90 days).
b. ECMWF analysis
To document the large-scale flow patterns and moisture distribution, European Centre for Medium-Range
Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) operational analysis is
used. These data were provided in real time in support of
field campaign forecasting efforts. The dataset benefits
from 4D variational data assimilation (4DVar), including
the DYNAMO field observations. For this study, the
0.258 pressure-level data are used.
c. Infrared satellite data
Infrared (IR) satellite coverage during DYNAMO
was provided by Meteorological Satellite-7 (Meteosat-7).
For this study, the data were interpolated to a 0.058 grid.
The focus is on latitude averages (58S–58N), which gives
a general indication of convective activity in the equatorial Indian Ocean. Cloud clusters were defined as
contiguous areas of ,208-K brightness temperatures,
and they are tracked in time as time clusters (Chen et al.
1996; Kerns and Chen 2013).
d. TRMM rainfall
Rainfall rate and accumulation are determined using
the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)
Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA; Huffman
et al. 2007). The algorithm uses rainfall rate retrievals
from TRMM Precipitation Radar (PR) and Microwave
Imager (TMI) as well as the Special Sensor Microwave
Imager (SSM/I), Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System (AMSR-E), and the
Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit-B (AMSU-B).
Typically, about 80% of the tropics and subtropics are
covered by passive microwave satellite overpasses
within a 3-h period. Where there are no passive microwave data available, infrared-based rain estimates are
used. The data used here are version 7, which are calibrated using the rainfall rates determined from coincident
TRMM PR/microwave overpasses. The data are at 3-h
temporal resolution on a 0.258 grid.
e. Total precipitable water
The Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) morphed satellite total precipitable water (TPW) is described by Wimmers and
Velden (2011). The product uses TPW retrievals from
the SSM/I and AMSR-E. To fill in the data gaps in between hourly satellite swath data, the latest available
MARCH 2014
KERNS AND CHEN
FIG. 1. (a)–(h) CIMSS morphed total precipitable water (color shading) and Meteosat IR brightness
temperatures (grayscale) from 20 to 25 Nov 2011. The DYNAMO array is drawn in dark black lines. The
equator is indicated with a solid black line. Terrain is indicated by the darker shades of green. The arrows
in (b),(c), and (d) denote the approximate leading edge of the dry air surge. Times are in UTC.
1329
1330
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
previous swath data are advected using low-level winds
from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction
(NCEP) Global Forecast System (GFS) analysis. The
data are provided by CIMSS hourly at 0.258 resolution.
Because the morphed TPW data uses multiple satellites with different calibrations, and the model winds
used to advect the TPW fields are subject to errors, there
are limitations to the TPW data. Discontinuities of a
few millimeters can occasionally be seen at the edges of
satellite swaths when the data are updated with new
swaths. Also, moderate changes in midlevel moisture
with the boundary layer and upper levels remaining
moist are not easily distinguished in terms of TPW. For
these reasons, the evolution of TPW is most useful at
determining strong gradients between moist (.;55 mm)
and dry air (,;45 mm) masses, where there are large
gradients of moisture through a deep layer of the atmosphere. Fortunately, these sharp moisture gradients
are common (Zhang et al. 2003).
3. Moisture, convection, and dry air intrusion
in the equatorial region
As shown in Figs. 1 and 2, deep convection (e.g., cold
cloud tops ,235 K; grayscale), is mainly limited to areas
with TPW .50 mm (shaded orange and red). For the
Indian Ocean during DYNAMO, this was mainly limited to latitudes from ;108S to 108N—referred to here as
the equatorial region. Numerous previous studies have
noted that moistening of the equatorial region is a necessary prerequisite to MJO initiation [see discussion in
Yoneyama et al. (2013)]. Without sufficient moisture
there can be no widespread deep convection and no
MJO. Nevertheless, even when the equatorial region is
sufficiently moist for widespread deep convection, the
deep convection does not uniformly encompass the entire moist equatorial region. Instead, it is clustered in
mesoscale convective systems [e.g., contiguous gray/
white areas with horizontal dimension O(100–500 km)
in Figs. 1 and 2], which themselves tend to cluster around
large-scale weather systems such as the intertropical
convergence zone (ITCZ) and various synoptic disturbances. In particular, an active ITCZ is common during
the destabilization phase leading up to MJO initiation
(Zhang 2005; Gottschalck et al. 2013; Yoneyama et al.
2013).
When deep convection is concentrated in the ITCZ
off the equator, there is likely some large-scale subsidence induced over the equator, which is unfavorable
for equatorial convection. Indeed, prior to the onset
of MJO-2 convection on the equator, the double ITCZs
on both sides were active (Figs. 1a–c). There is a local
minimum in TPW (around 50 mm vs .55 mm to the
VOLUME 142
north and south) over the equator on 21–22 November,
suggesting some subsidence-induced drying associated
with the ITCZs (Figs. 1a–c), which is unfavorable for
equatorial convection.
The boundary between the moist equatorial region
and the dry subtropics is characterized by a sharp drop
off in TPW from .50 to 30–40 mm within a distance of
;100–200 km. This feature is approximated by the yellow shading in Figs. 1 and 2. For example, at 0000 UTC
20 November the sharp moisture boundaries are at
around 108N and 158S in the western IO (Fig. 1a). Occasionally, the drier air intruded into the equatorial region. This process is referred to as dry air intrusion. For
example, a particularly pronounced instance of dry air
intrusion began in the eastern IO on 20 November
(Fig. 1a) and moved westward into the central IO three
days later (Figs. 1b–d; arrows indicate the leading edge
of the dry air). As the boundary penetrated deeper into
the equatorial region, the deep convection shifted from
the ITCZ to the equator (Figs. 1a,d). This particular
event is referred to as a ‘‘dry air surge’’ due to the distinct, sharp boundary between the dry and moist air.
During the period of this study, the equatorial Indian
Ocean started out on 20 November with a moist (TPW .
50 mm) equatorial region with convection concentrated away from the equator, resembling a double
ITCZ (Fig. 1a). Although the equatorial region was
sufficiently moist, the preferred configuration of convection was not yet favorable for equatorial convection
of the MJO. A sharp intrusion of dry air—a dry air
surge—penetrated from the southeast IO to within 58 of
the equator by 23 November (Fig. 1d). Meanwhile, a
companion dry air surge occurred in the Northern Hemisphere, penetrating to 88N. With the dry air intrusion/
surges, convection was no longer favored in the ITCZ.
A widespread blowup of convection occurred along the
equator, signaling the transition to the convective phase
of the MJO (Figs. 1d–h and 2a–f). Note that the surge
does not enhance convection. Instead, it shifts the preferred
location of the convection such that the new configuration is more favorable for development of the MJO.
Even with the dry air surge, most of the equatorial region remained moist, until the end of MJO-2 in the IO.
In the wake of MJO-2, the sustained intrusion of moderately dry air (40–50 mm) into the equatorial region
suppresses convection throughout the equatorial IO
(Figs. 2f–h), leading to the post-MJO-2 suppressed period,
referred to as the restoring phase by Yoneyama et al.
(2013).
A notable feature of the equatorial region during
DYNAMO was the frequent intrusion of drier air (e.g.,
40–45 mm) into the moist (.50 mm) equatorial region.
This dry air intrusion is particularly persistent from
MARCH 2014
KERNS AND CHEN
FIG. 2. (a)–(h) CIMSS morphed total precipitable water (color shading) and Meteosat IR brightness
temperatures (grayscale) from 25 Nov to 1 Dec 2011. The DYNAMO array is drawn in dark black lines.
The equator is indicated with a solid black line. Terrain is indicated by the darker shades of green. Times
are in UTC.
1331
1332
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
VOLUME 142
FIG. 3. Time–longitude plot of (a) TRMM rain rate, (b) Meteosat IR brightness temperature averaged from 58S to 58N.
Cloud clusters with areas .30 400 km2 tracking within 68S–68N are drawn as black circles proportional to the cloud cluster
size. The magenta contour in (b) is for 2 mm h21 latitude average TRMM rain rate. Date ticks are at 0000 UTC.
around 28 November into early December (Figs. 2e–h).
This was after the MJO convective envelope has moved
east of the study region. The intrusion of dry air into the
western side of the MJO envelope suppressed convection on the west side, making eastward propagation
more favorable. Within the dry air intrusion with
TPW , 50 mm, deep convection is nearly nonexistent.
Therefore, the dry air intrusion strongly affects the distribution of rainfall, deep convection, and latent heating
in the equatorial region of the IO.
4. Time–longitude evolution of MJO-2
The development and eastward propagation of MJO2 can be clearly seen in time–longitude sections of
rainfall (Fig. 3a), clouds (Fig. 3b), and zonal winds
(Fig. 4). The rainfall and cold cloud within 58S–58N associated with the passage of MJO-2 in the IO were
concentrated in two distinct eastward-moving features
with a 1–2-day break in between1 (Figs. 3a,b). The initial
1
The break in rainfall is less evident using 108S–108N or 158S–
158N latitude averages.
development of widespread heavy rain from 558 to 758E
on 22–23 November with subsequent eastward propagation indicates the initiation of MJO-2. The timing
corresponds with the penetration of dry air surges close
to the equator (Fig. 1d).
Within the DYNAMO observation array, the break
period was on 25–26 November. During the peak rainfall maxima, the latitude-averaged rain rates exceeded
5 mm h21 within the DYNAMO array. During the break
period, it was less than 0.5 mm h21. This break period is
similar to Yamada et al. (2010). However, one difference from that study is prominent westward-propagating
rain and cold cloud features, especially embedded in the
second rain maximum. The westward-moving features
had latitude-mean rain rates of .2 mm h21, while in
between them, rain rates were 0–1 mm h21. Based on the
time–longitude variation of the heavier rain rates, the
westward-moving features had speeds of 5–10 m s21.
This westward propagation is consistent with the MRGs
and ER waves, so they are considered to be related to
Rossby-like waves and Rossby gyres.
Corresponding with the leading edge MJO rainfall
there was an abrupt shift in low-level winds from easterly to westerly (Fig. 4a) and upper-level winds from
MARCH 2014
KERNS AND CHEN
1333
FIG. 4. As in Fig. 3, but that the color shading is for (a) 850- and (b) 200-hPa zonal wind. The magenta contour is for
2 mm h21 latitude average TRMM rain rate. In (b), the color scale is set to highlight 210.0 m s21, and 0 m s21 is drawn
as the dashed black contour.
zonal winds of ,10 m s21 to strong easterlies of .20 m s21
(Fig. 4b). (The seasonal mean 200-hPa winds during
DYNAMO were easterlies of around 10 m s21.) Unlike
in Houze et al. (2000), but similar to Yamada et al.
(2010), the heaviest rainfall coincides with the leading
edge of the wind shift. The first rainfall maximum
coupled with zonal wind confluence exhibited a predominant eastward motion at ;6–7 m s21, slower than
the propagation of pure convectively coupled Kelvin
waves at .10 m s21. Therefore, the MJO leading edge
possessed characteristics of Kelvin waves but was not
itself a pure Kelvin wave. At any rate, by helping to shift
the convection from the ITCZ to the equator, the dry sir
surge favors a Kelvin-like response, which tends to move
eastward. Also note that the upper-level wind shift signal can be traced back west of the study region, suggesting there may be some influence from the previous
circumnavigating MJO event (e.g., MJO-1).
After the passage of the second rainfall maximum
on 26–28 November, there was an abrupt decrease in
rainfall in the DYNAMO array. This marked the beginning of the suppressed phase of the MJO in the
DYNAMO array. Note that at this time the dry air
intrusion covered the western equatorial IO and was
moving across the DYNAMO arrays in the central IO
(Figs. 2f–h). The widespread, persistent intrusion of dry
air to the equatorial regions was concurrent with the
abrupt transition to suppressed conditions. In order for
the next MJO cycle to develop, a buildup or ‘‘recharge’’
of moisture over the equatorial region would be necessary (Blade and Hartmann 1993).
5. Vertical structure of dry air intrusions
a. Dry air ‘‘surge’’
The first major dry air intrusion event associated with
MJO-2 occurred as a sharp surge of dry air. The vertical
structure associated with the surge can be seen with the
3-hourly radiosonde data. Generally, Gan (Fig. 5a) and
the RV Revelle (Fig. 5b), which were within the moist
equatorial region, encountered higher relative humidity
throughout the troposphere than Diego Garcia (Fig. 5c)
and the RV Mirai (Fig. 5d). Note that the large-scale
subsidence drying over the equator induced by the active ITCZ convection was over Gan on 20 November
(Fig. 1a), at which time dry air with RH , 50% was seen
as low as 650 hPa (Fig. 5a). When the dry air surge
1334
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
VOLUME 142
FIG. 5. Time–height evolution of relative humidity from radiosondes released at (a) Gan,
(b) the R/V Revelle, (c) Diego Garcia, and (d) the R/V Mirai. Date ticks are at 0000 UTC.
diminished the ITCZ convection during the subsequent
days, Gan experienced deepening moist air (e.g., .70%
RH up to 700 hPa on 22 November). The sharp boundary of the dry air surge passed directly over the RV Mirai
and Diego Garcia on 20–22 November (Figs. 1a–c). This
is reflected in the 3-hourly radiosonde data from these
stations. At the R/V Mirai, relative humidity above
900 hPa dramatically decreased around 0000 UTC
20 November, associated with the passage of the dry air
surge (Fig. 5d). Prior to the surge, the R/V Mirai had
recorded RH of ;80% up to 500 hPa. Behind the dry air
surge, RH , 30% occurred as far down as 800 hPa. The
MARCH 2014
KERNS AND CHEN
1335
FIG. 6. Cross section of relative humidity from NOAA P3 dropsondes released on 22 Nov
2011. Two flight legs stitched together are drawn in the inset map in the upper left corner along
with the CIMSS TPW at 0300 UTC 22 Nov and the approximate locations of points A, B, and C.
The coordinates of A, B, and C are indicated below the x axis. The color scale of the inset is the
same as in Figs. 1 and 2.
dry air remained in place until the R/V Mirai encountered some scattered convection on 25–26 November
(e.g., Figs. 1h and 2a,b). Similarly, when the surge passed
Diego Garcia late on 21 November, there was a dramatic reduction of RH to ,30% in the low- to midlevels
(Fig. 5c).
In addition to the radiosondes, the NOAA P-3 penetrated the boundary of the dry air surge on 22 November
as it flew from Diego Garcia, through the southern
DYNAMO array, and north to the equator. The vertical
cross sections along the first two flight legs suggest that
the abrupt drying through most of the troposphere occurred within a distance of 100 km (Fig. 6). Along the
leading edge of the surge there was a line of congestus
clouds, but not deep convection (F. Judt, 2011, personal
communication). The boundary was not simply the
boundary between deep convective clouds and dry air
(Figs. 1a–d).
b. Equatorial dry air intrusion during
the rainfall break
The break period with reduced latitude-averaged
rainfall during the active MJO occurred at Gan on 25–
26 November and at the R/V Revelle on 26 November
(Fig. 3a). Radiosondes released at Gan and the R/V
Revelle show drying to ;70% RH at 900–700 hPa during
these time periods (Figs. 5a,b). Drying also occurred
above 500 hPa, especially at the R/V Revelle. At Gan,
this reduction in RH occurred on 25–26 November, with
RH ;70% at 800–700 hPa (Fig. 5a). At the R/V Revelle,
RH values were ,80% for most of 26 November, between 900 and 700 hPa (Fig. 5b). The low- to midlevel
drying is likely not a direct result of mesoscale subsidence within mesoscale convective systems (Zipser
et al. 1981), since it persisted over 1 day, and convection
was concentrated well away from Gan and the R/V
Revelle at this time (e.g., Fig. 2b). It is possible that
horizontal midlevel transport associated with inflow into
the large convective systems with stratiform rain to the
north may play a role (Zhang and Hagos 2009), especially with low TPW air at 58–68S, relatively close to the
equator (Figs. 2a–c). In the next section it is shown that
the synoptic gyre circulations embedded within the MJO
play a major role in this second form of dry air intrusion.
Note that this drier air does not show up prominently in
TPW (e.g., Fig. 2b) because the integrated tropospheric
water vapor content is still relatively high. This form of
dry air intrusion is more prominent above the moist
boundary layer, at the altitudes where the gyre circulations are strongest. Unlike the dry air surge, this form of
dry air intrusion is associated with more diffuse moisture
boundaries primarily at the low- to midlevels, which can
be difficult to resolve using satellite TPW. It illustrates
the importance of in situ observations for detecting
equatorial dry air intrusion. At any rate, the relatively
dry low- to midlevel air would not be favorable for
continued deep convection.
6. The role of synoptic ‘‘Rossby’’ gyres
Much of the heavy rainfall occurring behind the
leading edge of MJO-2, on the west side of the convective envelope, was related to synoptic gyre circulations
associated with westward-moving Rossby-like waves
and Rossby gyres embedded within the MJO. These
systems can be identified by cyclonic low-level wind
circulations, which are associated with relative maxima in the Northern Hemisphere streamfunction and
minima in the Southern Hemisphere (Fig. 7). During
the pre-MJO-2 suppressed period, these systems are
1336
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
VOLUME 142
FIG. 7. ECMWF 850-hPa wind barbs and TRMM rain rate (shaded, color bar). Full (half) barbs indicate 10 kt (5 kt,
1 kt 5 0.5144 m s21) of wind speed. 850-hPa streamfunction contours are drawn at every 1 3 106 m2 s21, for 210 3
106 m2 s21 to 24 3 106 m2 s21 (blue, dashed) and 4 3 106 m2 s21 to 10 3 106 m2 s21 (blue, solid). The DYNAMO array
is drawn with dark black lines. Times are in UTC.
relatively weak (Figs. 7a–c, e.g., the gyre centered near
28N, 878E in Fig. 7c), but they become more prominent
during the active MJO convective phase (Figs. 7d–j, e.g.,
gyre centered near 28S, 808E in Fig. 7h). The Rossby-like
waves move westward (Fig. 8) within the eastwardmoving MJO-2 envelope (Fig. 3). They are responsible
for the westward-moving rainfall features within the
active envelope of MJO-2 in the time–longitude perspective, especially during the second MJO-2 rain maximum (Fig. 3). For example, over the DYNAMO array,
the second rainfall peak over the DYNAMO array was
a direct result of the passage of a Southern Hemisphere
MARCH 2014
KERNS AND CHEN
FIG. 8. ECMWF 850-hPa wind barbs and TRMM rain
rate (shaded, colors as in Fig. 7). Wind barbs and streamfunction contours as in Fig. 7. The portion of the DYNAMO
array within the plot area is drawn with dark black lines. Times
are in UTC.
Rossby gyre on 27–28 November (Fig. 8). The westwardmoving rain features preferably develop progressively
to the east, following the MJO envelope, so that the
second MJO-2 rain maximum progresses generally eastward with embedded westward-moving heavy rain features (Fig. 3). Note that this is in contrast to Yamada et al.
1337
(2010), in which westward propagation of rainfall was
not prominent.
Early in the evolution of MJO-2, the gyres occur as
symmetric twin gyres, similar to ER waves, such as along
558–658E during 24–26 November (Figs. 7d–f). However, later in the active MJO-2 period, the gyres are
asymmetric systems in alternating hemispheres (Figs.
7g–j). These asymmetric systems initiate near the equator
with the rainfall concentrated away from the circulation
center, similar to MRGs (Figs. 8a,b). Then, as they move
off the equator, rainfall becomes more concentrated
near the center (Figs. 8d,e), more similar to TD-type
disturbances. When the systems move westward and off
the equator, the enhanced low-level flow has a significant cross-equatorial component (e.g., Figs. 7f,g,i). This
flow can draw in any drier low- to midlevel air that may
have penetrated close to the equator. It is a more subtle
form of dry air intrusion with more diffuse moisture
boundaries than the dry air surge; nevertheless, it can
influence rainfall and convection in the equatorial region.
The connection between the dry air intrusion and the
Rossby gyres can be seen in the pressure level RH from
the ECMWF analysis (Fig. 9). The strong southwesterly,
cross-equator flow in between the prominent Northern
Hemisphere gyre and developing Southern Hemisphere
gyre was drawing in relatively dry air from the western
IO (west of 608E). Higher-latitude drier air, originating
.58 poleward of the equator, was also drawn into the
west side of the MJO envelope. The subsaturated air
associated with the break in rainfall can be seen at 850
and 700 hPa in Fig. 9. In contrast to the MJO-2 leading
edge at ;908E, where the RH was .95%, the RH in the
southwest flow associated with dry air intrusion was
generally 70%–80%. (At the origins of the dry poleward
of the moist equatorial region air the RH was ,40%.)
Sustained dry air intrusion in the strong westerlies
on the west, back side of the MJO envelope was also
strongly affected by the synoptic gyres. As the dry air is
caught up in the circulations of the subsequent gyres, it is
drawn progressively equatorward into the MJO westerlies, and then eastward along the equator. Also, the
MJO westerlies are enhanced in the vicinity of the Rossby
gyres (e.g., Figs. 7d–j and 8). Drier air being drawn in to
the circulations of the synoptic gyres can be seen by inspection of the TPW maps in Fig. 2. Over the DYNAMO
array, this dry air intrusion in the MJO westerlies arrived
starting on 29 November (Figs. 2f,g). Radiosonde observations at Gan and the R/V Revelle show the equatorial
drying beginning at the low- to midlevels (;850–750 hPa)
late on 28 November and early on 29 November and
deepening throughout 29 November (Figs. 5a,b). The
dry air on the west side of the MJO envelope is not
favorable for continued convection in that part of the
1338
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
VOLUME 142
FIG. 9. ECMWF analysis relative humidity (RH, %) and streamlines for 0000 UTC 26 Nov 2011 at (a) 850 and
(b) 700 hPa. Times are in UTC.
envelope. Convection can only continue on the east side
of the MJO envelope, where eastward propagation of
the Kelvin-like leading edge is also favored.
7. Possible extratropical influences
on the initiation of MJO-2
The onset of MJO-2 equatorial convection occurred
when dry air intrusion in the form of a dry air surge
penetrated close to the equator in the western IO (Figs.
1a–d). Since the surge is apparently connected to the
subtropical trade wind region, it could be linked to
midlatitude systems, which are known to affect the initiation of Kelvin waves (Straub and Kiladis 2003) and
the MJO itself (Ray and Zhang 2010).
As a first step to explore the possible role of extratropical influence, the ‘‘W vectors’’ were calculated using the method of Ray and Zhang (2010) with the
ECMWF analysis (Fig. 10). The W vectors are used to
quantify the midlatitude Rossby wave activity flux
(Takaya and Nakamura 1997); W vectors pointing toward the equator indicate midlatitude Rossby wave
energy being directed toward the tropics. Meanwhile,
the perturbation streamfunction indicates the overall
Rossby wave activity. On 17–18 November, midlatitude
Rossby wave activity was weak (Figs. 10a,b). However,
on 19 November, a pronounced Rossby wave train began to enter the western south Indian Ocean (Fig. 10c).
The wave train remained over the south Indian Ocean
through 20–22 November (Figs. 10d–f), which is the
period when the dry air surge was penetrating toward
the equator (Figs. 1a–c). There were some W vectors
pointing toward the equator north of 308S, indicating
wave energy directed toward the tropics at that time.
Nevertheless, the wave train (indicated by the perturbation streamfunction) did not penetrate as far to the
equator as in the composite of Straub and Kiladis (2003).
The connection between the extratropical wave train,
the dry air surge, and the initiation of MJO-2 warrants
further investigation beyond the scope of this study. The
relative roles of the previous circumnavigating MJO
event (MJO-1; see Yoneyama et al. 2013; Gottschalck
et al. 2013), the midlatitude systems, and dry air intrusion/
surge cannot be fully determined at this point.
8. Conclusions
MJO-2 occurred in November–December 2011 during
CINDY/DYNAMO field campaign. It is the most intensively observed MJO initiation over the Indian Ocean
to date. Synoptic weather systems and associated dry air
intrusions had a strong influence on the evolution of convection during MJO-2. The heaviest rainfall associated
with MJO-2 occurred in two distinct maxima within the
eastward-propagating MJO-2 envelope. The rain maxima
lasted 2–3 days, with a dry ‘‘break’’ of 1–2 days in between.
There were prominent westward-propagating rainfall systems associated with Rossby-like waves within the MJO-2
envelope, which were dominant features of the second
rainfall maximum. Rainfall was concentrated in the eastward-propagating MJO leading edge and the westwardpropagating waves on the west side of the MJO envelope.
The leading edge of MJO-2 was Kelvin wave–like while
the west side was dominated by Rossby-like gyres.
MARCH 2014
KERNS AND CHEN
1339
FIG. 10. 200-hPa perturbation streamfunction (contours) and W vectors. Contours are every 5 3 107 m2 s21.
Negative contours are both drawn solid, and the zero contour is not drawn. The perturbation streamfunction is based
on subtracting the mean of 20 Sep 2011–10 Jan 2012. The scale for W vectors is indicated in the top-right corner of
each panel; W vectors are not drawn for magnitudes less than 1000 m2 s22. All plots are for 0000 UTC.
Generally, the equatorial IO is favorable for widespread deep convection with TPW . 50 mm. The dry air
intrusions, indicated by drier air penetrating into the
equatorial region, played an important role in the evolution of MJO-2 initiation. Dry air intrusions do not
directly trigger convection. They can only suppress
convection. An important factor is that when convection
is concentrated off the equator in ITCZ bands, there is
subsidence over the equator. Suppressing convection in
the ITCZ reduces or eliminates this subsidence, favoring
convection over the equator. Similarly, suppressing
convection on the west side of the MJO envelope tends
to reduce subsidence on the east side, favoring eastward
propagation. The three roles of dry air intrusion during
1340
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
VOLUME 142
FIG. 11. Schematic of the evolution of DYNAMO MJO-2 in the Indian Ocean. (left) A time–longitude perspective. Arrows represent the propagating features with the heaviest rainfall. (right) Schematic maps of the
moist equatorial region (TPW . 50 mm), dry air intrusions (marked with ‘‘DRY’’ and box arrows), and related
westward-propagating synoptic ‘‘Rossby’’ gyre systems (curved arrows). The labels 1–3 on the left time–longitude
panel correspond to the spatial patterns shown in the right panels and are described in the conclusions.
MJO-2 and associated large-scale weather features are
illustrated in Fig. 11. Dry air intrusion affected the
MJO-2 initiation in three distinct stages (parentheses
refer to the labels in Fig. 11):
1) Initially, convection had been most favored in the ITCZ,
not on the equator (stage 1a). Dry air intrusion—in the
form of a distinct surge—suppressed convection in
the southern ITCZ. This favored the onset of widespread equatorial convection around 23 November
(stage 1b).
2) Dry air intrusion on the west and poleward sides of
the synoptic Rossby gyres temporarily suppressed
convection within the active MJO envelope, leading
MARCH 2014
1341
KERNS AND CHEN
to a 1–2-day break in rainfall within the active convection envelope of MJO-2 (stage 2).
3) Persistent dry air intrusion associated with the
westward-propagating gyres helps the shutdown of
the equatorial convection in the strong low-level
westerlies after 28 November (stage 3). Dry air intrusion suppressed convection on the west side of the
MJO envelope, making it more favorable for the
envelope of convection to propagate eastward.
The dry surge associated with the initial development
of large-scale equatorial convection originated in the
eastern IO and progressed to the western IO, penetrating to ;48S (Fig. 1d). The convection had been previously organized into an ITCZ band at 58–108S with
little activity on the equator (Figs. 1a–c). After the ITCZ
convection was suppressed by the dry air surge, the focus
of convection shifted to the equator. This initial burst
of equatorial convection spanning ;208 of longitude
marked the beginning of the prominent eastward propagation of MJO-2 (Fig. 3). During the suppressed ‘‘destabilization’’ phase convection is often favored in the
off-equator ITCZ. By suppressing convection in the
ITCZ, dry air intrusions can help determine where
subsequent convection is favored to develop (e.g., near
the equator). Note, however, that the current study does
not directly address how the convection is triggered
along the equator. Regarding convective triggering, it is
likely that the circumnavigating upper-level signal from
MJO-1 played a role, as well as possible midlatitude
influences and upper-ocean conditions (e.g., hypothesis
3 of Yoneyama et al. 2013; Stephens et al. 2004).
At the back (west) side of the MJO, Rossby-like
waves/synoptic gyres became pronounced enough to
draw drier air into their circulations (Fig. 9). This form
of dry air intrusion is induced by circulation systems
within the MJO envelope, and it is associated with more
diffuse moisture gradients than the pre-MJO dry air
surge. This drier air was drawn in from higher latitudes
and across the zonal moisture gradient in the western
equatorial IO. Unlike the western Pacific during TOGA
COARE (Houze et al. 2000), the air in the western part
of the basin is relatively dry. Finally, when the MJO
westerlies weaken, the dry air intrusion would cease, and
the restoring phase leading to the next MJO event can
begin (e.g., top-right panel of Fig. 11).
Rossby waves and related synoptic gyres have not
been a major focus of previous research on the MJO
initiation. It can be difficult to distinguish between the
various ‘‘Rossby’’ modes. Regarding the nature of the
Rossby-like waves during MJO-2, one system originating east of the MJO (in the eastern IO) initially resembled an equatorial Rossby wave, which is symmetric
about the equator (Fig. 2c). It transitioned into a ‘‘TD
type’’ system (Fig. 7e) and eventually a tropical cyclone
in the Arabian Sea. Also, many of the subsequent gyre
disturbances initially resembled mixed Rossby–gravity
waves, with convection concentrated away from the gyre
centers (Figs. 8a,b). Regardless of their original form, the
gyres tended to move westward and transition to asymmetric off-equator TD-type systems. Three of them eventually developed into tropical cyclones. The pronounced
circulations of these gyres drew the relatively dry subtropical and western IO air into the west side of the MJO
envelope. This is viewed as an important factor—though
not the only factor—favoring the preferred development
of convection on the east side of the MJO envelope. This
eastward propagation of the convective envelope near the
equator marks the initiation of MJO-2.
More detailed research, including high-resolution
modeling, will be beneficial to clarify the physical processes linking dry air intrusion to MJO initiation. It remains to be seen how frequent similar dry air intrusions
and synoptic gyres occur in other MJO events in the IO.
Also, how common is dry air intrusion into the tropics
disrupting the ITCZ convection? Finally, the relevance
of the day-to-day synoptic variability, including Rossbylike waves, for MJO dynamics, prediction, and downstream teleconnections, needs to be further explored for
multiple MJO events.
Acknowledgments. We thank Ed Ryan of the University of Miami for assisting with the cloud cluster tracking
during DYNAMO. The manuscript greatly benefited
from discussions with Falko Judt, Paul Roundy, Augustin
Vintzileos, Jon Gottschalck, Pallav Ray, and others. Liz
Maldonado helped with copy editing the manuscript.
This research was supported by grants from NOAA
(NA11OAR4310077), NSF (AGS1062242), and ONR
(N000141110562).
REFERENCES
Blade, I., and D. Hartmann, 1993: Tropical intraseasonal oscillations
in a simple nonlinear model. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2922–2939.
Bond, N. A., and G. A. Vecchi, 2003: The influence of the Madden–
Julian Oscillation on precipitation in Oregon and Washington.
Wea. Forecasting, 18, 600–613.
Chen, S. S., and R. A. Houze, 1997: Interannual variability of deep
convection over the tropical warm pool. J. Geophys. Res., 102
(D22), 25 783–25 795.
——, ——, and B. E. Mapes, 1996: Multiscale variability of deep
convection in relation to large-scale circulation in TOGA
COARE. J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 1380–1409.
——, and Coauthors, 2012: Overview of aircraft observations
during DYNAMO: Emerging science in MJO. 2012 Fall
Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Amer. Geophys. Union, Abstract
A11M-02. [Available online at http://www.eol.ucar.edu/
projects/dynamo/meetings/2012/dec/.]
1342
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
Cho, H.-K., K. P. Bowman, and G. R. North, 2004: Equatorial
waves including the Madden–Julian Oscillation in TRMM
rainfall and OLR data. J. Climate, 17, 4387–4406.
Dickinson, M., and J. Molinari, 2002: Mixed Rossby–gravity waves
and western Pacific tropical cyclogenesis. Part I: Synoptic
evolution. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 2183–2196.
Dunkerton, T. J., 1993: Observation of 3–6-day meridional wind
oscillations over the topical Pacific, 1973–1992: Vertical structure and interannual variability. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 3292–3307.
——, and M. P. Baldwin, 1995: Observation of 3–6-day meridional
wind oscillations over the tropical Pacific, 1973–1992: Horizontal structure and propagation. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1585–1601.
Frank, W. M., and P. Roundy, 2006: The role of tropical waves in
tropical cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2397–2417.
Gottschalck, J., P. E. Roundy, C. J. Schreck III, A. Vintzileos, and
C. Zhang, 2013: Large-scale atmospheric and oceanic conditions during the 2011–12 DYNAMO field campaign. Mon.
Wea. Rev., 141, 4173–4196.
Hoell, A., M. Barlow, and R. Saini, 2012: The leading pattern of
intraseasonal and interranual Indian Ocean precipitation
variability and its relationship with Asian circulation during
the boreal cold season. J. Climate, 25, 7509–7526.
Houze, R. A., S. S. Chen, and D. E. Kingsmill, 2000: Convection
over the Pacific warm pool in relation to the atmospheric
Kelvin–Rossby wave. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 3058–3089.
Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 2007: The TRMM Multisatellite
Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear,
combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J. Hydrometeor., 8, 38–55.
Kerns, B. W., and S. S. Chen, 2013: Cloud clusters and tropical
cyclogenesis: Developing and nondeveloping systems and
their large-scale environment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 192–210.
Kiladis, G. N., M. C. Wheeler, P. T. Haertel, K. H. Straub, and P. E.
Roundy, 2009: Convectively coupled equatorial waves. Rev.
Geophys., 47, RG2003, doi:10.1029/2008RG000266.
Kubota, H., R. Shirooka, T. Ushiyama, J. Chen, T. Chuda,
K. Takeuchi, K. Yoneyama, and M. Katsumata, 2006: Observations of the structure of deep convections and their environment during the active phase of a Madden-Julian oscillation
event over the equatorial western Pacific. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,
84, 115–128.
Lau, K.-H., and N.-C. Lau, 1990: Observed structure and propagation characteristics of tropical summertime synoptic scale
disturbances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1888–1913.
Madden, R. A., and P. R. Julian, 1971: Detection of a 40-50 day
oscillation in the zonal wind in the tropical Pacific. J. Atmos.
Sci., 28, 702–708.
——, and ——, 1972: Description of a global scale circulation in the
torpical with 40-50 day period. J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1109–1123.
——, and ——, 1994: Observations of the 40–50-day tropical
oscillation—A review. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 814–837.
Maloney, E. D., and D. L. Hartmann, 2001: The Madden–Julian
oscillation, barotropic dynamics, and North Pacific tropical
cyclone formation. Part I: Observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 58,
2545–2558.
Mapes, B. E., and R. A. Houze, 1993: Cloud clusters and superclusters
over the oceanic warm pool. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1398–1415.
Masanuga, H., 2007: Seasonality and regionality of the Madden–
Julian Oscillation, Kelvin wave, and equatorial Rossby wave.
J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 4400–4416.
Molinari, J., and D. Vollaro, 2000: Planetary- and synoptic-scale
influences on eastern Pacific tropical cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea.
Rev., 128, 3296–3307.
VOLUME 142
Nakazawa, T., 1988: Tropical super clusters within intraseasonal
variations over the western Pacific. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 66,
823–839.
Ray, P., and C. Zhang, 2010: A case study of the mechanics of
extratropical influence on the initiation of the Madden–Julian
oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 515–528.
——, and T. Li, 2013: Relative roles of circumnavigating waves and
extratropics on the MJO and its relationship with the mean
state. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 876–893.
Roundy, P. E., 2008: Analysis of convectively coupled Kelvin
waves in the Indian Ocean MJO. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1342–
1359.
Stephens, G., P. Webster, R. H. Johnson, R. Engelen, and
T. L’Ecuyer, 2004: Observational evidence for the mutual
regulation of the tropical hydrological cycle and tropical sea
surface temperatures. J. Climate, 17, 2213–2224.
Straub, K. H., and G. N. Kiladis, 2003: Extratropical forcing
of convectively coupled Kelvin waves during austral winter.
J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 526–543.
Takaya, K., and H. Nakamura, 1997: A formulation of a wave-activity
flux for stationary Rossby waves on a zonally varying basic flow.
Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2985–2988.
Takayabu, Y. N., and T. S. Nitta, 1993: 3–5-day period disturbances
coupled with convection over the tropical Pacific Ocean.
J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 71, 221–246.
Wang, J., W. Brown, and D. Lauritsen, 2012: Dynamics of the
Madden–Julian Oscillation (DYNAMO) 2011–2012 radiosonde
data quality report. NCAR/Earth Observing Laboratory, Boulder,
CO, 14 pp. [Available online at http://data.eol.ucar.edu/datafile/
nph-get/347.099/readme.DYNAMO-2011.GAUS-Revelle3rdRelease.pdf.]
Wheeler, M., and G. N. Kiladis, 1999: Convectively coupled
equatorial waves: Analysis of clouds and temperature in the
wavenumber-frequency domain. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 374–
399.
——, and K. M. Weickmann, 2001: Real-time monitoring
and prediction of modes of coherent synoptic to intraseasonal tropical variability. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2677–
2694.
——, G. N. Kiladis, and P. J. Webster, 2000: Large-scale dynamical
fields associated with convective coupled equatorial waves.
J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 613–640.
Wimmers, A. J., and C. S. Velden, 2011: Seamless advective
blending of total precipitable water retrievals from polarorbiting satellites. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 50, 1024–
1036.
Yamada, H., K. Yoneyama, M. Katsumata, and R. Shirooka, 2010:
Observations of a super cloud cluster accompanied by synopticscale eastward-propagating precipitating systems over the
Indian Ocean. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 1456–1473.
Yang, G.-Y., B. Hoskins, and J. Slingo, 2007a: Convectively coupled equatorial waves. Part I: Horizontal and vertical structures. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3406–3423.
——, ——, and ——, 2007b: Convectively coupled equatorial
waves. Part II: Propagation characteristics. J. Atmos. Sci., 64,
3424–3437.
Yoneyama, K., C. Zhang, and C. N. Long, 2013: Tracking pulses
of the Madden–Julian oscillation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94,
1871–1891.
Young, K., J. Wang, T. Hock, D. Lauritsen, and C. Martin, 2012:
Dynamics of the Madden–Julian Oscillation (DYNAMO)
2011 dropsonde project analysis summary. NCAR/Earth Observing Laboratory, Boulder, CO, 9 pp. [Available online at
MARCH 2014
KERNS AND CHEN
http://data.eol.ucar.edu/datafile/nph-get/347.010/readme.
DYNAMO-2011.dropsondes-final.pdf.]
Zhang, C., 2005: Madden-Julian oscillation. Rev. Geophys., 43,
RG2003.
——, and S. M. Hagos, 2009: Bimodal structure and variability of
large-scale diabatic heating in the tropics. J. Atmos. Sci., 66,
3621–3640.
——, B. Mapes, and B. Soden, 2003: Bimodality in tropical water
vapour. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 2847–2866.
1343
Zhao, C., T. Li, and T. Zhou, 2013: Precursor signals and processes
associated with MJO initiation over the tropical Indian Ocean.
J. Climate, 26, 291–307.
Zhu, B., and B. Wang, 1993: The 30-60 day convection seesaw
between the tropical Indian and western Pacific Oceans.
J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 184–199.
Zipser, E. J., R. Meitan, and M. LeMone, 1981: Mesoscale motion
fields associated with a slowly moving GATE convective band.
J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1725–1750.