Download PREVENTATIVE CARE SCREENNG GUIDELINES

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Prostate-specific antigen wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Doralyn Jones DO
OBJECTIVES
 Understand how USPSTF guidelines are developed




and the ratings classification
Recognize the differences in screening guidelines and
be able to describe the USPSTF guidelines for various
cancer screenings
Know recommendation screening for common
sexually transmitted diseases
Define current screening practices for: coronary artery
disease, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia,
peprostate, colon and lung cancer
Know preventative care screening guidelines for
various male and female conditions
Why do we Screen?
 To Prevent morbidity and mortality
 Stop damage before symptoms appear
 Identify people who are particularly vulnerable to
disease
 Protect the public from spread of disease
I have a healthy person, what
screening tests to use?
 Burden of disease must be sufficient to warrant
screening; does it cause severe disease, disability,
death; what is prevalence and are there high risk
groups
 Test is high quality, accurate detection when
asymptomatic, high sensitivity and specificity,
reproducible results, safe, simple, cost effective
What screening tests to use?
 Screening reduces morbidity and mortality, effective
treatment for disease, early detection improves survival,
outweigh adverse effects of screening, treatment, early
diagnosis, randomized control trial of screening shows
benefit
 DON’T FORGET the importance of a thorough History
and Physical!
United States Preventative Services
Task Force (USPSTF)
 Task force sponsored by Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ)
 Independent panel of experts in primary care and
prevention
 Independent of the US government; NOT an official
position of the US Department of Health and Human
Services
 Considered as “the gold standard” by many in health
care
United States Preventative Services
Task Force (USPSTF)
The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services 2012
http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/cliniciansproviders/guidelinesrecommendations/guide/abstract
.html
United States Preventative Services
Task Force (USPSTF)
Systematic review of the literature to answer key
questions:
 1) Quality rating of the literature used
(MEDLINE, COCHRANE, etc)
 2) Estimation of benefits and harms
 3) Determination of balance of net benefits and
 harms
 4) Recommendations linked to a letter grade
Grading System of USPSTF
 A Strongly recommends
 B Recommends
 C Makes no recommendation
 D Recommends against
 E Insufficient evidence
Grading System of the USPSTF
 Strongly recommends (A)
 Good evidence that the service improves
important health outcomes
 There is high certainty that the net benefit is
substantial
 OFFER THIS SERVICE!
Grading System of the USPSTF
 Recommends (B)
 There is high certainty that the net benefit is
moderate or there is moderate certainty that the
net benefit is moderate to substantial.
 Benefits outweigh harms
 OFFER THIS SERVICE!
Grading System of the USPSTF
 Makes no recommendation (C)
 At least fair evidence that the service improves
health outcomes
 Balance of benefits and harms too close to call
 Selectively offer or provide this service to individual
patients based on professional judgment and
patient preferences. There is at least moderate
certainty that the net benefit is small.
Grading System of the USPSTF
 Recommends against (D)
 Moderate evidence or high certainty that the
service is ineffective
OR
 Harms outweigh benefits
Grading System of the USPSTF
 Insufficient evidence (I)
 Evidence lacking, poor quality or conflicting
 Balance of benefits and harms cannot be
determined
Grade
Definition
Suggestions for Practice
A
The USPSTF recommends the service. There is high
certainty that the net benefit is substantial.
Offer or provide service
B
The USPSTF recommends the service. There is high
certainty that the net benefit is moderate or there is
moderate certainty that the net benefit is moderate to
substantial.
Offer or provide service
C
The USPSTF recommends selectively offering or
providing this service to individual patients based on
professional judgment and patient preferences. There is
at least moderate certainty that the net benefit is small.
Offer or provide service for
selected patients depending
on individual circumstances
D
I
Statemen
t
The USPSTF recommends against the service. There is
moderate or high certainty that the service has no net
benefit or that the harms outweigh the benefits.
The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is
insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of
the service. Evidence is lacking, of poor quality, or
conflicting, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot
be determined.
Discourage use of service
Read the clinical
considerations section of
USPSTF Recommendation
Statement. If the service is
offered, patients should
understand the uncertainty
about the balance of benefits
and harms.
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer
 Most common cancer diagnosed in women
 Breast cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer
death among women in the United States
 Film mammography is the standard for detecting
breast cancer
BREAST CANCER
Risk factors











Age greater than 50 years
Prior history of breast cancer
Family history
Early menarche, before age 12
Late menopause, after age 50
Nulliparity
Age greater than 30 at first birth
Obesity
High socioeconomic status
Atypical hyperplasia on biopsy
Ionizing radiation exposure
Breast Cancer Screening
Summary of 2009 USPSTF Recommendations

The USPSTF recommends biennial screening mammography for
women aged 50 to 74 years.
Grade: B recommendation.
 The decision to start regular, biennial screening mammography
before the age of 50 years should be an individual one and take
patient context into account, including the patient's values
regarding specific benefits and harms.
Grade: C recommendation.
 The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to
assess the additional benefits and harms of screening
mammography in women 75 years or older.
Grade: I Statement.
Breast Cancer Screening
Other screening guidelines
American Cancer Society
(ACS)
American Congress of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists (ACOG)
 Yearly mammograms for
 Yearly
healthy women staring at
age 40
mammograms
starting age 40
*
AAFP same as
USPSTF
Cervical Cancer Screening-USPSTF
 The USPSTF recommends screening for cervical cancer in women ages
21 to 65 years with cytology (Pap smear) every 3 years or, for women
ages 30 to 65 years who want to lengthen the screening interval,
screening with a combination of cytology and human papillomavirus
(HPV) testing every 5 years. HPV testing, and screening interval.
Grade: A.
 The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in
women younger than age 21 years. Grade: D
 The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in
women older than age 65 years who have had adequate prior screening
and are not otherwise at high risk for cervical cancer. Grade: D
Cervical Cancer Screening
 The USPSTF recommends against screening for
cervical cancer in women who have had a
hysterectomy with removal of the cervix and who do
not have a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion
(i.e., cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] grade 2 or
3) or cervical cancer. Grade: D.
Cervical Cancer (ACS)
 2nd most common cancer among women in developing countries.
 75% decrease incidence/mortality in developed world (Pap smear)
 Risk Factors;












Early onset of sexual activity
Multiple sexual partners
High-risk sexual partner
History of sexually transmitted diseases (chlamydia)
Smoking (not adenocarcinoma) 2x risk
High parity; 3 or more pregnancies; also pregnancy before age 17
Immunosuppression (HIV)
Low socioeconomic status
Prolonged use of oral contraceptives ; after 5 years doubles
Hx of vaginal or vulvar cancer
Obesity, diet low in fruits and vegetable
Fam hx 2-3 x more likely
Cervical Cancer Screening
Guidelines from other
organizations are essentially
the same
Population
USPSTF
ACOG/ASCCP/ASCP/ACS
<21 yrs old
Recommends against screening.
Grade: D recommendation
Women should not be screened
regardless of the age of sexual
initiation or other risk factors.
21-29 years
Recommends screening with cytology every 3 years.
Grade: A recommendation.
Screening with cytology alone every 3
years is recommended.
30-65
Recommends screening with cytology every 3 years or for
women who want to lengthen the screening interval,
screening with a combination of cytology and HPV testing
every 5 years.
Grade: A recommendation
Women with evidence of adequate
negative prior screening and no history
of CIN2+ within the last 20 years
should not be screened. Screening
should not be resumed for any reason,
even if a woman reports having a new
sexual partner.
>65
Recommends against screening women who have had
adequate prior screening¶ and are not otherwise at high risk
for cervical cancer. Grade: D recommendation.
Women with evidence of adequate
negative prior screening and no history
of CIN2+ within the last 20 years
should not be screened. Screening
should not be resumed for any reason,
even if a woman reports having a new
sexual partner.
After
hysterectomy
Recommends against screening in women who have had a
hysterectomy with removal of the cervix and who do not have
a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion (ie, CIN 2 or 3)
or cervical cancer.
Grade: D recommendation
Women of any age following a
hysterectomy with removal of the
cervix who have no history of CIN2+
should not be screened for vaginal
cancer. Evidence of adequate negative
prior screening is not required.
Screening should not be resumed for
any reason, including if a woman
reports having a new sexual partner.
HPV vaccinated
Women who have been vaccinated should continue to be
screened.
Recommended screening practices
should not change on the basis of HPV
vaccination status.
Ovarian Cancer Screening
 USPSTF Do not screen (grade D)
 AAFP against routine screening (grade D)
 ACS no recommended screen
 ACOG no recommended routine screening
Endometrial Cancer Screening
 NO screening routine recommended
 Inform your post-menopausal patients that any
bleeding AFTER menopause should be brought to a
doctor’s attention
 Post menopausal vaginal bleeding is considered
malignancy until proven otherwise
OSTEOPOROSIS
 The USPSTF recommends screening for
osteoporosis in women aged 65 years or older and
in younger women whose fracture risk is equal to
or greater than that of a 65-year-old white woman
who has no additional risk factors.
Grade: B.
 The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence
is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits
and harms of screening for osteoporosis in men.
Grade: I
OSTEOPOROSIS
 INCREASED RISK
 Body weight < 70 kg *
 Smoking, weight loss,
family history,
decreased physical
activity, alcohol,
caffeine, cigarette, low
calcium and vitamin D
intake, ethnicity,
menstrual hx (started at
age 15 or >)
 DISEASES
 Intestinal
malabsorption: celiac,
crohn’s
 s/p gastrectomy
 Hyperthyroidism
 Hyperparathyroidism
 MS
 Thalassemia
 Liver and renal disease
 Multiple myeloma
STD Screening Guidelines
 HIV
 USPSTF
 The USPSTF strongly recommends that clinicians screen for human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in all adolescents and adults at
increased risk for HIV infection
Grade: A Recommendation.
 The USPSTF makes no recommendation for or against routinely
screening for HIV in adolescents and adults who are not at increased
risk for HIV infection
Grade: C Recommendation.
 The USPSTF recommends that clinicians screen all pregnant women
for HIV.
Grade: A Recommendation.
STD SCREENING GUIDELINES
HIV
 CDC
Recommends screening individuals age
13-64 at least once
 screening high risk individuals annually

STD SCREENING GUIDELINES
 Gonorrhea and Chlamydia
 USPSTF
 The USPSTF recommends that clinicians screen all sexually active women,
including those who are pregnant, for gonorrhea infection if they are at
increased risk for infection (that is, if they are young or have other
individual or population risk factors).
Grade: B Recommendation.
 The USPSTF found insufficient evidence to recommend for or against
routine screening for gonorrhea infection in men at increased risk for
infection.
Rating: I Statement.
 The USPSTF recommends against routine screening for gonorrhea
infection in men and women who are at low risk for infection.
Rating: D Recommendation.
 The USPSTF found insufficient evidence to recommend for or against
routine screening for gonorrhea infection in pregnant women who are not
at increased risk for infection.
Rating: I Statement.
STD Screening Guidelines
 Gonorrhea and Chlamydia
 CDC

Sexually active females < 25 yrs old should be tested
annually
Prostate Cancer Screening
 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends
against PSA blood screening in men younger than age 75 years.
Grade: D
 AAFP – same as USPSTF
 ACS – Starting at age 50, men should talk to a doctor about the
pros and cons of testing. Men who are African American or have
a father or brother who had prostate cancer before age 65, should
have this talk with a doctor starting at age 45. Testing includes
the PSA blood test with or without a rectal exam. How often they
are tested will depend on their PSA level.
 AUA – may start screening as young as age 40 with PSA and DRE
Colorectal Cancer Screening,
USPSTF
 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening for
colorectal cancer using fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, or
colonoscopy in adults, beginning at age 50 years and continuing until age 75
years. The risks and benefits of these screening methods may vary.
Grade: A
 The USPSTF recommends against routine screening for colorectal cancer in
adults 76 to 85 years of age. There may be considerations that support
colorectal cancer screening in an individual patient.
Grade: C
 The USPSTF recommends against screening for colorectal cancer in adults
older than age 85 years.
Grade: D
 The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to assess the benefits
and harms of computed tomographic colonography and fecal DNA testing as
screening modalities of colorectal cancer.
Grade: I
Lung Cancer Screening
 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force USPSTF)
concludes that the evidence is insufficient to
recommend for or against screening asymptomatic
persons for lung cancer with either low dose
computerized tomography (LDCT), chest x-ray (CXR),
sputum cytology, or a combination of these tests.
Grade: I
Skin Cancer Screening, USPSTF
 Recommendation: The U.S. Preventive Services Task
Force (USPSTF) concludes that the current evidence is
insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms
of using whole-body skin examination by a primary
care clinician or patient skin self-examination for the
early detection of cutaneous melanoma, basal cell
cancer, or squamous cell skin cancer in the adult
general population.
Grade: I
Coronary heart disease screening;
USPSTF
 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
recommends against routine screening with resting
electrocardiography (ECG), exercise treadmill test (ETT),
or electron-beam computerized tomography (EBCT)
scanning for coronary calcium for either the presence of
severe coronary artery stenosis (CAS) or the prediction of
coronary heart disease (CHD) events in adults at low risk
for CHD events. Grade: D
 The USPSTF found insufficient evidence to recommend for
or against routine screening with ECG, ETT, or EBCT
scanning for coronary calcium for either the presence of
severe CAS or the prediction of CHD events in adults at
increased risk for CHD events. Grade: I
 AAFP- same guidelines
CAD RISKS









Smoking
Hypertension
Dyslipidemia  high LDL , low HDL
DM
Obesity/ BMI
Metabolic syndrome
Sedentary lifestyle
Age, male > 45 , female > 55
Fam hx of early CAD male before age 55 , female before
age 65
Hyperlipidemia screening, USPSTF
 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly recommends
screening men aged 35 and older for lipid disorders.
Grade: A
 The USPSTF recommends screening men aged 20 to 35 for lipid disorders if
they are at increased risk for coronary heart disease.
Grade: B.
 The USPSTF strongly recommends screening women aged 45 and older for
lipid disorders if they are at increased risk for coronary heart disease.
Grade: A
 The USPSTF recommends screening women aged 20 to 45 for lipid disorders if
they are at increased risk for coronary heart disease.
Grade: B
 The USPSTF makes no recommendation for or against routine screening for
lipid disorders in men aged 20 to 35, or in women aged 20 and older who are
not at increased risk for coronary heart disease.
Grade: C
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
 USPSTF: 65-74 y/o males who have ever smoked (at
least 100 cig) Grade A
Diabetes screening ; uspstf
 Summary of Recommendation: The U.S.
Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
recommends screening for type 2 diabetes in
asymptomatic adults with sustained blood
pressure (either treated or untreated) greater than
135/80 mm Hg. Grade: B
Hypertension screening ; uspstf
 Summary of RecommendationThe U.S.
Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
recommends screening for high blood pressure in
adults aged 18 and older.
Grade: A
Annual TB screening
 Mycobacterium = SIC LUNGS
 Medical risk – CRF, DM, immune suppressed
 Socioeconomic – homeless, etoh, IV drug users
 Immigration - < than 5 years from endemic area
 Career – healthcare, prison guard, lab worker
 Long term care facility - nursing home, prison, mental
health facility
Obesity Screening, USPSTF
 The USPSTF recommends that clinicians screen all
adult patients for obesity and offer intensive
counseling and behavioral interventions to promote
sustained weight loss for obese adults.
Grade: B.
Tobacco Screening
 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
recommends that clinicians ask all adults about
tobacco use and provide tobacco cessation
interventions for those who use tobacco products.
Grade: A
References
 USPSTF www.ahrq.gov
 AAFP www.aafp.org
 New Physicians and Residents Program:
Preventive Medicine/USPSTF Recommendations,
Michael E. Srulevich, DO, MPH
 CDC www.cdc.gov