Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cancer Survivorship The GPs role Mike Simmonds What we will cover: • How are we doing • Tools for the job • How can we do better Cancer survivors – some evidence • Over 40% may have long term effects from the cancer and treatments1 • Unreported emotional and physical problems1 and poorer health outcomes • Will use GP appointments more than age matched controls2 1-Macmillan Health and Wellbeing of Cancer Survivors Study 2008 2-Armes et al J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6172-9. Epub 2009 Nov 2.Patients' supportive care needs beyond the end of cancer treatment: a prospective, longitudinal survey. Treatment Summary and Cancer reviews Watson et al 1 - Online survey, 100 oncologists and 200 GPs - Overall information in Treatment summary is poor - 50% of Cancer Reviews done opportunistically and only 64% had any structure 1-Watson et al “Views of Primary Care Physicians and Oncologists on Cancer Follow-up initiatives in primary care: an on-line survey” Journal of Cancer Survivorship Jun;4(2):159-66. Epub 2010 Feb 25. 2010 Treatment Summary and Cancer reviews Adams et al 2 - Most CCRs were done opportunistically - Patients wanted their diagnosis recognised and provision of general support - An active approach and specific appointments might legitimise discussion of problems - Both GPs and patients agreed this was a useful thing to do, but could be improved. 2-Adams et al “Views of cancer care reviews in primary care: a qualitative study” Br J Gen Pract. 2011 April 1; 61(585): e173–e182. National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2012/13 Care planning: • Before starting treatment almost half of patients (45%) were not fully informed about side effects that could affect them in the future • Almost four in five (78%) were not offered a written assessment and care plan • Around four in 10 (41%) were not given enough support from health and social services after leaving hospital National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2012/13 Financial support: • Although significant improvement has been made since the first survey in 2010, almost half of patients (46%) who would have liked information about how to get financial help or any benefits are still not receiving this. Relational care: • More than half of patients (58%) said that all doctors and nurses asked what name they preferred to be called by Living with and beyond cancer: taking action to improve outcomes (DH 2013) 47.3% of survivors express a fear of their cancer recurring 40% of prostate cancer survivors report urinary leakage 19% of colorectal cancer patients report difficulty controlling their bowels 24% of people were offered a written assessment and care plan (averaged across Trusts) We know what we want the four million people living with cancer to say by 2030 National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Vision (DH 2010) ‘those living with and beyond cancer are supported to live as healthy and active a life as possible for as long as possible’ Living with and beyond cancer: taking action to improve outcomes (DH 2013) A framework for survivorship Information and support from the point of diagnosis Promoting recovery Sustaining recovery Managing the consequences of treatment Supporting people with active and advanced disease A new approach to follow-up Tailored pathway to meet patient needs Holistic Needs Assessment — at diagnosis and posttreatment Needs identified and actioned Written care plans Treatment Summaries A new approach to follow-up Group learning, education and peer support Lifestyle advice post-treatment Implementation of remote monitoring systems mean that many patients will not need to visit the clinic to receive their results. Improved access to support and cancer rehabilitation for those living with the consequences of treatment The Cancer Care review QOF Schedule (2013/2014 onwards) Cancer 3 Good to have this as a QoF measure ..but non-specific and evidence of much variation. A cancer review consultation checklist Open questions and invite the patient to list his/her concerns and questions Check the patient‘s understanding of aims of treatment Ask about current physical health and symptoms or side effects A cancer review consultation checklist Assess emotional and psychological state and prompt for concerns about mood, body image and sexuality Ask how his/her family, friends and employers have reacted to their illness Give information about benefits, prescription exemption, physical activity opportunities etc. A cancer review consultation checklist Is you patient at greater risk of other problems as a result of the cancer or treatment e.g. osteoporosis Clarify access in and out of hours Signpost to other sources of information EMIS WEB MACMILLAN CANCER CARE REVIEW TEMPLATE INPS Template Cancer Care Review Template project results • GP responses very positive. •All patient responses very positive (71% v. satisfied) •Many patients didn't‘t know they were having a ―CCR‖ •Few CCRs involved carers. Distillation for a better CCR • Appointment +/- carer or family. • One double appointment • One information leaflet / question sheet for patient • A structured approach to the CCR (Mac Template is good!) Distillation for a better CCR • A flexible approach to revisiting topics. • Don‘t forget secondary prevention. • Consider performing a CCR at all key transitions (e.g. during treatment, after discharge, recurrence & palliative phase) Practice Nurses – a key role? Macmillan funded project to give Practice Nurses the knowledge, skills and confidence to extend their role in the care of people affected by cancer Uses concept of cancer as a long term condition and builds on their existing skills Nurses felt much better equipped to participate in scheduled CCR and respond opportunistically to patient concerns Treatment Summary Drivers for CCGs Quality of care Patient satisfaction Decreased demand – especially for ‗unscheduled care‘ / OOH care and A&E attendances Cost Avoidance of complaints / criticism Potential ways forward Find local champions / allies who can help promote the Cancer Care review and Treatment Summary Use summaries of evidence to show room for improvement Mobilise informed patients on commissioning groups. Promote role of Practice Nurses and training Look at balanced set of outcome measures What do you think makes a good Cancer Care Review? How do you carry out a cancer care review? What do you believe are the key elements? 3. Health and Wellbeing events Macmillan local projects Jam packed website Patient Packs Exercise to music DVD Evidence Reviews BMJ Learning module – free to all. National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Website www.ncsi.org.uk (Assessment & Care Planning) Acknowledgements: Terry Bowley Macmillan GP Advisor Noeline Young Project Manager NCSI Anne Wilkinson National Improvement Lead – Cancer GPA Group Nicola Harker MacGP Weston Super Mare David Plume GPA (Anglia) Helen Rickard Healthcare Project Officer, Primary & Community Care Macmillan