Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
A N N A L E S Z O O L O G I C I (Warszawa), 2007, 57(4): 823-826 A NEW SPECIES OF THE GENUS PHYTODIETUS GRAVENHORST, 1829 (HYMENOPTERA: ICHNEUMONIDAE) FROM POLAND AGATA KOSTRO-AMBROZIAK Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Institute of Biology, University of Białystok, ul. Świerkowa 20B, 15-950 Białystok, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.— A new tryphonine species Phytodietus (Weisia) januszi sp. nov. from Poland is described and illustrated. A key to the Palearctic species of the subgenus Weisia is provided. ± Key words.— Ichneumonidae, Tryphoninae, Phytodietus, new species, key, Poland. INTRODUCTION TAXONOMY The ichneumonids genus Phytodietus Gravenhorst, 1829 belongs to the subfamily Tryphoninae. Four subgenera of this genus are recognized in the modern time: Euctenopus Ashmead, 1900, Neuchorus Uchida, 1931, Phytodietus Gravenhorst, 1829 and Weisia Schmiedeknecht, 1907. The subgenus Weisia with ten species was recorded in the Ethiopian, Neotropical, Oriental and Palearctic regions (Schmiedeknecht 1907; Seyrig 1932; Gregor 1935; Benoit 1953, 1959; Shaumar 1966; Kaur and Jonathan 1979; Kolarov 2003; Kasparyan 2007). The following three species of this subgenus were previously known to occur in Palearctic: Ph. (W.) bayeri Gregor, 1935; Ph. (W.) elegans Schmiedeknecht, 1829 and Ph. (W.) rhodopaeus Kolarov, 2003. Weisia differs from other subgenera by the absence of areolet of the fore wings. In the present paper, the subgenus Weisia of the genus Phytodietus is recorded from Poland (Białystok) for the first time with description of the new species Ph. (W.) januszi sp. nov. A distribution (Fig. 1) and a key to the Palearctic species of the subgenus Weisia are provided. A key to the Palearctic species of the subgenus Weisia Schmiedeknecht 1. Prepectal carina of mesopleuron absent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . januszi sp. nov. –. Prepectal carina of mesopleuron present . . . . . . . 2 2. Subapical crests of propodeum present . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . bayeri Gregor –. Subapical crests of propodeum absent . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Mesosoma black with yellow spots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rhodopaeus Kolarov –. Mesosoma orange with black and yellow marks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . elegans Schmiedeknecht The terminology of the external structures is after Yu (1997). Phytodietus (W Weisia) januszi sp. nov. (Figs 2–10) Etymology. The species is named in honour of Dr. Janusz Sawoniewicz (Białystok), who collected the specimens of this new species. 824 A. KOSTRO-AMBROZIAK Head. Clypeus separated from face, its apical margin rounded without a median notch. Upper tooth of mandible longer than lower one. Malar space 0.50–0.56 times as long as basal width of mandible (Fig. 2). Vertex and temples broadly rounded. Antennae with flagellomeres 1 to 4 unspecialized, not appreciably broader than distal one. Flagellum with 29–30 flagellomeres. Mesosoma. Mesosoma polished, more or less smooth. Notauli of mesoscutum absent (Fig. 3). Pronotum without a discernible epomia. Prepectal carina of mesopleuron absent; speculum without pubescence. Propodeum polished, without any carinae, with rather not dense hairs and without transverse dorsal wrinkles (Fig. 4). Wings. Fore wing length 4.5–5.5 mm. Hind wing length 2.9–3.6 mm. Nervulus vertical; cubitus faint beyond recurrent vein; second recurrent vein vertical. Nervellus not intercepted; discoidella completely lacking; radiella and cubitella end beyond intercubitella, brachiella almost absent (Figs 8–9). Legs. Hind femur 5.0–5.5 times as long as wide. Lateral spur of hind tibia 0.45–0.55 times as long as first metatarsus (Fig. 5). Hind fifth tarsal segment 0.65–0.90 times as long as its third one (Fig. 6). Metasoma. Tergites rather shiny, smooth, with short not dense hairs. First tergite 1.3–1.5 times as long as posteriorly broad; its median basal pit moderately deep, and its lateral margins not elevated. Second tergite 0.75–0.95 times as long as broad Figure 1. Distribution of the species of the subgenus Weisia Schmiedeknecht anteriorly. Apex of ovipositor as in Fig. 7. in Palearctic region. S Ph. (W.) bayeri Gregor; Ph. (W.) elegans Colour (Fig. 10). Head black; bright yellow: Schmiedeknecht; Ì Ph. (W.) januszi sp. nov.; z Ph. (W.) rhodopaeus clypeus, mandible (without tooth), gena, the whole Kolarov. eye orbita, two longitudinal strips on the middle of face; bright orange: sometimes clypeus and facial strips. Scape and pedicel dorsolaterally yellow, venType material. Holotype (female): Poland, Białytrally and partly dorsally black; flagellum brownish. stok (Pietrasze), in orchard, on apple-tree, 30.V.1996, Pronotum black with wide yellow margins. MesoscuJ. Sawoniewicz. The type were deposited in the Musetum dark orange with median longitudinal black band um and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciextends from its anterior margin to the middle and with ences (Warsaw, Poland). a pair of anterolateral yellow spots. Scutellum orange Paratypes. Poland, Białystok (Pietrasze), in with yellow apical and basal spots. Postscutellum yelorchard, J. Sawoniewicz: 2 females, 26.V.2007; 1 male, low with orange middle. Axilla and axillary trought of 30.V.1996; 6 males, 12.V.2007, in the Museum and Instimetanotum black with yellow posterior margins. Mesotute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences; 2 females, pleuron with black, orange and yellow parts. Tegula 2.VI.2003; 1 male, 30.V.1999; 2 males, 18.VI.2002; and subtegular ridge yellow. Propodeum orange with 2 males, 11.V.2003; 3 males, 2.VI.2003; 1 male, 8.VII. black base and apex. Metapleuron in general orange, 2003, in author’s collection in the Institute of Biology, dorsally and ventrally black with bright yellow spots University of Białystok (Poland). Diagnosis. The new species may be easily distinnear hind coxae. Legs in general yellow. All femora dorsally with a narrow black strips; the strip on the guished from other palearctic species of the subgenus hind femur short. Hind coxa dorsally and ventrally with Weisia by the absence of prepectal carina and from rather wide black strips. Fore and middle coxae and all Ph. (W.) bayeri Gregor also by having the lateral spur trochanters with small black spots. Metasomae tergites on the hind tibia shorter than 0.55 of the basitarsus. Description. Female. Body length (without antenblack with white apical margins. Sternites white with black lateral spots. Ovipositor sheath black. nae) 4.5–6.3 mm. A NEW SPECIES OF THE GENUS PHYTODIETUS FROM POLAND 2 825 3 5 4 8 10 9 6 7 Figures 2–10. Phytodietus (Weisia) januszi sp. nov. (2) Head, front view; (3) mesoscutum, dorsal view; (4) propodeum and anterior part of first tergite of metasoma; (5) spur of hind tibia and first tarsal segment; (6) 3rd–5th segments of hind tarsus; (7) apex of ovipositor; (8) fore wing; (9) hind wing; (10) adult of female (holotype, lateral view), colour pattern. 826 A. KOSTRO-AMBROZIAK Male. Body length (without antennae) 4.5–5.9 mm; fore wing length 3.6–4.6 mm; hind wing length 2.4–3.2 mm. Flagellum with 28–31 flagellomeres. Hind femur 4.5–5.0 times as long as wide. First tergite of metasoma 1.6–1.8 times as long as posteriorly broad. Face entirely yellow; hind femur dorsally with wide yellow strip; hind tibia, sometimes the middle tarsus and mesosoma much darker than that of the female; propodeum black with only bright yellow lateral margins; axilla at the base of scutellum with bright yellow spots. Otherwise similar to female. Distribution. Poland (Białystok). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks to Dr. J. Sawoniewicz for various assistances. I thank Dr. D. Iwan for his valuable critical remarks. My deep thanks to the referees, Dr. S. A. Belokobylskij and Dr. J. Kolarov, for providing several constructive suggestions and corrections to the manuscript. I am greatly indebted to Dr. J. Macek (National Museum Prague, Czech Republic) who gave me the opportunity to examine of the type of Ph. bayeri; Dr. J. Kolarov (Bulgaria) for the loan of the holotype of Ph. rhodopaeus, Dr. Y. Jongema (Wageningen University, the Netherlands) for the loan of the holotype of Ph. elegans. My thanks also to Dr. J. Jelínek (Prague, Czech Republic) for providing me some necessary literature. I am grateful to T. Koziołkiewicz for the SEM photographs and Dr. J. Kupryjanowicz for the photograph of habitus of new species. REFERENCES Benoit, P. L. G. 1953. Notes Ichneumonologiques Africaines (III). Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines, 47: 145–152 Benoit, P. L. G. 1959. Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae (Banchinae, Bassinae, Pimplinae et Tryphoninae). South African Animal Life, 6: 441–482. Gregor, F. 1935. Zwei neue Arten der Ichneumonidae (Hym.) aus der Cechoslovakei. Bruenn, unpaginiert, 4 pp. Kasparyan, D. R. 2007. Review of Mexican species of the genus Phytodietus Gravenhorst (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Zoosystematica Rossica, 16(1): 49–58. Kaur, R. and J. K. Jonathan. 1979. Ichneumonologica Orientalis. VIII. The tribe Phytodietini from India (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 9: 1–276. Kolarov, J. 2003. New Phytodietini (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Tryphoninae) species from Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 55(3): 43–48. Schmiedeknecht, O. 1907. Opuscula Ichneumonologica. III. Band. (Fasc. XV–XVII) Pimplinae. Blankenburg in Thüringen. pp. 121–136. Seyrig, A. 1932. Les Ichneumonides de Madagascar. I. Ichneumonidae Pimplinae. Mémoires de I’Académie Malgache. Fascicule, 11: 183 pp. Shaumar, N. 1966. Les Ichneumonides d’Égypte. Entomophaga, 11: 441–469. Yu, D. S. 1999. Interactive catalogue of World Ichneumonidae 1998. CD-ROM, Taxapad, Bentall Centre, Vancouver, Canada. Received: September 6, 2007 Accepted: October 20, 2007