Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
BET Inhibitors as Agents for Anti-Cancer Therapy Patricia Mucci LoRusso, D.O. Associate Center Director – Innovative Medicine Yale University Patricia LoRusso, D.O. Disclosure Type: Consultant – Pfizer, Novartis, Astex, Genentech, Alexion Bromodomain: An Epigenetic Reader A Bromodomain is a small evolutionary conserved protein-protein interaction module that recognizes acetylated lysines • Bromodomains share a left handed bundle of four α helices linked by diverse loop regions that confer substrate specificity • A hydrophobic pocket binds acetylated lysine • 46 diverse human proteins contain a total of 61 bromodomains • frequent participants in oncogenic translocations Filippakopoulos et al., Cell (2012) Confidential 4 BET Protein Family Overview BET Protein Family • Four BET proteins (BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, BRDT) • Bind acetylated chromatin via twin bromodomains • Localize to promoter and enhancer regions • Most abundant at enhancers • Function as co-activators to transcription factors • MYC in most cancers • AR and ER • NFkB in cancer and inflammation • Others Confidential 5 MYC AR, ER, NFkB… BRD4 Epigenetic Regulation • • • Writer & eraser enzymes add/remove epigenetic modifications to chromatin Reader proteins regulate gene expression - bind to specific epigenetic modifications The BET inhibitors are drugging a fundamental class of epigenetic reader proteins that contain bromodomains Reader Proteins • Bromodomain proteins • Chromodomain proteins • PhD domain Writer/Eraser Enzymes • HATs/HDACs • Kinases/phosphatases • DNMTs/Tet proteins Confidential 6 BET Inhibitors: A Novel Class of Oncology Drugs • BET Inhibitors (such as JQ1) specifically target the BET family • Occupy the bromodomains and prevent BET proteins from binding to acetylated chromatin and regulating gene expression • Result in selective inhibition of specific gene sets, potent growth inhibition, senescence, differentiation and apoptosis • Efficacy in numerous predictive models Filippakopoulos et al., Nature (2010) Confidential 8 Crystal Structure of JQ1 and BRD4 Mechanism for Widespread Efficacy of BET Inhibitors: Down-Regulation of MYC JQ1 down-regulates MYC, one of the most overexpressed and/or amplified oncogenes MYC is a transcriptional activator • Activates cell proliferation, growth, and survival pathways • Considered a very promising yet difficult drug target JQ1 down-regulates MYC expression • BRD4 occupies the MYC promoter and enhancers • BRD4 activates MYC expression • JQ1 prevents BRD4 binding and decreases Myc expression Confidential 10 Widespread Efficacy Observed in Preclinical Oncology Models JQ1 efficacy has been observed in a wide array of cancer models Examples in hematological and solid tumor malignancies Glio/Medullo/Neuroblastoma NUT Midline Carcinoma Lung Cancer Breast Cancer Leukemias and Lymphomas (AML/ALL/NHL) Multiple Myeloma Colorectal Cancer Prostate Cancer Confidential 11 10 BRD4 Inhibitors in Clinical Development Drug Company Phase Tumor Types in Phase I Route of Administration MK-8628 (OTX015) Merck II AML, MDS, DLBCL, NSCLC, breast, CRPC, pancreas, NMC Oral TEN-010 Tensha I AML/ MDS and solid tumors Subcutaneous GSK525762/ GSK2820151 (open 1Q16) CPI-0610 GSK (2 drugs) I Broad array of heme and solid tumors including NMC Oral Constellation I AML, MDS , NHL, HD, MM Oral ABBV-075 AbbVie I Expansions in AML, MM, breast, NSCLC Oral BAY1238097 Bayer I HCC, lung, melanoma, lymphoma, AML, MM, NMC Oral INCB054329 Incyte I Solid tumors + AML,NHL, MM Oral FT-1101 Forma I AML and MDS Oral GS-5829 Gilead I/II Solid tumors phase I; phase II mCRPC combined with enzalutamide Oral BMS 986158 BMS TNBC, SCLC, ovarian, +Taxol combo Oral I Results of a First-in-Man Phase I Trial Assessing OTX015, an Orally Available BET-Bromodomain (BRD) Inhibitor, in Advanced Hematologic Malignancies A. Stathis1, B. Quesnel, S. Amorim, C. Thieblemont, E. Zucca, E. Raffoux, H. Dombret, Y. Peng, A. Palumbo, N. Vey, X. Thomas, M. Michallet, C. GomezRoca, C. Recher, L. Karlin, K. Yee, K. Rezai, C. Preudhomme, T. Facon, P. Herait 1Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Phase I and Lymphoma Units, Bellinzona, Switzerland Antitu mor Effects in Hematologic Malignancies MTT assay, Gl50 at 72h • • • Leukemia (ALL, AML, JAK2V617F) Lymphoma (ABC-DBCL, GBC-DBCL, ALCL, SMZL, MCL, PTCL) Mult iple myeloma -- M MlS - m ultiple myeloma ..·I vv• MYC - m u ltip le myeloma ...• ·. . . . v. . . ,. . . ... - '° O IO.. . .Or&.o•S 9 0 '° .,.... IOO...,.• •OTY. t ! _ , --.-- -.,..,; 11 20 )11 IO ... n - c.i.ye1 . . . - n . - .1 .. • Results: Patient Accrual / Dose Escalation • As of September 2014, dose escalation is finalized: 86 patients treated and evaluable for safety 76 evaluable for DLT: 36 AL patients and 40 OHM Dose level Dose (mg/day) AL n=41 OHM n=45 1 10 QD 3 5 2 20 QD 3 3 3 40 QD 4 4 4a 80 QD 4 7 4b 40 BID 8 6 5 120 QD (cont/disc*) 13 (6/7) 20 (7/13) 6 160 QD 6 0 * Continuous and discontinuous schedule optimization OTX015 Efficacy, OHM Cohort Dose Level (mg) DLBCL N Patients evaluable Other Lymphomas/MM N Pts (TTP days) Objective Response SD N Patients evaluable N Pts (TTP days) Objective Response SD 10 QD 3 1 20 QD 1 0 40 QD 0 2 1 (308+) 80 QD 2 1 1 (101) 40 BID 2 120 QD 12 1 CR (131+) 1 CR (143) 1 (148) 1 (107) 1 (112+)* 1 TOTAL 20 3 3 8 1 PR (239) 1 (112) 1 (126) 1 4 *Tumor shrinkage > 40%, disappearance of glucose fixation at the subphrenic lesion major clinical benefit Cancer Discovery, March 2016 Radiologic response of Patient 1 to OTX015/MK-8628 Histopathologic features at baseline and clinical and radiological features at baseline and in response to treatment with OTX015/MK-8628 in Patient 2 Constellation: CPI-0610 Phase 1 development in 3 independent studies: lymphoma, myeloma and acute leukemia Oral daily dosing x 14 days, followed by a 1-2 week break from treatment Dose escalation ongoing: maximum tolerated dose not yet determined Pharmacokinetics: T1/2 = 10.7 hours Pharmacodynamics: Suppression of BET target gene (CCR1) expression at higher doses and plasma concentrations Principal toxicity: thrombocytopenia CRs and PRs observed in patients with DLBCL and follicular lymphoma Dose Dependent Reduction in CCR1 Expression CPI-0610 Clinical Activity: DLBCL & FL Outcomes as a Function of CCR1 suppression CCR1 Suppression Complete or Partial Response Stable Disease Progressive Disease Total Patients Treated No Yes 1 2 18 21 3 3 3 9 Note: Important CCR1 Suppression Group had mean suppression of more than 50% and were populated from more than one dosing group Clinical efficacy of the BET bromodomain inhibitor TEN-010 in an open-label substudy with patients with documented NUT-midline carcinoma (NMC) G.I Shapiro1, A.Dowlati2, P.M. LoRusso3, J.P. Eder3, A. Anderson1, K.T.Do1, M.H. Kagey4,C. Sirard4, J. E. Bradner1, S.B. Landau4 1. Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA United States. 2. UH Case Medical Center, Cleveland OH, United States. 3. Smilow Cancer Center/Yale, New Haven, CT, United States. 4. Tensha Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, United States. TEN-010-001 Study Design A Two Part, Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label Study of TEN-010 Given Subcutaneously Part A Part A: Dose-Escalation in Advanced Solid Tumors • • • Classic 3+3 dose escalation design 3 week on / 1 week off schedule Enrolled 24 patients up to a maximum dose of 0.65 mg/kg 0.03 mg/kg 0.06 mg/kg 0.10 mg/kg 0.20 mg/kg 0.30 mg/kg 0.45 mg/kg 0.65 mg/kg Part A* • • • Classic 3+3 dose escalation design 2 week on / 1 week off schedule Started at 0.65 mg/kg dose level 0.65 mg/kg Confidential 29 0.85 mg/kg NMC Patient 004-004 • 47 year old man with nut midline carcinoma with involvement in the right sinonasal cavity, right orbit, sella, and right cavernous sinus • Progression after two cycles of carboplatin, gemcitabine, and Zolinza • Symptoms include: • Proptosis with limited movement on initial exam • Visual field loss in right eye • Loss of 30 pounds • Significant headaches • Patient initiated at 0.65 mg/kg for 21-day cycle (14 on, 7 off) in October 2015 • After 14 days of treatment, patient has tumor mass reduction and clinical improvements of right eye movements, headaches, and right eye proptosis Confidential 30 NMC Patient 004-004 Scans (2 of 2) • • Rapid clinical improvements in symptoms including improved eye movement and reduction of headaches within 1 week of treatment ~23% reduction by RECIST in mass size at Day 14 of treatment and ~60% reduction by volume Baseline Day 14 Confidential 31 Results • • • • • 33 year old man with NMC with disease in lung, liver, cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine, bone marrow, multiple long bones Previous treatment with a platinum regimen: progression Treated with 0.45 mg/kg in 28-day cycle Marked clinical improvement: reduction pain, able to ambulate Clinically reoccurred during 1 week planned drug-holiday interruption; could only partially generate clinical benefits with Cycle 2 LDH Biomarker DLBCL Patient 002-033: End of Cycle 1 Scan Conclusions -Multiple BET inhibitors are undergoing preclinical and clinical investigation against multiple different tumor types -Preliminary data show promise against various hematologic malignancies and solid tumors -Currently, as monotherapy, although encouraging results, efficacy has still been somewhat limited with frequent progression after initial response -Multiple preclinical drug combinations have demonstrated encouraging results that need clinical assessment