Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Unionid research in Lake Erie coastal wetlands Ferenc A. de Szalay, Richard Bowers, and Doug Kapusinski Department of Biological Sciences http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil • Since 1980s, Zebra mussels invaded lower Great Lakes caused drastic declines of unionids • Surveys by Zanatta, Nichols, Schloesser et al. found remnant unionid populations in some Great Lakes CW and nearshore areas Crane Creek Marsh, Ottawa NWR Crane Creek Marsh, Ottawa NWR Sampled 77 random locations in 2001 Tactile searches for 4 person hours per 50 x 50 m plot Collected zebra mussels on PVC plates at 4 locations • Abundant ZM at all locations • Most in deep areas (>35 cm) • Collected 1129 unionids in 15 species • Dominant species: Q. quadrula, P. grandis, L. fragilis, A. plicata • Aged 1 - 28 years Water Depth 1 1-17cm 18-35 cm a a Catch per unit effort 0.4 (0.2) Species Richness 0.5 (0.23) Number of zebra a b 0.8 (0.37) a 0 >35 cm 12.7 (3.44) a 0.8 (0.22) 3.4 (0.56) a 0.01 (0.00) 3.3 (1.42) mussels per unionid • Unionids clustered in deep areas (>35 cm) not exposed during late season seiches • Attached Zebra mussels highest in deep areas b b • GIS analysis – patchy distribution of unionids • Most in stream channel, deep pools • Few in areas dewatered during seiches • Thick shell species inhabited deepest areas (>35 cm) • Thin shell species inhabited deep & shallow areas (>15 cm) Crane Creek Marsh (n= 1130 mussels) Quadrula quadrula Leptodea fragilis Amblema plicata Pyganodon grandis Potamilus alatus Quadrula pustulosa 2001-2008 surveys similar unionid communities at other sites at Ottawa NWR Toxolasma parvus *Obliquaria reflexa Fusconaia flava Lasmigona complanata Lampsilis siliquoidea *Truncilla donaciformis *Truncilla truncata *Uniomerus tetralasmus Utterbackia imbecillis Young Marsh (n= 176 mussels) Gaeth Kurdy Marsh (n= 54 mussels) Pyganodon grandis Pyganodon grandis Quadrula quadrula Quadrula quadrula Toxolasma parvus Potamalis alatus Utterbackia imbecilis Leptodea fragilis Lasmigona complanata Amblema plicata Leptodea fragilis Toxolasma parvus Lasmigona complanata Utterbackia imbecilis • 63% with up to 1/4 of shell covered with byssal threads • 77% had no live zebra mussels on shell Why are unionids surviving in Crane Creek Marsh? • Zebra mussel mortality when unionids burrow in sediments (e.g. Nichols and Wilcox 1997) • Predation of zebra mussels by fish and waterfowl (e.g., Petrie and Knapton 1999, Magoulick and Lewis 2002) Predator Exclosure Experiment • 5-m diameter Exclosures with: – 3 X 3 cm mesh sides - Fishless – 3 X 3 cm mesh sides with 1 m X 1 m holes - Open – Stakes only - Sham • Added live Quadrula quadrula, Leptodea fragilis in June 2007 • Collected in July & September 2007 • Counted attached zebra mussels Quadrula - July ZM per Unionid 6 Leptodea - July 10 a,b 5 P<0.05 4 b 3 2 1 ZM per Unionid a 0 Fishless 6 4 2 0 Sham Fishless 100 120 80 100 b 60 P<0.001 40 20 Open Sham Leptodea - September Quadrula - September b 0 ZM per Unionid Number ZM/Unionid a Open N.S. 8 N.S. 80 60 40 20 0 Fishless Open Sham Fishless Open • Q. quadrula - Fishless >> Open = Sham • L. fragilis - N.S. Sham Implications • Predators limit zebra mussels on unionids – Which predators are impacting zebra mussels? Fish Species Number Size Bluegill 454 7.4 Pumpkinseed Sunfish 152 6.3 Green Sunfish 116 4.0 Orange-spotted Sunfish 102 7.7 Gizzard Shad 60 4.8 Black Crappie 54 6.0 Brown Bullhead 29 16.9 Spottail Shiner 22 3.9 Emerald Shiner 19 3.6 Common Carp 9 25.7 Bowfin 6 56.0 White Crappe 6 7.2 Tadpole Madtom 4 6.5 Brook Silversides 3 5.9 Channel Catfish 3 28.0 Golden Shiner 3 4.9 Largemouth Bass 3 9.9 Round Goby 3 3.0 Yellow Bullhead 3 4.7 Goldfish 2 16.4 Black Bullhead 1 5.6 Central Mudminnow 1 3.7 Freshwater Drum 1 3.9 Hybrid Striped Bass 1 15.5 Redear Sunfish 1 5.6 1058 Carp Enclosure Experiment • 5-m diameter Exclosures with: – 3 X 3 cm mesh sides - Fishless – Stakes only - Sham – 3 X 3 cm mesh sides with 1 carp - Carp • Added live and dead Q. quadrula in June 2008 • Collected live and dead Q. quadrula in July, Sept. 2008 • Counted attached zebra mussels September - Dead Quadrula September - Live Quadrula 100 a 80 P<0.01 60 b 40 b 20 a P<0.05 80 ZM per Unionid ZM per Unionid 100 60 40 b b Sham Carp 20 0 0 Fishless Sham Carp Fishless • Live Q. quadrula - Fishless >> Sham = Carp • Dead Q. quadrula - Fishless >> Sham = Carp Conclusions • Zebra mussel survive in Great Lakes coastal marshes • Zebra mussel reduced by fish predation • Common Carp are key predators of zebra mussel on unionids • Unionid burrowing during summer does not eliminate attached zebra mussels Thanks to: Dan Frisk, Doug Brewer, Ron Huffman, USFWS; Chris Dwyer, Ohio DNR Field and laboratory help by D. Kapusinski, J. Clark, N. Yaussy, J. Bowers, A. Brager. M. Rubin, K. Gee, Robert Christy, KSU photgrapher Funded provided by Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Lake Erie Protection Fund, A.&M. Herrick Aquatic Ecology Research Facility Fund