Download Economics of International Migration12 - e

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Economics of International
Migration12
Jan Brzozowski, PhD
Cracow University of Economics
International Migration and FDIs
• Immigrant investment: the role of host
country policies
• Case study: Canadian immigration policy
Immigrant investment
• Usually immigrants come with low stock of
financial capital
• Still, it’s not about the quantity, but quality of
migration flow
• Selected, less numerous groups of immigrants
can be very beneficial to destination country
How to attract immigrant investment?
• Growth potential of destination economy
• Favorable entrepreneurship environment (rule
of law, good governance, stability, low
corruption etc.)
• Administrative incentives (fiscal instruments,
admission procedures, residence&citizenship
acquisition etc.)
Examples of favorable immigrant
investor policies
• Cyprus Citizenship by Investment: investment of
2.5 € million or more in real estate enables
national citizenship and passport. The property
can be sold after 3 years
• Swiss Immigrant Investor Program: residence
permit for invividuals who fund their company
and create jobs for Swiss citizens; alternativelly:
Lump Sum Taxation (min. 150 thousand CHF) for
permanent residents
US: EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visa
Program
• 10 thousand visas EB-5 issued anually
• Avaliable for individuals who invest 1 million $ or 500
thousand $ in Targeted Emplyment Areas (high
unemployment area or rural area)
• Investment must benefit the US economy: create at least
10 jobs or save jobs in „trubled businesses”
• After the investment criteria is met – conditional residence
permit for 2 years, then possibility to apply for permanent
green card
http://blog.lucidtext.com/category/eb-5-statistics/
EB-5 VISA STATISTICS (2006-2012)
www.iiusa.org
Case study: Canadian policy of
attracting immigrant investors
Basic facts
• 2006: population of 31.6 million, including 6.2 million foreign-born
• 2011: population of 33.5 million, including 6.8 million foreign-born
individuals
• Immigrants constitute 20.6% of the population (the highest
proportion among the G8 countries)
• Consistent immigration policy in last 30 years: each year ca. 200250 thousand new immigrants are admitted
• Economic and humanitarian immigration
300000
70
60
250000
50
200000
40
150000
30
100000
20
50000
10
0
0
Economic immigrants
All immigrants
economic immigrants as % of total immigration
Entry mode for economic migrants:
points system
• Main aim: to make sure that immigrant will contribute positivelly to
Canadian economy
• The evaluated elements are: educational attainment (up to 25
points); language facility in English and/or French (up to 24 points);
labour market experience (up to 21 points); age (up to 10 points);
personal adaptability (up to 10 points). Additional 10 points
awarded for employment already arranged in Canada.
• The passing grade was 67 points out of a possible 100 (for 2008).
• 1st Jan 2015: new Comprehensive Ranking System introduced (up
to 1200 points (core human capital factors, accompanying
partner/spouse factors, skill transferability factors and job
offer/arranged employment factors)
Within Economic Migrants – 3 cathegories of immigrant
entrepreneurs
• Self-Employed (1969) - small-scale entrepreneurs, expected to
establish a business immediately upon arrival. Conditions: business
experience and financial capital. The entry treshold was only
30/100.
• Entrepreneurs (1978) – middle-scale entrepreneurs, expected to
have a credible plan for estabilishing a business that will hire at
least 1 person,. Conditions: previous firm ownership, net wortk of
at least C$300,000 (€195,000). They needed only 35 points to
qualify for permanent residence.
• Investors - larger entrepreneurs, expected to invest a minimum
amount of approximately $400,000 (€260,000). The threshold was
also 35/100.
• Special emphasis put on manufacturing sector (considered as
underdeveloped in Canada). Still, migrants mostly are active in real
estate and commerce sectors.
90000
Please note: only principal applicants included (in the previous charts also the relatives in each catheogory have been included)
80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Business Classes
2009
2010
Economic immigrants
2011
2012
2013
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
Entrepreneurs
2008
2009
Self-employed
2010
2011
Investors
2012
2013
But how it affected Canadian
economy?
• Initial outcomes very promissing
• Research on intentions of entrepreneur immigrants
arriving to Canada between 1992 and 1995: they
intended to create or maintain ca. 24,000 jobs
• investor immigrants between 1986 and 1996 – hoped
to add over $3 billion (€2 billion) of venture capital
• Enthusiasm of policy-makers: the programme seems to
be effective
But
• Nearly 2/3 of Business Class immigrants –
Eastern Asia (Taiwan, Hong Kong, mainland
China)
• Limited language skills + cultural differences
Evidence from Vancouver
(Wong and Ng 1998)
• Beneficiaries of the programme of Chineseorigin
• They work long hours and achieve low profit
rates. Many of their businesses are in
precarious circumstances
• They remain active in the ethnic enclave, few
go into the mainstream economy
Ley (2003): study among business
imigrants in British Columbia
• Failed expectations of immigrants, reluctance to
open a new business
• Complaints about Canadian economic
environment (high taxes, strong trade unions, too
many regulations)
• Transmission of business skills from one cultural
or economic and regulatory setting to another
can be problematic!
Hiebert (2008)
• comparison of Business Class immigrants with
other cathegories of immigrants
• Immigrants who arrived to Canada between 1985
and 2001 and filed a tax return in 2001
• Skilled workers had on average higher language
skills (87% claimed proficiency in English or
French, while in Business cathegory only 55%)
Employment earnings in 2001
Business immigrants
fare not very well on
(Canadian $)
labour market)…
Business immigrant
Refugee
Family immgirant
Skilled Worker
All immigrants
0
5000
10000
15000
Hiebert (2008)
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
Total income in 2001
Business immigrant
Refugee
Family immgirant
Skilled Worker
All immigrants
0
5000
10000
15000
Hiebert (2008)
20000
25000
30000
35000
Conclusion
• Business immigrants have the lowest average income
among all immigrant cathegories
• This can be attributed to underreporting of income (tax
evasion), but still the gains for Canadian economy are
rather modest
• Conditions for Immigrant Investor Program have been
increased (investment of min. invest C$800,000)
• On June 19 2014 the federal Immigrant Investor Program
and Entrepreneur Program were terminated