Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The HELCOM Initial Holistic Assessment of Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea 2003-2007 Jesper H. Andersen, DHI, Denmark 1/18 EEA Eionet Marine Workshop 25 October 2010 EEA, Copenhagen, Denmark HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan • Adopted in the 2007 Krakow Ministerial Meeting • Ecosystem-based approach to management of human activities • Ecological objectives • Measures and actions for: – – – – Eutrophication Hazardous substances Maritime activities Biodiversity and nature conservation • National Implementation Programmes in 2010 2/18 HELCOM monitoring and assessment strategy 3/18 4/18 • Based on data from HELCOM’s coordinated monitoring programmes • Use of indicator-based assessment tools Initial Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea 2003-2007 • Overview of the ecosystem health of the Baltic Sea in 2003-2007 • Status, anthropogenic pressures and economic analysis • Baseline for assessing the effectiveness of the implementation of the measures of the HELCOM BSAP – How far are we from reaching good environmental / ecological status? • Contribution to the EU MSFD implementation 5/18 Ecosystem health status of the entire sea was impaired in 2003-2007 • Based on biological and chemical status indicators • In all sub-basins the status was classified as being impaired, i.e. moderate, poor or bad • The poor/bad status of the Baltic Sea Proper is due to eutrophication, contamination with hazardous substances and decline of biodiversity • Gulf of Bothnia is the subbasin with the least impaired status The map of ’ecosystem health’ above uses HOLAS: • 6/18 The HELCOM Holistic Ecosystem Health Assessment Tool (HOLAS) – a merger of HEAT, BEAT and CHASE taking key BSAP, WFD and MSFD principles into account – in principle equivalent to ’GES’ sensu MSFD What are the pressures on the marine environment? • • Analysis of anthropogenic pressures : 52 data layers, here just a few examples... A single activity may result in many pressures Bottom trawling 7/18 Shipping intensity Airborne nitrogen deposition Underwater noise Baltic Sea Pressure Index Spatial distribution of the sum of humaninduce pressures The BSPI methodology: 8/18 • • For each 5x5 km square of the sea, pressures taking place in that area were summed up • Human activities put a pressure on the entire sea area with the least pressure in the northern areas and the most in the eastern, southeastern and southern areas The Baltic Sea Pressure Index is based on Halpern et al. (2008) The map above: • 9/10 Chlorophyll a (µg L-1) Secchi (m) What is the status? – Eutrophication The HELCOM Eutrophication Assessment Tool (HEAT) – a modernised version of OSPAR COMP as well as based on WFD principles Eutrophication: Trends of the nutrient inputs Total waterborne load of nitrogen from all HELCOM countries to the Baltic Sea, 1995-2008 • During 1995-2006, there was no obvious reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus inputs due to measures taken (some data lacking for 2007/08) • The BSAP targets have not been permanently reached for either nutrient and there are differences in the performance of the countries • Further work will be needed especially if climate change increases the loads Total waterborne loads 800000 700000 600000 Non flow-normalised direct coastal loads 500000 400000 Maximum allowable waterborne input in BSAP 300000 200000 BSAP 1997-2003 average load (nonnormalised) 100000 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 0 1995 N,t Total waterborne load of phosphorus from all HELCOM countries to the Baltic Sea, 1995-2008 Total waterborne loads 45000 40000 35000 Non flow-normalised direct coastal loads 30000 25000 20000 Maximum allowable waterborne input in BSAP 15000 10000 BSAP 1997-2003 average load (nonnormalised) 10/18 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 0 p,t 1995 5000 Costs and benefits of reaching the BSAP targets for eutrophication 11/18 What is the status? – Hazardous substances 1600 1.2 1400 DDE - PCB 1000 .8 800 .6 600 mean productivity 1.0 1200 .4 400 .2 200 0 .0 65 70 75 80 85 Year 90 95 00 05 pia - 09.10.16 16:30, PR_DDE_PCB2 The example above: • 12/18 • Mean productivity (green line) vs. egg lipid concentrations of DDE (red) and PCBs (blue) of the white-tailed sea eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) on the Swedish Baltic Sea coast from 1965–2005 (Helander et al. 2002, 2008). The HELCOM Chemical Status Assessment Tool (CHASE). What is the status? – Biodiversity and nature conservation Biodiversity status Bottom trawling intensity The map above: • The HELCOM Biodiversity Status Assessment Tool (BEAT) – based on HEAT as well as BSAP and Habitats Directive principles Follow-up actions: • 13/18 • Continue dialogue between the fisheries and environment sectors – HELCOM’s Fisheries and Environment Forum Assess if unsustainable fishing practices are taking place in protected areas Designation of Baltic Marine Protected Ares 14/18 • We have reached the 10 % target for the regional network of marine protected areas set by the UN CBD COP7 • ... but the network is not yet ecologically coherent and wellmanaged • Science-based designation principles taking coherence into account are now being used (MARXAN) Take home messages • The Baltic Sea is in a bad shape! • Assessments have moved from simple trend assessments and SoE assessments to complex indicator-based status assessments • We have developed and applied the following indicator-based tools: – HEAT (eutrophication) – CHASE (hazardous substances) – BEAT (biodiversity) 15/18 HOLAS (’ecosystem health’) • BSPI (cumulative pressure index) and BSII (not shown today) • Future MPA are likely to be designated on the basis of scientific principles (MARXAN) Looking into the future • Review of environmental targets for eutrophication, and as a follow-up also a review of nutrient reduction targets • Further development of indicators and targets (especially biodiversity and hazardous substances) • Assessment of the threat status of species and biotopes: updating and creating Red Lists • Revision of monitoring programmes • There is no such thing as a perfect assessment tool! Further development of the tool box will take place via the HARMONY project (a North Sea/Kattegat activity feeding back to both MSFD and BSAP implementation) 16/18 Thank you for your attention! Please study the HELCOM assessments as well as the tool box 17/18