Download Temporal analysis of bibliographic databases

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Temporal analysis of
bibliographic databases
1
- WHEN ARE ACADEMICS MOST
PRODUCTIVE?
Yiting Zhao
Supervisors:
Qing Wang
Peter Christen
Google Scholar
2
 Google Scholar Profile: track citations to your
publications
Google Scholar
3
 Search for researchers working on certain research
topic
Overview
4
 Aims
 Methodology
 Evaluation
 Future Research
Aims
5
 To collect research outputs by individual researchers
from Google Scholar.
 To develop techniques analysing the productivity of
researchers.
 To develop visualisation techniques that allow a
presentation of the analyse.
Methodology
6
 Data Crawling and Parsing
 Individual Researcher
 Groups of Researchers
 Data Analysis
 Individual Researcher: yearly citation counts
 Groups of Researchers:
Calendar Year Citation/Publication Counts
 Career Year Citation/Publication Counts
 Career Year Citation/Publication : Average Counts Ratio
 Rank the Researchers

Methodology
7
 Analysis
 Individual Researcher: calculate the yearly citation counts for a
researcher
 Groups of Researchers:
Calendar Year Citation/Publication Counts
 Career Year Citation/Publication Counts
 Career Year Citation/Publication : Average Counts Ratio
 Rank the Researchers

Evaluation
8
 Accuracy of calculating the yearly citation counts for
an individual researcher.
RID
RName
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
6Slzb38AAAAJ
Brian
Anderson
1563
1657
1961
2049
2250
2520
2514
2749
1775
1426
1713
2191
2258
2258
2351
2389
2427
2035
92
97
114
161
167
240
379
467
395
113
133
168
190
192
201
313
361
400
157
179
229
224
220
223
253
306
204
127
178
196
197
228
245
308
338
283
227
239
264
319
325
345
304
414
417
241
258
283
301
318
338
367
438
469
oz-2CXsAAAAJ
u0xUDSoAAAAJ
sTAoZeUAAAAJ
Peter
Christen
Lexing Xie
Arkady
Zaslavsky
Evaluation
9
 Accuracy of calculating the yearly citation counts for
an individual researcher.
RID
RName
Difference score
6Slzb38AAAAJ
Brian Anderson
0.067909
oz-2CXsAAAAJ
Peter Christen
0.19961647
u0xUDSoAAAAJ
Lexing Xie
0.1220656
sTAoZeUAAAAJ
Arkady Zaslavsky
0.0586942
Evaluation
10
 Evaluation of Analysis for Group of Researchers
 Four groups of researchers with research topics
‘Catalysis’, ‘Data Mining’, ‘Genomics’, and
‘Pharmacokinetics’.
Catalysis
Data Mining
Genomics
Pharmacokinetics
No. of
Researchers
Total
Citations
Total
Publications
5
5
6
6
189750
440570
713685
64453
6050
6605
4860
2440
Evaluation- Calendar Year Citation Plot
11
Evaluation- Career Year Citation Plot
12
Evaluation- Career Year Publication Plot
13
Pharmacokinetics
Catalysis
Data Mining
Genomics
Conclusions
14
 This approach introduce a way for measuring the
productivity of researchers
 Future works:
 Clustering of Researchers
 More analysis techniques
Q&A
15