* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download National Economic Recovery Measures in Malta
Survey
Document related concepts
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Production for use wikipedia , lookup
Steady-state economy wikipedia , lookup
Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup
Business cycle wikipedia , lookup
Economics of fascism wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
MALTA National Economic Recovery Measures in Malta Given its size, Malta’s economy operates in the framework of high dependence on imports, in order to respond to its expenditure needs, as well as on its exports, so as to generate the income. This position demands carefully tailored stimuli measures for the whole economy, which was projected to increase by 0.7% in this year. The Maltese Government has formulated its first policy responses to the recent global economic downturn and consequent decline in demand, in the 2009 fiscal budget, with a mix of expenditure programmes and tax alleviation policies. Malta’s most resilient industries to external volatilities: the pharmaceutical industry, IT and financial services, represent only around 17% of its total economic activity. Of particular note is that Malta’s financial system has remained relatively immune to the negative impacts from abroad, thanks to the strong regulatory frameworks and predominant reliance on its domestic savings deposits. However, the major part of the economy (63%) relies on manufacturing and tourism industries, which are particularly vulnerable to the recent decline in global demand. In the past, Malta’s business cycles coincided broadly with the EU15 ones, albeit with a three times more pronounced counter-effects. In view of this past experience, Malta’s Government is bracing itself up with higher expenditure projects on infrastructure, environment, investments in education and re-skilling, industry and tourism marketing. Along with these projects, the main policy orientation remains: improving business regulation initiatives mainly in respect of small and medium sized enterprises, as well as fostering flexicurity at all levels. Therefore, the following considerations are of paramount significance to render this policy orientation effective: a) the intended stimulus measures need to bring an immediate positive effect if the magnitude of extraordinary challenges expected in a short run are to be managed successfully; b) in Malta, being a small economy, the traditional approach of increase in consumers’ disposable incomes is not likely to stimulate domestic economic activity in any marked way rather, this approach would result in higher imports or possibly in increased savings; c) the most effective way of safeguarding the domestic activity and employment is by focusing stimuli measures directly towards productive activities, and in particular those where Malta already possesses a competitive advantage; d) the need to safeguard existing activities over the coming months should not compromise Malta’s ongoing economic restructuring, albeit the latter may to an extent be dented by the imminent difficult international scenario. Malta taps extensively from the EU funds, ERDF and ESF in particular, which is also seen as a positive contribution towards the national targeted policy aims. A continuous collaboration between the Government and the Social Partners has been beneficial to alleviate more drastic consequences of the slow-down, hence present job losses are seen as being well within the absorption capacity of the national economy. The dialogue between the Social Partners and the Government focuses primarily on the following issues: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. a reduction in the operational costs of business in Malta; safeguarding major productive establishments from losing valuable human capital; increased marketing support to sustain demand in the tourism sector; improving flexibility in working arrangements; enhancing access by business to low cost liquidity; further simplification and speeding up of processes to access EU funds; redoubling of efforts to attract investment in areas where Malta already enjoys a competitive advantage; h. the expediting of planning permitting procedures for major projects that are already in the pipeline; i. Encouraging and where necessary prodding Government to seek temporary derogations from the limits to state aid to enterprises. Both parties agree that in order to achieve the ultimate goal of bringing Malta’s GDP per capita levels closer to the EU average, monitoring and anticipation of difficulties needs to be exercised with highest agility.