Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
How does early statistical output become late statistical input? CESS 2016 – Session C3 "Timely estimates of economic indicators" Ingo Kuhnert European Commission DG Economic and Financial Affairs How statisticians see timeliness • <Picture> How data users see timeliness • <Picture> Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Timeliness and other key quality features Timing A case study How to adapt Conclusions Key quality features of statistics Timeliness the length of time between data availability and the phenomenon they describe but also Punctuality the time lag between the actual delivery of data and the scheduled release target date Accuracy the degree of closeness of estimates to the true values they were intended to measure Reliability the closeness of the initial estimated value to the subsequent estimated value Relevance the degree to which statistical information meets user needs (includes Completeness) Key quality features of statistics II How does timeliness relate to: - Frequency: ambivalent – higher frequency means earlier data, but shorter reporting periods make data look old sooner - Reliability: more or less badly. Also, if timeliness is improved via an additional early release, there is more revision slots - Relevance: positive but asymmetric (too late = irrelevant). If earlier data is less complete, part of the gain vanishes. - (Accessibility and Clarity) Key quality features of statistics III Timeliness improvements will not necessarily result in appropriate increase in user satisfaction because many users have a large bundle of needs. Remove the most pressing shortcoming and others that were curtailed will come to the front. On the contrary, they can trigger additional user needs in particular as regards completeness and reliability. Timeliness of quarterly (EU) GDP • • • • • ESA 95 original Flash GDP growth ESA 95 amended ESA 2010 Preliminary flash (1999): (2003): (2007): (2014): (2016): t+4 months (legal) t+45 days t+70 days (legal) t+2 months (legal) t+30 days Timing: What's output to you is input to me Gauging the economy needs a long production chain: users of statistics may well appear as producers of statistics to their respective clients. Institutional boundaries can over-emphasize the user – producer antagonism. Business Statistics National Accounts Economic Forecasts Economic Governance Timing: a simple scheme Inputs Process Outputs When does the last necessary input arrive? What is the minimum time needed for production? When is the first compulsory output committed? Timing: producers and users Traditionally, producers of statistics could wait until they have all necessary source data, add a processing time that allows quality checking and a safety margin, and derive a release date. Users who need a single data input are in a comparable position, but users who need data from several statistical domains have to look for a lull in statistical releases to insert their process. Timing: Interference Inputs Process input arriving after production input arriving during production Outputs cannot be helped bad A case study: European Semester Implementation of the EU’s economic governance is organised in an annual cycle – the European Semester – in which the European Commission, Council, Parliament and Member States interact. As part of the European Semester, the European Commission (COM) analyses the fiscal and structural reform policies of every Member State, provides recommendations, and monitors their implementation. COM produces economic forecasts aligned in time with key milestones in the European Semester process: November: COM publishes the Annual Growth Survey (AGS), setting out proposals for EU priorities in the coming year May: COM proposes country specific recommendations (CSRs) on economic and budgetary policies http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/the_european_semester/index_en.htm A case study: DG ECFIN economic forecasts (Spring forecast 2016) Temporal coverage: 2016 & 2017 (2016Q1 to 2017Q4) Geographical coverage: EU/EA, EU member States, US, JP Frequency: annual, except for GDP and HICP (quarterly) Variables coverage: GDP and components, deflators, HICP, population, employment, general government finance, current account balance, exchange rates Inputs: historic data for variables covered from ESTAT, national sources, commercial suppliers, monthly data, business and consumer surveys, … Published: 03/05/2016 http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/eeip/pdf/ip025_en.pdf ESTAT releases end April 2016 • • • • • • • • • • 08/03/ … 19/04/ 21/04/ 22/04/ 29/04/ 29/04/ 29/04/ … 13/05/ GDP and main aggregates (2015Q4) monthly BoP (Feb 2016) EDP spring notification release (2015) QGFS release (2015Q4) preliminary GDP flash release (2016Q1) Unemployment (March 2016) Inflation (HICP) (April 2016) GDP flash release (2016Q1) ECFIN forecast calendar (SF 2016) • • • • • • • • • 02/03/ … 22/04/ 22/04/ 25/04/ 29/04/ 02/05/ … 03/05/ • Kick-off seminar Cut-off (12:00) Trade consistency exercise (Fri) Final text contributions (Mon) Final text merge (Fri) Printing Release (2016 - 2017) 18/05/ adoption of CSR package A case study: Timing Inputs Process Blue = QNA (Q-2) Red = EDP (A-1) Dot = GDP t+30 (Q-1) Dash = GDP t+45 (Q-1) Outputs Yellow = AGS/CSR production How to adapt to time pressure 1. Advance inputs (most comfortable solution, pass pressure and blame down the chain) 2. Replace inputs (difficult, loss of quality and/or need for process changes) 3. Shorten your own production time (uncomfortable but good idea if there is slack) 4. Relax outputs timeliness requirements (usually very little influence) How to adapt: Solution (v1) Inputs Process All timing unchanged, but an extra reconciliation step added in the process Outputs How to adapt: Solution (v2) Inputs Process Process prolonged and segmented. The preliminary GDP flash now is the last input. Outputs In parallel, European semester-related steps have been slightly postponed. Conclusions • Both users and producers have to make an effort to understand the timing constraints on the other side(s) better • Education of users about the trade-off between timeliness and other quality aspects • Better coordination of statistical production processes across & within domains • Harmonised release and revision policies • Further acceleration of statistical production • Adequate resources and political support for statistical production if a strong policy need has been identified