Download PPT

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
EUSO Onboard LIDAR
M.Teshima
Discussion by Valentin Mitev
Neuschatel Observatory
[email protected]
Options for EUSO Lidar
1. Stand-alone laser diode based (near-IR)
2. Stand-alone one-wavelengths Nd:YAG based
3. Stand-alone three-wavelengths Nd:YAG based
EUSO:
Laser Diode based, PRN- cw lidar
(Pseudo-Random Noise continuous wave)

+
PRN code
Lidar detected signal
Atmospheric response function
Laser Diode based LIDAR
Low power, compact, and long life
Assumed performances of the PRN lidar subsystems:
Sensor Sub-systems parameters
Parameter
Value
Laser diode, wavelength
800nm
Laser diode, power
20W
Transmitter diameter/divergence
100mm/1mrad
Receiver primary/secondary diameter
500mm/120mm
Receiver divergence
2mrad
Detector APD – Quantum Efficiency/gain
50%/300
Filter FWHM/transmission
2nm/60%
Optical efficiency (no filter transmission included)
45%
Platform and measurement parameters
Parameter
Value
Platform Altitude
480km
Altitude resolution
150m
Candidate:
Upgrade of ‘Beacon laser’: Based on several laser diodes at 808nm, combined in a single
multimode fiber/Total of 8W without redundancy
PRN-cw lidar:
Detection conditions:
1. Desert dust: SR=5@532nm
OD =0.89@800nm
2. Subvisible cloud:
SR=100@532nm
OD=0.62@800nm
3. Optical background: Full
Moon/45°
4. Integration time: 1s
PRN-cw lidar:
Detection conditions:
1. Opaque cloud:
SR=1000@532nm
OD =3.81@800nm
2. Subvisible cloud:
SR=20@532nm
OD=0.12
3. Optical background:
Full Moon/45°
4. Integration time:
0.01s
Conclusion
Laser Diode based, PRN- cw lidar
compact package + long life + low power
But:
Only opaque cloud top altitude
EUSO:
One- (single-) wavelength
pulsed lidar
Assumed performances of the single wavelength, pulsed lidar subsystems:
Sensor Sub-systems parameters
Parameter
Value
Laser, wavelength
1064nm
Laser, pulse energy/pulse rep. rate/ mean power
50mJ/100Hz (2x50) /5W (2x2.5W)
Transmitter diameter/divergence
50mm/0.1mrad
Receiver primary/secondary diameter
400mm/60mm
Receiver divergence
0.3mrad
Detector APD – Quantum Efficiency/gain
38%/300
Filter FWHM/transmission
0.4nm/50%
Optical efficiency (no filter transmission included)
33%
Platform and measurement parameters
Parameter
Value
Platform Altitude
480km
Altitude resolution
150m
Range resolution: 150m; Int. time: 0.01s
Opaque cloud SR = 7993 at1064 at 4km;
OD=2.28
Subvis. cloud SR = 1585 at 1064nm at 10km;
OD=0.12
Range resolution: 150m; Int. time: 5s
Opaque cloud SR = 7993 at 1064 at 4km;
OD=2.28
Subvis. cloud SR = 1585 at 1064 at
10km; OD=0.12
Range resolution: 150m; Int. time: 1s
Dust layer SR = 33.5 at 1064 at 0-4km;
OD=0.67
Range resolution: 150m; Int. time: 1s
Dust layer SR = 33.5 at 1064 at 0-4km;
OD= 0.67
Subvis. cloud SR = 1585 at 1064 at
10km; OD=0.12
Conclusion about the singlewavelength pulsed lidar
compact package +developed technology +
long life + sufficiently low consumption
1. Opaque cloud top altitude
2. Subvisible clouds optical depth@1m
3. Dust layer transmisson profile @1m
EUSO:
Three- wavelength pulsed
lidar
Nd-YAG Pulsed Laser
> simplified ‘clone’ of the laser for ALADIN
1064nm, 532nm, 355nm
Pulse rep rate: 100pps (operational mode)/ 50pps (stan-by
mode)
Power we need: ~ 50-70mJ per wavelength
> NOT 120 mJ per harmonic AS FOR ALADIN
> NO WAVELENGTH LOCKING AND
STABILISATION, AS FOR ALADIN
Assumed performances of the single wavelength, pulsed lidar subsystems:
Sensor Sub-systems parameters
Parameter
Value
Laser, pulse rep rate /total pulse ehergy&optical power 100/ ~180mJ/18W
Laser wavelength/ pulse energy / mean power
1064nm/50mJ//5W
Laser wavelength/ pulse energy / mean power
532nm/50mJ//5W
Laser wavelength/ pulse energy / mean power
355nm/50mJ//5W
Transmitter diameter/divergence
50mm/0.1mrad
Receiver primary/secondary diameter
300mm/60mm
Receiver divergence
0.3mrad
Detector APD – Quantum Efficiency/gain
38%/300
Detector PMT (532nm) – Quantum Efficiency
15%
Detector PMT (355nm) – Quantum Efficiency
25%
Filter FWHM/transmission – all wavelength
0.4nm/50%
Optical efficiency (no filter transmission included)
33%
Platform and measurement parameters
Parameter
Value
Platform Altitude
480km
Altitude resolution
150m
Range resolution: 150m; Int.
time: 0.01s
Opaque cloud SR = 297 at 355nm
at 6km; OD=6.38
Subvis. cloud SR = 4.6 at 355 nm
at 10km; OD=0.11
Range resolution: 150m; Int.
time: 5s
Range resolution: 150m; Int. time: 0.01s
Opaque cloud SR = 1000 at 532nm at
6km;
Subvis. cloud SR = 20 at 532 nm at
10km; OD=0.1
Range resolution: 150m; Int. time: 5s
Conclusion: the three-wavelength
pulsed lidar
More complicated and less compact, less
redundancy, higher consumption
1. Opaque cloud top altitude
2. Subvisible clouds optical depth@355nm
3. Dust layer transmisson profile @355nm
4. Redndancy in information output, due to more
power/wavelength
5. Calibration for EUSO detector
in Chapter 5 – EUSO Red Book
Fig. 5.2.4-11.1 in Chapter 5 – EUSO Red Book
Laser
Detection box
Beam pointing mirror
Telescope
Mirror
Lidar Probing, line-of-sight
EUSO Lidar: concept with honeycomb panels (closed)
Mass ~140Kg
Power ~ 300W
EUSO LIDAR Conclusion
• Laser Diode PRN-cw Lidar is very interesting
technology, however the current performance is
not enough for EUSO
• Three wave lengths Lidar is very powerful,
but Mass and Power are problem
• One wave length Lidar is perhaps optimum in
performance and hardware resources.
– Cloud top information
– Thin cloud transmission
– Dust layer transmission
Related documents