Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Overview of public expenditure management in Vietnam (Paper presented at Workshop on Public Expenditure Reform co-organized by Ministry of Finance of Vietnam and Fiscal and Planning Ministry of Republic of Korea and World Bank - October 9-10, 2003) Hand in hand with broader reform of the economy, public expenditure management and fiscal policy in Vietnam has experienced important changes in order to support overall national economic development goals. In this workshop, allow me to share with your distinguished guests some aspects of the reform in the field: I. Reform in Budget management in Vietnam 1. Major Vietnam features of budget management in - State budget in Vietnam is uniformly managed based on principles of centralized democracy, disclosure, transparency featuring designation and decentralization of power and responsibility and accountability binding. National Assembly decides on annual budget plan proposal, appropriation bill at central level as well as endorses final account of implemented budget. People Council at different levels decides on budget plan, appropriation bill and endorses final budget accout at their corresponding level. - Central budget plays fundamental role, namely, to be responsible for performance of national strategic and important tasks and to assist lower-level budget at localities where imbalances between expenditure needs and revenue capacity exist. Local budget is delegated with the right to certain revenue sources in order to be active and dynamic in implementing planned economic and social development targets. - State budget is to balance on a principle that total revenue from taxes, fees and charges be higher than total current expenditure to accumulate more resources for investment and development expenditure; in case of deficit, the deficit be lower than investment and development expenditure, so that a more balanced budget should be attainable. Local budget is to have total expenditure lower or equal to total revenue (no budget deficit). - Budget deficit is financed by domestic and external borrowings. Deficit financing abides by principle that fund mobilized should not direct at consumption but only at investment and development and budget should be provisioned to cover interest and principal payments when due. - Revenues and expenditures are controlled uniformly by central regulation or framework, for certain area, local budget is allowed to set concrete parameters to fit in the context at its locality. 2. Important changes in budget according to Budget Law (amended) effective from fiscal year 2004 management 2002 and 2.1 More power and accountability given to National Assembly and People Councils in approval of budget plan and approriation and endorsement of final budget account In comparison with current Budget Law, National Assembly is to decide on not only budget overall as aggregates or structures or certain areas, but also specific expenditure plan of ministerial level agencies, government agencies, other central agencies and central transfer to budget of provinces or cities directly belonged to central level (this task is the responsibility of Standing Committee of National Assembly according to current Budget Law). For People Councils, in addition to power to decide local budget plan; appropriation for local budget; expenditure plan for each departments on certain expenditure items; transfers to lower-level budget; endorsement of final budget account, the Budget Law (as amended) assigns to People Councils of provinces or cities directly belonged to central level following rights to decide: - the extent to which revenue or expenditure tasks are decentralized to lower-level budget; - sharing ratio (a percentage) for revenue to be distributed among budget of different levels with regard to revenue source which could be retained at local budget according to provisions of Budget Law; fees and charges and other financial contributions by people in accordance with relevant laws and regulations; - appropriation norms and criteria applicable at local budget; decide on regulation, set of expenditure norms and criteria according to Government requirements; - fund to be mobilized for the purpose of investment into infrastructural projects which are responsible for by local budget provided that balance of outstanding obligations should not be higher than 30% of the annual capital expenditure budget of the province. 2.2.Adjusted decetralization with regard to financial and budget management in order to promote the national financial system’s integrity and central budget fundamental role, on the one hand, and to encourage autonomy and creativity as well as dynamism of local budget, to improve the likelihood of a balanced budget at local level in the implementation of social and economic tasks, on the other. - Revenue decentralization aims at maximum revenue retained at local budget either through 100% local retained or central-local shared revenue while revenue sources of which 100% centrally acquired constrain only to those sources that are not directly linked to localities such as import and export duties, crude oil … In comparison with current Budget Law, there are 2 revenue sources which are currently 100% centrally acquired, changed to central-local shared revenue include special consumption tax and petrol and gas fees. - Budget Law stipulates expenditure tasks at central and local budget level; while specific designation of expenditure tasks at lower budget level (province, district and commune) is decided by provincial People Council. According to above-mentioned sharing arrangement, number of localities which are capable of self-balanced budget and making contributions to central budget would increase in the fiscal year 2004. 2.3 Promotion of creativity and dynamism among ministries, localities and spending agencies in management and use of budget and assigned assets along side with strengthening of disciplines and rules on financial prudence against wasteful practices. State Budget Law widens the scope of powers as well as responsibilities delegated to ministries, localities and spending agencies specifically showed through regulations on preparation and consolidation of budget plan; Government and People Committee decide on specfic budget plan for each of their belonging spending agencies and adjust budget plans if necessary. Head of state budget spending agency is fully responsible for management and use of assigned budget and assets in legal term. 2.4 Promotion of administrative reform in budget management in order to encourage activeness and dynamism from local and grass-root levels State Budget Law brings about important changes in term of budget procedures ranging from implementation, final account, inspection and audit stage of budget, particularly budget expenditure process is no longer subject to quarterly limits but rather bases on annual expenditure plan. 2.5 Disclosure information and transparency of budget - Budget plan, final account and audit opinion thereof of state budget, budget at all levels, budget of spending agencies and organization receiving support from state budget are always published. Procedures, administrative rules collection, submission, exemption, reduction reimbursement of budget revenue, transfer settlement are all listed clearly at offices question. on or or in Those regulations aim to improve budget transparency to promote democracy as well as strengthened supervision of relevant agencies or people over the whole process of state budget operation and management and use of state assets. 3. Prospects management for further changes to budget Though significant changes have been achieved with regard to budget management, in order to improve efficiency in the use of national financial resources, there is clearly a critical need for further reform to budget management which would focus on following aspects: 3.1 In order to ensure better coherence between Government policies and budget plan and to improve efficiency of budget implementation, in the coming time, establishment of a more comprehensive legal framework to set ground for output-based budgeting and medium-term budget framework to enhance annual budgeting would be very important. 3.2 Completion of set of sectoral expenditure norms and criteria would provide a better ground for strict control over state financial resourse utilization. II.Fiscal policy reform in Vietnam Financial policy of the Government of Vietnam has experienced significant changes to better progress toward two important goals of economic development at high sustainable growth rate while ensuring social equity. More specifically: 1. Fiscal policy in Vietnam - Budget revenue policy: Since 1990, Vietnam has seen two stages in its tax system and is now carrying out further reform with such objectives as: + Taxes featuring equity and non-discrimination among different economic sectors. + Tax policy in accordance with overall economy orientation toward a socialist market-based system conducive to healthy competition; moving toward a system with lower rates and broadened tax bases and higher proportion of direct taxes in total tax revenue. + Tax policy in accordance with economic integration roadmap that Vietnam has committed under international and regional frameworks. - Budget expenditure policy: State budget expenditure should be viewed as one financial resource that is to complement and supplement other available sources in meeting aggregate expenditure needs. More specifically, state budget should focus on priorities such as: + Economic infrastructural projects which are critically important but non-profitable or incapable of cost recovery, particularly those in disadvantageous or poor areas (roads, irrigation …) + Promotion of education, vocational training and science and technology through both prioritized budget grant and renewed budget management scheme for the field; combining state budget with financial resources from business and household sector in exercises of public services provision such as education, healthcare, cultural services …. + Poverty reduction which emphasizes on construction of critically important infrastructures in poor areas and education on business doing as a way for poverty reduction; direct budget transfer to cover healthcare insurance for poor people nationwide or textbook for poor school-aged children. … + Financial assistance for economic restructuring or technology renewal to improve product quality, especially in agriculture area such as quality of agricultural export, renewal of plant and animal species, plantation and animal farming pattern. - Budget deficit policy: featuring imposition of strict control on budget deficit, neither cash issuance nor commercial borrowing could be used as a means to finance the deficit, if any. Deficit could only incurred in case of necessary capital and development investment. Sovereign debt and national debt level should be always kept at sustainable and secured level for economic development. 2. years Achievements of fiscal policy over past Firstly, national financial potential and state budget strength has been consolidated significantly. After a period of quite high economic growth in 1991-1996 (annualized average at 8.5%), in the context of the aftermath of regional financial crises (1997-1999) and the global economic downturn and incidence of a number of severe natural disasters, foreign investment decreased from annualized average level of 4,200USD million during period 1991-1996 to roughly 2,900USD million for the period 1997-2001 (31% reduction), fundametal weaknesses left unaddressed for a while and economic growth rate stayed at only 6.4% per annum. In that situation, a radical and active budget policy and budget management scheme was adopted to successfully maintain fiscal and financial stability in Vietnam; budget revenue showed positive growth to ensure adequacy of financial resource to meet social and economic development needs, on the one hand, and to increase capital and development investment with annual growth of 19.5%, on the other, so as to promote aggregate domestic investment as an important factor compensating the reduced foreign investment. Budget revenue in 2002 was 1.9 times higher than that of 1996, marked an annualized growth rate of 10%; revenue structure also experienced positive development with high proportion of fees and taxes in total budget revenue grew from 92.8% in period 1991-1996 to 94.9% in period 1997-2001, which did not only sufficiently meet current expenditure need but also accumulate for capital and development investment and debt repayment. This was important factor that revive economic development momentum for the year 2002 and 2003 (2002 accounted growth rate of 6.9% and 2003 estimated to grow at 7.3%) Secondly, budget structure has positively shifted to a development budget which is in support of production, conducive and facilitative to productivity promotion; the function of macroeconomic management by state budget proved to be more coherent and more effective, contributing to avoidance of economic downturn and promotion of performance in a number of industries. - With expenditure strategy of prioritized capital and development investment, capital expenditure has always been the most important item in the budget over the past years with growth rate of more than 19% per annum, almost as twice as that of current expenditure, equivalent to 7% of GDP or 20.9% of aggregate investment capital of the economy. Investment capital from the budget has contributed to rapid increase in the economy’s aggregate investment (averaged at 3.7% per annum) which helped the economy to undergo significant decrease in foreign investment (31%) resulted from regional and global economic downturn over past years. State budget has focused on development of critically important transportation and irrigation system, particularly regional, provincial and rural transportation networks which would enhance goods and services circulation; investments in other social and economic infrastructure such as: schools, hospitals, cultural and sport facilities; investments to promote economic restructuring and infrastructural development in moutaineous areas, Tay Nguyen, disagvantegeous and flooding areas in Cuu Long river delta, the central part of Vietnam and particularly disadvantageous villages; investments in project to renew plant and animal species to target high productivity species; … State budget has developed a number of large economic projects and social and economic infrastruture system has been improved significantly. - With regard to development of education, healthcare and other social services, state budget has emphasized on human resources development and earmarked sustainable budget for education of 12.8% in total budget expenditure in 1997 to increase to 17.2% in 2003 (according to GFS the index in 2003 roughly estimated 19%); expenditure for science and technology and enviromental studies increased from 1.3% to 2.0%; healthcare and children healthcare and protection also received appropriate budget increase….. - State budget has focused more on poverty reduction particularly in areas where ethnic minorities and disadvantageous villages reside. Over 4 years (1999-2002), state budget invested 3,500VND billion in a program in support of specially disadvantageous villages in remote and mountainous areas (Program 135); completed and put into use thousands of infrastructure projects such as: roads, small irrigation, water supply, electricity, schools, healthcare clinics and markets in mountainous areas and disadvagtageous villages; extended financial assistance through Job Creation Fund to 2 million people to help them either find a job or do business on themselves; increased budget allocated to agricultural, fishing, forestry promotion programs or staff training programs …. Outcomes have been highly substantive and practical in improving quality of life among ethnic minority groups, equiping officers at villages, communes with knowledge on economic management so as to improve physical and spiritual life for people and help reduce the ratio of poor household from 53% in 1991 to 28.9% in 2002 (according to WB standard) and gradually develop moutainous economy. Thirdly, state budget reserves and contingency has been consolidated in order to actively cope with macroeconomic development and natural disasters. Empirically, over past years, Vietnam has suffered frequent natural disasters (drought, typhoon, flood… ) on a large scale and severity; there have been many new tasks for the budget arised during the course of budget implementation. Thanks to good reserves and contingency policy, state budget balance at both central and local level has been maitained or recovered more actively; capable of implementing primary tasks according to plan while actively remedy natural disasters implications as well as being capable of implementing newly arised tasks or new urgent tasks. Fourthly, state budget balance maintained at sustainable level; Sovereign debt and national debt kept at reasonable level that did not have adverse implications on macroeconomic position; debt obligations have been honored on due course according to commitments. For the past years, budget deficit has always been kept at below 5% of GDP (equivalent to 3% deficit if the calculation bases on international standards), lower than capital and development investment contributing to macroeconomic stability. Debt management has advanced significantly that ensured timely repayment according to commitments while progressed sucesfully with regard to debt renegotiation and restructuring which has contributed to good relationships with international monetary organizations and bilateral creditor countries. 3. Existing problems and prospects for further fiscal policy reform - Existing problems in fiscal policy: + Though preliminary achievements have been accomplished, macroeconomic policy by the State still inadequately mobilize resources from all economic sectors to direct at productive use for higher economic development of the country. Domestic investment to total domestic savings has roughly estimated 80%, unused resources has been huge while much of economic development investment need left unmet. Foreign investment has tended to decrease over past years. Business sector’s efficiency and performance has been limited. Investment policy targeting poor and disadvantageous areas has promoted living standard in those areas significantly, however, number of poor households is still high and income gaps among provinces and regions are also extensive. + Use of state budget has been limited in term of effectiveness, unfocused… + Adoption of participatory approach to mobilize financial resources for development of education and healthcare services has still been limited. - Prospects for further fiscal policy reform in order to achieve sustainable economic growth and poverty reduction. + Continuation of tax reform, implementation of financial policy based on principles of effectiveness, equity, trasnparency and disclosure in accordance with international economic integration requirements and standards. + Assurance of a balanced expenditure structure between capital and current expenditure in which public expenditure reform would be conducted in parallel with bolder adoption of participatory approach to public services provision in suitable areas so as to be capable of better support extended to poorer or disadvantageous regions. Assurance of a good balance between investment in growth engine areas and support extended to poorer and disadvantageous regions. + Strict control and monitoring of expenditure in favor of state-owned enterprises sector which may have subsidy nature in order to gradually phase out this sort of assistance. Review of off-budget funds to either phase out their existence or reduce state budget assistance extended to them. + Continuation of support and financing programs on infrastructure, education, healthcare, clean water supply, environmental protection, plant and animal species subsidization, prices support, transportation cost assistance, poverty reduction and job creation …. in order to promote economic dvelopment in agricultural, rural, remote, disadvantageous and mountainous areas./.