Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Changes to Oncology Coding 2009 Bobbi Buell Version 7.0 January 2009 Disclaimer Payers differ on their guidelines. Please verify coding for each payer and claim. This is not legal or payment advice. This content is abbreviated for Medical Oncology. It does not substitute for a thorough review of code books, regulations, and Carrier guidance. This information is good for the date of the information and may contain typographical errors. CPT is the trademark for the American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. All denial data from RemitDATA. Copyrighted to them and all rights reserved. Session Objectives Discuss Fee Schedule for 2009 Discuss CPT Changes for 2009 Discuss HCPCS Coding for 2009 Discuss ESA Coding Now Discuss Coding for PQRI 2009 Discuss Coding for E-Prescribing 2009 Review some E/M Changes for 2008 Review Consult Coding Discuss What You Need to Do Next Medicare Physician Payment Basics Payments are based on RVUs for each code The pool of RVUs is fixed – any changes must be budget neutral--we had one of the few exceptions in 2004-2005. The Medicare conversion factor determines the overall level of Medicare payments A formula spelled out in the Medicare statute determines the annual update to the conversion factor and that has been a disaster. What Happened to the Conversion Factor? Section 131 of the MIPPA substitutes a positive update to payment rates under the MPFS of 1.1 percent for the negative update that would have resulted from the application of the statutory formula that includes the sustainable growth rate. Section 133(b) of the MIPPA also requires CMS to make a technical change in how a statutorily required budget-neutrality adjustment is applied. CMS previously applied a separate budget-neutrality adjustment to work RVUs, but Section 133(b) of the MIPPA requires that the budget-neutrality adjustment be applied instead to the conversion factor…so, we end up at $36.0666 from $38.0870. THIS HELPS PROCEDURAL SPECIALTIES AND HURTS US. Impact of 2009 PFS Changes Code Number Descriptor 96360 Hydration initial 96361 Hydration Add-on 96365 Therapeutic initial 96366 Therapeutic Add-on 96367 Therapeutic Sequential 96368 Therapeutic Concurrent 96372 Therapeutic Injection 96374 Therapeutic Push initial 96375 Therapeutic Push seq 96401 Chemo injection non-h 96402 Chemo injection horm 96409 Chemo Push initial 96411 Chemo Push Sequent 96413 Chemo infusion initial 96415 Chemo infusion add-on 96416 Chemo infusion long 96417 Chemo infusion seql 96523 Irrigate implanted dev Work PE 0.17 0.09 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.1 0.21 0.19 0.24 0.2 0.28 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.04 Mal 1.33 0.33 1.63 0.39 0.73 0.36 0.4 1.29 0.52 1.65 0.82 2.8 1.51 3.73 0.67 4.17 1.76 0.65 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.01 Total RVUs 2009Total RVUs 2008 RVU change 2008 $ 1.57 1.61 -0.04 $ 60.56 0.46 0.49 -0.03 $ 18.28 1.91 1.97 -0.06 $ 73.89 0.61 0.64 -0.03 $ 23.61 0.96 0.97 -0.01 $ 38.09 0.57 0.6 -0.03 $ 22.09 0.58 0.56 0.02 $ 20.57 1.51 1.54 -0.03 $ 57.89 0.66 0.68 -0.02 $ 25.52 1.87 1.73 0.14 $ 64.75 1.02 1.09 -0.07 $ 40.75 3.1 3.16 -0.06 $ 119.21 1.77 1.81 -0.04 $ 68.18 4.09 4.27 -0.18 $ 161.49 0.93 0.97 -0.04 $ 36.18 4.46 4.63 -0.17 $ 175.20 2.04 2.12 -0.08 $ 79.60 0.7 0.72 -0.02 $ 27.42 2009 $ $ 56.62 $ 16.59 $ 68.89 $ 22.00 $ 34.62 $ 20.56 $ 20.92 $ 54.46 $ 23.80 $ 67.45 $ 36.79 $ 111.81 $ 63.84 $ 147.51 $ 33.54 $ 160.86 $ 73.58 $ 25.25 Change $ (3.94) $ (1.69) $ (5.00) $ (1.61) $ (3.47) $ (1.53) $ 0.35 $ (3.43) $ (1.72) $ 2.70 $ (3.96) $ (7.40) $ (4.34) $ (13.98) $ (2.64) $ (14.34) $ (6.02) $ (2.17) Change w/4% $ (1.67) $ (1.03) $ (2.25) $ (0.73) $ (2.08) $ (0.71) $ 1.19 $ (1.25) $ (0.76) $ 5.39 $ (2.49) $ (2.93) $ (1.79) $ (8.08) $ (1.30) $ (7.91) $ (3.08) $ (1.16) Impact of PFS Changes for 2009 Code Number Descriptor 99211 Office visit, established 99212 Office visit, established 99213 Office visit, established 99214 Office visit, established 99215 Office visit, established 99241 Office Consultation 99242 Office Consultation 99243 Office Consultation 99244 Office Consultation 99245 Office Consultation Work PE 0.17 0.45 0.92 1.42 2 0.64 1.34 1.88 3.02 3.77 Mal 0.34 0.55 0.75 1.09 1.38 0.66 1.08 1.45 1.93 2.3 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.05 0.1 0.13 0.16 0.21 Total RVUs 2009Total RVUs 2008 RVU change 2008 $ 0.52 0.54 -0.02 $ 19.81 1.03 1.03 0 $ 37.33 1.7 1.68 0.02 $ 59.80 2.56 2.53 0.03 $ 89.89 3.46 3.43 0.03 $ 121.50 1.35 1.34 0.01 $ 47.99 2.52 2.5 0.02 $ 89.12 3.46 3.43 0.03 $ 122.26 5.11 5.06 0.05 $ 179.01 6.28 6.25 0.03 $ 220.90 2009 $ $ 18.75 $ 37.15 $ 61.31 $ 92.33 $ 124.79 $ 48.69 $ 90.89 $ 124.79 $ 184.30 $ 226.50 Change Change w 4% $ (1.06) $ (0.30) $ (0.18) $ 1.30 $ 1.51 $ 3.97 $ 2.44 $ 6.13 $ 3.29 $ 8.28 $ 0.70 $ 2.65 $ 1.77 $ 5.40 $ 2.53 $ 7.52 $ 5.29 $ 12.66 $ 5.60 $ 14.66 Other Proposed Medicare FS Changes 2009 Non-payment for preventable conditions is now part of inpatient payment. CMS discusses the possibility of it in physician payment and is still looking for comments. Nurse Practitioners who enrolled in the Medicare Program on or after 1/1/2003 must have a Masters’ Degree or DNP. Reinstates the ability to use electronic facsimile transmission of prescription until January 1, 2012. But, this is unrelated to getting the incentive in 2009. G0332 is out! Change in the Enrollment Methodology Establishment of an Effective Billing Date for Physicians and NonPhysician Practitioners: The final rule establishes the effective date of billing for physicians and non-physician practitioners as the later of: (1) the date of filing of a Medicare enrollment application that was subsequently approved by a Medicare contractor; or (2) the date an enrolled physician or non-physician practitioner first started furnishing services at a new practice location. In addition, physicians and non-physician practitioners who meet all program requirements may bill retrospectively: For services furnished up to 30 days prior to the effective date, rather than the 23 months allowed under current regulations; and For services furnished up to 90 days prior to the effective date if the President has declared an emergency under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act PECOS Starting January 1, enrollment for physicians or other providers in a new location will be much more strict in terms of what you can bill--now it's 23 months; next year, it will be 30 days. The Internet-based Provider Enrollment, Chain and Ownership System (PECOS) will allow physicians and non-physician practitioners to enroll, make a change in their Medicare enrollment, view their Medicare enrollment information on file with Medicare, and check on the status of a Medicare enrollment application via the Internet. On December 1, CMS announced that PECOS is now available in about 20 states, NOT including California. Physicians and non-physician practitioners in the District of Columbia and the States shown above who wish to access Internet-based PECOS may go to this place to check it out: https://pecos.cms.hhs.gov/pecos/login.do After Revocation of Billing Privileges The final rule provides that a physician or non-physician practitioner is not allowed to bill for services furnished after certain reportable events, including: A Federal exclusion or debarment, or felony conviction; A State license suspension or revocation; or A practice location is determined to be not operational by CMS or its contractor. For all other revocation actions, individual practitioners will be required to submit all outstanding claims within 60 days of the effective date of revocation. Provider Reporting of Certain Events Revised Reporting Responsibilities for Physicians and NonPhysician Practitioners: The rule requires physicians and non-physician practitioners and physician and non-physician practitioner organizations to notify their Medicare contractor of a change of ownership, final adverse action, or change of location within 30 days of the reportable event. Failure to notify the designated contractor of a change related to a final adverse action or a change of location may result in an overpayment from the date of the reportable event. Lab Services Technical Component of Pathology Services for Hospital Patients - Section 136 of the MIPPA allows independent laboratories to bill Medicare directly for the technical component of physician pathology services furnished to hospital inpatient and outpatients until December 31, 2009, rather than requiring that it be bundled into the payment to the hospital. Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule Update - Section 145 of the MIPPA sets the clinical laboratory fee schedule update at the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) minus 0.5 percentage points for each of the calendar years 2009 through 2013, but repeals a competitive bidding demonstration program for clinical laboratory services that had been required under the MMA. Must maintain ordering and referring information for 7 years. Fee Schedule: Carry-over Anti-Markup Provisions (Delayed until 1/1/2009) CMS proposes to prohibit the markup of purchased diagnostic services for both the technical and professional components performed by outside suppliers. Two approaches this year: Physicians “who do not share the practice” will be subject to the anti-markup. This includes contractors who serve several physicians. This means they must be in the practice ≥ 75% of the time. Physicians who do not share the building will be subject to antimarkup. This means that, if you have a Pathologist who contracts with your office < 75% of their time, you may not mark up their fees--TC or PC. Telehealth Services The final rule incorporates the requirement in section 149 of the MIPPA that, effective for services furnished on or after January 1, 2009, CMS add three new facility types to the list of authorized telehealth originating sites: a hospital-based or CAH-based renal dialysis center (including satellites), a skilled nursing facility (SNF), and a community mental health center (CMHC). The final rule also adopts the proposal to add new HCPCS codes specific to the telehealth delivery of follow up inpatient consultations. The new codes will enable practitioners to bill for follow-up inpatient consultations delivered via telehealth. This provision effectively restores followup inpatient consultations to the list of Medicare covered telehealth services. They had been included prior to 2006, but ceased to be on the list of Medicare telehealth services, when the CPT Editorial Panel of the American Medical Association (AMA) deleted the specific codes for follow-up inpatient consultations and advised practitioners to report follow-up inpatient consultation using more general codes (i.e. codes describing subsequent hospital care) CMS did not add these more general codes to the list of Medicare telehealth services because, in addition to follow-up inpatient consultation, the subsequent hospital care codes could be used to report services involving the on-going (day to day) management of a hospital inpatient, which CMS believed would not be appropriately furnished via telehealth. The new codes are G0406-G0408 (with -GT modifier). CPT Changes 2009 CPT decided to ‘go green this year and changed the numbering for the Hydration and Therapeutic codes so they are in the same section as the Chemo codes. All Hydration and Therapeutic codes will be “963” codes instead of “907” codes. 90761 = 96361 90767 = 96367 90772 = 96372 ETC. Source: CPT 2009 Crosswalk available at http://www.asco.org CPT Changes 2009 The Chemotherapy Section name has changed to “Chemotherapy or Highly Complex Drug or Highly Complex Biologic Agent” Administration The word “highly complex” used with frequency Will payers change admin codes on some drugs? CMS leaves this up to the MACs and Carriers. Other payers may be more strict with drug administration, but let’s wait and see what the AMA says. Descriptor Source: CPT 2009 HCPCS Changes 2009 (1/1/2009) New Codes: J0641 J1267 J1453 J1459 INJECTION, LEVOLEUCOVORIN CALCIUM, 0.5 MG INJECTION, DORIPENEM, 10 MG INJECTION, FOSAPREPITANT, 1 MG INJECTION, IMMUNE GLOBULIN (PRIVIGEN), INTRAVENOUS, NON-LYOPHILIZED (E.G. HCPCS Changes New Codes J8705 TOPOTECAN, ORAL, 0.25 MG J9033 INJECTION, BENDAMUSTINE HCL, 1 MG J9207 INJECTION, IXABEPILONE, 1 MG J9330 INJECTION, TEMSIROLIMUS, 1 MG HCPCS Changes Changed Descriptors J1572 INJECTION, IMMUNE GLOBULIN, (FLEBOGAMMA/FLEBOGAMMA DIF), INTRAVENOUS, J2788 INJECTION, RHO D IMMUNE GLOBULIN, HUMAN, MINIDOSE, 50 MICROGRAMS (250 I.U.) J2790 INJECTION, RHO D IMMUNE GLOBULIN, HUMAN, FULL DOSE, 300 MICROGRAMS (1500 I.U.) HCPCS Deleted Codes Q4097 INJECTION, IMMUNE GLOBULIN (PRIVIGEN), INTRAVENOUS, NONLYOPHILIZED (E.G. Q4098 INJECTION, IRON DEXTRAN, 50 MG J9182 Etoposide 100 mg • BACK IN ACTION J1750 INJECTION, IRON DEXTRAN, 50 MG MIPPA Legislation - PQRI The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA), passed in July 2008, contained several new authorities and requirements for quality reporting and PQRI for 2009 and beyond. Section 131 directly impacts PQRI Section 132 contains the new electronic prescribing incentive provisions. MIPPA Legislation – PQRI, Section 131 PQRI 2009 incentive provided and raised to 2% Eligible professionals shall be paid 2% incentive of estimated allowable charges submitted not later than 2 months after the end of the reporting period for 2009 quality measures. Adds qualified audiologists in the definition of eligible professionals. No effect on 2007 or 2008 incentive payments. Registries CMS received over 55 self-nomination requests for registries to become “qualified” to submit quality data for possible incentive payment on behalf of their clients. 32 registries have been selected for “production” (eligible to earn a payment incentive for their providers) The final list of “qualified” registries is posted on the PQRI website at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PQRI/20_Reporting.asp#To pOfPage and go to the first download (“2008 List of Qualified Registries”) Registries Becoming a “qualified” registry is not a guarantee by CMS that the registry will be successful submitting data on behalf of their clients. These registries, however, have gone through a complete evaluation of their measure calculations and a test that their system can successfully communicate with our data warehouse. 6 Registry-Based Options Reporting Period: January 1, 2008 December 31, 2008 Reporting Period: July 1, 2008 – December 31, 2008 Individual Measures: 80% of applicable cases Minimum 3 measures Individual Measures: 80% of applicable cases Minimum 3 measures One Measures Group: 30 consecutive patients OR 80% of applicable cases One Measures Group: 15 consecutive patients OR 80% of applicable cases Do You Want to Use a Registry? Depends upon the measures that you use. Must be a registered registry with CMS and approved for submission. Must successfully report in 2008. This can be a mystery right now. Not really known until after 3/31/2009. May charge you, so is it cheaper than doing it claim by claim? Hematology-Oncology Measures 2009 MDS And Acute Leukemias Cytogenetic Testing (ICD-9 codes changed for 2009) MDS Documentation of Iron Stores Multiple Myeloma: Treatment With Bisphosphonates (Minor language and ICD-9 changes for 2009) CLL Baseline Flow Cytometry (ICD-9 codes changed for 2009) Hormonal Therapy for Stage IC-III ER/PR + Breast Cancer (CPT II codes changed; language change) Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer Patients (Updated language, CPT II codes changed, language changes) Breast Cancer Patients Who Have pT and pN category and histological grade for their cancer (Language changes, minor coding changes) Colorectal Cancer Patients Who Have pT and pN category and histological grade for their cancer (Language changes, minor coding changes) Inappropriate use of bone scan for staging low risk cancer patients (Denominator code change, language change) Adjuvant hormonal therapy for high-risk prostate cancer patients (Language, Instruction changes, minor coding changes) Three-dimensional radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer (CPT II changes, language changes, reporting frequency) Melanoma: Follow Up Aspects of Care (2009) Melanoma: Continuity of Care (2009) Melanoma: Coordination of Care (2009) Oncology Med/Rad: Plan of Care for Pain (2009) goes with Oncology Med/Rad: Pain Quantified (2009) Oncology: Radiation Dose Limits to Normal Tissues (2009) Oncology Recording of Clinical Stage for Lung and Esophageal Cancer (2009) Notice #73 #74 #101 and #103 are gone Coding #71 2008 Coding Example--Measure #71 Hormonal Therapy for Stage IC-III. ER/PR + Breast CA Report once per reporting period for all females 18 and over having breast cancer seen during the reporting period. Numerator Coding for patients receiving tamoxifen and AIs and have Stage 1C-III, ER/PR+; coding now depends upon the submission of one to three numerator codes in some cases. Tamoxifen/AI Prescribed (Three CPT II Codes [4179F & 33xxF & 3315F] are required to report) Tamoxifen/ AI Not Prescribed for Medical, Patient, or System Reasons (Three CPT II Codes [4179F-1-3P & 33xxF & 3315F ] Tamoxifen/ AI Not Prescribed due to Stage or ER/PR Negative [3302F OR 3303F OR 3312F or 3316F] Tamoxifen/ AI Not Prescribed; Reason Not Specified (Three CPT II Codes [4179F-8P & 33xxF & 3315F] are required to report) No documentation of cancer stage or ER/PR status [3305F-8P or 3316F-8P ONLY] Denominator Coding Patient is 18 years old or older Breast Cancer Dx Codes (174.0-174.6, 174.8, 174.9) E/M codes (99201-99205, 99212-99215) PQRI Measure #71 Changes for 2009 Coding Changes Different instructions Deleted: 3302F, 3303F, 3305F, 3306F, 3307F, 3309F, 3310F, 3311F, 3312F Added: 3370F = AJCC Breast Cancer Stage 0 documented 3372F = AJCC Breast Cancer Stage I: T1 mic, T1a, or T1b documented 3374F = AJCC Breast Cancer Stage I: TIC, Tumor Size >1 cm2cm 3376F = AJCC Breast Cancer Stage II documented 3378F = AJCC Breast Cancer Stage III documented 3380F = AJCC Breast Cancer Stage IV documented http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PQRI/15_MeasuresCodes.asp PQRI Coding 2009 Coding Example--Measure #71 Hormonal Therapy for Stage IC-III. ER/PR + Breast CA Report once per reporting period for all females 18 and over having breast cancer seen during the reporting period. Numerator Coding for patients receiving tamoxifen and AIs and have Stage 1C-III, ER/PR+; coding now depends upon the submission of one to three numerator codes in some cases. Tamoxifen/AI Prescribed (Three CPT II Codes [4179F & 3374F or 3376F or 3378F & 3315F] are required to report) Tamoxifen/ AI Not Prescribed for Medical, Patient, or System Reasons (Three CPT II Codes [4179F-1-3P & 33xxF & 3315F ] Tamoxifen/ AI Not Prescribed due to Stage or ER/PR Negative [3370F or 3372F or 3380F or 3316F]--ONE CODE ONLY Tamoxifen/ AI Not Prescribed; Reason Not Specified (Three CPT II Codes [4179F-8P & 33xxF & 3315F] are required to report) No documentation of cancer stage or ER/PR status [3370F-8P or 3316F-8P ONLY] Denominator Coding Patient is 18 years old or older Breast Cancer Dx Codes (174.0-174.6, 174.8, 174.9) E/M codes (99201-99205, 99212-99215) http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PQRI/15_MeasuresCodes.asp PQRI Errors Errors from 2007 1,711,975 (12.15%) of QDC submission attempts had a missing NPI. 2,662,023 (18.89%) of QDC submission attempts occurred with an incorrect HCPCS code. 1,963,196 (13.93%) of QDC submission attempts occurred with an incorrect Dx code. 1,019,422 (7.24%) of QDC submissions had an incorrect HCPCS and Dx code. 700,201 (4.97%) had only the QDC code and no other line items were billed. “Physician Quality Reporting Initiative 2007 Reporting Experience” available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/pqri/ Oncology-Specific Errors Measure % OK HCPCS Wrong Dx Wrong QDC Only NPI Problem #71 Breast Cancer with drug tx 83.70% 5.61% 4.04% 5.87% 13.38% #73 Plan of Chemotherapy 25.16% 52.70% 12.40% 8.00% 5.68% #72 Stage III Colon Cancer 56.25% 7.38% 12.00% 4.68% 9.31% “Physician Quality Reporting Initiative 2007 Reporting Experience” available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/pqri/ Hem-Onc Specific Errors Measure % OK HCPCS Wrong Dx Wrong QDC Only NPI Problem #70 Baseline Flow in CLL 77.31% 7.13% 10.35% 3.28% 12.50% #67 MDS Baseline Cytogenetic Testing 66.63% 9.05% 9.47% 3.67% 10.31% #69 Multiple Myeloma Tx With Biphosphonates 73.02% 12.21% 8.28% 4.46% 12.40% #74 RT Recommended Breast Ca 15.45% 58.15% 1.03% 7.47% 7.31% “Physician Quality Reporting Initiative 2007 Reporting Experience” available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/pqri/ PQRI Things to Remember Patient must have the proper age, diagnosis and that must be linked to the PQRI codes. Codes must be arrayed per measure specifications. Patient must meet the age requirement. Codes must be reported with the denominator CPT or HCPCS codes. Claims must have an NPI. 80% is calculated by NPI. Get forms at http://www.amaassn.org/ama/pub/category/17432.html MIPPA Legislation – Successful Electronic Prescriber, Section 132 The MIPPA provides for a 2% incentive payment to eligible professionals who successfully prescribe (as defined by the statute) their patient’s medications electronically beginning in 2009. E-Prescribing measure will be removed from PQRI for 2009 and added to the E-Prescribing incentive program as a stand-alone benefit. The Secretary has the authority to update the specifications of the electronic prescribing measure in the future. 2008 PQRI – E-Prescribing Measure Electronic Prescribing Structural Measure (measure #125) qualifies as one of three required measures in PQRI to earn an incentive payment. Requirement for 2008 PQRI is to report the measure on 80% or more of eligible patients BUT this goes to 50% in 2009. No separate incentive for successful EPrescribing in 2008 PQRI Qualified Electronic Prescribing Systems – 2009 The measure assesses eligible professional’s use of electronic prescribing using a qualified system. As a qualified system, the program must be able to perform the following tasks: Communicate with the patient’s pharmacy; Help the physician identify appropriate drugs and provide information on lower cost alternatives for the patient; Provide information on formulary and tiered formulary medications; and Generate alerts about possible adverse events, such as improper dosing, drug-to-drug interactions, or allergy concerns. Successful Reporting of the eRx Measure for 2009 The measure is intended to be reported on for EVERY patient visit in the denominator. Successful reporting is defined as reporting the measure on at least 50% of eligible patients or an amount of electronic submission of claims under Part D. Limitation: CPT codes that make up the denominator MUST account for at least 10% of the provider’s total allowed charges for Medicare Part B covered services OR a parameter of claims NOT submitted to Part D (not in 2009). Coding for E-Prescribing 2009 You must use a QUALIFIED E-prescribing system AND Have an encounter with one of these codes 90801, 90802, 90803, 90804, 90805, 90806, 90807, 90808, 90809, 92002, 92004, 92012, 92014, 96150, 96151, 96152, 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99211, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, 99241, 99242, 99243, 99244, 99245, G101, G0108, G0109. Notice some from original guidelines were removed. Coding for E-prescribing 2008-2009 Report on all eligible patients: G8443--All prescriptions created during the encounter were generated using an e-prescribing system. G8445--No prescriptions were generated during the encounter. Provider does have access to a qualified e-prescribing system. G8446--Provider does have access to a qualified e-prescribing system. Some or all prescriptions generated were printed or phoned in as required by state regulation, patient request, or pharmacy being able to receive electronic transmission. Free E-Prescribing in Oncology! That’s right! Just for cancer practices! www.oncologyerx.com For more information, contact me! Future Penalties for Not Electronically Prescribing Eligible professionals who are not successfully using electronic prescribing by 2012 will be penalized 1% of their covered Medicare Part B charges. This means that these providers will be paid at 99% for their covered Medicare Part B fee schedule services. Limitation applies as for incentives Fee reduction is prospective, providers will have to electronically prescribe by a date to be determined to be sure their fees are not reduced in 2012. This date will not be before 2010. Hardship exemption on a case-by-case basis for small practices. Future Penalties for Not Electronically Prescribing In 2013 - 1.5% deducted from their covered Medicare Part B services. Professionals will be paid at 98.5% of the physician fee schedule for covered services. In 2014 and beyond penalty will increase to 2%. Professionals will receive 98% of the physician fee schedule for the covered services they provide. Part D Information The Secretary has the authority to change the requirements for successful E-Prescribing in the future. The MIPPA legislation allows for future use of Part D data in lieu of claims-based reporting by eligible professionals. Should You Go For It? Let’s say you are a single Medical Oncologist AND you want to know whether or not to go for both incentives for your NPI Your E/M revenue is $325,000 Your drug administration revenue, plus other procedures is $275,000 Your Medicare % is 50% Your PQRI plus E-Rx bonus would be $12,000. Info Sources for ESAs… View the policy itself at View CMS FAQs http://www.ascofoundation.org/portal/site/ASCO/menuitem.5d1b 4bae73a9104ce277e89a320041a0/?vgnextoid=24be6e750752 3110VgnVCM100000ed730ad1RCRD View CMS Transmittals R1412, R1413, R80NCD at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/ncpc_view_document.asp?id=12 View ASCO FAQs http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdecisionmemo.asp?id=203 http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Transmittals/2008Trans/list.asp View American Society of Hematology Guidelines (ASH) at http://www.hematology.org/policy/practice/01242008.cfm ESA/Anemia Billing Summary If the patient has cancer and is on chemotherapy, submit the “most recent” hemoglobin must be <10 (or Hct < 30%). Bill the H or H results and use -EA. Follow Carrier guidelines for diagnosis coding. If the patient is on Radiotherapy, submit the latest H or H result, use -EB, and get denied. If the patient does not have chemotherapy-induced anemia (or ESRD), submit the latest H or H, use -EC, and follow your Carrier’s guidelines for coding and billing. If the patient has cancer and is on an anemia drug which is not self-administered, submit the latest H or H result. All other guidelines are at Carrier discretion. © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Drugs as % of Total Reimbursement 72.7% 73.0% 72.0% 71.0% 69.7% 70.0% 69.0% 67.1% 66.6% 68.0% 66.9% 67.0% 66.0% 65.0% 64.0% 63.0% Q1 Q2 Commercial © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Q3 Medicare 66.3% Drug Revenue as Multiple of E&M Revenue 6.5 Q3 7.7 7.0 Q2 10.3 9.6 Q1 10.8 0 2 4 Medicare © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 6 8 Commercial 10 12 ESA as % of Total Drugs Paid 24.1% 25.0% 20.0% 14.2% 14.8% 15.0% 8.7% 10.0% 7.9% 8.4% Q2 Q3 5.0% 0.0% Q1 Commercial © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Medicare Medicare ESA Denial Rates/Reasons J0881 – Darbepoetin Q3 Denial Rate – 26.7% Most Common Denial Codes Others 8% 50 38% J0885 – Epoetin Alpha Q3 Denial Rate – 28.1% Most Common Denial Codes Others 7% 11 2% 11 3% 4 4 8% 12% 18 12% 16 20% 18 23% © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 16 29% 50 37% Commercial ESA Denial Rates/Reasons J0881 – Darbepoetin Q3 Denial Rate – 16.5% J0885 – Epoetin Alpha Q3 Denial Rate – 9.1% Most Common Denial Codes Others 22% 18 38% Most Common Denial Codes Others 24% 18 30% 29 4% 4 50 5% 9% 96 10% 50 96 12% 16 16% 15% © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 16 17% ESA Medicare Denial Results Q3 What does this mean? Medical necessity is #1 problem Missing Information Lack of knowledge of guidelines/ NCD Poor review of LCDs H/H dropping off claims---still! H/H for all non-ESRD claims Clearinghouse/formatting problems Modifier confusion is an area of improvement. © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ESA DSO COMPARISON 79 80 74 63 70 60 47 50 40 30 20 10 0 J0881 - Darbepoetin Medicare Q3 © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. J0885 - Epoetin Alpha Commercial Q3 Medicare: Hospital Discharge Day Transmittal #1460, CR #5794, effective 4/1/2008 A Hospital Discharge Day service (99238-99239) is a face-toface service between the attending physician and the patient. Only the attending physician of record shall report 99238-99239. Other providers shall report subsequent hospital services (9923199233), if they perform concurrent services. Reporting of the service is on the calendar day of the visit, even if it differs from the discharge date. Report only one discharge service (99238-99239) per patient per stay. Do NOT report discharge services and subsequent services the same date. Discharge services may be billed for pronouncement of death on the date of death. Medicare: Inpatient/ Observation Transmittal #1466, CR 5791 Initial Hospital Observation Services (CPT codes 99218-99220) and Observation Care Discharge Services (99217) When the observation care is less than 8 hours on the same calendar date report an Initial Observation Care code. Do not report an Observation Care Discharge Service. When the patient is admitted for observation care and discharged on a different calendar date report an Initial Observation Care and an Observation Care Discharge. In those rare instances when a patient is held in observation care status for more than two calendar dates report an Office or Other Outpatient Visit (CPT 9921199215) for a visit before the discharge date. The medical record must include documentation that: Satisfies E/M guidelines for admission to and discharge from observation care to inpatient hospital care. Identifies the billing physician/NPP was present and personally performed the services Indicates the number of hours that the patient remained in the observation care status Identifies the admission and discharge notes were written by the billing physician/NPP Medicare: Prolonged Services On April 14, 2008, CMS issued Transmittal 1490CP, Change Request 5972, Effective Date is June 2, 2008(meaning that’s when you are responsible for it) with an Implementation Date of July 7, 2008 These services (99354-99355) are payable when billed on the same day (and, on the same claim) as the companion evaluation and management codes. Again, the time for the service refers to the typical/average time units associated with the companion evaluation and management service as noted in the CPT code. Each additional 30 minutes of direct face-to-face patient contact following the first hour of prolonged services may be reported by CPT code 99355. Prolonged service of less than 30 minutes total duration on a given date is not separately reported because the work involved is included in the total work of the evaluation and management codes. So, using our 99213 example, you would not report anything of less than 45 minutes, as that time frame is 30 minutes past the average visit time per CPT. Medicare Prolonged Services Code 99355 or 99357 may be used to report each additional 30 minutes beyond the first hour of prolonged services, based on the place of service. These codes may be used to report the final 15 – 30 minutes of prolonged service on a given date, if not otherwise billed. Prolonged service of less than 15 minutes beyond the first hour or less than 15 minutes beyond the final 30 minutes is not reported separately. Companion Codes must be correct in terms of pairing with Prolonged Services or claims for these codes will not be paid… The companion evaluation and management codes for 99354-99355 are the Office or Other Outpatient visit codes (99201 - 99205, 99212 –99215), the Office or Other Outpatient Consultation codes (99241 – 99245), the Domiciliary, Rest Home, or Custodial Care Services codes (99324 – 99328, 99334 – 99337), the Home Services codes (99341 - 99345, 99347 – 99350); and/or The companion evaluation and management codes for 99356-99357 are the Initial Hospital Care codes (99221 - 99223, 99231 – 99233), the Inpatient Consultation codes (99251 – 99255); Nursing Facility Services codes (99304 -99318). There is a requirement for physician (or NPP) presence. Physicians may count only the duration of direct face-toface contact between the physician and the patient (whether the service was continuous or not) beyond the typical/average time of the visit code billed to determine whether prolonged services can/cannot be billed and to determine the prolonged services codes that are allowable. Documentation is required in the medical record regarding the duration and content of the medically necessary evaluation and management service and prolonged services billed. According to the Transmittal “the start and end times of the visit shall be documented in the medical record along with the date of service.)” Counseling/coordination of care can necessitate use of Prolonged Services---but you must use the highest level of the code set involved first, e.g. 99215, 99245. Medicare will not pay prolonged services codes 99358 and 99359, which do not require any direct patient face-toface contact (e.g., telephone calls). Medicare Consultations (Medicare) Transmittal 788, CR #4215, December 2005 No shared visits for consultations in either office or hospital. Either the NPP or MD should charge for the consult. This is black and white in the transmittal. 3 R’s have been more formalized and one has been added… REQUEST from another physician for consultant’s opinion must be clearly documented in BOTH the receiving and referring physician charts. Referring MDs must have it in their plan of care, but there is no need for you to check every record. The REASON for the consult must be clearly documented in the medical record. Opinion RENDERED by the consultant with RECOMMENDATIONS for treatment. REPORT goes back to the referring physician. 99211 may not be used for a consult. NO SPLIT OR SHARED VISITS!!!!!!!! Consultations Consultations (Cont’d) Consultations may be billed based on time for counseling/coordination of care, but an opinion must be rendered. Also, if care is continuous before the consult for the same/original problem, an additional consult may not be billed. Only ONE consultation may be billed per inpatient stay. Consultations Transfer of Care A transfer of care occurs when a physician or NPP requests that another physician or NPP take over the responsibility for managing the patient’s complete care for the condition, and does not expect to continue treating or caring for the patient for that condition. When this transfer is arranged, the requesting provider is not asking for an opinion or advice to personally treat this patient and is not expecting to continue treating the patient for the condition. The receiving physician or NPP shall document this transfer of the patient’s care in the patient’s medical record or plan of care. If a transfer of care occurs, report the appropriate new or established patient visit code should be billed based on place of service. 51 Specialty Societies have objected to this language (including the AMA, ASCO, and ASH), but this Transmittal is still in effect and has been the Medicare rule since 1/1/2006. Consult vs. Referral (Not Official) Referral Consult Diagnosis and/or treatment known at the time of the referral for a new or existing problem. Referring physician wants to ascertain differential diagnoses and/or treatments for the patient for a new problem. Documents the consultation request as part of their treatment plan. Treatment known at the time of the referral with or without report by consultant. Treatment plan to be communicated by report by consultant to the referring physician. Referring physician does not expect to further treat the patient for this particular diagnosis. Referring physician will continue to treat the patient after the consultation. Referring physician out of the picture. Consultant generates a report with their opinion and plan for treatment and may update the referring physician periodically . COMMERCIAL PAYOR DSO 60 50 53 42 43 41 39 40 30 20 10 AETNA BCBS © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CIGNA UNITED HEALTH OTHER COMMERCIAL DSO BY CATEGORY 45 45 46 44 43 42 40 40 38 38 36 34 CHEMO DRUGS © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. E&M Others RADONC Commercial © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. What’s Going On? Commercial Duplicate Claims 32.1% Unbundling 20.1% Missing information 11.2% Initial Procedure Not Billed 4.0% Expenses Incurred After Coverage Terminated 3.7% © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. MEDICARE © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Biggest Problems--Medicare 44.7% Duplicate Claims 19.8% Missing Information 6.1% Medical Necessity 5.9% Initial Procedure Not Billed 5.0% Provider Not Eligible on This Date of Service © 2008, RemitDATA, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Strategies for Success Look at when your individual payers are going to adopt the new CPT codes. Analyze the reasons for rejected, denied, or delayed claims and fix it. If you do not have an EOB analyzer, you are behind the curve. Really consider doing PQRI and e-prescribing---4% is nothing to sneeze at. Enforce payments with private payers. Audit chemo prospectively; peer review E&M. Physicians must review consults before it is too late! Transmittal 788, CR 4215 (2005). Look at your billing profiles. Give $$ back before the RACs collect it for you! Participate in the struggle! Contact Info Contact [email protected] [email protected] 800-795-2633 Newsletter is free! E-prescribing is free! Thank You from onPoint Oncology LLC!