* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Development of Buddhist Sects
Gautama Buddha wikipedia , lookup
Buddha-nature wikipedia , lookup
Pratītyasamutpāda wikipedia , lookup
Yiqiejing yinyi (Xuanying) wikipedia , lookup
Nirvana (Buddhism) wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist texts wikipedia , lookup
Dhyāna in Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist influences on print technology wikipedia , lookup
Sanghyang Adi Buddha wikipedia , lookup
Enlightenment in Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist art wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist philosophy wikipedia , lookup
Korean Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism and violence wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism and psychology wikipedia , lookup
Dalit Buddhist movement wikipedia , lookup
Chinese Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism in Japan wikipedia , lookup
Persecution of Buddhists wikipedia , lookup
History of Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist ethics wikipedia , lookup
Greco-Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism in Vietnam wikipedia , lookup
History of Buddhism in India wikipedia , lookup
Pre-sectarian Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Women in Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Silk Road transmission of Buddhism wikipedia , lookup
Triratna Buddhist Community wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism and sexual orientation wikipedia , lookup
Decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism and Western philosophy wikipedia , lookup
Buddhist Era 2547 Wap Second Quarter - Saturday, October 18,2003 The Development of Buddhist Sects by Rekadahene Chandajothi Nayake Thera Buddhism, its history and civilisation As a result of the clashes among the Maha Sangha after the Buddha’s demise and also owing to the unwarranted and unwelcome words of Bhikkhu Sabbaddra, the First Great Council of Buddhist monks was summoned under the leadership and patronage of Ven. Mahakashyapa Upali and Ananda. At this time, the Buddhist Bhikkhus were scattered all over India and for this reason could not be controlled by a single individual from one centre alone. Owing to the difficulties connected with the problem of centralised control of the Sangha, many undesirable practices that were taboo for monks began to creep into their daily routine. The purpose of the First Buddhist Council was the preservation of the creed of Buddhism and the Vinaya rules in their pristine form. But barely a century had elapsed, before the Sasana encountered further signs of dissension. These clashes, however, contributed to the spread of Buddhism more than to its downfall. Despite the fact that the Sthaviravada branch of Buddhism was far removedfromtheprinciplesoftherivalfactionsthatemerged,someofthemore influential of the other sects such as the Mahasanghikas, who regarded the Buddha as the architect of emancipation, held sway in many quarters. During this period it had occurred to the monks that they should change with the times. The Second Buddhist Council could be regarded as a protest against these new ideas that emerged among the Bhikkhus. It was unavoidable that ideas contradictory to the teachings of Lord Buddha should arise among the community of monks. Thus, the Theravada monks immediately showed their willingness to make a revision of the Tripitaka. A certain amount of unrest was created among the contemporary community of monks by the ten objects presented as suitable for them to accept from laymen. The outcome of all these pretty disagreements and controversies was the division of the priesthood into eighteen sects within so short a span of time as one hundred and thirty six years, the period between Kalasoka and Dharmasoka. It is evident that the division of the Sthaviravada amongst themselves into these various sects was in one sense an impediment to the development of Buddhism. However in another sense it helped the spread of the Buddhasasana by promoting debate and controversy and the production of various commentaries and learned texts. The most marked effect of the Second Council was the emergence of a faction of Bhikkhus who defected from Sthaviravada at Kosambi, giving rise to a new sect named Mahasanghika. This lead us to conclude that this sect was the original cause of the Buddhist Schism which later developed as Mahayana. Even though there were only trivial differences in this new sect as regards the philosophy it propagated, This division contributed to the spread of Buddhism. This sect relaxed some of the strict Vinaya rules of the community of monks, and in order to attract as many adherents as possible, did its utmost to instruct society in its own concepts and doctrines. With the lapse of time, there was a defection among the Mahasanghika, so that in no time it was transformed into five different sects. The doctrines of the new sects also showed a slight deviation from Sthaviravada. The Sthaviravadas too, it should be noted, divided into eleven different sects. Of the eighteen sects mentioned earlier, at least four, the Sthaviravada, Mahasanghika, Dharmagttika and Sarvastivada spread to Sri Lanka. Some of them extended much farther to various other countries, influencing their philosophy though, but they could not make much headway. Nevertheless, it should be admitted that these various factions in the community of monks did bring about a great revival in the Sasana. The fact that there existed clashes among the sangha even at the time when Asoka became a true Buddhist and devoted himself to the promoting of the Sasana with zeal, is best indicated by the division of the Mahasangha in various schools. This situation prompted Asoka to hold the Third Buddhist Council under the patronage of Venerable Moggaliputtatissa. Some historians are of opinion that this council cannot be attributed to the initiative of Asoka. Those who are reluctant to attribute it to Asoka, go by the paucity of any epigraphical evidence to support such a view. But we cannot take only what is contained in epigraphy as historical because not all the activities of Asoka are recorded in these inscriptions and edicts, and because it is possible that those records which contain references to many others of his deeds are yet to be traced. Moreover, if we are to accept the first two Councils as historical, by their mere mention in the Mahavansa, there is no satisfactory ground for rejecting altogether the historicity of the Third Buddhist Council. Among the historical records of Sri Lanka, the word “Devanampriya” occurs for the first time in the Mahavansa and Mahavansa Tika. Thus, it is not desirable to question the validity of all that is stated in the Mahavansa. One result of this Third Council was that all the monks expelled from the sasana after this convention held an assembly in close proximity to Nalanda to protest against the high handed acts of the Sthaviravada. But it was a futile attempt. They subsequently met at Kosambi, re-entered the order through the sects of such faction as the Mahasanghikas and formed nine separate scts. Even though our chronicles Mahavansa and Dipavansa record that Asoka embraced Buddhism, he seems to have been a patron of all the existing religions. However, Asoka’s Dharma, as incorporated in all his famous edicts erected throughout his empire, is entirely based on the teachings of the Buddha. ☞