Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
U.S. National Suicide Prevention Research Efforts: 2008-2013 Portfolio Analyses Long-Term Research Objective 3.A. Long-Term Research Objective 3.A. Determine whether treatment of risk conditions (e.g., insomnia, psychosis, agitation, parental psychopathology), including optimal adherence and complete response, mitigates suicide risk. Funding Organization: Department of Defense Study Title: Brief Cognitive Therapy for Military Populations Principal Investigator: David Rudd Year When Study First Received Funding: 2008 Abstract: The research gap in the treatment of suicidality is considerable, particularly with military populations, including those returning from deployment in support of OIF/OEF. Only one randomized clinical trial targeting suicidality has been conducted with a military sample (Rudd et al., 1996). Due to these circumstances, researching the trajectory and psychotherapeutic treatment of suicidality among military personnel has become increasing critical. When focusing specifically on methodologically sound studies of treatments that have effectively reduced suicide attempts, Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (CBT) emerges as the dominant psychotherapy. CBT embodies several elements, techniques and interventions that supporting research suggests are effective in treating suicidality, including: a theoretical model that is easily explained to patients (specifically, learning about the relationships between cognitions, emotions, and behavioral responses); a manual-driven approach with treatment fidelity checks; and a focus on treatment compliance, targeting identifiable skills, and assuming personal responsibility. Brief Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (B-CBT) includes all of the aforementioned, empirically supported treatment components of CBT. B-CBT is a 12-session modification of a previously tested and empirically supported approach to treating suicidality (Rudd et al., 1996; Rudd, Joiner, & Rajab, 2004). This study will be conducted at Fort Carson, targeting 150 participants. Participants will be recruited from the appropriate clinical facilities, including the outpatient clinic, emergency room, and inpatient facility. Those agreeing to participate will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions, B-CBT (experimental condition) or treatment as usual (control condition). Treatment as usual is simply the existing outpatient treatment currently available at Fort Carson. Participants will be assessed with clinician administered interviews as well as self-report scales at intake as well as 1,3,6,12,18, and 24 months. Although time-limited treatment of suicidality is the primary target of the project, additional elements will be explored including prospective investigation of suicide risk factors and warning signs, as well as development of a centralized software assessment/management tracking system for high-risk suicidal individuals. This study design is firmly grounded in empirical support and has great potential to further our understanding of the development and treatment of suicidality in the military population. Funding Organization: National Institutes of Health Study Title: Research Training for Prevention of Suicide and Psychosis: A Public Health Model Principal Investigator: Aaron Beck Year When Study First Received Funding: 2010 Abstract: DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The primary aim of this training program is to promote academic research careers for postdoctoral trainees in researching the treatment and prevention of suicide, 1 U.S. National Suicide Prevention Research Efforts: 2008-2013 Portfolio Analyses Long-Term Research Objective 3.A. depression, and schizophrenia. In response to a pressing need for clinical researchers to translate relevant clinical findings Into community mental health services, this program will provide the next generation of researchers with an understanding of the complexities involved in clinical intervention research and the strategies to translate and disseminate such findings into public health settings. Within this context, the program includes a focus on evidence-based interventions for mental disorders and suicide including cognitive, behavioral, dynamic, family, and pharmacological treatments. This application requests support for a two-year Postdoctoral Training Program (3 trainees in Year 1, 5 trainees in Years 2-5). This program will provide trainees with knowledge and experience in the proper conduct of clinical intervention research, ethics, human subjects issues, consent procedures, clinical measurement of symptoms, as well as in research design, statistical analytic approaches, and preparation of peer-reviewed articles and research grant applications. The training will be delivered through three major components: (1) a core curriculum of didactic presentations and workshops on a variety of topics related to clinical intervention research, (2) a year-long mentored clinical research experience with a core faculty member's research group and an optional secondary research experience with another faculty member, and (3) a mentored independent clinical research project that will lead to an application for independent research funding by the conclusion of this training program (e.g., NIH K-Award, foundation grant). In addition, in order to prepare for an academic research career, trainees will have access to a broad array of research and professional development resources, including research meetings, statistical courses, career development mentoring and case consultations. The internationally recognized faculty has many years of experience collaborating with one another and training research fellows. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Suicide is a leading cause of death. Depression and schizophrenia are two of the ten leading mental disorders that generate disability, and are significant risk factors for suicide. Evaluating, refining and disseminating programs for the treatment and prevention of suicide, depression and schizophrenia are crucial for reducing the global burden of disease associated with these conditions. Funding Organization: Veterans Affairs Study Title: VA Augmentation and Switching Treatments for Improving Depression Outcomes (VAST-D) Principal Investigator: Sidney Zisook Year When Study First Received Funding: 2013 Abstract: The overall purpose is to determine research based 'next-steps' for outpatients with major depressive disorder who have not had satisfactory outcomes to standard 'first-step' treatments. The primary objective is to compare the acute (up to 12 weeks) treatment effectiveness of augmenting an antidepressant with aripiprazole or with bupropion-SR vs. switching treatment to bupropion-SR monotherapy on symptom remission in Veterans with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who have not achieved optimal response after an adequate trial on antidepressant (SSRI or SNRI) monotherapy. The secondary objectives are to compare the acute (up to 12 weeks) and long term (up to 36 weeks) efficacy, safety, effects on functioning, suicidality, quality of life, anxiety and other associated symptoms, costs and cost-effectiveness of each of the three treatments. Funding Organization: Veterans Affairs Study Title: Assessing Medications as Interventions to Prevent Suicide in the VHA Principal Investigator: Eric G. Smith Year When Study First Received Funding: 2010 2 U.S. National Suicide Prevention Research Efforts: 2008-2013 Portfolio Analyses Long-Term Research Objective 3.A. Abstract: Background: Suicide prevention is a major clinical and programmatic focus of the VHA. For patients with mood disorders, stronger evidence exists for lithium as a suicide preventative than any other medication. However, the evidence base is still thin, with little randomized evidence and with observational evidence that frequently is confounded and/or lacks active controls. Most recently, a small randomized trial comparing lithium and divalproex for preventing suicide attempts failed to find a significant difference between the medications, so the potential of lithium as a suicide preventative within or outside the VHA is still unresolved. OBJECTIVE(S): The primary objective of this study is to assess, using modern comparative effectiveness methods such as high-dimensional propensity scores, whether use of lithium is associated with reduced risks of suicide for VHA patients compared with anticonvulsant mood stabilizers (with initial focus on valproate, the most popular anticonvulsant mood stabilizer). Secondary objectives include assessing and accounting for "healthy adherer" effects, risks associated with discontinuation/nonadherence that might limit usefulness in a real-world setting, and addressing potential unmeasured confounding in administrative data through chart review. 3