Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Archaeological Excavations at Khirbet Wadi Hamam (Veradim) – A Roman Period Village in the Eastern Lower Galilee, Israel Khirbet Hamam is located on a steep slope of the Nitai Mountain, above Wadi Arbel, two kilometers west of the Sea of Galilee. Settled on an area of over 50 dunam, this was one of the largest villages in the Eastern Galilee during the Roman period. The large spring beneath the site and the proximity to the ancient route that led from the sea of Galilee, through Wadi Arbel to central Galilee and from there to the Mediterranean coast, can explain the development of a big settlement at this location. Sea of Galilee Kh. Wadi Hamam Tiberias Location Map Aerial photo of Khirbet Hamam and surroundings Mt. Arbel Wadi Arbel Mt. Nitai Spring Kh. Hamam The selection of Kh. Hamam for excavating was due to the unique advantages it presented in coping with the methodological problems, concerning the highly debated issue of the dating of the so called ‘Galilean Synagogues’. These buildings have many architectural elements that belong to what is known as the “Roman Baroque Architecture” which was common in the Eastern Mediterranean mainly during the second, third and early fourth centuries CE. In the early twentieth century, Heinrich Kohl and Carl Watzinger, pioneers of ancient synagogue research, have pointed out the similarities between the Galilean synagogues and temples and monuments in southern Syria with inscriptions that date them to the second and third centuries. They concluded that the Galilean synagogues were built during the very same period, in accordance with the architectural style which was common in the region. This conclusion was the common view among scholars up to some thirty years ago. In the early 1970s’ the Franciscan researchers, Vergilio Corbo and Stanislaw Loffreda, published their preliminary report of the excavations in the synagogue of Kefar Nahum. Their conclusions, that what is considered as the “flag ship” of the Galilean Synagogues was built, in fact, only in the fifth century, stimulated a big debate. This debate has intensified lately, when scholars pointed out other Galilean synagogues which should be dated, in their eyes, to the Byzantine period and not to the Roman period as had previously been believed. Actually, today there is not even one Galilean synagogue which scholars all agree that was built during the Roman period in the second or third century CE. Many scholars believe that all these synagogues, or at least most of them, were, in fact, built during the Byzantine period (under Christian regime), mainly in the fifth and sixth centuries. This issue has far reaching consequences even for basic concepts of archaeological discipline and historical research. Galilean synagogues that were excavated previously, such as Gush- Halav, are located in villages that were settled continuously through the entire Roman and Byzantine periods. The many layers of settlement and the findings from the various periods have complicated the archaeological picture and were subject to interpretive debates. Previous work in Kh. Hamam had shown that this site was abandoned, probably, in the late fourth century CE. The absence of layers and findings of later periods, that in other sites complicated the picture and were subject for interpretive debates, provides us here with a truly “test case”, without factors that may cloud the picture. The site was never excavated previously, hence enabling us to use advanced archaeological methods that are used these days, in order to establish the date of the synagogue. The excavation at Khirbet Hamam is based on two main principles: The first, a careful stratigraphic excavation and detailed documentation of all findings from the synagogue itself and its surroundings. The second principle is investigating the synagogue in its context, by excavating residential and industrial areas in the village. These two principles are meant to provide a vertical picture of the building itself, its plan and history; and a horizontal picture of the synagogue in its context: its place in the village, in the history of the village and on the background of village life. The First Season - October 2007: About thirty people took part in the dig, including students from the Institute of Archaeology of the Hebrew University, high school students from nearby schools, groups of Jewish youth from abroad, and hired workers. The following staff members are participating in the project: Michael Osband and Shulamit Miller (area supervisors), Benni Arubas (Survey, Mappings and ArchitecturalStratigraphic Analysis) and Gabi Laron (photographer). Two areas were opened during the first season: The synagogue and its surroundings (Area A) and an olive oil production site and a residential structure (Area B). This season we have excavated the northern (back) part of the synagogue (in estimation, about one quarter of the building) and only in one small area have we reached the floor. The portion excavated, however, is sufficient to enable us to sketch an initial plan of the building. This is a north-south lengthwise building, facing south towards Jerusalem. Two rows of benches lined the interior of the building, along the west, north and eastern walls. In the hall, three rows of columns supported the construction holding the roof. Hundreds of tiles found in the debris, attest to a roof made of tiles. The building is 14.5 meters wide, one of the widest synagogues excavated in the Galilee to date. Northern part of the synagogue – facing north The north-western part of the synagogue is covered with beautiful architectural elements that had collapsed onto it. In the NW corner, the walls were preserved to a height of about 2 meters above the floor level. Interestingly, the building stones in the collapse are mainly from limestone, while the walls that are still standing are built from basalt. It seems, therefore, that the walls were built of a combination of lime stone and basalt. No parallel to this phenomenon is known from other synagogues. Likewise, in addition to the high-quality decorated elements made of limestone, in the collapse we found also elements made of basalt, decorated in a somewhat sloppy manner. Collapse in the north-western Part of the synagogue – facing west In the north-eastern part of the synagogue we uncovered benches along the northern wall and reached the foundation of a mosaic floor, revealed here only 30-40 centimeters beneath the surface. A segment of the mosaic (some 1X1.5 m.) survived in the eastern aisle of the building. It is made of tiny stones (3-5 mm. in size) in a variety of colors. The scene, revealed here, depicts a series of craftsmen, surrounding a huge building and busy at work. The craftsmen are holding various tools of their trade: one with a frame saw, another with a carpenter’s hammer, a third with a masonry hammer, chiseling a building stone, etc. Two porters carrying a building stone together are climbing up to the building on a ramp. To date, there are no parallels to this scene, neither in other synagogues, nor in Roman-Byzantine art in Israel at all. The question of course is: What is the scene depicting? Since biblical scenes are common in synagogue art it is possible that the scene depicts one of the biblical stories about construction (Noah’s ark? the tower of Babel? Solomon’s Temple?). The mosaic floor has been removed from the excavation site and its now in the process of being restored in the laboratory of the Israel Museum. Details from the mosaic Mr. Musa Mar`i Fares and a water basin (for ablution?) found near the synagogue Area B – is located to the north of the synagogue and on the same terrace. We began with the excavation of an olive oil production site. The site uncovered included a crushing basin, a series of weights belonging to a lever-and-weight press and a base of a direct-pressure screw press. Base of a direct-pressure screw press Surprisingly, it turned out the olive oil plant was built (apparently in the fourth century) on top of a residential structure that had collapsed. This is a well-built two-story house with an interior wall that had windows which allowed air and light to enter the inner rooms (an architectural feature known as ‘Korazin windows’). Olive oil production site on top of the collapsed residential structure The next season of excavations is planned for April 27th to May 29th, 2008