Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Speech perception wikipedia , lookup
Telecommunications relay service wikipedia , lookup
Sound localization wikipedia , lookup
Evolution of mammalian auditory ossicles wikipedia , lookup
Hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Auditory processing disorder wikipedia , lookup
Auditory system wikipedia , lookup
Noise-induced hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Sensorineural hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Audiology and hearing health professionals in developed and developing countries wikipedia , lookup
Better Understanding of Audiological Test Results in Children with ASD Rebecca Davis & Lillian Stiegler Southeastern Louisiana University Common ♦ ♦ ♦ Auditory Complaints in Individuals with ASD: Hypersensitivity to loud or novel stimuli Difficulty with competing stimuli Difficulty in background noise ♦ Inconsistent and/or no responses to auditory stimuli Challenges in Testing the Child with ASD: ♦ Behavior issues ♦ Acceptance of headphones, probe tips, etc. ♦ Fear of test environment ♦ Fear of sound “Hearing is adequate for speech and language development” or Is It? ♦ Often results are limited to behavioral assessment of the peripheral auditory system ♦ Does not address issues of auditory processing ability ♦ Although Autism is a complex neurological disorder, this should not be discounted in management Solutions: ♦ Individualize audiological assessment based on the client’s reported symptoms & the challenges they present during testing ♦ Be persistent ♦ Be descriptive in impressions of the test results obtained Patient 1 Results Obtained WNL 2 Testing Performed Pure tone, Speech Audiometry Sound field VRA 3 ABR, DPOAE, Immittance 4 5 Sound field VRA screenings on two separate occasions ABR Responses to clicks at 15 dBnHL in both ears; 500 Hz tonebursts-35 dBnHL in both ears; DPOAEs present in both ears; tympanometry consistent with patent PE tubes. Responses WNL at 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz; speech awareness threshold at 10 dBHL; body part recognition – 100% Absolute and interpeak latencies were WNL and recorded down to 20 dBnHL; morphology was “infantlike” 6 None Impressions “Hearing is within normal limits in both ears” “Results indicated adequate hearing for speech and language development.” “These results are consistent with normal and/or adequate peripheral hearing sensitivity bilaterally” No No “Hearing is adequate for speech and language development” Yes No Yes COR Inconsistent responses to pure tones “Bilaterally normal ABR…These threshold levels are considered to be within normal limits and adequate for the development of normal speech and language” “Mother felt that A’s vision and hearing were satisfactory for assessment purposes” “Hearing accuity is questionable.” ABR “Normal sensitivity but abnormal I-V intervals and abnormal synchrony.” Recommend further testing before generating an impression 8 Pure Tone AC OAEs WNL at 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz Present in both ears 9 Speech Audiometry SRT in sound field at 10 dB 10 Pure tones, tympanometry BAER WNL Normal latency-intensity curve Sound field VRA, speech, tympanometry, 7 Rx:Further Testing? No “hearing acuity is adequate for speech and language development” “This indicated that G’s hearing was essentially within normal limits” No Yes No Yes, but further behavioral attempts were unsuccessful. Yes None given None given No Yes Normal pure tone, speech response at 30 dBHL; abnormal pressure and compliance “normal hearing sensitivity bilaterally” Yes Immittance Normal type A tympanograms; ipsilateral reflexes at 90-95 dB “Normal auditory functioning” 11 TEOAEs Present bilaterally “Hearing within normal limits, with no evidence of any conductive component at this time.” No 12 Sound field VRA, OAEs, tympanometry Minimal responses considered WNL; OAEs present; tympanometry consistent with PE tubes “Hearing considered within normal limits” Yes “SRTs were within normal limits bilaterally. TEOAES were present bilaterally, indicating hearing within normal limits.” Yes Speech, TEOAEs Screening at 20 dB at 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz “hearing within normal limits” Screening at 20 dB at 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz “normal hearing across all frequencies” “hearing considered within normal limits” “ [hearing] was within normal limits” No No No Yes Hearing evaluation (no tests identified) “results were found to be within normal limits” Yes ABR (no sedation), tympanometry “no significant high frequency hearing loss in either ear” Yes Pure tone air 13 14 15 OAEs present bilaterally No Pure tone air x 4 Hearing screening Could not be conditioned for hearing screening Responses to clicks at 15 dBnHL; type A tympanogram present in the right ear, could not obtain a tympanogram in the left ear *Davis, R. & Stiegler, L. (2005). Toward more effective audiological assessment of children with autism spectrum disorders. Seminars in Hearing, 26, 241-252. References American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1995): Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Task Force on Central Auditory Processing Consensus Development. Rockville, MD: ASHA. Davis, R. & Stiegler, L. (2005). Toward more effective audiological assessment of children with autism spectrum disorders. Seminars in Hearing, 26, 241-252. Filipek P, Accardo P, Ashwal, S, et al. (2000). Practice parameter: Screening and diagnosis of autism. Neurology, 55, 468-479. Grandin, T. (1995). Thinking in Pictures. New York, NY: Doubleday. Gravel, J., Dunn, M., Lee, W., & Ellis, M. (2006). Peripheral audition of children on the Autistic spectrum. Ear and Hearing, 27, 299-312. Grewe, T., Danhauer, J., Danhauer, K., & Thornton, A. (1994). Clinical use of otoacoustic emissions in children with autism. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 30, 123-132. Kellerman, G., Fan, J., & Gorman, J. (2005). Auditory abnormalities in autism: Toward functional distinctions among findings. CNS Spectrums, 10, 748-756. Konstantareas, M., Homatidis, S. (1987). Ear infections in autistic and normal children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 585-593 Roper, L., Arnold, P., & Monteiro, B. (2003). Co-occurrence of autism and deafness: Diagnostic considerations. Autism, 7, 245-253. Rosenhall, U., Nordin, V., Brantberg, K., Gillberg, C. (2003). Autism and auditory brainstem responses. Ear and Hearing, 24, 206-214. Rosenhall, U., Nordin, V., Sandstrom, M., Ahlsen, G., & Gillberg, C. (1999). Autism and hearing loss. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 349-357. Tharpe, A., Bess, F., Sladen, D., Schissel, H., Couch, S., Schery, T. (2006). Auditory characteristics of children with autism. Ear & Hearing, 27, 430-441. Webster, D. (1998). Neuroscience of Communication. San Diego: Singular.