Download Developing and Leading Effective Teams

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Developing and Leading
Effective Teams
Chapter 11
Work Teams: Types, Effectiveness,
and Stumbling Blocks
• Team
• a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a
common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold
themselves mutually accountable
Work Teams: Types, Effectiveness,
and Stumbling Blocks
• The essence of a team is common commitment
• Without it, groups perform as individuals; with it, they become a
powerful unit of collective performance
The Evolution of a Team
Four General Types of Work Teams
and Their Outputs
A General Typology of Work Teams
• Advice teams
• created to broaden the
information base for managerial
decisions
• Production Teams
• responsible for performing day-today operations
A General Typology of Work Teams
• Project Teams
• require creative problem solving,
often involving the application of
specialized knowledge
• time is critical
• Action Teams
• High specialization is combined
with high coordination
• best exemplified by a baseball
team
Effective Work Teams
Effective Work Teams
• Team viability
• defined as team members’
satisfaction and continued
willingness to contribute.
How Strong Are Your Teamwork
Competencies?
Why Work Teams Fail
Characteristics of Effective Teamwork
Cooperation
• Individuals are said to be cooperating when their efforts are
systematically integrated to achieve a collective objective.
• The greater the integration, the greater the degree of cooperation.
Research Support for Cooperation
1. Cooperation is superior to competition in promoting achievement
and productivity.
2. Cooperation is superior to individualistic efforts in promoting
achievement and productivity.
3. Cooperation without intergroup competition promotes higher
achievement and productivity than cooperation with intergroup
competition
Trust
• Trust
• Reciprocal faith in others’
intentions and behavior
• Propensity to trust
• A personality trait involving one’s
general willingness to trust others.
Interpersonal Trust Involves a Cognitive
Leap
How to Build Trust
Communication
Support
Respect
Fairness
Predictability
Competence
How to Build Trust
• Trust needs to be earned; it cannot be demanded.
• Trust is anchored to credibility —
• “developing the integrity, intent, capabilities, and results that make you
believable , both to yourself and to others.”
Cohesiveness
• Cohesiveness
• a process whereby “a sense of ‘we-ness’ emerges to transcend individual
differences and motives
Cohesiveness
Cohesive group members stick together for one or both of the
following reasons:
1. they enjoy each others’ company
2. they need each other to accomplish a common goal.
Cohesiveness
• Socio-emotional cohesiveness
• a sense of togetherness that develops when individuals derive emotional
satisfaction from group participation.
• Instrumental cohesiveness
• a sense of togetherness that develops when group members are mutually
dependent on one another because they believe they could not achieve the
group’s goal by acting separately
Lessons from Group Cohesiveness Research
• There is a small but statistically significant
cohesiveness→performance effect.
• The cohesiveness→performance effect was stronger for smaller and
real groups
• The cohesiveness→performance effect becomes stronger as one
moves from nonmilitary real groups to military groups to sports
teams.
Steps Managers Can Take to Enhance the
Two Types of Group Cohesiveness
Basic Distinctions between Virtual Teams
and Self-Managed Teams
Virtual Teams
• Virtual team
• physically dispersed task
group that conducts its
business primarily
through modern
information technology
Research Insights
• Virtual groups formed over the Internet follow a group development
process similar to that for face-to-face groups
• Internet chat rooms create more work and yield poorer decisions than
face-to-face meetings and telephone conferences
• Inspirational leadership has a positive impact on creativity in electronic
brainstorming groups
• Conflict management is particularly difficult for asynchronous virtual teams
that have no opportunity for face-to-face interaction
Practical Considerations
• Meaningful face-to-face contact, especially during early phases of the
group development process, is absolutely essential
• Periodic face-to-face interaction not only fosters social bonding
among virtual team members, it also facilitates conflict resolution.
How to Create and Manage a Virtual
Team
Self-Managed Teams
• Self-managed teams
• Groups of employees granted administrative oversight for their work.
• Accountability is maintained indirectly by outside managers and leaders
Self-Managed Teams
Team advisers rely on four indirect influence tactics:
• Relating
• Scouting
• Persuading
• Empowering
Are Self-Managed Teams Effective?
Self-managed teams had:
• A positive effect on productivity.
• A positive effect on specific attitudes relating to self-management
• No significant effect on general attitudes
• No significant effect on absenteeism or turnover
Team Building
• Team building
• Experiential learning aimed at
better internal functioning of
groups.
Ways to Empower Self-Managed Teams
Attributes of
High-Performance Teams
Participative
leadership
Shared
responsibility
Aligned on
purpose
High
Future
focused
Focused on
task
communication
Creative
talents
Rapid
response
Assessing the Effectiveness of Team
Building
• Reaction
• How did the participants feel about the activity?
• Learning
• Did the experience increase knowledge or improve skills?
Assessing the Effectiveness of Team
Building
• Behavior
• Did participants’ on-the-job behavior improve as a result of the activity?
• Results
• Did participants subsequently achieve better measurable results?
Team Leadership
• Team leadership aimed at building group cohesiveness and limiting
conflict tended to enhance team performance
• A coaching style of leadership was effective for charismatic leaders
when dealing with team members having low self-efficacy
• Treating members as separate individuals and applying differentiated
leadership may result in some loss of group effectiveness