Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
MODERN TIMES by Art Hobson [email protected] NWA Times 25 June 2005 The Global Warming Story USA fiddles while Earth burns Earth now absorbs 0.85 watts per square meter more energy from the sun than it emits to space--equivalent to an 0.85-watt heater placed over every square meter on the planet. To put it another way, this energy imbalance is equivalent to the effect of 400,000 huge 1000-megawatt power plants that put their entire energy output into heating the planet. This is the amount of energy now going into global warming. Hundreds of glaciers are melting all over the Antarctic Peninsula, where climate has warmed by 3.5 degrees since 1950. The huge West Antarctic ice sheet is partially disintegrating and sliding seaward. Global temperatures rose by one degree during the twentieth century, sea levels are rising, there's been a five percent increase in the frequency of heavy rains in the USA, carbon dioxide concentrations are at by far their highest level in half a million years, Alaskan temperatures are up by seven degrees since 1950, the Arctic ice cap has thinned by 40 percent since 1950, the edges of the Greenland ice sheet are melting away, mountain glaciers are retreating all over the world, spring thaws are occurring earlier worldwide, upper atmospheric water vapor is increasing, Europe's recent record-breaking hot and deadly summers have been linked to global warming, and there are literally thousands of research reports about biological changes caused by recent global warming. The World Health Organization estimates that global warming already accounts for more than 160,000 deaths annually. Nature is speaking to us loud and clear, but President Bush and most Americans are not listening. Like the (partly fictitious) story of Emperor Nero fiddling while Rome burned, the USA fiddles while Earth burns. Not long ago, America was the world's environmental leader instead of its laggard. Through the Carter and Reagan presidencies, we led the fight against ozone depletion; you can find my June 11 column on this at http://physics.uark.edu/hobson/. That fight culminated in 1986 with the signing of a sweeping treaty that quickly did away with essentially all ozone-destroying chemicals, including the extremely profitable refrigerating fluid marketed as freon. Powerful corporations such as Dow and Dupont had the good sense to support the ozone treaty, and sufficient business acumen to reap big profits by being first in line to produce non-destructive replacements for the banned chemicals. The ozone story shows that it's possible to take radical action against global environmental problems, that U.S. business can play a wise supporting role even when enormous profits are at stake, and that the USA knows how to lead on these issues. The global warming story, on the other hand, is an absurd and tragic farce. Present harm and future catastrophe stare us in the face, while our president rejects the Kyoto treaty on global warming as bad for business. Alert consumers opt for highly efficient automobiles partly in response to global warming, while General Motors rejects hybrid vehicles and pursues its giant SUVs and thus continues losing sales to environmentally-aware foreign competitors. British Prime Minister Tony Blair implores our president to support global warming action at the coming G8 economic conference, while Bush mumbles platitudes about conducting further climate research. The news media consider the fate of the planet to be too abstract to consume the valuable minutes that they could otherwise devote to pop stars, murders, and Hollywood intrigues. Many people prefer to put their faith in novels like Michael Chrichton's State of Fear rather than in the published findings of thousands of serious scientists. Science itself is partly responsible for our nation's folly, because science teachers have not educated public school or college students about science-related social problems such as global warming. On the other hand, scientists have, to their credit, extensively researched global warming and have tried to warn the public. An unprecedented joint statement from the leading scientific academies of the eight nations involved in the G8 summit, plus Brazil, India, and China, warns that governments must no longer procrastinate on global warming, which the academies see as humanity's gravest danger. President Bush's anti-science and pro-fossil fuel ideology have been evident for years. This administration has repeatedly ignored the findings of the thousands of scientists participating in the ongoing scientific consensus represented by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. He ignored a 2002 U.S. National Academy of Sciences report that he himself had requested. When his own Department of State reported to the United Nations that global warming is caused by humans and is a danger to the world, he derided it as "a report put out by the bureaucracy." He removed the section on climate change from a 2002 Environmental Protection Agency report. He tampered with a 2003 EPA report, specifically demanding deletion of a 1000-year temperature record that contradicted his own opinions, insertion of a reference to a discredited study funded by the American Petroleum Institute, and elimination of the report's overall conclusion. EPA director Christine Whitman says the situation was so "brutal" that she opted to delete the entire global warming section. Bush pressured the UN to replace U.S. scientist Robert Watson as head of the IPCC because the oil industry didn't like Watson's conclusions. The president and most Americans are following the pseudoscientific fantasy of determining one's conclusions before considering the evidence. But nature cannot be fooled. We'd better start listening to her.