* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy
Survey
Document related concepts
Allen Telescope Array wikipedia , lookup
James Webb Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Spitzer Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
CfA 1.2 m Millimeter-Wave Telescope wikipedia , lookup
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
Optical telescope wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Review and Overview The Imaging Chain in Optical Astronomy “Imaging Chain” includes these elements: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. energy source object collector detector (or sensor) processor display analysis storage (if any) Source and/or Object Optical Imaging Chain • In astronomy, the source of energy (1) and the object (2) are almost always one and the same! • i.e., The object emits the light 1: source – Examples: • Galaxies • Stars 5: processing – Exceptions: 2: object 6: display 7: analysis 3: collector 4: sensor Optical Imaging Chain in Astronomy until 1980 or so • Planets and the moon • Dust and gas that reflects or absorbs starlight Optical Imaging Chain in Modern Astronomy (post-1980) 5: processing 1: source 2: object 5: processing 1: source 2: object 6: display 7: analysis 3: collector 4: sensor 6: display 7: analysis 3: collector 4: sensor 8: storage 8: storage (stack of glass) 1 Transition (“Catch-up”) Phase: Digitize Plates Optical Imaging Chain in Radio Astronomy 6: display 7: analysis 1,2 + 3,4 Scanner radio waves receiver where waves are collected waves converted into electro signals 5 8: storage computer received as signal 6,7 Specific Requirements for Astronomical Imaging Systems • Requirements always conflict – Always want more than you can have ⇒must “trade off” desirable attributes − Deciding the relative merits is a difficult task • “general-purpose” instruments (cameras) may not be sufficient • Want simultaneously to have: – excellent angular resolution AND wide field of view – high sensitivity AND wide dynamic range • Dynamic range is the ability to image “bright” and “faint” sources Angular Resolution vs. Field of View • Angular Resolution: ability to distinguish sources that are separated by small angles – Limited by: • Optical Diffraction • Sensor Resolution • Field of View: angular size of the image field – Limited by: • Optics • Sensor Size (area) – broad wavelength coverage AND ability to measure narrow spectral lines Sensitivity vs. Dynamic Range • Sensitivity – ability to measure faint brightness Wavelength Coverage vs. Spectral Resolution • Wavelength Coverage – Ability to image over a wide range of wavelengths – Limited by: • Spectral Transmission of Optics (Glass cuts off UV, far IR) • Dynamic Range – ability to image “bright” and “faint” sources in same system • Spectral Resolution – Ability to detect and measure narrow spectral lines – Limited by: • “Spectrometer” Resolution (number of lines in diffraction grating) 2 Optical Collection (Link #3): Refracting Telescopes • Lenses collect light • BIG disadvantages Optical Collector (Link #3) – Chromatic Aberrations (due to dispersion of glass) – Lenses are HEAVY and supported only on periphery • Limits the Lens Diameter • Largest is 40" at Yerkes Observatory, Wisconsin http://astro.uchicago.edu/vtour/40inch/kyle3.jpg Optical Collection (Link #3): Reflecting Telescopes • Mirrors collect light • Chromatic Aberrations eliminated • Fabrication techniques continue to improve • Mirrors may be supported from behind ⇒ Mirrors may be made much larger than refractive lenses Thin and Light (Weight) Mirrors Optical Reflecting Telescopes • Concave parabolic primary mirror to collect light from source – modern mirrors for large telescopes are thin, lightweight & deformable, to optimize image quality 3.5 meter WIYN telescope mirror, Kitt Peak, Arizona Hale 200" Telescope Palomar Mountain, CA • Light weight ⇒Easier to point – “light-duty” mechanical systems ⇒ cheaper • Thin Glass ⇒ Less “Thermal Mass” – Reaches Equilibrium (“cools down” to ambient temperature) quicker http://www.cmog.org/page.cfm?page=374 http://www.astro.caltech.edu/observatories/palomar/overview.html 3 200" mirror (5 meters) for Hale Telescope • • • • • • • Keck telescopes, Mauna Kea, HI Monolithic Mirror (single piece) Several feet thick 10 months to cool 7.5 years to grind Mirror weighs 20 tons Telescope weighs 400 tons “Equatorial” Mount – follows sky with one motion http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/geninfo/about.html 400" mirror (10 meters) for Keck Telescope • 36 segments • 3" thick • Each segment weighs 400 kg (880 pounds) – Total weight of mirror is 14,400 kg (< 15 tons) • Telescope weighs 270 tons • “Alt-azimuth” mount (left-right, up-down motion) Basic Designs of Optical Reflecting Telescopes 1. Prime focus: light focused by primary mirror alone 2. Newtonian: use flat, diagonal secondary mirror to deflect light out side of tube 3. Cassegrain: use convex secondary mirror to reflect light back through hole in primary 4. Nasmyth (or Coudé) focus (coudé ⇒ French for “bend” or “elbow”): uses a tertiary mirror to redirect light to external instruments (e.g., a spectrograph) – follows sky with two motions + rotation Prime Focus Sensor Newtonian Reflector f Mirror diameter must be large to ensure that obstruction is not significant Sensor 4 Feature of Cassegrain Telescope Cassegrain Telescope • Long Focal Length in Short Tube f Sensor Location of Equivalent Thin Lens Secondary Convex Mirror Coudé or Nasmyth Telescope Optical Reflecting Telescopes Schematic of 10-meter Keck telescope (segmented mirror) Sensor Large Optical Telescopes Telescopes with largest diameters (in use or under construction: – 10-meter Keck (Mauna Kea, Hawaii) – 8-meter Subaru (Mauna Kea) – 8-meter Gemini (twin telescopes: Mauna Kea & Cerro Pachon, Chile) – 6.5-meter Mt. Hopkins (Arizona) – 5-meter Mt. Palomar (California) – 4-meter NOAO (Kitt Peak, AZ & Cerro Tololo, Chile) Keck telescope mirror (note person) Why Build Large Telescopes? 1. Larger Aperture ⇒ Gathers MORE Light – Light-Gathering Power ∝ Area – Area of Circular Aperture = πD2 / 4 ∝ D2 • D = diameter of primary collecting element 2. Larger aperture ⇒ better angular resolution – recall that: ∆θ ≅ λ D Summit of Mauna Kea, with Maui in background http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/billa/bigeyes.html 5 Why Build Small Telescopes? 1. Smaller aperture ⇒ collects less light • ⇒ less chance of saturation (“overexposure”) on bright sources 2. Smaller aperture ⇒ larger field of view (generally) – F Ratio: F# • F# describes the ability of the optic to “deflect” or “focus” light – Smaller F# ⇒ optic “deflects” light more than system with larger F# Determined by “F ratio” or “F#” F#≡ f D f = focal length of collecting element D = diameter of aperture Small F# F# of Large Telescopes • Hale 200" on Palomar: f/3.3 – focal length of primary mirror is: 3.3 × 200" = 660" = 55' ≅ 16.8 m – Dome must be large enough to enclose Large F# F Ratio: F# • Two reflecting telescopes with different F# and same detector have different “Fields of View”: • Keck 10-m on Mauna Kea: f/1.75 – focal length of primary mirror is: 1.75 × 10m = 17.5 m ≅ 58 m large ∆θ small ∆θ Small F# Large F# Astronomical Cameras Usually Include: 1. Spectral Filters – Sensors (Link #4) – most experiments require specific wavelength range(s) broad-band or narrow-band 2. “Reimaging” Optics – enlarge or reduce image formed by primary collecting element 3. Light-Sensitive Detector: Sensor 6 Astronomical Sensors • Most common detectors: – Human Eye – Photographic Emulsion Angular Resolution • Fundamental Limit due to Diffraction in “Optical Collector” (Link #3) ∆θ ≅ • film • plates λ D – Electronic Sensors • But Also Limited by Resolution of Sensor! • CCDs Sensor Resolution ChargeCharge-Coupled Devices (CCDs (CCDs)) • Standard light detection medium for BOTH professional and amateur astronomical imaging systems – Significant decrease in price • numerous advantages over film: – high quantum efficiency (QE) • Obvious for Electronic Sensors (e.g., CCDs) • Elements have finite size • Light is summed over area of sensor element (“integrated”) • Light from two stars that falls on same element is added together • stars cannot be distinguished in image! • meaning most of the photons incident on CCD are “counted” – linear response • measured signal is proportional to number of photons collected – fast processing turnaround (CCD readout speeds ~1 sec) • NO development of emulsion! – regular grid of sensor elements (pixels) • as opposed to random distribution of AgX grains – image delivered in computer-ready form ∆x Same Effect in Photographic Emulsions • More difficult to quantify • Light-sensitive “grains” of silver halide in the emulsion • Placed “randomly” in emulsion • “Random” sizes • “large” grains are more sensitive • (respond to few photons) • “small” grains produce better resolution Photographic techniques: silver halide • Film – Emulsion on “flexible” substrate – Still used by amateurs using sensitive film • B&W and color • Special treatment to increase sensitivity • Photographic Plates – Emulsion on glass plates – Most common detector from earliest development of AgX techniques until CCDs in late 70’s 7 Eye as Astronomical Detector Eye with Telescope • Eye includes its own lens Without Eyepiece – focuses light on retina ( “sensor”) • When used with a telescope, must add yet another lens – redirect rays from primary optic – make them parallel (“collimated”) • rays appear to come from “infinity” (infinite distance away) With Eyepiece Light entering eye is “collimated” – reimaging is performed by “eyepiece” Eye as Astronomical Detector • Point sources (stars) appear brighter to eye through telescope • Large role in ground-based optical astronomy – scintillation modifies source angular size 2 • Factor is Atmospheric Effects on Image D P2 • twinkling of stars = “smearing” of point sources – extinction reduces light intensity – D is telescope diameter – P is diameter of eye pupil – Magnification should make light fill the eye pupil (“exit pupil”) • atmosphere scatters a small amount of light, especially at short (bluer) wavelengths • water vapor blocks specific wavelengths, especially nearIR – scattered light produces interfering “background” • Extended sources (for example, nebulae) do not appear brighter through a telescope – Gain in light gathering power exactly compensated by image magnification, spreads light out over larger angle. Scattering • “Wavelength Dependent” – Depends on color of light – Long wavelengths are scattered “less” • astronomical images are never limited to light from source alone; always include “source” + “background sky” • “light pollution” worsens sky background Scattering by Molecules "Rayleigh Scattering" ∝ 1 λ4 • Molecules are SMALL • “Blue” light is scattered MUCH more than red light – Reason for BOTH • blue sky (blue light scattered from sun in all directions) • red sunset (blue light is scattered out of the sun’s direct rays) 8 Scattering by Dust "Mie Scattering" ∝ 1 λ • Dust particles are MUCH larger than molecules Link #5: Image Processing – e.g., from volcanos, dust storms • Blue light is scattered by dust “somewhat more” than red light Link #5: Image Processing Image Processing • Once collected, images must be corrected for: • Formerly: performed in darkroom – e.g., David Malin’s “Unsharp Masking” • Subtract a blurred copy from a “sharp” positive • (or, add a blurred negative to a “sharp” positive) • Now performed in computers, e.g., – contrast enhancement – “sharpening” – “normalization” (background division) –… – Atmosphere (to extent possible) • e.g., sequence of images obtained at a variety of telescope elevations usually can be corrected for atmospheric extinction – CCD defects and artifacts • dark current – CCD pixel reports a signal even when not exposed to light • bad pixels – some pixels will be dead, hot, or even “flickering” • variations in pixel-to-pixel sensitivity – every pixel has its own QE – can be characterized by “flat field” Image Display and Analysis Links #6 and #7 Image Display and Analysis • This step often is where astronomy really begins. • Type and extent of display and analysis depends on purpose of imaging experiment • Common examples: – evaluating whether an object has been detected or not – determining total CCD signal (counts) for an object, such as a star – determining relative intensities of an object from images at two different wavelengths – determining relative sizes of an extended object from images at two different wavelengths 9 Storage • Glass plates Link #8: Storage – Lots of climate-controlled storage space – expensive – available to one user at a time – now being “digitized” (scanned), as in the archive you use with DS9 • Digital Images – Lots of disk space – cheaper all the time – available to many users 10