Download Scissor bite in a young patient treated

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
V. Favero*, L. Sbricoli**, L. Favero**
*Department of Surgery, Dentistry and Maxillofacial Unit,
University of Verona, Italy
** Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
Scissor bite in a young
patient treated with an
orthodontic-orthopedic
device.
A case report
abstract
Background Scissor bite is a rare malocclusion that
often leads to minor facial asymmetry. An orthodontic
and orthopaedic correction is advisable in young
patients to prevent subsequent temporomandibular
diseases requesting maxillofacial intervention.
Case report In this case report a 8-year-old girl in
mixed dentition with unilateral left scissor bite was
treated with a modified Rapid Palatal Expander. To
modify an overexpanded maxilla (width 39 mm measured
between both upper first molars) the device was used
to close rather than to expand, without need of patient
compliance. Orthodontic correction was then completed
with traditional bracketing. Results were tangible (width
36 mm) and remained stable even for at least 2 years after
retention. This original device has proved to be useful in
this kind of situations and can be easily applied to young
patient to correct such malocclusions.
age and an adequate intervention is therefore requested
to prevent the problem from skeletally consolidating,
making a future maxillofacial correction necessary. The
scissor bite is a condition that can lead to this type of
asymmetry. It is defined as a transversal discrepancy
posteriorly in the maxilla where the palatine surface of the
maxillary teeth is found in connection with the vestibular
surface of the lower teeth. In this way the physiological
cusp-pitch contact is missing [Proffit and Fields, 2000;
Pirttiniemi, 1994; Bishara et al., 1994].
In the young patient scissor bite may not be urgent, but
it can hide a problem with the temporomandibular joint
(TMJ) that can become manifest with growth [Pinho,
2011]. Many devices and orthodontic techniques have
been proposed [Pirttiniemi et al., 1990; Favero et al.,
2002] for the correction of this defect at an early stage,
including the use of an expander applied to the lower
arch, intra-arch elastic for the closure of the upper maxilla
and criss-cross inter-arch elastics. The rapid expansion of
the palate is an orthopaedic procedure routinely used in
orthodontics. Its purpose is to obtain a medium-palatine
suture distraction before his final ossification, widening
the transverse diameter of the maxilla [Haas, 1965;
Haas, 1970; Haas, 1980]. This case report describes the
innovative use of the palatal expander, which exploits the
central screw to bring near the two halves of the device
and decrease the transverse diameter of the upper jaw.
Case report
Diagnosis
An 8-year-old girl in mixed dentition presented with
right complete scissor bite, including the first permanent
molar (Fig. 1). The patient was at the beginning of the
second stage of mixed dentition and showed a Class
I occlusion on both sides. The incisors showed a Class
II relationship, an increased overjet and a decreased
overbite. The midline lines were not coincident. On
the right side, a scissor bite on all the lateral posterior
Keywords Modified Rapid Palatal Expander; Scissor
bite.
Introduction
Face asymmetries are widespread among the
population: this particular can be easily noticed mirroring
the left and right halves of the face. A normal degree of
asymmetry is due to the variability of the human species
and is not considered pathological. In some cases,
however, this facial shape can be identified at an early
European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry vol. 14/2-2013
art_40-12 Sbricoli editato.indd 153
FIG. 1 Complete right side scissor bite.
153
07/05/13 11:47
FAVERO V., SBRICOLI L. AND FAVERO L.
FIG. 2 RPE with open screw applied to the model casts.
FIG. 3 Simulation of upper arch contraction on model casts.
FIG. 4 RPE applied on model casts.
FIG. 5 Intraoral view of RPE and X-elastics.
teeth was remarkable. The palate was very large and
overexpanded (width 39 mm measured between both
upper first molars), with presence of diastema between
the incisors. The lower arch showed a contraction on the
right side with lingual torque of the teeth and due to the
torque the arch form was symmetric. The tongue was
large too and seemed to be postured upon the lower
arch. Oral hygiene was acceptable. The oral movements
were not perfect, while opening and protruding the
mandible an initial left movement was remarkable. The
patient neither referred pain, nor functional limitations.
Device description
A modified RPE was prepared using cast models to
simulate palatal contraction (Fig. 2, 3, 4).
The main characteristics of the device were the
following.
The arms were provided with two acrylic bites beside
the incisors, with the function of centering the
mandible at the end of the activation of the appliance
by maintaining the centered position of the mandible.
Some buttons were soldered on the vestibular side
of the right arm of the RPE to allow anchorage of
›
›
154
art_40-12 Sbricoli editato.indd 154
X-elastics, with the purpose of correcting the dental
torque between upper and lower arch (Fig. 5).
The RPE was applied with the screw opened and
then closed, till the resolution of the scissor bite. The
number of activations was programmed before by the
simulation of the contraction on model casts.
›
First phase treatment
The main aim of the orthodontic treatment was solving
the asymmetry and prevent the possible development of
TMJ problems related to the scissor bite. For these reasons
it was decided to carry out a two phase treatment. The
first phase of treatment took into consideration the
following points.
Centering the midline and the position of mandible.
Eliminating the upper condition of the scissor bite by
contracting the upper arch.
Correcting the dental relation with the scissor bite
by changing the torque of the teeth, especially in the
lower arch.
Correcting of the sagittal occlusal relation, in particular
of the front between the incisors (Class II, overjet,
overbite).
›
›
›
›
European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry vol. 14/2-2013
07/05/13 11:47
TREAMENT OF SCISSOR BITE: A CASE REPORT
FIG. 6 Follow up, lateral left view.
FIG. 7 Follow up, front view.
›Reducing
to the minimum the complexity of
treatment.
The Rapid Palatal Expander (RPE) was banded with
one activation per week and elastics were applied.
The scissor bite was easily resolved and the RPE was
debanded seven months later. Then the upper arch was
banded and a Class II utility arch was applied. In the
lower arch a lip bumper was applied. The utility arch was
activated by using Class II elastics and an anterior vertical
elastic anchored to the acrylic portion of the lip bumper.
This stage took five months. The first phase lasted 14
months.
Second phase treatment
There was a two years interval between the first and
second phase. The second phase of treatment was in
relation to the new dental problems emerged after
completing the dentition: the objectives of the treatment
were the correction of the rotations, a good dental
alignment with space closure, a good intercuspidation
and coordination of both arches. During phase two
the upper and the lower arches were bonded and NiTi
.018 round wires were inserted. Lingual buttons were
bonded to correct derotation of the premolars, by using
elastic chain to the wire. Lower and upper coordinate SS
wires and Class II elastics completed the treatment. The
second phase took about ten months.
End of treatment
At the end of treatment, the real problem of initial
malocclusion seemed to be disappeared. There was no
evidence of asymmetry between the right and the left
part of the face. The lower part of the profile seemed
to have a good sagittal relation, maintaining however
a good biprotrusion. Intraorally, the arch form was
symmetric with a good shape, a good occlusion was
remarkable on both sides. On the posterior left side the
scissor bite had completely disappeared. The midline line
was centered. Also the incisor relationship was good:
the incisal Class II had been corrected. The overjet was
normal. The dental overbite was still slightly decreased.
One thing is remarkable: the trasversal width between
both upper first molars decreased from 39 mm to 36
European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry vol. 14/2-2013
art_40-12 Sbricoli editato.indd 155
FIG. 8 Follow up, lateral right view.
mm after the first phase of treatment. No sign of TMJ
disorders or muscle tenderness were present.
As the philosophy of the interceptive treatment
suggests, the first stage of treatment was absolutely
necessary and effective and the second stage of therapy
was simple and short, with real benefit for the patient.
Second phase lasted 10 months. A Hawley removable
plate was used as upper retainers, while 3-3 bonded
lingual retainers were used for the lower arch.
Follow up
The follow-up evaluation one year and eight months
out of treatment shows good stability of the skeletal
and dental parameters (Fig. 6, 7, 8). From the frontal
view, the face is still symmetrical and harmonic, the
smile is attractive. The sagittal and vertical relationships
have remained unchanged and the occlusion and
interdigitation have further improved thanks to posttreatment settling. A good future prognosis of stability
can be expected, even if it is noticeable that the maxilla
has a tendency to expand probably because of the
tongue position.
References
› Bishara S, Burbey P, Kharouf J. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review.
Angle Orthod 1994;64:89-98.
›Favero L, Brollo P, Bressan E. Orthodontic anchorage with specific
fixtures: related study analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002
Jul;122(1):84-94.
› Haas AJ. Long-term posttreatment evaluation of rapid palatal expansion.
Angle Orthod 1980;50:189-217.
› Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics.
Am J Orthod 1970;57:219-55.
› Haas AJ. The treatment of maxillary deficiency by opening the midpalatal
suture. Angle Orthod 1965;35:200-17.
› Pinho T. Early treatment of scissor bite. J Clin Orthod 2011 Sep;45(9):498506.
› Pirttiniemi P, Kantomaa T, Lahtela P. Relationship between craniofacial and
condyle path asymmetry in unilateral cross-bite patients. Eur J Orthod.
1990 Nov;12(4):408-13.
› Pirttiniemi PM. Associations of mandibular and facial asymmetries—a
review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106: 191-200.
› Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr. Contemporary orthodontics. 3rd edition. St Louis:
Mosby; 2000.
155
07/05/13 11:47