Download THE CRIMEAN WAR - 1853-1856

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
History
S5
THE EFFECTS OF
AOlution
THE CRIMEAN WAR - 1853-1856
Subtopic
Developed by (Maxon J.
Kasumba)
50 minutes
Students working in groups
THE CRIMEAN WAR –
EFFECTS
Overview/general summary
The Crimean War of 1854-56 broke out between Russia on one side, and
Britain, France, Ottoman Turkey as well as Piedmont-Sardinia on the
other. It had been Russia's policy to promote the disintegration of the
Ottoman Empire and help independence of the Balkan states. On the
contrary, the Anglo-French strategy was to maintain the territorial
integrity of Turkey and deny Russia access to the Mediterranean Sea and
Black Sea. Russia was defeated eventually.
Specific Objectives
•
Lesson 65
The Treaty of Paris 1856 ended the war formally. In fact, the Crimean war
had many significant repercussions on the international relations of
Europe; for instance, it put an end to the "Concert of Europe and the
general peace since 1815, and paved the way, indirectly to the success of
both the Italian and German unification movements.
Analyze the Effects
of the Crimean war
Lesson Objectives
Learners should be able
to;
These effects and so much more can be broadly seen later.
Linked to other lessons
•
Explain the Effects of
the Crimean war
• Not linked
Evaluation
At the end of the lesson learners shall be able to:
•
Last updated:
Explain the Effects of the Crimean war
May 2011
Step1
Introduction
Duration: 10 minutes
The teacher introduces the lesson by reviewing the previous lesson. This is intended to draw the attention of
the learners to what they learnt previously before the teacher introduces a new lesson.
After the recap of the previous lesson, the teacher introduces the new lesson( The Effects of the Crimean
war). The teacher shall go ahead and put the learners in different learning groups, after which, the learners
exchange ideas about their previous research work (Examine the effects of the Crimean war), which the
learners proceed to present afterwards.
How to achieve this learning
Let the learners get in groups of 5
Let each group exchange ideas about the Effects of the Crimean war
Thereafter, each group identifies a learner to make a brief presentation of their discussion
How to conduct the lesson
Step 2
Activity 1:
THE EFFECTS OF THE CRIMEAN WAR 1853-1856
Duration: 20 minutes
Resources needed : Chalk, duster, notes note-books and pens
Class organization : Groups of 5 - Group presentation and discussion (from students)
Instruction to the learners: Let the learners discuss the Effects of the Crimean war
Method of Evaluation:
Evaluate the learners basing on the correct effects of the Crimean war. For correct answers, refer to the
points mentioned below in the notes.
NOTE: During this period of time, the learners may also ask any related questions to the teacher
Step 3
Activity 2:
Teacher gives notes to learners
Duration: 20 minutes
Resources needed: notes about the effects of the Crimean war
Class organization: normal class session
Instruction to the learners: the learners should take notes as given by the teacher
THE EFFECTS OF THE CRIMEAN WAR 1853-1856
The Crimean War was concluded by the 1856 Paris peace treaty that was signed between Russia and
the allied powers. The war and the treaty had political, social, and economic impact on Europe both in
Last updated:
May 2011
the short run and the long run. The consequences of the Crimean War were positive and negative in
the history of Europe.
≈
The Crimean War laid foundation for nursing and the International Red Cross society.
The death and suffering of Russian and allied troops led to widespread concern about the conditions
of soldiers in war zones. This made Florence Nightingale to take care of the Scutari hospital where she
gave medical services and nursing to the wounded and sick. She did this after realizing that adequate
medical attention and services plus humanitarian assistance could have significantly reduced the
death toll.
≈
The war forced Tsar Alexander II to embark on reforms. Russia was defeated and the 1856 Paris
Peace Treaty was a bitter pill for her to swallow.
This together with bad socio-economic conditions made the Russians to develop a revolutionary spirit
against the government. This forced Tsar Nicholas II to embark on immediate reforms in agriculture
and industries to improve on the standards of living and strengthen her military power in order to win
public confidence and avert a revolution. In 1861 he passed the emancipation act in which all slaves
were set free. However, the heavy emancipation fee became a source of tension amongst the
peasants that contributed to the outbreak of the Russian revolution of 1917.
≈
The Crimean War contributed to the unification of Italy and Germany. Austria, the main obstacle to
both unifications remained neutral during the war.
This isolated Austria from the allied powers that fought and defeated Russia. On the other hand,
Austria’s neutrality also alienated her from Russia because Russia branded Austria “a thankful friend”.
This is because Tsar Nicholas I of Russia expected Austria’s alliance as a compensation for his role in
suppressing the 1848 revolutions in Hungary, Bohemia and Vienna that saved the Austrian Empire.
This explains why Russia could not support Austria in the course of Italian and German unifications.
This favored both unifications for it:
Provided a free and unrestricted opportunity for the destruction of the Austrian power in Germany
and Italy to those who had courage… Bismarck and Cavour were the chief beneficiaries of the Crimean
War and without it; there might have been neither a Kingdom of Italy nor a German empire (L.C.B.
Seaman, 1983 P31).
≈
For the Italians who actively participated on the side of the allies, the war won for them British
moral support and the French military support at the 1856 Paris Peace Treaty.
This is why Britain favored Garibaldi’s liberation of Naples and Sicily while France helped in the
liberation of Lombardy. The Crimean war also gave the Italians military experience, which helped in
overthrowing Austria from Italian peninsular.
≈
The war increased the prestige and popularity of Napoleon III in France and Europe.
He achieved his aim of revenging the 1812 Moscow campaign and disciplining Tsar Nicholas I for
failure to recognize his legitimacy as a rightful monarch. The fact that the peace conference and treaty
were held and signed in Paris under the Chairmanship of Napoleon III shows how acceptable and
recognized Napoleon III was amongst the great powers of Europe. It was therefore an honorable
diplomatic achievement for Napoleon III and France. This won for Napoleon III the loyalty and support
Last updated:
May 2011
of the French Catholics, Bonapartists, Liberals and glory seekers, which helped to consolidate his rule
for some time.
≈
As already noted the Crimean War was crowned up at the Paris Peace treaty of 1856.
By the treaty, the independence of Turkey was guaranteed and it was clearly spelt out that no power
had the right to interfere in the internal affairs of the Ottoman Empire. Turkey was admitted into the
concert of Europe from which she had earlier been excluded. In other words the ‘sick-man’ got a new
lease of life under the protection of European powers and that is why V.D. Mahajan argues that,
“it appears that the sick man of Europe was put on her legs again”
(V.D. Mahajan, History of Modern Europe, P 421).
However, in the long run Russia violated the territorial independence of Turkey by supporting
nationalistic revolts such as the Bulgarian affairs of 1878. She even defeated Turkey in 1878 and
forced her to sign the treaty of San Stefano.
≈
There were some territorial re-adjustments as a result of the Crimean War. Bessarabia was taken
from Russia and given to Moldavia.
The states of Moldavia, Wallachia and Serbia were granted a large measure of independence and
internal self-government. But they were to acknowledge and honor Turkey’s over lordship.
However, this was absurd (unreasonable) because it was a step towards the disintegration of the
Ottoman Empire that allied powers had fought to avoid. It also encouraged other oppressed
nationalities under Turkey to rise up for their independence, which gave Russia an excuse to intervene
in the Balkans like in 1878. This is a testimony that the Paris Peace conference settles ‘almost nothing’
and that the war was wasteful and a useless venture.
Additional activity:
•
Examine the effects of the Crimean war.
Homework
Method of evaluation: Questions/answers
QUESTION:
1. Give an outline of the effects of the Crimean war of 1853-1856
Answers;
i.
The Crimean War laid foundation for nursing and the International Red Cross society. The death
and suffering of Russian and allied troops led to widespread concern about the conditions of
soldiers in war zones.
ii.
The war forced Tsar Alexander II to embark on reforms. Russia was defeated and the 1856 Paris
Peace Treaty was a bitter pill for her to swallow.
Last updated:
May 2011
iii.
The Crimean War contributed to the unification of Italy and Germany. Austria, the main obstacle
to both unifications remained neutral during the war.
iv.
The war increased the prestige and popularity of Napoleon III in France and Europe. He achieved
his aim of revenging the 1812 Moscow campaign and disciplining Tsar Nicholas I for failure to
recognize his legitimacy as a rightful monarch.
v.
As already noted the Crimean War was crowned up at the Paris Peace treaty of 1856. By the
treaty, the independence of Turkey was guaranteed and it was clearly spelt out that no power had
the right to interfere in the internal affairs of the Ottoman Empire.
vi.
There were some territorial re-adjustments as a result of the Crimean War. Bessarabia was taken
from Russia and given to Moldavia.
References
1.
Denis ,Richards(1789-1984 ) An Illustrated History of Modern Europe –seventh edition –pp 155-174
2.
H.L. Peacock1789-1981 ) A history of modern Europe 1789-1981 – seventh edition –pages 216-243
3.
Paul, Kennedy (1987) the Rise and fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict. From 1500
to 2000 (New York: Random House,)
4.
Stuart ,T, Miller Modern European history – second edition –pp 133-142
Last updated:
May 2011