Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
History S5 THE EFFECTS OF AOlution THE CRIMEAN WAR - 1853-1856 Subtopic Developed by (Maxon J. Kasumba) 50 minutes Students working in groups THE CRIMEAN WAR – EFFECTS Overview/general summary The Crimean War of 1854-56 broke out between Russia on one side, and Britain, France, Ottoman Turkey as well as Piedmont-Sardinia on the other. It had been Russia's policy to promote the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire and help independence of the Balkan states. On the contrary, the Anglo-French strategy was to maintain the territorial integrity of Turkey and deny Russia access to the Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea. Russia was defeated eventually. Specific Objectives • Lesson 65 The Treaty of Paris 1856 ended the war formally. In fact, the Crimean war had many significant repercussions on the international relations of Europe; for instance, it put an end to the "Concert of Europe and the general peace since 1815, and paved the way, indirectly to the success of both the Italian and German unification movements. Analyze the Effects of the Crimean war Lesson Objectives Learners should be able to; These effects and so much more can be broadly seen later. Linked to other lessons • Explain the Effects of the Crimean war • Not linked Evaluation At the end of the lesson learners shall be able to: • Last updated: Explain the Effects of the Crimean war May 2011 Step1 Introduction Duration: 10 minutes The teacher introduces the lesson by reviewing the previous lesson. This is intended to draw the attention of the learners to what they learnt previously before the teacher introduces a new lesson. After the recap of the previous lesson, the teacher introduces the new lesson( The Effects of the Crimean war). The teacher shall go ahead and put the learners in different learning groups, after which, the learners exchange ideas about their previous research work (Examine the effects of the Crimean war), which the learners proceed to present afterwards. How to achieve this learning Let the learners get in groups of 5 Let each group exchange ideas about the Effects of the Crimean war Thereafter, each group identifies a learner to make a brief presentation of their discussion How to conduct the lesson Step 2 Activity 1: THE EFFECTS OF THE CRIMEAN WAR 1853-1856 Duration: 20 minutes Resources needed : Chalk, duster, notes note-books and pens Class organization : Groups of 5 - Group presentation and discussion (from students) Instruction to the learners: Let the learners discuss the Effects of the Crimean war Method of Evaluation: Evaluate the learners basing on the correct effects of the Crimean war. For correct answers, refer to the points mentioned below in the notes. NOTE: During this period of time, the learners may also ask any related questions to the teacher Step 3 Activity 2: Teacher gives notes to learners Duration: 20 minutes Resources needed: notes about the effects of the Crimean war Class organization: normal class session Instruction to the learners: the learners should take notes as given by the teacher THE EFFECTS OF THE CRIMEAN WAR 1853-1856 The Crimean War was concluded by the 1856 Paris peace treaty that was signed between Russia and the allied powers. The war and the treaty had political, social, and economic impact on Europe both in Last updated: May 2011 the short run and the long run. The consequences of the Crimean War were positive and negative in the history of Europe. ≈ The Crimean War laid foundation for nursing and the International Red Cross society. The death and suffering of Russian and allied troops led to widespread concern about the conditions of soldiers in war zones. This made Florence Nightingale to take care of the Scutari hospital where she gave medical services and nursing to the wounded and sick. She did this after realizing that adequate medical attention and services plus humanitarian assistance could have significantly reduced the death toll. ≈ The war forced Tsar Alexander II to embark on reforms. Russia was defeated and the 1856 Paris Peace Treaty was a bitter pill for her to swallow. This together with bad socio-economic conditions made the Russians to develop a revolutionary spirit against the government. This forced Tsar Nicholas II to embark on immediate reforms in agriculture and industries to improve on the standards of living and strengthen her military power in order to win public confidence and avert a revolution. In 1861 he passed the emancipation act in which all slaves were set free. However, the heavy emancipation fee became a source of tension amongst the peasants that contributed to the outbreak of the Russian revolution of 1917. ≈ The Crimean War contributed to the unification of Italy and Germany. Austria, the main obstacle to both unifications remained neutral during the war. This isolated Austria from the allied powers that fought and defeated Russia. On the other hand, Austria’s neutrality also alienated her from Russia because Russia branded Austria “a thankful friend”. This is because Tsar Nicholas I of Russia expected Austria’s alliance as a compensation for his role in suppressing the 1848 revolutions in Hungary, Bohemia and Vienna that saved the Austrian Empire. This explains why Russia could not support Austria in the course of Italian and German unifications. This favored both unifications for it: Provided a free and unrestricted opportunity for the destruction of the Austrian power in Germany and Italy to those who had courage… Bismarck and Cavour were the chief beneficiaries of the Crimean War and without it; there might have been neither a Kingdom of Italy nor a German empire (L.C.B. Seaman, 1983 P31). ≈ For the Italians who actively participated on the side of the allies, the war won for them British moral support and the French military support at the 1856 Paris Peace Treaty. This is why Britain favored Garibaldi’s liberation of Naples and Sicily while France helped in the liberation of Lombardy. The Crimean war also gave the Italians military experience, which helped in overthrowing Austria from Italian peninsular. ≈ The war increased the prestige and popularity of Napoleon III in France and Europe. He achieved his aim of revenging the 1812 Moscow campaign and disciplining Tsar Nicholas I for failure to recognize his legitimacy as a rightful monarch. The fact that the peace conference and treaty were held and signed in Paris under the Chairmanship of Napoleon III shows how acceptable and recognized Napoleon III was amongst the great powers of Europe. It was therefore an honorable diplomatic achievement for Napoleon III and France. This won for Napoleon III the loyalty and support Last updated: May 2011 of the French Catholics, Bonapartists, Liberals and glory seekers, which helped to consolidate his rule for some time. ≈ As already noted the Crimean War was crowned up at the Paris Peace treaty of 1856. By the treaty, the independence of Turkey was guaranteed and it was clearly spelt out that no power had the right to interfere in the internal affairs of the Ottoman Empire. Turkey was admitted into the concert of Europe from which she had earlier been excluded. In other words the ‘sick-man’ got a new lease of life under the protection of European powers and that is why V.D. Mahajan argues that, “it appears that the sick man of Europe was put on her legs again” (V.D. Mahajan, History of Modern Europe, P 421). However, in the long run Russia violated the territorial independence of Turkey by supporting nationalistic revolts such as the Bulgarian affairs of 1878. She even defeated Turkey in 1878 and forced her to sign the treaty of San Stefano. ≈ There were some territorial re-adjustments as a result of the Crimean War. Bessarabia was taken from Russia and given to Moldavia. The states of Moldavia, Wallachia and Serbia were granted a large measure of independence and internal self-government. But they were to acknowledge and honor Turkey’s over lordship. However, this was absurd (unreasonable) because it was a step towards the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire that allied powers had fought to avoid. It also encouraged other oppressed nationalities under Turkey to rise up for their independence, which gave Russia an excuse to intervene in the Balkans like in 1878. This is a testimony that the Paris Peace conference settles ‘almost nothing’ and that the war was wasteful and a useless venture. Additional activity: • Examine the effects of the Crimean war. Homework Method of evaluation: Questions/answers QUESTION: 1. Give an outline of the effects of the Crimean war of 1853-1856 Answers; i. The Crimean War laid foundation for nursing and the International Red Cross society. The death and suffering of Russian and allied troops led to widespread concern about the conditions of soldiers in war zones. ii. The war forced Tsar Alexander II to embark on reforms. Russia was defeated and the 1856 Paris Peace Treaty was a bitter pill for her to swallow. Last updated: May 2011 iii. The Crimean War contributed to the unification of Italy and Germany. Austria, the main obstacle to both unifications remained neutral during the war. iv. The war increased the prestige and popularity of Napoleon III in France and Europe. He achieved his aim of revenging the 1812 Moscow campaign and disciplining Tsar Nicholas I for failure to recognize his legitimacy as a rightful monarch. v. As already noted the Crimean War was crowned up at the Paris Peace treaty of 1856. By the treaty, the independence of Turkey was guaranteed and it was clearly spelt out that no power had the right to interfere in the internal affairs of the Ottoman Empire. vi. There were some territorial re-adjustments as a result of the Crimean War. Bessarabia was taken from Russia and given to Moldavia. References 1. Denis ,Richards(1789-1984 ) An Illustrated History of Modern Europe –seventh edition –pp 155-174 2. H.L. Peacock1789-1981 ) A history of modern Europe 1789-1981 – seventh edition –pages 216-243 3. Paul, Kennedy (1987) the Rise and fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict. From 1500 to 2000 (New York: Random House,) 4. Stuart ,T, Miller Modern European history – second edition –pp 133-142 Last updated: May 2011