Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Bowel Disease Research Foundation of The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Advancing the cure and treatment of bowel disease Research Project Final Report Principal investigator Project Title Start date David Bowden Institution Countess of Chester NHS FT Evaluation Of Acid Ceramidase As A Potential Response Biomarker And Radiosensitisation Target In Rectal Cancer Feb 2015 Finish date Feb 2016 Lay Summary (max 500 words) Please use the following format: a) Problem addressed, background and strategic significance b) Method(s) used c) Hoped for results d) Actual results and implications for treatment/understandi ng Colorectal cancer is the second commonest cause of cancerrelated death in the UK, with rectal cancer comprising approximately one third of newly diagnosed cases. Whilst surgery remains the most efficacious treatment, radiotherapy has become routinely used in the neoadjuvant setting for rectal cancer, with ‘short-course’ treatment conferring a reduction in local disease recurrence and an increase in disease free survival post-operatively. ‘Long-course’ radiotherapy combined with chemotherapeutic sensitizers such as capecitabine (chemoradiotherapy) is used in locally advanced disease in an attempt to achieve down-staging of the tumour, and to minimise the risk of involved margins at surgical resection. The response to chemoradiotherapy is variable. There is an observed pathological complete response (where no tumour cells are detectable in a resection specimen) in 15-20% of patients, with an overall down-staging effect observed in up to 70%. Patients with a pathological complete response to chemoradiotherapy have significantly reduced local disease recurrence or metastases, and improved overall and disease free survival at 5 years, when compared with those who do not respond. Neo-adjuvant therapy is not without risk of local and systemic toxicity. Examples of morbidity include long-term ano-rectal and genito-urinary dysfunction in up to 50% of patients, an increased risk of post-operative anastomotic leak, and systemic risks of cardiac failure and secondary tumours. Patients who do not respond to chemoradiotherapy are not only exposed to its risks but also to a delay in the commencement of the next stage of their treatment. There is currently no way of predicting who will respond to chemoradiotherapy. The ability to predict response would allow positive selection of patients who will benefit from treatment, and exclude those who would only be exposed to the risks and delay to other treatment modalities. Additionally, an understanding of the mechanisms behind radio-resistance may permit the opportunity for this to be manipulated to improve treatment efficacy, conferring advantages in reducing local recurrence and improving overall/disease free survival whilst potentially increasing the proportion of patients who would benefit from treatment. An improvement in treatment efficacy may in turn reduce dosage requirements and subsequently unwanted off-target effects. Our group have previously identified one protein to be overexpressed in relatively radioresistant patients. The aim of this project was confirm this finding in a larger set of patients and explore whether this protein plays a direct role in mediating radioresistance in a colorectal cell line. The implication of this protein, acid ceramidase, in radioresistance is a novel one and this study has the potential to further increase the knowledge of radioresitance in rectal cancer. Furthermore, this protein has a known pharmacological inhibitor and thus has translational potential. The proposed project will explore both pharmacological and molecular manipulation of this protein and if time permits seek to explore whether manipulation affects radiosensitivity. Background (purpose for project) Introduction Colorectal cancer is the second commonest cause of cancer death in the UK. Locally advanced rectal cancer represents a particular surgical and oncological challenge in both the treatment of the primary tumour and also early access to systemic therapy. Response to chemoradiotherapy is extremely variable, and it is clearly established that there are no reliable clinical or molecular predictors of response (1). The overall long term survival from rectal cancer remains fairly static with most patients succumbing to systemic disease. The ability to predict or improve radioresistance would ensure that unnecessary morbidity (radiotherapy side effects, delay in systemic chemotherapy) is reduced for this very important group of patients (2). Our initial pilot data was obtained from eight patients undergoing chemoradiation followed by surgical resection in a single UK centre (Chester). Tumour samples prior to chemoradiotherapy and post surgery were subjected to isobaric tagging for relative quantification (iTRAQ). A total of 3359 unique proteins were identified, all of which were present in at least half of the samples and therefore taken forwards for analysis. The data were acquired over 3 experimental runs, with a mean (SD) of 7 (21.2) peptides used to identify the proteins of origin. This corresponds to a mean (SD) coverage of 15.18% (15.72%) for identified proteins. A total of 8 proteins were differentially expressed between the initial diagnostic samples of the responders and nonresponders (which were classified according to histological regression). Of these proteins, 3 were downregulated and 5 upregulated. On pathway analysis using Ingenuity software, the ceramide degradation pathway was identified as being the most significantly downregulated pathway in those tumours responding to chemoradiotherapy. Acid ceramidase is a sphingolipid - a group of biomolecules known to be responsible for important signalling functions in the control of cell growth and differentiation (3). Importantly, a recent study has convincingly demonstrated that downregulation of the corresponding gene with siRNA in a prostate cancer cell line confers radiosensitivity (4). This in vitro study in PPC-1 cells assessed radiation response by clonogenic and cytotoxic assays, and also demonstrated that upregulation of acid ceramidase decreased sensitivity to radiation and created cross-resistance to chemotherapy. The small molecule acid ceramidase inhibitor, LCL385, was also sufficient to sensitize PPC-1 cells to radiation. These data support our finding of low levels of acid ceramidase in those tumours responding to radiotherapy. Carmofur, in common to the widely used radiosensitiser capecitabine, is a fluorouracil analogue currently in widespread clinical use in the US in the adjuvant setting for colorectal cancer. In addition to its presumed primary mode of action as a thymidylate synthetase inhibitor it has also independently been shown to inhibit acid ceramidase in the human tumour derived cell lines SW403 (colorectal) and LNCaP (prostate), a property not shared by fluorouracil or capecitabine (5). Methods 1. Construction of a tissue microarray (TMA) of rectal cancer patients undergoing long course chemoradiotherapy prior to surgical resection. 2. Immunohistochemical analysis of TMA and scoring of staining along with correlation with clinical (as assessed by radiological response) and pathological response. 3. Molecular inhibition of AC expression using both pharmacological manipulation with the chemotherapy agent Carmofur and molecular manipulation with siRNA. Confirmation of inhibition to confirmed using Western blotting and also analysis of AC activity using a propriety activity assay (courtesy of University of Barcelona) Results and discussion 1. Immunohistochemical analysis of a tissue microarray of 111 patients undergoing chemoradiation followed by surgical resection in a single institution (COCH). This confirmed that high AC expression in normal colonic epithelium was associated with poor response (p=0.012). Within the tumour diagnostic biopsies, AC expression in the stroma was also strongly associated with response with low expression in good responders (p=0.012) and complete pathological response (p=0.003). Conversely, high stromal expression was associated with poor response (p=0.017) During the study we were also fortunate to collaborate with the Sanger Institute at the University of Cambridge who were able to analyse AC protein expression across a wide range of cell lines (n=49) in order to support our proteomic findings. This confirmed a wide range of differential levels of AC expression (-2.06 to +1.6, compared with normalised control). Analysis of mRNA gene expression across 1000+ cancer cell lines (from Affymetrix U219 gene expression array) confirms differential expression at this level also. Table 1: AC protein expression across 49 colorectal cell lines (courtesy of Sanger Institute, University of Cambridge (scores normalised to an internal control) 2. Inhibition of AC expression in the colorectal cancer cell line HCT116 (p53+/+) was assessed using western blotting after molecular and pharmacological treatment. siRNA inhibition reduced AC expression to a maximum to 15.5% across a variety of concentrations after 48 hours. Inhibition with carmofur (2uM) appears to achieve maximum effect between 2 and 3 hours with a maximum reduction in expression to 32.4%. Figure 1: Suppression of AC expression via biological (siRNA) and pharmacological manipulation (M: untreated culture medium, V: DMSO vehicle control, siRNA: transfected RNA knockdown cells, NC-siRNA: non coding transfected cells, Can: AC postive rectal cancer specimen) 3. AC Activity was investigated in the same cell line with an assay employing the substrate Rbm14-12 (University of Barcelona). Inhibition of activity reached a maximum of 27.2% after only 30 minutes incubation with 2.5uM carmofur. This effect was not observed with the standard radiosensitiser 5FU. siRNA inhibition achieved similar levels of suppression (24.4%), but this was only evident after 24 hours of incubation. es 100 a ) d i80 % ( m 60 ar yti e40 vi C tc d ic20 A A0 0 Acid Ceramidase Activity ASAH1 siRNA 20 40 Time (Hours) 60 80 Acid Ceramidase Activity (%) Acid Ceramidase Activity Pro ile - 2.5µM Carmofur 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (Hours) Figure 2: Suppression of AC activity via siRNA and carmofur: time course after incubation versus umbelliferone fluorescence (adjusted according to background fluorescence and normalised to time point 0) Conclusion Our project has confirmed our initial proteomic finding that acid ceramidase does appear to play a role in response of rectal cancer to chemoradiotherapy. We have furthermore been able to demonstrate successful molecular and pharmacological manipulation of both protein expression and protein activity. We have also demonstrated that there appears to be a wide range of expression of acid ceramidase at protein and mRNA level in 49 colorectal cell lines. Recommendations for future work Our initial investigation into the effects of manipulation of acid ceramidase on radiosensitivity using a clonogenic assay have so far not yielded any positive results. However, we have only analysed one cell line (HT 116) which has relatively low levels of expression. Having established a collaboration with the Sanger Institute we have a research fellow in place to investigate this further looking at 6 cell lines compromising relatively high and low expressers of the protein. Little is known about why AC may be implicated in radioresistance and we will attempt to elucidate this further by exploring the relationship between AC expression and know markers of radioresistance such as DNA repair proteins. References (author, title, date of publication) 1. Ryan JE, Warrier SK, Lynch AC, Ramsay RG, Phillips, Heriot AG. Predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review. Col Dis 2015 (18): 234-246 2. Tiernan J, Cook A, Geh I, George B, Magill L, Northover J, Verjee A, Wheeler J, Fearnhead N. Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities for the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Col Dis 2014 (16): 965-970 3. García-Barros, M., Coant, N., Truman, J., Snider, A. and Hannun, Y. (2014). Sphingolipids in colon cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1841(5), 773-782. 4. Mahdy, A., Cheng, J., Li, J., Elojeimy, S., Meacham, W., Turner, L., Bai, A., Gault, C., McPherson, A., Garcia, N., Beckham, T., Saad, A., Bielawska, A., Bielawski, J., Hannun, Y., Keane, T., Taha, M., Hammouda, H., Norris, J. and Liu, X. (2009). Acid ceramidase upregulation in prostate cancer cells confers resistance to radiation: AC inhibition, a potential radiosensitizer. Molecular Therapy, 17(3), 430438. 5. Realini, N., Solorzano, C., Pagliuca, C., Pizzirani, D., Armirotti, A., Luciani, R., Costi, M., Bandiera, T. and Piomelli, D. (2013). Discovery of highly potent acid ceramidase inhibitors with in vitro tumor chemosensitizing activity. Scientific Reports, 3, 1035.