Download Candida - ICU education

Document related concepts

Bad Pharma wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Intravenous therapy wikipedia , lookup

Ofloxacin wikipedia , lookup

Bilastine wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Fungal Infections and
Antifungals in ICU
DR. ANKIT JAIN
FUNGI IN
CLINICAL
PRACTICSE
Candidia spp

Candida spp

Candidiasis

Spectrum of Disease

Mucocutaneous disease and Asymptomatic funguria

Invasive Fungal disease

Candidemia ± Endopthalmitis

Disseminated Hematological infection

Single deep organ infection

Meningitis

Endocarditis

IntraAbdominal infection
Candida species
Candidia spp
C. Glabrata
C. Tropicalis
C. Albicans
C. Parapsilosis
Non Albicans
C. Krusei
C. Lusitanide
C.
guillermondii
Candidia spp

C. albicans

Commonest

40-60% of invasive candidiasis

Source

Endogenous e.g. GI flora or mucocutaneous

Exogenous e.g. Healthcare worker, infusate
Candidia spp


C. glabrata

Increasing incidence

20-30% if invasive candidiasis

Higher mortality than albicans

Reduced sensitivity to azoles esp. Fluconazole
C. Tropicalis

20-30% if invasive candidiasis

Sensitive to most antifungals
Candidia spp


C. parapsilosis

10-20% in certain centers

Associated with use of plastic derivatives e.g. IV catheter related infections, esp
patients receiving TPN)

Reduced sensitivity to Echinocandins
C. krusei

<15%

Intrinsic resistance to Fluconazole
Candidia spp


C. lusitanide

<15%

Intrinsic resistance to Amphotericin B.
C. guillermondi

Sensitive only to AmphoB.
Moulds


Invasive Aspergillosis

A. fumigatus (commonest)

A. flavus

A. terreus
Others

Fusarium spp.

Scedosporium spp.

Zygomycetes spp.
Invasive Aspergillosis

Spectrum of disease

Lung and sinus disease

Skin and CNS infection

Rarely blood stream infection (Neutropenic)

Lung transplant- Anastamosis

Steroids- Cavitatory lesions

Allergic reaction to spore inhalation.
Risk Factors for
Invasive Fungal
Infections
Mechanism of invasive candidiasis

Proliferation of Candida in the gut


Loss of GI mucosal integrity (Chemotherapy/inflammation)


Secondary to broad spectrum antibiotic exposure.
Candida enters blood stream from GIT.
Failure of Immune system due to any cause

T Cells (prevent colonization and superfi cial invasion)

Epithelial cells (Barrier destroyed)

Reduced phagocytosis by macrophages and neutrophils (prevent deep
invasion and blood stream dissemination)
Patients at Risk
Independent risk factors for candidaemia in ICU patients
Internal (Patient Factors)
External (Environmental Factors)
Renal Failure
Recent abdominal surgery
Hematological malignancy
Central venous catheters
Neutropenia
TPN
Age <1month and >65 years
Broad spectrum antibiotics
Mucosal Candida colonization
Corticosteroids
Prolonged stay in ICU
Identifying the patient at risk

Why??

Prevent invasive fungal infections.

Reduce mortality of invasive fungal infections

Therapy


Prophylaxis

Pre-emptive

Empirical
Avoid overuse of Antifungals thus preventing
resistance.
Identifying the patient at risk

How??

Scores

Diagnostic Tests
Identifying the patient at risk (Scores)
Identifying the patient at risk (Scores)

Scores

Many of the criteria are broad and encompass most ICU admissions.

Sensitivity/Specificity??

Benefit/ positive outcome of using these scores lacking!
Challenges in
Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections

Radiology

Cannot id specific organism

Difficult to differentiate from
bacterial infection.

Lack of immune response in
immunocompromised – false
negative

Delay in symptoms
Challenges in
Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections


Culture

Reliable method for detecting fungemia.

Replication time is longer for fungi than bacteria

Unable to differentiate colonisation from true infection

May require invasive specimen

False negative
Histopathology

Definitive diagnosis!

Invasive specimen

Morphological differentiation might be difficult.
New Diagnostic Tests:
Galactomannan Assay

Identify Aspergillus with simple blood tests

Approved for screening of IA in HSCT recepients.

NOT a one time diagnostic tool.

Serial sampling of patients at risk (2 / week)

Increase in optical density in serial samples (Index value>)

Predict disease upto 1 week before clinical symptoms develop.
New Diagnostic Tests:
Galactomannan Assay

Sensitivity 80%. Specificity 89% (In malignancy)

Sensitivity and Specificity less in ICU patients and transplant patients

Samples Used: Blood/Serum, BAL, CSF, Urine

False Positive


Patients on B Lactam (Piptaz)
False Negative

Prior antifungal exposure.
New Diagnostic Tests:
Beta Glucan Test

Non Specific

Targets components of fungal cell wall.

Diagnose Candida and Aspergillus

Does NOT detect Cryptococcus or Zygomycetes.

Serial Monitoring detects infection 1 week prior to clinical symptoms.

A negative beta glucan test is associated with a negative predictive value
>90% and can be used to rule out invasive fungal infection.

False positive with dialysis filters, albumin, immunoglobulin
ANTIFUNGAL
AGENTS
Site of action of Antifungals
Azoles

MOA:
Inhibit fungal cytochrome P450 → Reduce ergasterol production

Classification
Imidazoles, nonsystemic
Ketoconazol, Miconazole
Imidazoles, systemic
Fluconazol, Voriconazole,
Posaconazole, Ravuconazole
Triazoles
Itraconazole
Fluconazole

Introduced in 1990

High Bioavailability – Oral and IV

Highly active against many species of Candida.

Fungistatic

Low incidence of serious side effects.

Conversion from IV to oral is simple.

Non albicans species has limited its use.
Fluconazole

Spectrum of Acticity
Good
Moderate
Poor
C. Albicans
C. Glabrata
Moulds
C. Tropicalis
Dimorphic fungi
C. Parapsilosis
C. Krusei
C. Lusitaniae
Cryptococcus neoformans
Coccidiodes immites
Fluconazole

Adverse Effects

Generally well tolerated

Hepatotoxicity and rash

Lower intensity of drug interactions than other azoles.

Does occur with drugs metabolised by cytochrome P450 pathway.

QTc may be prolonged.
Fluconazole

Dosing

Fluconazole 200-400 mg IV/PO daily in 1-2 divided doses

Renal dosing needed.

Increase dose for C. glabrata (800 mg/day)
Fluconazole - Pearls

Poorly active against all C. krusei and some C.glabrata.
Check susceptibilities and give 800 mg per day of fluconazole.
If lab does not do susceptibility testing - alternative agent such as an echinocandin.

Often given as prophylaxis against Candida infections in high risk populations.
In such patients try an echinocandin instead.

High bioavailability of fluconazole makes it an excellent therapy to transition to as
patients tolerate oral medications.
Voriconazole

Broad spectrum antifungal.

Active against candida and moulds.

It is fungistatic for yeasts but fungicidal for some filamentous fungi

Good bioavailability – Oral and IV

Spectrum
Good
Moderate
Poor
C.Albicans
C.Glabrata
Zygomycetes
C.Parapsilosis
Flucon Resistent Albicans
C.Tropicalis
Fusarium spp
C.Krusei
Cryptococcus N
Aspergillus spp
Voriconazole


Side Effects

Common to azoles

Agent Specific

Photo toxicity

Visual disturbances.
Dosing

6mg/kg IV q12h x 2 doses then 4mg/kg IV q 12h

200 mg PO q 2h
Voriconazole - Pearls

The IV form contains a cyclodextrin vehicle that accumulates in renal dysfunction
and may be nephrotoxic. It is contraindicated with a CrCl<50 ml/min. Oral
preparation avoid this issue.

Voriconazole is eliminated hepatically and is unlikely to be useful in the treatment
of candiduria.

Voriconazole is the drug of choice for invasive aspergillosis and is frequently used
in the treatment of infections caused by other moulds.

It can be used for candidiasis as well, but fluconazole and echinocandins are
more frequently used for these infections.

In the ICU setting drugs commonly given and interacting with voriconazole
include omeprazole, phenytoin and warfarin.
Posaconazole

Newest extended spectrum Azole.

Only azole active against Zygomycetes.

Prophylaxis of fungal infection in neutropenic patients and for
oropharyngeal candidiasis.

Only oral suspension available (IV formulation in development)

To be administered with high fat diet.

PEARL

200 mg q6h in fasting state achieves same concentrations as 400 mg q12h with
high fat meal.
Echinocandins

Latest class of antifungals introduced in clinical practice.

Agents


Caspofungin,

Micafungin,

Anidulafungin
Mechanism of Action

Site of action is fungal cell wall. (As against cell membrane by other antifungals)

Inhibit synthesis of beta-1,3-glucan.
Echinocandins

Virtually indistinguishable spectrum of activity.

Fewer drug interactions than Azoles.

Safer than Polyenes.

Great activity against fluconazole resistant yeast.

Lack of Oral form.
Echinocandins

Spectrum
Good
Moderate
Poor
C. Albicans
C. Parapsilosis
Zygomycetes
C. Glabrata
Dimorphic fungi
Non Aspergillus Molds
C. Lusitaniae
C. Parapsilosis
C. Tropicalis
C. Krusei
Aspergillus
Cryptococcus N
Echinocandins

Adverse Effects

Excellent safety profile.

Histamine mediated infusion related reactions (Red man syndrome of
Vancomycin)

Rarely Hepatotoxicity

Clinically significant drug interactions rare.
Echinocandin

Dosages

Caspofungin 70 mg IV loading dose; then 50 mg IV OD

Micafungin 100 mg IV OD

Anidulafungin 200 mg IV loading dose; then 100 mg IV OD
Echinocandins - Pearls

Caspofungin and micafungin are eliminated hepatically by non–cytochrome P450
metabolism. Anidulafungin degrades in the plasma and avoids hepatic metabolism.

Despite this unique method of elimination, it is not completely devoid of hepatotoxicity.

Excellent fungicidal activity against Candida.

Against Aspergillus species they exhibit activity that is neither classically cidal nor static.
Instead, they cause aberrant, nonfunctional hyphae to be formed by the actively growing
mould.

Although drug interactions are minor Be careful when you use them with the
immunosuppressants cyclosporine (caspofungin) and sirolimus (micafungin).
Echinocandins Pearls

Drug of choice for invasive candidiasis especially in hemodynamically
unstable patients.

Useful in treatment of invasive aspergillosis but dont have the level of
supporting data like voriconazole and polyenes

The level of echinocandins in special compartments such as cerebrospinal
fluid and intraocular compartment remains low.
Polyenes

Agents

Amphotericin B deoxycholate

Amphotericin B in lipid complex

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion

Amphotericin B liposome

Newer agents introduced to counter toxicities of AmphoB deoxycholate

MOA

Binding to ergosterol in the cell membrane of fungi, disrupting its function.
Polyenes

Spectrum
Good
Moderate
Poor
Most Candida
Zygomycetes
C. Lusitaniae
Aspergillus
Cryptococcus
Dimorphic fungi
Many moulds
Asp. terreus
Polyenes

Side effects

Nephrotoxicity

Direct effect on distal tubules.

Vasoconstriction of afferent arteriole.

Nephrotoxicity leads to wasting of Mg and K which needs supplementation.

Minimized with maintenance of appropriate hydration. (250-500 ml NS bolus
immediately prior to dose)

Administer drug by continuous infusion can prevent nephrotoxicity but does not
optimize the concentration-dependent pharmacodynamics properties of
AmpB.
Polyenes


Infusion related reactions

Fevers, chills and rigors

Also with lipid based formulations

Premedication with diphenhydramine and acetaminophen.
Liposomal product associated with unique cardiopulmonary toxicity
presenting as chest pain, hypoxia +/- flank pain. D/D ACS
Polyenes


Dosages

Amphotericin B deoxycholate - 0.5 to 1.5 mg/kg/day

Lpid formulations - 3 to 6 mg/kg/day.
Caution: Check your formulations. Fatal overdoses of amphotericin B
deoxycholate have been given when dosed as the lipid forms. (5x)
Polyenes Pearls

Amphotericin B formulations remain the drugs of choice for cryptococcal meningitis and
serious forms of some other fungal infections, such as dimorphic fungi and some mould
infections

Because of their broad spectrum, they are also a reasonable choice if fungal infection is
suspected but the infecting organism is not known, as in febrile neutropenia.

Their use in candidiasis and aspergillosis has declined with the availability of newer, safer
agents.
Antifungal
Susceptibility
Testing
Susceptibility/ Sensitivity Testing


Method

Broth Dilution and Disc Diffusion

Commercially available kits.
Advantages

Guiding antifungal drug selection.

De-escalation of therapy as in antibiotics.
Susceptibility/ Sensitivity Testing


Breakpoints for Azole

Susceptible (S)

Susceptible dose dependent (S-DD)

Resistant (R)
Breakpoint for Echinocandins

Susceptible i.e ≤ 2 mcg/ml

No formal breakpoint for resistance

MIC > 2 mcg/ml can be considered
resistance.
Susceptibility/ Sensitivity Testing

S-DD to Fluconazole

Higher dose to reach therapeutic range.

400-800 mg/day dosing.
Treatment
Stratergies
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis
Candida Blood Stream Infections


When to start treatment??

Delaying treatment associated with higher mortality

If candidaemia is suspected, blood cultures should be taken even in the
absence of fever.

Consequently treatment has to be started immediately after blood cultures
grow yeasts without waiting for the results of identification of Candida species
and susceptibility tests.
How long??

2 weeks after documented negative blood culture.
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis
Factors to consider while choosing empirical antifungal
treatment

Knowledge of local resistance
patterns

Co-morbidities of patient

Risk factors favouring the presence of
non - albicans species

Prior treatment with fluconazole;

Site of infection





Spectrum of activity
Known adverse effects
Pharmacodynamics
/pharmacokinetics.
Cost of treatment
Presence of haemodynamic instability
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis
Candida Blood Stream Infections

First Line therapy : Echinocandins

Especially if

Hemodynamic instability

Previous use of Azoles

Isolation of C. glabrata,

3 agents interchangeable.

No issue of resistance like Azoles

C. parapsilosis resistance not translated to clinical practice
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis
Candida Blood Stream Infections

Candida with Neutropenia



Drug of choice : Caspofungin
Can use fluconazole as empirical therapy if

Low incidence of Non Albicans

Low incidence of resistant albicans species.

Fluconazole is preferred in haemodynamically stable patients with no
fluconazole exposure during the last 30 days

Known local epidemiology
Step down to fluconazole once culture sensitivity made available.
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis
Candida Blood Stream Infections

Candida BSI with ocular involvement

Echinocandins have poor ocular penetration.

Azoles are the drug of choice.

Justifies dilated fundoscopy in all patients with suspected candida BSI.
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis
Candida Blood Stream Infections

Clinical response to treatment in 48-72 hours.

If no improvement after 72 hours of treatment

Metastatic site of infection

Drug resistance

Suboptimal dose
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis
Urinary Tract Infections

Do you treat every patient with candida in urine culture??

Colonization of urinary tract/catheter common especially in diabetics.

Do not treat if


Asymptomatic

No Risk factors

Remove urinary catheter if possible
Treat if

Sepsis of unknown origin

Risk factors present

Posted for urological procedure
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis
Urinary Tract Infections


Drug of choice

Fluconazole or Flucytosine

All other antifungals – poor concentrations in urine.
Duration of treatment

2 Weeks
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis
Lung Infection

Contaminant??

Treat if : Candida in Sputum and


Positive culture from another site (Blood, pleural fluid etc) s/o disseminated
disease

Risk factors for invasive fungal infection

No other source of sepsis.
Drug of Choice

All anticandida antifungals have excellent lung penetration
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis

CNS infections cannot be treated with Echinocandins

CVS infections

LF AmpB

High dose Echinocandins
Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis
INVASIVE MOULD INFECTIONS

Unidentified mould infection: Amphotericin B

Invasive Aspergillosis: Voriconazole

Patients on antifungal prophylaxis: Use antifungal agent from another
group.

Caspofungin has shown favourable results in patients with IA refractory to
first line antifungals

Micafungin and anidulafungin are not approved for IA treatment despite
their activity against Aspergillus spp.

The duration of IPA treatment might last from several months to more than
one year and should be tailored to patients’ response
Other Fungal Infections

Cryptococcosis/Cryptococcal Meningitis


Non HIV

Amphoterecin B

4-6 weeks.

Curative
HIV infected

Amphoterecin B (± 5 FU) x 2 weeks

Fluconazole x life long prophylaxis.

Treat IC HTN with LP/Shunts.

Steroids / Immunomodulators(Animal studies, Clinical trials)
Other Fungal Infections

Histoplasmosis

AmpB (Severe) 3-12 months

Itraconazole (Non Critical)

HIV vs Non HIV