* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download design solutions - Maxim Integrated
Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup
Solar micro-inverter wikipedia , lookup
Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Shockley–Queisser limit wikipedia , lookup
Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
DESIGN SOLUTIONS POWER Choosing the Right Step-Up/Down Voltage Regulator for Portable Applications Introduction VBAT A popular power source for portable devices is a single lithium-ion cell with 4.2V at full charge and 2.8V at end of discharge. However, some functions within portable electronics, such as a SIM card and DSP, require 2.8V and 3.3V. These are normally provided by low noise LDOs. The LDOs inputs (VCC) must be at a slightly higher voltage than the highest LDO output. Hence, VCC ends up right in the middle of the lithium-ion battery’s range of operation. The use of a step-up/ down voltage regulator, capable of operating from an input that can be higher or lower than the output, becomes necessary. Figure 1 shows the battery voltage (VBAT) as the power source for a typical portable design. VBAT 2.8-4.2V STEP UP/DOWN VOUT1 = 3.3V VCC = 3.4V LDO VOUT2 = 2.8V LDO L T3 VCC Bypass OFF OFF ON Step-Up SWITCH SWITCH/ OFF Fig 2. Bypass-Boost power train and operation table This architecture can only regulate VBAT voltages lower than the set VCC = 3.4V. For VBAT > 3.4V the boost converter stops regulating and the pass transistor turns on, directly connecting VBAT to VCC. Figure 3 shows the battery profile discharging over time and the LDO input voltage for the bypass-boost architecture. Voltage LDOs Input VCC with Bypass-Boost VBAT Bypass Mode One way to solve the problem is to use a bypass-boost converter, namely a boost converter with an extra “pass” transistor integrated between the power source, VBAT, and the LDO input, VCC. Figure 2 shows the bypass-boost power train architecture and its operation table. Here the bypass transistor T3 accomplishes a “poor man’s” step-down operation. T3 T2 Fig 1. LDOs input voltage set by a Step-Up/Down converter Bypass-Boost T2 T1 4.2V In portable applications the voltage regulator efficiency is of the utmost importance, since higher efficiency translates into longer untethered operation. In this Power Design Solution we will review the available options, compare their performance, and determine the most efficient solution. T1 VCC (Bypass-Boost) 3.4V VBAT Boost Mode 2.8V Time Fig 3. LDOs input voltage profile with Bypass-Boost For the majority of the time (VBAT > 3.4V) the pass transistor in the bypass-boost architecture literally “passes the buck” to the LDOs downstream. The LDOs bear the task of regulating the high VBAT value down to their output set values. Since this regulation is linear the result is high power dissipation inside the LDO. This results in greater energy consumption and also requires a board design and IC selection capable of dissipating this energy. 1 Buck-Boost Case Study In contrast to the bypass-boost architecture, a buck-boost converter used in this circuit will never stop regulating its output to 3.4V. In addition, the regulation is entirely switch mode, which provides high efficiency operation. Figure 4 shows the buck-boost power train architecture and its operation table. In this case study we compare the system efficiency (from VBAT to VOUT) of Maxim’s MAX77801 buck-boost IC to a competitor’s bypass-boost IC. Each regulator feeds a single 3.3V LDO loaded with 500mA. VCC T3 T1 L T1 T2 T3 T4 StepDown SWITCH SWITCH/ ON OFF StepUp ON OFF SWITCH/ SWITCH T4 T2 Fig 4. Buck-Boost power train and operation table For VBAT > VCC the IC regulates in buck (step-down) mode, while for VBAT < VCC it seamlessly transitions to boost (step-up) operation. The entire battery voltage range is covered in a switch-mode, high efficiency fashion. Figure 5 shows the battery profile discharging over time and the LDO input voltage for the buck-boost architecture. VBAT 2.8-4.2V Figure 8 shows the result of the comparison. Solid lines indicate efficiency and dotted lines show battery current consumption for each solution. As expected, the efficiency of the two architectures is similar when VBAT is below or near the LDO output voltage. Outside this range, and for the entire time VBAT is above the LDO output voltage, the efficiency of the buck-boost (above 90%) is far superior to that of the bypass-boost (as low as 67% with full battery). This superior performance is due to the ability of the buck-boost IC to supply power to the LDO in switch mode across the entire range of operation. Bypass -Boost 80 0.9 0.8 Efficien cy 0.7 70 0.6 Bypass-Boost Current Consumption 60 0.5 Buck-Boost Curre nt Consumption 50 0.4 0.3 Boost Mode 30 VCC = 3.4V 3.3 3.4 3.5 0.2 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 0.1 4.4 VBAT (V) 2.8V Time Fig 5. LDOs input voltage profile with Buck-Boost Figure 6 superimposes the two modes of operation and highlights the section where the buck-boost has a clear advantage in terms of power dissipation. The shaded triangle represents the power lost in linear regulation by the bypass-boost operation. Voltage 4.2V LDOs Input VCC with Bypass-Boost LDOs Input VCC with Buck-Boost VBAT Extra Power Loss Fig 8. Buck-Boost vs Bypass-Boost efficiency comparison Conclusion The comparison of the buck-boost architecture to the bypass-boost architecture shows that in principle the buck-boost operates with superior efficiency. A practical comparison of the MAX77801 buck-boost solution vs a competitor’s bypass-boost architecture shows that in operation, there is an advantage of up to 25% efficiency for the Maxim device. Thus, the buck-boost IC is an ideal solution for power-stingy portable applications. Learn more: MAX77801 High-Efficiency Buck-Boost Regulator VCC (Bypass-Boost) Design Solutions No. 1 VCC (Buck-Boost) Need Design Support? Call 888 MAXIM-IC (888 629-4642) VBAT Time Fig 6. LDOs input voltage profile with Buck-Boost vs Bypass-Boost 2 1 Buck-Boost Efficiency 40 VCC (Buck-Boost) VBAT 2.8V BuckBoost Vs BypassBoost 100 Efficiency (%) Buck Mode 3.4V 3.3V, 500mA 90 LDOs Input VCC with Buck-Boost VBAT 3.4V LDO Fig 7. Efficiency test setup Voltage 4.2V VOUT VCC = 3.4V STEPUP/DOWN IBAT (A) VBAT Maxim Integrated and the Maxim logo are registered trademarks of Maxim Integrated Corporation. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Maxim Integrated 160 Rio Robles San Jose, CA 95134 USA 408-601-1000 maximintegrated.com